Abstract

Asphalt pavement rutting is caused primarily by shear stresses induced by heavy truckloads. Many tests have been developed to determine asphalt mix rutting potential. However, due to limited correlation with field rutting performance, long testing hours, and difficulties of sample fabricating, no test can be used as a fast and straightforward assessment tool for quality control or quality assurance/acceptance (QC/QA) purpose. In this study, a shearing fixture was developed to investigate the shear rutting potentials of the asphalt mixture more easily and rapidly. An analytical solution was derived from the mechanical analysis. With this solution, the stress distributions of the specimen under the shear loading were analyzed and plotted. These stress distribution plots are also compared with those under the other loading fixtures, such as the indirect tension (IDT) fixture and Marshall fixture. The comparison indicates that the developed shearing fixture is good at inducing shear stress to the specimen and manifesting the shear rutting mechanism. Several scenarios were evaluated by varying the loading fixture configurations, such as the bottom support arc length and angle. The impacts of these configuration elements on the stress distribution were investigated. Laboratory-mixed and laboratory-molded specimens were tested using the shearing fixture, and the test results show high repeatability. The mechanical analysis and experiments indicate that the new shear rutting test is very promising for evaluating the asphalt mix rutting potential quickly and straightforwardly.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author, Sheng Hu, upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was made possible by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration. The authors thank project manager Tom Schwerdt, project advisor Richard Izzo, and other project management committee (PMC) members for their valuable guidance and support.

Disclaimer

The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. They do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of any agency or institute. This paper does not constitute a standard, specification, nor is it intended for design, construction, bidding, contracting, tendering, certification, or permit purposes. Trade names were used solely for information purposes and not for product endorsement or certification.

References

ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for marshall stability and flow of asphalt mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of asphalt mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Hondros, G. 1959. “The evaluation of Poisson’s ratio and the modulus of materials of low tensile resistance by the Brazilian (indirect tensile) test with particular reference to concrete.” Aust. J. Appl. Sci. 10 (3): 243–268.
Kourkoulis, S. K., C. F. Markides, and P. E. Chatzistergos. 2012. “The Brazilian disc under parabolically varying load: Theoretical and experimental study of the displacement field.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 49 (7–8): 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.12.013.
Monismith, C. L., J. Sousa, J. Harvey, J. Deacon, J. Coplantz, and G. Paulsen. 1994. Permanent deformation response of asphalt aggregate mixes. Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program.
Serati, M., H. Alehossein, and N. Erarslan. 2015. “The Brazilian disc test under a non-uniform contact pressure along its thickness.” Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 49 (4): 1573–1577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0773-3.
Sousa, J. B., J. Craus, and C. L. Monismith. 1991. Summary report on permanent deformation in asphalt concrete. Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program.
Tarefder, R. A., and M. M. Hasan. 2018. Evaluating rutting/stripping potentials of asphalt mixes using hamburg wheel tracking device. Norman, OK: Southern Plains Transportation Center.
Timoshenko S. P., and J. N. Goodier. 1987. Theory of elasticity. New York: McRAW-Hill.
Vallerga, B. A., and W. R. Lovering. 1985. “Evolution of the hveem stabilometer method of designing asphalt paving mixtures.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 54 (8): 243–265.
Walubita, L. F., L. Fuentes, A. Prakoso, L. M. R. Pianeta, J. J. Komba, and B. Naik. 2020. “Correlating the HWTT laboratory test data to field rutting performance of in-service highway sections.” Constr. Build. Mater. 236 (Mar): 117552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117552.
Williams, R. C., D. W. Hill, and M. P. Rottermond. 2005. “Utilization of an asphalt pavement analyzer for hot mix asphalt laboratory mix design.” J. ASTM Int. 2 (4): 16–40.
Witczak, M. W. 2005. Simple performance tests summary of recommended. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Witczak, M. W., K. Kaloush, T. Pellinen, M. EL-Basyouny, and H. Von Quintus. 2002. Simple performance test for superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Yin, F., C. Chen, R. West, A. E. Martin, and E. Arambula-Mercado. 2020. “Determining the relationship among hamburg wheel-tracking test parameters and correlation to field performance of asphalt pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2674 (4): 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120912430.
Zhang, W., S. Shen, S. Wu, and L. N. Mohammad. 2017. “Prediction model for field rut depth of asphalt pavement based on Hamburg wheel tracking test properties.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (9): 04017098. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001946.
Zhou, F., B. Crockford, J. Zhang, S. Hu, J. Epps, and L. Sun. 2019. “Development and validation of an ideal shear rutting test for asphalt mix design and QC/QA.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 2019 (Mar): 719–750.
Zhou, F., S. Im, L. Sun, and T. Scullion. 2017. “Development of an IDEAL cracking test for asphalt mixture design and QC/QA.” J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (4): 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1389082.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34Issue 9September 2022

History

Received: Oct 5, 2021
Accepted: Jan 10, 2022
Published online: Jun 27, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xi Luo, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3135. Email: [email protected]
Associate Research Engineer, Materials & Pavements Div., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843-3135 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0505-430X. Email: [email protected]
Fujie Zhou, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Senior Research Engineer, Materials & Pavements Div., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843-3135. Email: [email protected]
William Crockford, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Engineer, Materials & Pavements Div., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843-3135. Email: [email protected]
Associate Transportation Researcher, Materials & Pavements Div., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX 77843-3135. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3219-0991. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share