Technical Papers
Oct 23, 2018

Effect of Geofoam on Vertical Stress Distribution on Buried Structures Subjected to Static and Cyclic Footing Loads

Publication: Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10, Issue 1

Abstract

Buried structures, such as pipes and culverts, are extensively used for transportation applications. The existence of these structures within the soil mass causes a redistribution of stresses. The stiffness of the buried structure relative to the surrounding soil affects the magnitude and distribution of vertical stresses. Higher stresses on a buried structure may cause excessive deformations and even failure of the buried structure. Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam, a lightweight material, has been increasingly used above buried structures as a compressible inclusion to reduce vertical stresses acting on the buried structures. This experimental study investigated the effects of EPS geofoam, including geofoam stiffness and thickness, on the distribution of vertical stresses above a rectangular concrete culvert under static and cyclic footing loads. Reduced-scale models were constructed in a test box under a plane-strain condition. This study adopted the induced trench installation (ITI) method to place the concrete culvert overlaid with an EPS geofoam. The backfill material was a dry, poorly graded Kansas River sand. The footing load was applied parallell to the culvert axis. Earth pressure cells were used to monitor the vertical stress distributions above the geofoam and surrounding soil. The experimental results show that the EPS geofoam reduced the vertical stresses on the buried structure due to the mobilization of soil arching. The lower stiffness and thin geofoam had more effect on the vertical stress reduction. Cyclic loading minimized the soil arching effect induced by the compressible geofoam. This paper also examines the test results with available analytical solutions. The effects of soil arching and the induced vertical stress above the rigid structure under static footing load were considered separately. The analytical solutions were found to match well with the experimental results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The laboratory manager and technician, David Woody and Kent Dye of the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Kansas (KU), provided their technical support during the fabrication of the box and the laboratory testing. Visiting graduate student, Panpan Shen, and graduate student, Saif Jawad, at the KU CEAE Department provided their assistance in collecting test materials and performing laboratory tests. This research was conducted under a joint effort between KU and Tongji University, which is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51478349). All the above support is greatly appreciated.

