Technical Papers
Dec 1, 2022

Reactivity Assessment of Supplementary Cementitious Materials and Their Binary Blends Using R3 Test

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 2

Abstract

The suitability of the rapid, relevant, and reliable (R3) heat of hydration and bound water tests for measuring the reactivity of various supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and their blends with calcium hydroxide (CH) was investigated in this study. These tests have been recently standardized in current standards. The test was carried out on pastes of fly ash (FA), slag (S), kaolinitic calcined clay (K), limestone (LS), and their blends. A detailed analysis of the heat of hydration and bound water measurements specified according to the R3 test was carried out. A good correlation was found between the two types of test results and also between the reactivity test results versus strength activity index measured using cement mortar compressive strength. The formation of hydration products in the R3 test paste specimens was also studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The hydration products for SCMs formed in the test were similar to those reported in cement systems. It was seen that the interactions in the blended SCMs with CH were also similar to those reported in cement pastes. Further, the microstructure of the specimen was studied using scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis, and the overall hydration of various SCMs was studied. The influence of the proportions of the SCMs in the blended SCMs and that of fineness were also investigated. The applicability and limitations of this test method for SCMs and their blends were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results received financial funding from the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) under Grant No. 7F-08527.01.02.

References

Association Francaise de Normalisation. 2012. Additions pour béton hydraulique Métakaolin Spécifications et critères de conformité. NF P18-513. La Plaine Saint-Denis Cedex, France: Association Francaise de Normalisation.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural pozzolans for use in portland-cement concrete. ASTM C311/C311M-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test methods for measuring the reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials by isothermal calorimetry and bound water measurements. ASTM C1897-20. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Aubert, J. E., P. Segui, B. Husson, and M. Measson. 2012. “A method developed to quantify lime and gypsum consumed by mineral additions.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (7): 874–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.04.005.
Avet, F., et al. 2022. “Report of RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 2: Optimization and testing of the robustness of the R3 reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials.” Mater. Struct. 55 (3): 92. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01928-6.
Avet, F., R. Snellings, A. Alujas Diaz, M. Ben Haha, and K. Scrivener. 2016. “Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays.” Cem. Concr. Res. 85 (Jul): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.015.
Baert, G., S. Hoste, G. De Schutter, and N. De Belie. 2008. “Reactivity of fly ash in cement paste studied by means of thermogravimetry and isothermal calorimetry.” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 94 (2): 485–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-007-8787-z.
Bahurudeen, A., K. Wani, M. A. Basit, and M. Santhanam. 2016. “Assessment of pozzolanic performance of sugarcane bagasse ash.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001361.
Balonis, M., and F. P. Glasser. 2009. “The density of cement phases.” Cem. Concr. Res. 39 (9): 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.06.005.
Ben Haha, M., K. De Weerdt, and B. Lothenbach. 2010. “Quantification of the degree of reaction of fly ash.” Cem. Concr. Res. 40 (11): 1620–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.07.004.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2013a. Method of test for pozzolanic materials. IS 1727. New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2013b. Pulverized fuel ash—Specifications, part-1: For use as pozzolana in cement, cement mortar and concrete. IS 3812 (Part 1). New Delhi, India: BIS.
BIS (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2015. Ordinary portland cement—Specification. IS 269. New Delhi, India: BIS.
Blotevogel, S., A. Ehrenberg, L. Steger, L. Doussang, J. Kaknics, C. Patapy, and M. Cyr. 2020. “Ability of the R3 test to evaluate differences in early age reactivity of 16 industrial ground granulated blast furnace slags (GGBS).” Cem. Concr. Res. 130 (Jan): 105998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.105998.
CEN (European Commitiee for Standardization). 2000. Cement part—Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, European Standards. EN 197-1 Part 1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Commitiee for Standardization). 2013. Methods of testing cement—Part 5: Pozzolanicity test for pozzolanic cement. EN 196-5. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CSA Group. 2013. Standard practice for the evaluation of alternative supplementary cementing materials (ASCMs) for use in concrete. CSA A3004-08 E1. Toronto: CSA Group.
Durdziński, P. T., C. F. Dunant, M. Ben Haha, and K. L. Scrivener. 2015a. “A new quantification method based on SEM-EDS to assess fly ash composition and study the reaction of its individual components in hydrating cement paste.” Cem. Concr. Res. 73 (Jul): 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.02.008.
Durdziński, P. T., R. Snellings, C. F. Dunant, M. Ben Haha, and K. L. Scrivener. 2015b. “Fly ash as an assemblage of model Ca-Mg-Na-aluminosilicate glasses.” Cem. Concr. Res. 78 (Dec): 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.005.
Kasaniya, M., M. D. A. Thomas, and E. G. Moffatt. 2019. “Development of rapid and reliable pozzolanic reactivity test method.” ACI Mater. J. 116 (4): 145–154. https://doi.org/10.14359/51716718.
Katyal, N. K., J. M. Sharma, A. K. Dhawan, M. M. Ali, and K. Mohan. 2008. “Development of rapid method for the estimation of reactive silica in fly ash.” Cem. Concr. Res. 38 (1): 104–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.020.
