Effects of Artificial Aging on Polyurethane Resins Used in Geotechnical Works
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 5
Abstract
Polyurethane resins are often used in the geotechnical domain to fill fine fissures, small underground cavities, or soil pores to reduce soil permeability, improve the bearing capacity of a shallow foundation, limit the compressibility of the foundation soil, reinforce road embankments, or obtain a lifting effect of structures that have suffered differential settlements. Polyurethane resins have been widely investigated from the mechanical point of view, but the effect of long-term aging on mechanical behavior is not yet well documented. This paper aims to investigate mechanical, physical, and chemical variations following an artificial aging treatment of polyurethane resin specimens with different densities, obtained under different expansion conditions. Artificial aging was obtained in several ways, such as soaking samples in different chemical solutions or subjecting them to different environmental conditions, to simulate the long-term effect of staying in the underground environment. Besides verifying the volume stability of specimens before and after aging, uniaxial compression tests have been performed on samples with and without aging treatment to verify maintenance or any change in the mechanical properties. Accelerated aging does not seem to affect volume change or mechanical behavior of the tested polyurethane resins. Comparison of both physical and mechanical properties before and after aging allows the deduction of useful information for practical geotechnical applications. The tested polyurethane resins showed (1) very high durability under several wetting-drying cycles, (2) high stability if exposed to aggressive chemical agents, and (3) practically unchanged deformability and strength in conditions very similar to those present in the ground. Moreover, the samples that underwent the highest volume change when soaked in chemical solutions revealed no any chemical degradation under infrared spectroscopy.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This work has benefited from the equipment and framework of the COMP-HUB Initiative, funded by the Departments of Excellence program of the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (MIUR, 2018–2022). The authors thank Novatek s.r.l. for kindly providing the HDR specimens. The authors also thank Maria Grazia Zanoni and Alessandro Canali for technical support in the execution of laboratory tests. The authors are grateful to the two reviewers, who made it possible to improve the paper.
References
Andersons, J., M. Kirpluks, P. Cabulis, K. Kalnins, and U. Cabulis. 2020. “Bio-based rigid high-density polyurethane foams as a structural thermal break material.” Constr. Build. Mater. 260 (Nov): 120471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120471.
Arulrajah, A., M. Yaghoubi, M. M. Disfani, S. Horpibulsuk, M. W. Bo, and M. Leong. 2018. “Evaluation of fly ash- and slag-based geopolymers for the improvement of a soft marine clay by deep soil mixing.” Soils Found. 58: 1358–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.07.005.
ASTM. 2000. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics. ASTM D 695-08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2004. Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid cellular plastics. ASTM D 1621-04a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Buzzi, O., S. Fityus, Y. Sasaki, and S. Sloan. 2008. “Structure and properties of expanding polyurethane foam in the context of foundation remediation in expansive soil.” Mech. Mater. 40 (12): 1012–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2008.07.002.
Buzzi, O., S. Fityus, and S. Sloan. 2010. “Use of expanding polyurethane resin to remediate expansive soil foundations.” Can. Geotech. J. 47 (6): 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-132.
Chen, B., M. He, Z. Huang, and Z. Wu. 2019. “Long-term field test and numerical simulation of foamed polyurethane insulation on concrete dam in severely cold region.” Constr. Build. Mater. 212 (Jul): 618–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.016.
Chompoorat, T., T. Thepumon, A. Khamplod, and S. Likitlersuang. 2022. “Improving mechanical properties and shrinkage cracking characteristics of soft clay in deep soil mixing.” Constr. Build. Mater. 316 (Jan): 125858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125858.
Cong, L., F. Yang, G. Guo, M. Ren, J. Shi, and L. Tan. 2019. “The use of polyurethane for asphalt pavement engineering applications: A state-of-the-art review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 225 (Nov): 1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.213.
De, A., A. N. Morgante, and T. F. Zimmie. 2016. “Numerical and physical modeling of geofoam barriers as protection against effects of surface blast on underground tunnels.” Geotext. Geomembr. 44 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.008.
EN ISO 2440. 1997. Flexible and rigid cellular polymeric materials—Accelerated aging tests. Geneva: ISO.
EN ISO 471. 1995. Rubber—Temperatures, humidities and times for conditioning and testing. Geneva: ISO.
Fan, J., D. Wang, and D. Qian. 2018. “Soil-cement mixture properties and design considerations for reinforced excavation.” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 10 (4): 791–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.03.004.
Fraj, A. B., M. Kismi, and P. Mounanga. 2010. “Valorization of coarse rigid polyurethane foam waste in lightweight aggregate concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (6): 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.010.
Golpazir, I., A. Ghalandarzadeh, M. K. Jafari, and M. Mahdavi. 2016. “Dynamic properties of polyurethane foam-sand mixtures using cyclic triaxial tests.” Constr. Build. Mater. 118 (Aug): 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.035.
Gopalakrishnan, S., and T. Linda Fernando. 2011. “Studies on aging performance of some novel polyurethanes.” J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 3 (2): 848–862.
Güllü, H., H. Canakci, and I. F. Al Zangana. 2017. “Use of cement based grout with glass powder for deep mixing.” Constr. Build. Mater. 137: 12–20.
