Effect of Geotechnical Parameter Variability on Soil-Pipeline Interaction
Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10, Issue 4
Abstract
Soil properties are stochastic in nature, and at a particular location, the soil properties will have an associated mean and probability distribution. However, in soil-pipeline interaction studies on oil and gas pipelines where the maximum response is associated with stronger pipe-soil spring properties, the soil properties used to determine the maximum soil resistance and soil spring stiffness are usually taken as deterministic, assuming no variation in soil properties. Alternatively, for soil-pipeline interaction scenarios where the maximum response is associated with weaker pipe-soil spring properties, the geotechnical engineer may assign deterministic lower-bound values in an attempt to apply conservatism. This paper examines the effect of variability of soil properties on the maximum soil resistances and soil stiffness values for both drained and undrained soil loading conditions. Then, the resulting probabilistic distributions are applied to two example soil-pipeline interaction problems common in pipeline design, a longitudinal landslide and a strike-slip earthquake fault displacement. The results show that the stresses and strains in the pipeline resulting from drained soil loading are relatively insensitive to the probabilistic distribution of soil properties, and for the most part, the use of average values may be adequate. However, for some soil-pipeline interaction scenarios and loading conditions, and given the large natural variation in undrained soil properties, the use of single deterministic average soil properties under undrained loading conditions may underestimate important pipeline strains or stresses. The use of probabilistic soil properties for some pipeline loading scenarios is recommended.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Doug Honegger of D.G. Honegger Consulting Inc. for his review and suggestions to improve the initial draft of this paper.
References
ALA (American Lifelines Alliance). 2005. Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. Washington, DC: ALA.
Almanaseer, N., and A. Sankarasubramanian. 2012. “Role of climate variability in modulating the surface water and groundwater interaction over the southeast United States.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 17 (9): 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000536.
Hillenbrand, H. G., M. K. Gräf, and C. Kalwa. 2001. “Development and production of high-strength pipeline steels.” In Proc., Conf. on Niobium 2001. Ratingen, Germany: Europipe GmbH.
Korkmaz, K., M. Gunduz, and A. Asik. 2015. “Temporal and spatial variations of groundwater level and salinity: A case study in the irrigated areas of Menemen Plain in western Turkey.” Hung. Agric. Eng. 28: 39–43.
Krahn, J., and D. Fredlund. 1983. “Variability in the engineering properties of natural soil deposits.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, 34. Bologna, Italy: Pitagora Editrice.
Lacasse, S., and F. Nadim. 1996. “Uncertainty in characterizing soil properties.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., Uncertainty in the Geological Environment: From Theory to Practice, 49–75. Reston, VA: ASCE.
McGuffey, V., J. Iori, Z. Kyfor, and D. Athanasiou-Grivas. 1981. “Statistical geotechnical properties of Lockport clays.” In Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 54–60. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Oswell, J. M. 2016. Soil mechanics for pipeline stress analysis, 223. Calgary, AB: Naviq Consulting Inc.
Phoon, K. K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1999. “Characterization of geotechnical variability.” Can. Geotech. J. 36 (4): 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-038.
PRCI (Pipeline Research Council International). 2009. Guidelines for constructing natural gas and liquid hydrocarbon pipelines through areas prone to landslide and subsidence hazards. Chantilly, VA: C-CORE, D.G. Honegger Consulting, and SSD.
Rizkalla, M., A. Trigg, and G. Simmonds. 1996. Recent advances in the modeling of longitudinal pipeline-soil interaction for cohesive soils. New York: ASME.
SSD. 2016. PIPLIN-PC: Stress and deformation analysis of pipelines: User reference and theoretical manual. Version 4.60. Reno, NV: SSD.
Wijewickreme, D., H. Karimian, and D. G. Honegger. 2009. “Response of buried steel pipelines subjected to relative axial soil movement.” Can. Geotech. J. 46 (7): 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-019.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 1, 2018
Accepted: Mar 5, 2019
Published online: Aug 14, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.