Technical Papers
Mar 30, 2022

Investigation of the Causal Relationships among Different Barrier Categories to Timely Posthurricane Recovery

Publication: Natural Hazards Review
Volume 23, Issue 3

Abstract

The incidence of hurricanes has increased in the United States during recent years, affecting many aspects of the lives of those who have fallen victim to them. Delays that may be due to unexpected barriers to the recovery process are a major issue for the community, governors, and other federal authorities and directly impact the length of the recovery. Their barriers’ impacts on each other can intensify their negative effects and lead to further delays. A significant step toward resolving this problem is determining exactly how posthurricane recovery barriers interact with each other and how that affects the recovery process. Therefore, the aims of this study were to (1) investigate the causal relationships among the barrier categories to timely posthurricane recovery, and (2) identify the extent to which the barrier categories and their interactions impact the timeliness of the recovery. A survey was developed to determine the impacts of the 62 barriers that were identified as detrimental to timely posthurricane recovery. A total of 44 experts and 195 other individuals (referred to herein as the public) completed the survey. The structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was used to develop two interrelated networks of the posthurricane recovery barriers, based on experts’ and the public’s perspectives and inputs, to analyze their impacts on the duration of the recovery process after hurricanes. The findings revealed some significant discrepancies between the perspectives of the two groups regarding the impacts of various barriers on the length of the recovery process. The experts considered coordination-related barriers as the foremost influences on the length of recovery, while the public group considered social-related barriers as the most influential. Both groups considered environment-related barriers to be unimportant and to have the least effect on the duration of the recovery. The results of this study will help decision-makers identify the paths that lead to significant delays in the posthurricane recovery process. They will also help postdisaster recovery planners understand the differences between the perspectives of the public and the experts so they can develop recommendations and strategies that are effective in preventing delays.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and generosity of the Center for Transportation Equity, Decisions and Dollars (CTEDD), without which the present study could not have been completed.

