Multiscale Characterization of Fly Ash–Based Geopolymer and Type V Portland Cement Exposed to
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 6
Abstract
Fly ash–based geopolymer is an attractive supplemental cementitious material that has been receiving great attention from the community; however, its durability characteristics such as resistance to sulfate-related damage have not yet been fully examined. This study investigates the properties of fly ash–based geopolymer and its counterpart, Type V portland cement paste/mortar, when they are exposed to solution. Toward that end, a multiscale characterization was conducted. Changes in nanomechanical properties due to exposure were tracked and quantified by nanoindentation. Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy were coupled to characterize microstructural and chemical changes at different exposure levels. Moreover, the effect of solution on macroscale properties, including changes in mass and compressive strength, were examined. Results indicated that exposure to solution affected the two cementitious materials very differently. No significant sign of deterioration was observed in fly ash–based geopolymer, although changed the chemical compositions by increasing Mg content and decreasing Na in the original N-A-S-H gel. On the contrary, Type V portland cement presented the degradation of the main hydration product due to the decalcification process with increasing exposure. This resulted in a significant drop of Ca/Si ratio and compressive strength after 6 months of immersion. Test-analysis results in different length scales in this study imply that fly ash–based geopolymer can be a durable material under environments.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for funding provided by the Land and Housing Institute (LHI) in the Republic of Korea. The first author (Hani Alanazi) would also like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Majmaah University for supporting this work under project number No. R-2021-247.
References
Alanazi, H., J. Hu, and Y. R. Kim. 2019. “Effect of slag, silica fume, and metakaolin on properties and performance of alkali-activated fly ash cured at ambient temperature.” Constr. Build. Mater. 197 (Feb): 747–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.172.
Al-Dulaijan, S. U., M. Maslehuddin, M. M. Al-Zahrani, A. M. Sharif, M. Shameem, and M. Ibrahim. 2003. “Sulfate resistance of plain and blended cements exposed to varying concentrations of sodium sulfate.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 25 (4): 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00083-5.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars [using 2-in. or (50-mm) cube specimens]. ASTM-C109/109 M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM C33-18. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Azad, N. M., and S. M. Samarakoon. 2021. “Utilization of industrial by-products/waste to manufacture geopolymer cement/concrete.” Sustainability 13 (2): 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020873.
Bakharev, T. 2005. “Durability of geopolymer materials in sodium and magnesium sulfate solutions.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (6): 1233–1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.002.
Bernal, J. D. 1952. “The structures of cement hydration compounds.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. Chemistry of Cement, 216–236. London: Cement and Concrete Association.
Bernal, S. A., and J. L. Provis. 2014. “Durability of alkali-activated materials: Progress and perspectives.” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97 (4): 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12831.
Bernard, E., A. Dauzères, and B. Lothenbach. 2018. “Magnesium and calcium silicate hydrates. Part II: Mg-exchange at the interface ‘low-pH’ cement and magnesium environment studied in a CSH and MSH model system.” Appl. Geochem. 89 (Feb): 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.12.006.
Brown, P. W. 1981. “An evaluation of the sulfate resistance of cements in a controlled environment.” Cem. Concr. Res. 11 (5): 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(81)90030-2.
Cho, Y., J. H. Kim, S. Jung, Y. Chung, and Y. Jeong. 2019. “Importance of cation species during sulfate resistance tests for alkali-activated FA/GGBFS blended mortars.” Materials 12 (21): 3547. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213547.
Constantinides, G., K. S. R. Chandran, F.-J. Ulm, and K. J. Van Vliet. 2006. “Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: Principles and validation.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 430 (1–2): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.125.
Constantinides, G., and F. J. Ulm. 2007. “The nanogranular nature of C–S–H.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55 (1): 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2006.06.003.