Kocaba, V., E. Gallucci, and K. L. Scrivener. 2012. “Methods for determination of degree of reaction of slag in blended cement pastes.” Cem. Concr. Res. 42 (3): 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.010.
Li, X., et al. 2018. “Reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials: RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 1.” Mater. Struct./Materiaux et Constr. 51 (6): 151. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1269-x.
Lothenbach, B., D. A. Kulik, T. Matschei, M. Balonis, L. Baquerizo, B. Dilnesa, G. D. Miron, and R. J. Myers. 2019. “Cemdata18: A chemical thermodynamic database for hydrated Portland cements and alkali-activated materials.” Cem. Concr. Res. 115 (Oct): 472–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.018.
Lothenbach, B., K. Scrivener, and R. D. Hooton. 2011. “Supplementary cementitious materials.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (12): 1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.12.001.
Matschei, T., B. Lothenbach, and F. P. Glasser. 2007. “The role of calcium carbonate in cement hydration.” Cem. Concr. Res. 37 (4): 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.013.
Okoronkwo, M. U., and F. P. Glasser. 2016. “Stability of strätlingite in the CASH system.” Mater. Struct./Materiaux et Constr. 49 (10): 4305–4318. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0789-x.
Pacewska, B., and I. Wilińska. 2020. “Usage of supplementary cementitious materials: Advantages and limitations: Part I. C–S–H, C–A–S–H and other products formed in different binding mixtures.” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 142 (1): 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09907-1.
Palou, M., M. Boháč, E. Kuzielová, R. Novotný, M. Žemlička, and J. Dragomirová. 2020. “Use of calorimetry and thermal analysis to assess the heat of supplementary cementitious materials during the hydration of composite cementitious binders.” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 142 (1): 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09341-3.
Parashar, A., et al. 2022. “Report of RILEM TC 267—TRM: Improvement and robustness study of lime mortar strength test for assessing reactivity of SCMs.” Mater. Struct. 55 (3): 96. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-022-01911-1.
Parashar, A., and S. Bishnoi. 2020. “A comparison of test methods to assess the strength potential of plain and blended supplementary cementitious materials.” Constr. Build. Mater. 256 (Sep): 119292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119292.
Parashar, A., and S. Bishnoi. 2021. “Hydration behaviour of limestone-calcined clay and limestone-slag in ternary blended cement.” Rilem Tech. Lett. 6 (Mar): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.21809/rilemtechlett.2021.134.
Sabir, B. B., S. Wild, and J. Bai. 2001. “Cement & concrete composites metakaolin and calcined clays as pozzolans for concrete: A review.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 23 (6): 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00092-5.
Saladi, N., and W. Ashraf. 2020. “Ground and sieved bio ash versus coal fly ash: Comparative analysis of pozzolanic reactivity.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (12): 04020377. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003443.
Scrivener, K., R. Snellings, and B. Lothenbach. 2018. A practical guide to microstructural analysis of cementitious materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Scrivener, K. L. 2014. “Options for the future of cement.” Indian Concr. J. 88 (7): 11–21.
Shah, V., A. Parashar, S. Medepalli, and S. Bishnoi. 2020a. “Prediction of carbonation using reactivity test methods for pozzolanic materials.” Adv. Cem. Res. 32 (7): 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.18.00144.
Shah, V., A. Parashar, G. Mishra, S. Medepalli, S. Krishnan, and S. Bishnoi. 2020b. “Influence of cement replacement by limestone calcined clay pozzolan on the engineering properties of mortar and concrete.” Adv. Cem. Res. 32 (3): 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1680/jadcr.18.00073.
Shah, V., A. Parashar, and A. Scott. 2022. “Understanding the importance of carbonates on the performance of portland metakaolin cement.” Constr. Build. Mater. 319 (Feb): 126155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126155.
Snellings, R., A. Salze, and K. L. Scrivener. 2014. “Use of X-ray diffraction to quantify amorphous supplementary cementitious materials in anhydrous and hydrated blended cements.” Cem. Concr. Res. 64 (Oct): 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.06.011.
Snellings, R., and K. L. Scrivener. 2016. “Rapid screening tests for supplementary cementitious materials: Past and future.” Mater. Struct. 49 (8): 3265–3279. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0718-z.
Suraneni, P., and J. Weiss. 2017. “Examining the pozzolanicity of supplementary cementitious materials using isothermal calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 83 (Oct): 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.009.
Swamy, R. N. 1993. “Fly ash and slag: Standards and specifications-help or hindrance?” Mater. Struct. 26 (10): 600–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472835.
Vessalas, K., P. S. Thomas, A. S. Ray, J. P. Guerbois, P. Joyce, and J. Haggman. 2009. “Pozzolanic reactivity of the supplementary cementitious material pitchstone fines by thermogravimetric analysis.” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 97 (1): 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-008-9708-5.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 35Issue 2February 2023

History

Received: Nov 5, 2021
Accepted: May 31, 2022
Published online: Dec 1, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: May 1, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-3471. Email: [email protected]
Satya Medepalli [email protected]
Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. Email: [email protected]
Shashank Bishnoi [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Improving the Performance of Fly Ash–Portland Cement with Limestone Calcined Clay, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17545, 36, 8, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share