References

Alipour, F., H. Khankeh, H. Fekrazad, M. Kamali, H. Rafiey, and S. Ahmadi. 2015. “Social issues and post-disaster recovery: A qualitative study in an Iranian context.” Int. Social Work 58 (5): 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815584426.
Anderson, D., C. Patarapichayatham, and J. F. T. Nese. 2013. Basic concepts of structural equation modeling. Eugene, OR: Behavioral Research and Teaching, Univ. of Oregon.
Arouri, M., C. Nguyen, and A. B. Youssef. 2015. “Natural disasters, household welfare, and resilience: Evidence from rural Vietnam.” World Dev. 70 (Jun): 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.12.017.
Arrindell, W. A., E. Sanavio, and G. Aguilar. 1999. “The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy.” Personality Individual Differ. 27 (4): 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00192-5.
Assaf, H. 2011. “Framework for modeling mass disasters.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 12 (2): 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000033.
Asún, R. A., K. Rdz-Navarro, and J. M. Alvarado. 2016. “Developing multidimensional Likert scales using item factor analysis: The case of four-point items.” Sociological Methods Res. 45 (1): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114566716.
Audefroy, J. F. 2010. “Post-disaster emergency and reconstruction experiences in Asia and Latin America: An assessment.” Dev. Pract. 20 (6): 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2010.491528.
Beiler, M. O., L. Marroquin, and S. McNeil. 2016. “State-of-the-practice assessment of climate change adaptation practices across metropolitan planning organizations pre-and post-Hurricane Sandy.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 88 (Jun): 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.04.003.
Bentler, P. M. 2006. EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
Bostick, T. P., T. H. Holzer, and S. Sarkani. 2017. “Enabling stakeholder involvement in coastal disaster resilience planning.” Risk Anal. 37 (6): 1181–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12737.
Byrne, B. M. 2006. Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carrasco, S., C. Ochiai, and K. Okazaki. 2016. “Disaster induced resettlement: Multi-stakeholder interactions and decision making following tropical storm Washi in Cagayan de Oro, Philippines.” Procedia-Social Behav. Sci. 218 (May): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.04.008.
Choi, J., A. Deshmukh, and M. Hastak. 2019. “Seven-layer classification of infrastructure to improve community resilience to disasters.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 04019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000486.
El-Anwar, O., and L. Chen. 2014. “Maximizing the computational efficiency of temporary housing decision support following disasters.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 28 (1): 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000244.
El-Anwar, O., K. El-Rayes, and A. Elnashai. 2010. “Maximizing temporary housing safety after natural disasters.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (2): 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000018.
Eybpoosh, M., I. Dikmen, and M. Talat Birgonul. 2011. “Identification of risk paths in international construction projects using structural equation modeling.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (12): 1164–1175. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000382.
Félix, D., D. Monteiro, J. M. Branco, R. Bologna, and A. Feio. 2014. “The role of temporary accommodation buildings for post-disaster housing reconstruction.” J. House Built Environ. 30 (4): 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9431-4.
FEMA. 2011. A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Finch, C., C. T. Emrich, and S. L. Cutter. 2010. “Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans.” Popul. Environ. 31 (4): 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8.
Fung, S. F., E. O. W. Chow, and C. K. Cheung. 2020. “Development and validation of a brief self-assessed wisdom scale.” BMC Geriatrics 20 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-1456-9.
Garson, G. D. 2008. Structural equation modeling. Raleigh, NC: Public Administration Program.
Garson, G. D. 2013. Path analysis. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishing.
Gori, A., I. Gidaris, J. R. Elliott, J. Padgett, K. Loughran, P. Bedient, P. Panakkal, and A. Juan. 2020. “Accessibility and recovery assessment of Houston’s roadway network due to fluvial flooding during Hurricane Harvey.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 21 (2): 04020005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000355.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
Hamideh, S., W. G. Peacock, and S. Van Zandt. 2021. “Housing type matters for pace of recovery: Evidence from Hurricane Ike.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 57 (Apr): 102149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102149.
Jaccard, J., and C. K. Wan. 1996. LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Jordan, E., and A. Javernick-Will. 2013. “Indicators of community recovery: Content analysis and Delphi approach.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 14 (1): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000087.
Jöreskog, K. G. 1969. “A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.” Psychometrika 34 (2): 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289343.
Kassem, M. A., M. A. Khoiry, and N. Hamzah. 2020. “Structural modelling of internal risk factors for oil and gas construction projects.” Int. J. Energy Sect. Manage. 14 (5): 975–1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-11-2019-0022.