Das, S., P. Yang, S. S. Singh, J. C. E. Mertens, X. Xiao, N. Chawla, and N. Neithalath. 2015. “Effective properties of a fly ash geopolymer: Synergistic application of X-ray synchrotron tomography, nanoindentation, and homogenization models.” Cem. Concr. Res. 78 (Dec): 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.004.
Elyamany, H. E., M. Abd Elmoaty, and A. M. Elshaboury. 2018. “Magnesium sulfate resistance of geopolymer mortar.” Constr. Build. Mater. 184 (2018): 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.212.
Famy, C., A. R. Brough, and H. F. W. Taylor. 2003. “The CSH gel of Portland cement mortars. Part I: The interpretation of energy-dispersive X-ray microanalyses from scanning electron microscopy, with some observations on CSH, AFm and AFt phase compositions.” Cem. Concr. Res. 33 (9): 1389–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00064-4.
Fernández-Jiménez, A., and A. Palomo. 2003. “Characterization of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements.” Fuel 82 (18): 2259–2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00194-7.
Fernández-Jiménez, A., and A. Palomo. 2005. “Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (10): 1984–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.003.
Fernández-Jiménez, A., A. Palomo, and M. Criado. 2005. “Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: A descriptive model.” Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (6): 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.08.021.
Garcia-Lodeiro, I., A. Palomo, A. Fernández-Jiménez, and D. E. Macphee. 2011. “Compatibility studies between NASH and CASH gels. Study in the ternary diagram .” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (9): 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.05.006.
Habert, G., J. D. E. De Lacaillerie, and N. Roussel. 2011. “An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: Reviewing current research trends.” J. Cleaner Prod. 19 (11): 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012.
Hou, P., S. Kawashima, D. Kong, D. J. Corr, J. Qian, and S. P. Shah. 2013. “Modification effects of colloidal on cement hydration and its gel property.” Composites, Part B 45 (1): 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.056.
Hu, C., and Z. Li. 2015. “Property investigation of individual phases in cementitious composites containing silica fume and fly ash.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 57 (Mar): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.011.
Ibrahim, M., A. S. Al-Gahtani, M. Maslehuddin, and F. H. Dakhil. 1999. “Use of surface treatment materials to improve concrete durability.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 11 (1): 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(36).
Ismail, I., S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, S. Hamdan, and J. S. van Deventer. 2013. “Microstructural changes in alkali activated fly ash/slag geopolymers with sulfate exposure.” Mater. Struct. 46 (3): 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9906-2.
Juenger, M. C. G., F. Winnefeld, J. L. Provis, and J. H. Ideker. 2011. “Advances in alternative cementitious binders.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (12): 1232–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012.
Khedmati, M., H. Alanazi, Y. R. Kim, G. Nsengiyumva, and S. Moussavi. 2018a. “Effects of molar ratio on properties of aggregate-paste interphase in fly ash-based geopolymer mixtures through multiscale measurements.” Constr. Build. Mater. 191 (Dec): 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.024.
Khedmati, M., Y. R. Kim, and J. A. Turner. 2019. “Investigation of the interphase between recycled aggregates and cementitious binding materials using integrated microstructural-nanomechanical-chemical characterization.” Composites, Part B 158 (Feb): 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.041.
Khedmati, M., Y. R. Kim, J. A. Turner, H. Alanazi, and C. Nguyen. 2018b. “An integrated microstructural-nanomechanical-chemical approach to examine material-specific characteristics of cementitious interphase regions.” Mater. Charact. 138 (Apr): 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.045.
Long, T., Q. Wang, Z. Guan, Y. Chen, and X. Shi. 2017. “Deterioration and microstructural evolution of the fly ash geopolymer concrete against solution.” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1 (Oct): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.045.
Ma, Y., J. Hu, and G. Ye. 2013. “The pore structure and permeability of alkali activated fly ash.” Fuel 104 (Feb): 771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.05.034.
Marchand, J., I. Odler, and J. P. Skalny. 2009. Sulfate attack on concrete. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mathis, R. P. 1996. “Freezing and thawing, deicing salt, and sulfate resistance of concrete pavers.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Southern Illinois Univ. at Carbondal.
