Technical Papers
Jan 20, 2023

Performance Assessment of Bioasphalt Mixtures Containing Guayule Resin as an Innovative Biobased Asphalt Alternative

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 4

Abstract

Guayule resin was investigated through mixture to assess its role in the field performance. For performance comparisons, conventional asphalt, neat guayule, asphalt–rubber–guayule, and guayule–rubber binders were implied. Field-simulated lab mixtures were made to investigate the major distresses. Modified Lottman, rut, semicircular bending, and disk-shaped compact tension tests were used to assess stripping, rutting, fatigue, and thermal cracking resistances. Stripping and rutting susceptibilities were also assessed by Hamburg wheel-tracking test. The outcomes disclosed that when the modified Lottman test was used, guayule containing a 7% air content was more susceptible to stripping than that containing a 3.5% air content, resulting in tensile strength ratios of 40% and 71%, respectively. All investigated mixtures did not reach out the stripping inflection point under the Hamburg wheel-tracking criteria. Asphalt offered the worst Hamburg rut depth, which was 3.2 mm after 20,000 passes. Guayule-based mixtures perfectly resisted rutting as proven by the rut test. Guayule offered the worst rut depth of 6.3 mm, indicating a great rutting resistance. The guayule-based mixture had a high fracture toughness at intermediate temperatures. Guayule and guayule–rubber mixtures offered a critical strain energy release rate of 0.650.69  kJ/m2 compared to 0.46  kJ/m2 for asphalt. They, however, tended to possess low thermal fracture resistance (less than the threshold fracture energy, 400  J/m2). Conversely, a blend of 62.5% asphalt, 12.5% rubber, and 25% guayule offered 591  J/m2 at its performance grade low temperature (16°C) and 409  J/m2 at 22°C compared to 429  J/m2 for asphalt at the later temperature, which represented the performance-grade low temperature of asphalt.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published paper.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks go to Steven Lusher, Ph.D., for his assistance with providing technical support, materials, and information based on his experience with guayule. Likewise, the authors are grateful to the Bridgestone Corporation for creating guayule resin and providing valuable information in this regard.