References

ACPA (American Concrete Pipe Association). 2011. Concrete pipe design manual. Vienna, VA: ACPA.
Ahmed, M. 2016. “Experimental investigations into the role of geosynthetic inclusions on the earth pressure acting on buried structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, McGill Univ.
Al-Naddaf, M. 2017. “Investigation of soil arching stability under static and cyclic surface loading using trapdoor model tests.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas.
Al-Naddaf, M., J. Han, S. Jawad, G. Abdulrasool, and C. Xu. 2017. “Investigation of stability of soil arching under surface loading using trapdoor model tests.” In Proc., 19th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 889–892. Seoul: International Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
ASTM. 2011. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purpose. ASTM-D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. ASTM D1621. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bennett, R. M., S. M. Wood, E. C. Drumm, and N. R. Rainwater. 2005. “Vertical loads on concrete box culverts under high embankments.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (6): 643–649. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:6(643).
Bloomquist, D., A. Boyd, Y. Chen, and M. Crosby. 2009. Load response comparison between fiber and steel reinforced concrete pipe-phase two. Gainesville, FL: Univ. of Florida.
Brown, C. B. 1967. “Forces on rigid culverts under high fills.” J. Struct. Div. 93 (5): 195–215.
Chen, B., and L. Sun. 2013a. “Performance of a reinforced concrete box culvert installed in trapezoidal trenches.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (1): 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000494.
Chen, B., and L. Sun. 2013b. “The impact of soil properties on the structural integrity of high-fill reinforced concrete culverts.” Comput. Geotech. 52 (1): 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.03.006.
Dasgupta, A., and B. Sengupta. 1991. “Large-scale model test on square box culvert backfilled with sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. 117 (1): 156–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(156).
Han, J. 2015. Principles and practice of ground improvement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Han, J., F. Wang, M. Al-Naddaf, and C. Xu. 2017. “Progressive development of two-dimensional soil arching with displacement.” Int. J. Geomech. 17 (12): 04017112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001025.
Han, J., F. Wang, C. Xu, and M. Al-Naddaf. 2016. “Fully-mobilized soil arching versus partially-mobilized soil arching.” In Proc., 2016 Int. Conf. on Transportation Infrastructure and Materials. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications.
Hong, W. P., S. Hong, and T. H.-K. Kang. 2016. “Lateral earth pressure on a pipe buried in soft grounds undergoing lateral movement.” J. Struct. Integr. Maint. 1 (3): 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2016.1211238.
Kakrasul, J. I., J. Han, S. M. Rahmaninezhad, and M. Weldu. 2016. “Model tests of geosynthetic-reinforced earth walls with limited-space retained fill.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 3rd Pan-American Conf. on Geosynthetics (GeoAmericas), 1279–1286. Jupiter, FL: Minerva Technology, Resources, and Information.
Kang, J., F. Parker, Y. J. Kang, and C. H. Yoo. 2008. “Effects of frictional forces acting on sidewalls of buried box culverts.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 32 (3): 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.628.
Key, A. J. 1999. “Behaviour of two layer railway track ballast under cyclic and monotonic loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield.
Kim, K., and C. H. Yoo. 2005. “Design loading on deeply buried box culverts.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (1): 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:1(20).
Liedberg, N. 1997. “Load reduction on a rigid pipe: Pilot study of a soft cushion installation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1594: 217–223. https://doi.org/10.3141/1594-25.
Marston, A. 1930. “The theory of external loads on closed conduits in the light of the latest experiments.” In Proc., Highway Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Marston, A., and A. Anderson. 1913. The theory of loads on pipes in ditches: And tests of cement and clay drain tile and sewer pipe. Ames, IA: Iowa State College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts.
McAffee, R., and A. Valsangkar. 2005. “Performance of an induced trench installation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1936 (1): 230–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193600126.
McAffee, R. P., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2008. “Field performance, centrifuge testing, and numerical modelling of an induced trench installation.” Can. Geotech. J. 45 (1): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-086.
McGuigan, B. L., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2010. “Centrifuge testing and numerical analysis of box culverts installed in induced trenches.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-085.
McGuigan, B. L., and A. J. Valsangkar. 2011. “Earth pressures on twin positive projecting and induced trench box culverts under high embankments.” Can. Geotech. J. 48 (2): 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1139/T10-058.
Meguid, M., M. Hussein, M. Ahmed, Z. Omeman, and J. Whalen. 2017. “Investigation of soil-geosynthetic-structure interaction associated with induced trench installation.” Geotext. Geomembr. 45 (4): 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.004.
Oshati, O. S., A. J. Valsangkar, and A. B. Schriver. 2012. “Earth pressures exerted on an induced trench cast-in-place double-cell rectangular box culvert.” Can. Geotech. J. 49 (11): 1267–1284. https://doi.org/10.1139/t2012-093.
Penman, A., J. Charles, J. Nash, and J. Humphreys. 1975. “Performance of culvert under Winscar dam.” Geotechnique 25 (4): 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1975.25.4.713.
Rahmaninezhad, S. M., J. Han, M. Weldu, and J. I. Kakrasul. 2016. “Effects of methods of applying normal stresses in pullout tests on pressure distributions and pullout resistance.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., 3rd Pan-American Conf. on Geosynthetics (GeoAmericas), 1308–1315. Jupiter, FL: Minerva Technology, Resources, and Information.
Rahmaninezhad, S. M., S. S. Yasrobi, and S. Eftekharzadeh. 2009. “Effects of compaction in the subgrade of the reinforced sand backfills with geotextile on bearing capacity.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. 12 (1): 320–328.
Shenton, M. 1975. “Deformation of railway ballast under repeated loading conditions.” In Proc., Railroad Track Mechanics and Technology (Kerr ed.), 387–404. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ.
Sladen, J., and J. Oswell. 1988. “The induced trench method—A critical review and case history.” Can. Geotech. J. 25 (3): 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1139/t88-059.
Spangler, M. G. 1948. “Underground conduits—An appraisal of modern research.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 113 (1): 316–345.
Spangler, M. G. 1950. Field measurements of the settlement ratios of various highway culverts. Ames, IA: Iowa Engineering Experiment Station.
Sun, L., T. Hopkins, and T. Beckham. 2011. “Long-term monitoring of culvert load reduction using an imperfect ditch backfilled with geofoam.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2212 (1): 56–64. https://doi.org/10.3141/2212-06.
Sun, L., T. C. Hopkins, and T. L. Beckham. 2009. Reduction of stresses on buried rigid highway structures using the imperfect ditch method and expanded polysterene (geofoam). Lexington, KY: Univ. of Kentucky.
Terzaghi, K. 1943. Theoretical soil mechanics, 66–76. New York: Wiley.
Vaslestad, J., T. H. Johansen, and W. Holm. 1993. “Load reduction on rigid culverts beneath high fills: Long-term behavior.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1415: 58–68.
Zarnani, S., M. M. El-Emam, and R. J. Bathurst. 2011. “Comparison of numerical and analytical solutions for reinforced soil wall shaking table tests.” Geomech. Eng. 3 (4): 291–321. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2011.3.4.291.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice
Volume 10Issue 1February 2019

History

Received: Feb 16, 2018
Accepted: Jul 2, 2018
Published online: Oct 23, 2018
Published in print: Feb 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 23, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mahdi Al-Naddaf, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Student and Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., Lawrence, KS 66045-7609.
Jie Han, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Glenn L. Parker Professor of Geotechnical Engineering, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., Lawrence, KS 66045-7609 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Chao Xu, Ph.D.
Professor, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji Univ., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China.
Seyed Mustapha Rahmaninezhad, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate and Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Kansas, 1530 W. 15th St., Lawrence, KS 66045-7609.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share