Mermerdaş, K., Z. Algın, and Ş. Ekmen. 2020. “Experimental assessment and optimization of mix parameters of fly ash-based lightweight geopolymer mortar with respect to shrinkage and strength.” J. Build. Eng. 31 (Sep): 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101351.
Miller, M., C. Bobko, M. Vandamme, and F. J. Ulm. 2008. “Surface roughness criteria for cement paste nanoindentation.” Cem. Concr. Res. 38 (4): 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.11.014.
Mondal, P. 2008. “Nanomechanical properties of cementitious materials.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern Univ.
Němeček, J., V. Šmilauer, and L. Kopecký. 2011. “Nanoindentation characteristics of alkali-activated aluminosilicate materials.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 33 (2): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.10.005.
Oliver, W. C., and G. M. Pharr. 1992. “An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments.” J. Mater. Res. 7 (6): 1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564.
Provis, J. L., and J. S. J. Van Deventer. 2009. Geopolymers: Structures, processing, properties and industrial applications. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing.
Rami, K. Z., Y. R. Kim, M. Khedmati, G. Nsengiyumva, and H. Alanazi. 2018. “Two-way linked multiscale method integrated with nanomechanical tests and cohesive zone fracture to model highly heterogeneous binding materials.” J. Eng. Mech. 144 (10): 04018095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001518.
Rashidian-Dezfouli, H., and P. R. Rangaraju. 2017. “A comparative study on the durability of geopolymers produced with ground glass fiber, fly ash, and glass-powder in sodium sulfate solution.” Constr. Build. Mater. 153 (2017): 996–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.139.
Rozière, E., A. Loukili, R. El Hachem, and F. Grondin. 2009. “Durability of concrete exposed to leaching and external sulphate attacks.” Cem. Concr. Res. 39 (12): 1188–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.07.021.
Schneider, M., M. Romer, M. Tschudin, and H. Bolio. 2011. “Sustainable cement production—Present and future.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (7): 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.019.
Taylor, H. F. W. 1997. Vol. 2 of Cement chemistry. London: Thomas Telford.
Valencia Saavedra, W. G., D. E. Angulo, and R. Mejía de Gutiérrez. 2016. “Fly ash slag geopolymer concrete: Resistance to sodium and magnesium sulfate attack.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (12): 04016148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001618.
Venkatanarayanan, H. K., and P. R. Rangaraju. 2014. “Evaluation of sulfate resistance of Portland cement mortars containing low-carbon rice husk ash.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 26 (4): 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000868.
Wei, Y., X. Gao, and S. Liang. 2016. “Nanoindentation-based study of the micro-mechanical properties, structure, and hydration degree of slag blended cementitious materials.” J. Mater. Sci. 51 (7): 3349–3361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9650-4.
Xiao, J., W. Li, Z. Sun, D. A. Lange, and S. P. Shah. 2013. “Properties of interfacial transition zones in recycled aggregate concrete tested by nanoindentation.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 37 (Mar): 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.006.
Zadeh, V. Z., and C. P. Bobko. 2013. “Nanoscale mechanical properties of concrete containing blast furnace slag and fly ash before and after thermal damage.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 37 (Mar): 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.09.003.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 8, 2021
Accepted: Oct 15, 2021
Published online: Mar 21, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 21, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Weilong Song, Fusheng Zha, Zhiduo Zhu, Fei Wang, Sulfate Resistance of Novel Alkali-Activated Filling Grout for Shield Tunnels: Comparison with Typical OPC-Based Filling Grout, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16300, 35, 12, (2023).
- Xiaoduo Ou, Yuchu Zeng, Jie Jiang, Zhengfan Lyu, Hailiang Chen, Guangyuan Chen, Experimental research on the properties of foamed mixture lightweight soil with red mud, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01673, 17, (e01673), (2022).