References

AASHTO. 2017. Standard specification for Superpave volumetric mix design. AASHTO M 323-17. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. AASHTO T 283-14. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019a. Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA). AASHTO T 324-19. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019b. Standard method of test for determining rutting susceptibility of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA). AASHTO T 340-10. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019c. Standard method of test for preparing and determining the density of asphalt mixture specimens by means of the Superpave gyratory compactor. AASHTO T 312-19. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2019d. Standard practice for mixture conditioning of hot mix asphalt (HMA). AASHTO R 30-02. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020a. Standard method of test for bulk specific gravity (Gmb) of compacted asphalt mixtures using saturated surface-dry specimens. AASHTO T 166-16. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020b. Standard method of test for theoretical maximum specific gravity (G mm) and density of asphalt mixtures. AASHTO T 209-20. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdelrahman, M., D. R. Katti, A. Ghavibazoo, H. B. Upadhyay, and K. S. Katti. 2014. “Engineering physical properties of asphalt binders through nanoclay–asphalt interactions.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (12): 04014099. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001017.
Ahmad, M., B. K. Bairgi, Z. H. Khan, and R. A. Tarefder. 2020. “Evaluation of the fracture resistance of asphalt concrete mixes including the effect of anisotropy.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 13 (2): 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0092-2.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for evaluation of asphalt mixture cracking resistance using the semi-circular bend test (SCB) at intermediate temperatures. ASTM D8044-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for determining fracture energy of asphalt mixtures using the disk-shaped compact tension geometry. ASTM D7313-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Bell, C. 1990. “Relationship between laboratory aging tests and field performance of asphalt-concrete mixtures.” In Serviceability and durability of construction materials, 745–754. New York: ASCE.
Buttlar, W., P. Rath, H. Majidifard, E. V. Dave, and H. Wang. 2018. “Relating DC (T) fracture energy to field cracking observations and recommended specification thresholds for performance-engineered mix design.” Transp. Res. Circ. (E-C251): 51–71.
CDOT (Colorado DOT). 2020. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted bituminous mixtures. CPL 5112-20. Denver: CDOT.
Cooper, S. B., W. King, and S. Kabir. 2016. Testing and analysis of LWT and SCB properties of asphalt concrete mixtures. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
Cooper, S. B., III, and L. N. Mohammad. 2019. “Implementation of balanced mixture criteria during asphalt mixture design: Louisiana’s experience.” Transp. Res. Circ. (E-C251): 22–30.
Deef-Allah, E., M. Abdelrahman, and A. Hemida. 2020. “Improving asphalt binder’s elasticity through controlling the interaction parameters between CRM and asphalt binder.” Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater. 9 (1): 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1520/ACEM20190204.
FHWA. 2013. “FHWA-HIF-13-005, Asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT).” Accessed July 27, 2021. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/asphalt/pubs/hif13005.pdf.
Fitts, G. L. 2005. “Hamburg wheel tracking (HWT) test.” Accessed July 27, 2021. https://www.ltrc.lsu.edu/asphalt/pdf/Hamburg%20Wheel%20Tracking%20Test.pdf.
Fwa, T., H. Pasindu, and G. Ong. 2012. “Critical rut depth for pavement maintenance based on vehicle skidding and hydroplaning consideration.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (4): 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000336.
Ghavibazoo, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2014. “Effect of crumb rubber dissolution on low-temperature performance and aging of asphalt–rubber binder.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2445 (1): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.3141/2445-06.
Ghavibazoo, A., M. Abdelrahman, and M. Ragab. 2013. “Effect of crumb rubber modifier dissolution on storage stability of crumb rubber–modified asphalt.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2370 (1): 109–115. https://doi.org/10.3141/2370-14.
Ghavibazoo, A., M. Abdelrahman, and M. Ragab. 2016. “Changes in composition and molecular structure of asphalt in mixing with crumb rubber modifier.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 17 (4): 906–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1138878.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2018. “A threshold to utilize guayule resin as a new binder in flexible pavement industry.” Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 8 (12): 83–94.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2019a. “Influence of guayule resin as a bio-based additive on asphalt–rubber binder at elevated temperatures.” Recycling 4 (3): 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling4030038.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2019b. “Review on rheological characterization of bio-oils/bio-binders and their applicability in the flexible pavement industry.” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 10 (12): 395–405. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/4Q6CR.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2020a. “Effect of guayule resin as a bio-based additive on storage stability and liquid phase separation of asphalt rubber binder.” In Proc., 99th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2020b. “Monitoring separation tendency of partial asphalt replacement by crumb rubber modifier and guayule resin.” Constr. Build. Mater. 251 (Aug): 118967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118967.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2021a. “Component analysis of bio-asphalt binder using crumb rubber modifier and guayule resin as an innovative asphalt replacer.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 169 (Jun): 105486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105486.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2021b. “Guayule resin: An innovative bioresource for asphalt cement replacement.” J. Cleaner Prod. 314 (Sep): 128065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128065.
Hemida, A., and M. Abdelrahman. 2021c. “Rheological and component characterization of an innovative bio-binder using guayule resin in partial and entire asphalt replacement.” In Proc., 99th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Johanneck, L., J. Geib, D. Van Deusen, J. Garrity, C. Hanson, and E. V. Dave. 2015. DCT low temperature fracture testing pilot project. St. Paul, MN: MnDOT Library.
Kim, M., L. N. Mohammad, and M. A. Elseifi. 2012. “Characterization of fracture properties of asphalt mixtures as measured by semicircular bend test and indirect tension test.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2296 (1): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.3141/2296-12.
MoDOT. 2020. Missouri standard specifications for highway construction, Section 403 asphaltic concrete pavement. Jefferson City, MO: MoDOT.
Moore, N. 2016. Evaluation of laboratory cracking tests related to top-down cracking in asphalt pavements. Auburn, AL: Auburn Univ.
Mull, M., K. Stuart, and A. Yehia. 2002. “Fracture resistance characterization of chemically modified crumb rubber asphalt pavement.” J. Mater. Sci. 37 (3): 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013721708572.
Nakayama, F. 2005. “Guayule future development.” Ind. Crops Prod. 22 (1): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2004.05.006.
Radeef, H., N. A. Hassan, A. Z. Abidin, M. Mahmud, M. M. Satar, M. M. Warid, and Z. Al Saffar. 2021. “Determining fracture energy in asphalt mixture: A review.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 682 (1): 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/682/1/012069.
Rafiq, W., M. Bin Napiah, M. Hartadi Sutanto, W. Salah Alaloul, Z. Nadia Binti Zabri, M. Imran Khan, and M. Ali Musarat. 2020. “Investigation on Hamburg wheel-tracking device stripping performance properties of recycled hot-mix asphalt mixtures.” Materials 13 (21): 4704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214704.
Rasutis, D., K. Soratana, C. McMahan, and A. E. Landis. 2015. “A sustainability review of domestic rubber from the guayule plant.” Ind. Crops Prod. 70 (Aug): 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.042.
Roberts, F., P. Kandhal, E. Brown, D. Lee, and T. Kennedy. 1996. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction. Greenbelt, MD: National Asphalt Pavement.
Stempihar, J. 2013. Development of the C* fracture test for asphalt concrete mixtures. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State Univ.
Stewart, C. M., J. G. Reyes, and V. M. Garcia. 2017. “Comparison of fracture test standards for a super pave dense-graded hot mix asphalt.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 169 (Jan): 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.10.016.
TxDOT (Texas DOT). 2019. Test procedure for Hamburg wheel-tracking test. Tex-242-F. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
VanFrank, K., M. VanMilligen, and T. Biel. 2017. Intermediate temperature cracking in HMA: Phase 1 semi-circular bending (SCB) practicality evaluation. Taylorsville, UT: Research Division, Utah DOT.
Yildirim, Y., M. Solaimanian, and T. W. Kennedy. 2000. Mixing and compaction temperatures for hot mix asphalt concrete. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Zaumanis, M., R. B. Mallick, and R. Frank. 2014. “100% recycled hot mix asphalt: A review and analysis.” Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 92 (Nov): 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.007.
Zegeye, E. T., K. H. Moon, M. Turos, T. R. Clyne, and M. O. Marasteanu. 2012. “Low temperature fracture properties of polyphosphoric acid modified asphalt mixtures.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 24 (8): 1089–1096. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000488.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 4April 2023

History

Received: Dec 23, 2021
Accepted: Jul 14, 2022
Published online: Jan 20, 2023
Published in print: Apr 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Jun 20, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction & Building Engineering, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport, P.O. Box 1029, Alexandria, Egypt (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8651-5536. Email: [email protected]
Magdy Abdelrahman, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Missouri Asphalt Pavement Association (MAPA) Endowed Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65409. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share