Abstract

Wastewater infrastructure systems deteriorate over time due to a combination of physical and chemical factors. Failure of these critical structures can cause major social, environmental, and economic impacts. To avoid such problems, several researchers attempted to develop infrastructure condition assessment methodologies to maintain sewer pipe networks at desired condition. Sewer condition prediction models are developed to provide a framework to forecast future conditions of pipes and to schedule inspection frequencies. Yet, utility managers and other authorities are often challenged with identifying the optimal timeline for inspection of sewer pipelines. Frequent inspection of sewer networks is not cost-effective due to limited time, expensive assessment technologies, and large inventories of pipes. Therefore, the objective of this state-of-the-art review is to study progress over the years in developing condition prediction models and investigating the potential factors affecting the condition of sewer pipes. Published papers for prediction models from 2001 through 2019 were identified and analyzed. Also, this study conducts a comparative analysis of the most common condition prediction models such as artificial intelligence (AI) and statistical models. The literature review suggests that, out of 20 independent variables studied, pipe age, diameter, and length are the most significant contributors to the deterioration of sewer systems. In addition, it can be concluded that AI models reduce uncertainty in current condition prediction models. Furthermore, the most appropriate prediction models for development are those that are capable of accurately finding nonlinear and complex relationships among variables. This study recommends the use of more environmental and operational factors—e.g., soil type, bedding material, flow rate, and soil corrosivity—and advanced data mining techniques to develop comprehensive and accurate condition prediction models. The findings of this study are intended to guide practitioners in developing customized condition assessment models for their agencies that can save millions of dollars through optimized inspection timelines and fewer incidents.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