Kermanshachi, S., K. Bergstrand, and B. Rouhanizadeh. 2019. Identifying, weighting and causality modeling of social and economic barriers to rapid infrastructure recovery from natural disasters: A study of hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria. Washington, DC: USDOT, Univ. Transportation Centers Program.
Kontou, E., P. Murray-Tuite, and K. Wernstedt. 2017. “Duration of commute travel changes in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy using accelerated failure time modeling.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 100 (Jun): 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.015.
Li, S., J. Wu, Z. Gao, Y. Lin, and B. Fu. 2011. “The analysis of traffic congestion and dynamic propagation properties based on complex network.” Acta Phys. Sin. 60 (5): 050701. https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.60.050701.
Loehlin, J., and A. Beaujean. 2016. Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. 5th ed. London: Taylor & Francis.
Lou, Y., and L. Zhang. 2011. “Defending transportation networks against random and targeted attacks.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2234 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.3141/2234-04.
Mitchell, C. M., A. M. Esnard, and A. Sapat. 2012. “Hurricane events, population displacement, and sheltering provision in the United States.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 13 (2): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000064.
Moradi, S., and A. Nejat. 2020. “RecovUS: An agent-based model of post-disaster household recovery.” J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 23 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4445.
Moradi, S., V. Vasandani, B. S. Student, and A. Nejat. 2019. “A review of resilience variables in the context of disasters.” J. Emergency Manage. 17 (5): 403–432. https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.2019.0431.
Mostafizi, A., H. Wang, D. Cox, and S. Dong. 2019. “An agent-based vertical evacuation model for a near-field tsunami: Choice behavior, logical shelter locations, and life safety.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 34 (Mar): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.018.
Muse, D. M. 2021. “Physical distress and psychological outcomes: An examination of Hurricane Katrina rebuilders.” Doctoral dissertation, College of Health Professions, Walden Univ.
Nakhaei, M., H. R. Khankeh, and F. Ghasemi. 2016. “Indicators of life recovery after disasters and emergencies.” Health Emergencies Disasters 1 (3): 121–124. https://doi.org/10.15412/J.HDQ.09010301.
Nazarnia, H., H. Sarmasti, and W. O. Wills. 2020. “Application of household disruption data to delineate critical infrastructure resilience characteristics in the aftermath of disaster: A case study of Bhaktapur, Nepal.” Saf. Sci. 121 (Jan): 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.014.
Nejat, A., and S. Ghosh. 2016. “LASSO model of postdisaster housing recovery: Case study of Hurricane Sandy.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 17 (3): 04016007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000223.
Nejat, A., S. Moradi, and S. Ghosh. 2019. “Anchors of social network awareness index: A key to modeling postdisaster housing recovery.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 04019004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000471.
Nicolas, C., J. Kim, and S. Chi. 2021. “Understanding the influences of urban-specific contexts for smart city development using structural equation modeling.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 147 (2): 04021010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000670.
Orabi, W., A. B. Senouci, K. El-Rayes, and H. Al-Derham. 2010. “Optimizing resource utilization during the recovery of civil infrastructure systems.” J. Manage. Eng. 26 (4): 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000024.
Padgett, J. E., and C. Tapia. 2013. “Sustainability of natural hazard risk mitigation: Life cycle analysis of environmental indicators for bridge infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (4): 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000138.
Palttala, P., C. Boano, R. Lund, and M. Vos. 2012. “Communication gaps in disaster management: Perceptions by experts from governmental and non-governmental organizations.” J. Contingencies Crisis Manage. 20 (1): 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2011.00656.x.
Pramudita, A., and E. Taniguchi. 2014. “Model of debris collection operation after disasters and its application in urban area.” Int. J. Urban Sci. 18 (2): 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.929507.
Roosli, R., and A. E. Collins. 2016. “Key lessons and guidelines for post-disaster permanent housing provision in Kelantan, Malaysia.” Procedia Eng. 145 (Jan): 1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.156.
Rouhanizadeh, B. 2020. “Analysis of barriers causing delay in post-hurricane recovery: Experts’ vs. public’s perspectives.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and S. Kermanshachi. 2020. “Post-disaster reconstruction of transportation infrastructures: Lessons learned.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 63 (Dec): 102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102505.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and S. Kermanshachi. 2021a. “Barriers to an effective post-recovery process: A comparative analysis of the public’s and experts’ perspectives.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 57 (Apr): 102181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102181.