Jamsawang, P., D. T. Bergado, and P. Voottipruex. 2011. “Field behaviour of stiffened deep cement mixing piles.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Ground Improve 164 (1): 33–49.
Junco, C., A. Rodriguez, V. Calderon, C. Munoz-Ruperez, and S. Gutierrez-Gonzalez. 2018. “Fatigue durability test of mortars incorporating polyurethane foam wastes.” Constr. Build. Mater. 190 (Sep): 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.161.
Lattuati-Derieux, A., S. Thao-Heu, and B. Lavédrine. 2011. “Assessment of the degradation of polyurethane foams after artificial and natural aging by using pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.” J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (1): 4498–4508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.05.013.
Lee, F. H., Y. Lee, S. H. Chew, and K. Y. Yong. 2005. “Strength and modulus of marine clay-cement mixes.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 131 (2): 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:2(178).
Li, M., M. Du, F. Wang, B. Xue, C. Zhang, and H. Fang. 2020. “Study on the mechanical properties of polyurethane (PU) grouting material of different geometric sizes under uniaxial compression.” Constr. Build. Mater. 259 (2): 119797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119797.
Li, X., L. Wang, M. Hao, Y. Zhong, and B. Zhang. 2019. “An analytical solution for the radial flow of variable density grout in rock fractures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 206 (2): 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.089.
Liu, K., W. Liang, F. Ren, J. Ren, F. Wang, and H. Ding. 2019. “The study on compressive mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane grout materials with different densities.” Constr. Build. Mater. 206 (Sep): 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.012.
Lorenzo, G. A., and D. T. Bergado. 2006. “Fundamental characteristics of cement-admixed clay in deep mixing.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 18 (2): 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:2(161).
Malíková, M., J. Rychlý, L. Matisová-Rychlá, K. Csomorová, I. Janigová, and H. W. Wilde. 2010. “Assessing the progress of degradation in polyurethanes by chemiluminescence. I: Unstabilised polyurethane films.” Polym. Degrad. Stab. 95 (Aug): 2367–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.08.016.
Rychlý, J., A. Lattuati-Derieux, B. Lavédrine, L. Matisová-Rychlá, M. Malíková, K. Csomorová, and I. Janigová. 2011. “Assessing the progress of degradation in polyurethanes by chemiluminescence and thermal analysis. II. Flexible polyether- and polyester-type polyurethane foams.” Polym. Degrad. Stab. 96 (Jan): 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.01.012.
Saha, M. C., H. Mahfuz, U. K. Chakravarty, M. Uddin, M. E. Kabir, and S. Jeelani. 2005. “Effect of density, microstructure, and strain rate on compression behavior of polymeric foams.” Mater. Sci. Eng. A 406 (Aug): 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.07.006.
Saleh, S., N. Z. M. Yunus, K. Ahmad, and N. Ali. 2019. “Improving the strength of weak soil using polyurethane grouts: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 202 (Jan): 738–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.048.
Smardzewski, J., and L. Matwiej. 2013. “Effects of aging of polyurethane foams in the context of furniture design.” Drvna Industrija 64 (3): 201–209. https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2013.1241.
Sonnenschein, M., B. L. Wendt, A. K. Schrock, J. M. Sonney, and A. J. Ryan. 2008. “The relationship between polyurethane foam microstructure and foam aging.” Polymer 49 (Jan): 934–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.008.
Topolnicki, M. 2016. “General overview and advances in deep soil mixing.” In Proc., 24th Geotechnical Conf. of Torino–Design, Construction and Controls of Soil Improvement Systems. Bologna, Italy: Patron Editore.
Valentino, R., E. Romeo, and A. Misra. 2013. “Mechanical aspects of micropiles made of reinforced polyurethane resins.” Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31 (2): 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-012-9599-x.
Valentino, R., E. Romeo, and D. Stevanoni. 2014. “An experimental study on the mechanical behaviour of two polyurethane resins used for geotechnical applications.” Mech. Mater. 71 (Jan): 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.01.007.
Valentino, R., and D. Stevanoni. 2010. “Micropiles made of reinforced polyurethane resins: Load tests and evaluation of the bearing capacity.” Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 15 (2010): 895–912.
Zhang, B., Z. Fan, S. Hu, Z. Shen, and H. Ma. 2019. “Mechanical response of the fly ash cenospheres/polyurethane syntactic foams fabricated through infiltration process.” Constr. Build. Mater. 206 (Feb): 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.047.
Zhang, Z., R. Roque, B. Birgisson, and B. Sangpetgnam. 2001. “Identification and verification of a suitable crack growth law.” Asphalt Paving Technol. 70 (May): 206–241.
Zhu, H., and S. A. Xu. 2019. “Synthesis and properties of rigid polyurethane foams synthesized from modified urea-formaldehyde resin.” Constr. Build. Mater. 202 (Jan): 718–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.035.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35 • Issue 5 • May 2023
Copyright
© 2023 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 30, 2021
Accepted: Aug 10, 2022
Published online: Feb 21, 2023
Published in print: May 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jul 21, 2023
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.