References

Altarabsheh, A. G. 2016. “Managing urban wastewater system using complex adaptive system approach.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ.
Ana, E., W. Bauwens, M. Pessemier, C. Thoeye, S. Smolders, I. Boonen, and G. D. Gueldre. 2009. “An investigation of the factors influencing sewer structural deterioration.” Urban Water J. 6 (4): 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620902810902.
Ariaratnam, S. T., A. El-Assaly, and Y. Yang. 2001. “Assessment of infrastructure inspection needs using logistic models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (4): 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(160).
ASCE. 2017. Report card for America’s infrastructure. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ashoori, T., M. Najafi, A. Tabesh, S. M. S. J. Korky, and M. Malek Mohammadi. 2017. Use of cut-and-cover method for pipeline installation in underground freight transportation. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Atique, F. 2016. “Analysis of urban pipe deterioration using Copula method.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware.
Ayoub, G. M., et al. 2004. “Assessment of hydrogen sulphide corrosion of cementitious sewer pipes: A case study.” Urban Water J. 1 (1): 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620410001732062.
Bakry, I., H. Alzraiee, K. Kaddoura, M. E. Masry, and T. Zayed. 2016a. “Condition prediction for chemical grouting rehabilitation of sewer networks.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (6): 04016042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000893.
Bakry, I., H. Alzraiee, M. E. Masry, K. Kaddoura, and T. Zayed. 2016b. “Condition prediction for cured-in-place pipe rehabilitation of sewer mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (5): 04016016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000866.
Baur, R., and R. Herz. 2002. “Selective inspection planning with ageing forecast for sewer types.” J. Water Sci. Technol. 46 (6–7): 389–396. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0704.
Charniak, E., and D. McDermott. 1985. Introduction to artificial intelligence. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2008. “Infrastructure condition prediction models for sustainable sewer pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (5): 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(333).
Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2011. “Integrating WRC and CERIU condition assessment models and classification protocols for sewer pipelines.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 17 (3): 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000052.
Coles, S. 2011. An introduction to statistical modeling of extreme values. London: Springer.
Davies, J. P., B. A. Clarke, J. T. Whiter, and R. J. Cunningham. 2001. “Factors influencing the structural deterioration and collapse of rigid sewer pipes.” J. Urban Water 3 (1–2): 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00017-6.
EPA. 2004. “Report to congress: Impacts and control of CSOs and SSOs.” Accessed August 20, 2018. http://www.Ep.gov/nrmrl.
EPA. 2007. “Innovation and research for water infrastructure for the 21st century.” Accessed April 2018. http://www.Ep.gov/nrmrl.
Gat, Y. L. 2008. “Modelling the deterioration process of drainage pipelines.” Urban Water J. 5 (2): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620801939398.
Gedam, A., S. Mangulkar, and B. Gandhi. 2016. “Prediction of sewer pipe main condition using the linear regression approach.” J. Geosci. Environ. Protection 4 (5): 100–105. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2016.45010.
Harvey, R. R., and E. A. McBean. 2014. “Comparing the utility of decision trees and support vector machines when planning inspections of linear sewer infrastructure.” J. Hydroinf. 16 (6): 1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2014.007.
Jalalediny Korky, S., H. Aaron, M. Najafi, M. Malek Mohammadi, and R. Serajiantehrani. 2019. “Design and installation of water pipeline renewals.” In North American society for trenchless technology (NASTT) NASTT’s 2019 No-Dig Show. Chicago: North American Society for Trenchless Technology.
Jeong, H. S., H. S. Baik, and D. M. Abraham. 2005. “An ordered probit model approach for developing Markov chain-based deterioration model for wastewater infrastructure systems.” In Proc., Pipelines 2005: Optimizing Pipeline Design, Operations, and Maintenance in Today’s Economy, 649–661. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kabir, G., N. B. C. Balek, and S. Tesfamariam. 2018. “Sewer structural condition prediction integrating Bayesian model averaging with logistic regression.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 32 (3): 04018019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001162.
Kaushal, V., and S. P. Guleria. 2015. “Geotechnical investigation of black cotton soils.” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. 5 (2): 15–22.
Khan, Z., T. Zayed, and O. Moselhi. 2010. “Structural condition assessment of sewer pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 24 (2): 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000081.
Kley, G., and N. Caradot. 2013. “D1.2. review of sewer deterioration models.” In KWB report, project SEMA. Berlin: Asset Management Strategies for Sewer Systems.
Koo, D. H., and S. T. Ariaratnam. 2006. “Innovative method for assessment of underground sewer pipe condition.” Autom. Constr. 15 (4): 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.007.
Kulandaivel, G. 2004. “Sewer pipeline condition prediction using neural network models.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Michigan State Univ.
Laakso, T., T. Kokkonen, I. Mellin, and R. Vahala. 2018. “Sewer condition prediction and analysis of explanatory factors.” J. Water 10 (9): 1239. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10091239.
Lindner, R. 2008. “Effectively managing sewer pipeline infrastructure.” J. Underground Infrastr. Manage. 2008 (Dec): 23–25.
Lubini, A. T., and M. Fuamba. 2011. “Modeling of the deterioration timeline of sewer systems.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 38 (12): 1381–1390. https://doi.org/10.1139/l11-103.
Malek Mohammadi, M. 2019. “Development of condition prediction models for sanitary sewer pipes.” Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Malek Mohammadi, M., M. Najafi, V. Kaushal, R. Serajiantehrani, N. Salehabadi, and T. Ashoori. 2019a. “Sewer pipes condition prediction models: A state-of-the-art review.” Infrastructures 4 (4): 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures4040064.
Malek Mohammadi, M., M. Najafi, A. Tabesh, J. Riley, and J. Gruber. 2019b. “Condition prediction of sanitary sewer pipes.” In Proc., ASCE Pipeline Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mashford, J., D. Marlow, D. Tran, and R. May. 2011. “Prediction of sewer condition grade using support vector machines.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 25 (4): 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000089.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Moteleb, M. 2010. “Risk based decision making tools for sewer infrastructure management.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Cincinnati.
Najafi, M., and S. B. Gokhale. 2005. Trenchless technology: Pipeline and utility design, construction, and renewal. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Najafi, M., and G. Kulandaivel. 2005. “Pipeline condition prediction using neural network models.” In Proc., American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Pipeline Division Specialty Conf. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Opila, M. C. 2011. “Structural condition scoring of buried sewer pipes for risk-based decision making.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Delaware.
O’Reilly, M. P., R. B. Prosbrook, G. C. Cox, and A. McCloskey. 1989. Analysis of defects in 180 km of pipe sewers in southern water authority. Wokingham, UK: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
Rahman, S., and D. J. Vanier. 2004. “NRC report: An evaluation of condition assessment protocols for sewer management, National Research Council Canada.” Accessed July 15, 2018. https://nparc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/view/object/?id=93ed3e91-be5e-452d-b79d-c20d4ac77002.
Russell, S. J., and P. Norvig. 2010. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Boston: Pearson.
Salman, B. 2010. “Infrastructure management and deterioration risk assessment of wastewater collection systems.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Cincinnati.
Salman, B., and O. Salem. 2012. “Modeling failure of wastewater collection lines using various section-level regression models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 18 (2): 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000075.
Singh, A., and S. Adachi. 2013. “Bathtub curves and pipe prioritization based on failure rate.” Built Environ. Project Asset Manage. 3 (1): 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-11-2011-0027.
Sousa, V., J. P. Matos, and N. Matias. 2014. “Evaluation of artificial intelligence tool performance and uncertainty for predicting sewer structural condition.” Autom. Constr. 44 (Aug): 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.004.
Tran, D. H. 2007. “Investigation of deterioration models for stormwater pipe systems.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Victoria Univ.
Tran, D. H., A. Ng, and B. Perera. 2007. “Neural networks deterioration models for serviceability condition of buried stormwater pipes.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20 (8): 1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2007.02.005.
Tran, D. H., A. W. M. Ng, B. J. C. Perera, S. Burn, and P. Davis. 2006. “Application of probabilistic neural networks in modelling structural deterioration of stormwater pipes.” Urban Water J. 3 (3): 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15730620600961684.
Tran, D. H., B. J. C. Perera, and A. Ng. 2009. “Comparison of structural deterioration models for stormwater drainage pipes.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 24 (2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2008.00577.x.
Wirahadikusumah, R., D. Abraham, and T. Iseley. 2001. “Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (2): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(77).
Yang, J. 2004. “Road crack condition performance modeling using recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks.” Doctoral dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of South Florida.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 11Issue 4November 2020

History

Published online: Jun 27, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 27, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammadreza Malek Mohammadi, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Doctoral Graduate, Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Mohammad Najafi, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor and Director, Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 438 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7922-2746. Email: [email protected]
Ramtin Serajiantehrani, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-1142 [email protected]
Doctoral Graduate, Center for Underground Infrastructure Research and Education, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19308, Arlington, TX 76019. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-1142. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share