Rouhanizadeh, B., and S. Kermanshachi. 2021b. “Gender-based evaluation of economic, social, and physical challenges in timely post-hurricane recovery.” Prog. Disaster Sci. 9 (Jan): 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100146.
Rouhanizadeh, B., S. Kermanshachi, and V. S. Dhamangaonkar. 2019. “Identification and categorization of policy and legal barriers to long-term timely postdisaster reconstruction.” J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 11 (3): 04519014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000307.
Rouhanizadeh, B., S. Kermanshachi, and T. J. Nipa. 2020. “Exploratory analysis of barriers to effective post-disaster recovery.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 50 (Nov): 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101735.
Rouhanizadeh, B., S. Kermanshachi, and E. Safapour. 2022. “An investigation of causal relationships among barriers that delay post-hurricane recovery of human communities.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 67 (Jan): 102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102666.
Sajjad, M., N. Lin, and J. C. Chan. 2020. “Spatial heterogeneities of current and future hurricane flood risk along the US Atlantic and Gulf coasts.” Sci. Total Environ. 713 (Apr): 136704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136704.
Sanders, S., S. L. Bowie, and B. Y. Dias. 2003. “Lessons learned on forced relocation of older adults: The impact of Hurricane Andrew on health, mental health, and social support of public housing residents.” J. Gerontological Social Work 40 (4): 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v40n04_03.
Sanusi, F., J. Choi, M. B. Ulak, E. E. Ozguven, and T. Abichou. 2020. “Metadata-based analysis of physical–social–civic systems to develop the knowledge base for hurricane shelter planning.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (5): 04020041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000802.
Schwab, J., K. C. Topping, C. Eadie, R. E. Deyle, and R. A. Smith. 2014. Planning for post-disaster recovery. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
Shaheen, F., N. Ahmad, M. Waqas, A. Waheed, and O. Farooq. 2017. “Structural equation modeling (SEM) in social sciences & medical research: A guide for improved analysis.” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Social Sci. 7 (5): 132–143. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i5/2882.
Sullivan, J., et al. 2009. “Public talks and science listens: A community-based participatory approach to characterizing environmental health risk perceptions and assessing recovery needs in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.” Environ Health Insights 3 (Jan): EHI-S2158. https://doi.org/10.4137/EHI.S2158.
Tatsuki, S., H. Hayashi, K. Yamori, T. Noda, K. Tamura, and K. Koshiyama. 2003. “Model construction and testing of psychological recovery processes from the Kobe earthquake disaster experiences I: Life recovery process scale construction using the 2002 public restoration housing residents population survey data.” In Proc., 3rd Workshop for Comparative Study on Urban Earthquake Disaster Management, 30–31. Washington, DC: Workshop for Comparative Study.
Tuler, S., and T. Webler. 2020. “Promises and challenges of citizen engagement in risk and environmental decision making.” In Handbook of US environmental policy. London: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972840.00020.
Tyler, J., and A. A. Sadiq. 2019. “Business continuity and disaster recovery in the aftermath of Hurricane Irma: Exploring whether community-level mitigation activities make a difference.” Nat. Hazard. Rev. 20 (1): 04018026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000323.
Verderber, S. 2008. “Emergency housing in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: An assessment of the FEMA travel trailer program.” J. Hous. Built Environ. 23 (4): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-008-9124-y.
Weerakoon, R., A. Kumar, and C. Desha. 2015. “Sustainability in post-disaster road infrastructure recovery projects in Queensland, Australia.” In Proc., 9th Annual Int. Conf. of the International Institute for Infrastructure Renewal and Reconstruction. Brisbane City, QLD, Australia: Queensland Univ. of Technology.
Weinkle, J., C. Landsea, D. Collins, R. Musulin, R. P. Crompton, P. J. Klotzbach, and R. Pielke. 2018. “Normalized hurricane damage in the continental United States 1900–2017.” Nat. Sustainability 1 (12): 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0165-2.
Yang-Wallentin, F., K. G. Jöreskog, and H. Luo. 2010. “Confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables with misspecified models.” Struct. Equation Model. 17 (3): 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2010.489003.
Zottarelli, L. 2008. “Post-Hurricane Katrina employment recovery: The interaction of race and place.” Social Sci. Q. 89 (3): 592–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00550.x.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review
Volume 23Issue 3August 2022

History

Received: Jan 20, 2021
Accepted: Feb 22, 2022
Published online: Mar 30, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 30, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Behzad Rouhanizadeh, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 425 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019. Email: [email protected]
Sharareh Kermanshachi, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Arlington, 438 Nedderman Hall, 416 Yates St., Arlington, TX 76019 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share