Technical Papers
Jan 18, 2022

Experimental Assessment and CVGM Modeling to Investigate the Seismic Stress– and Strain–Controlled Fatigue Properties of St-37 and St-52 Grade Steels

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 4

Abstract

In this study, the damaging effects of seismic stress-controlled fatigue (low-cycle and high-cycle fatigue) and seismic strain–controlled fatigue (extremely low-cycle fatigue) on Grade St-37 and St-52 steels were studied. So far, no comprehensive studies have been performed on the fatigue parameters of these two types of steels and their properties have not been compared with each other. In this study, S-N curves of grade St-37 and St-52 steels were obtained by performing rotational fatigue test (experimental stress–controlled test) on more than 80 specimens, and the behavior of these two types of steels under seismic stress–controlled fatigue was compared with each other. The cyclic void growth model (CVGM) was used to investigate the effects of seismic strain–controlled fatigue on steels. The parameters used in the CVGM for the most commonly used steels in Iran (St-37, St-52) were obtained on the basis of monotonic and cyclic loading test results (experimental strain-controlled test) on more than 50 specimens. To compare the behavior of these two types of steel and their structural moment connections, four types of connections of Grade St-37 and four types of St-52 material were modeled and examined under seismic stress–controlled fatigue and seismic strain–controlled fatigue. The results show that under seismic stress–controlled fatigue and seismic strain–controlled fatigue, St-52 steel moment connections have a better fatigue strength than St-37 steel connections. Also it can be said that under strain-controlled fatigue, bolted flange plate connections have the best performance, and under stress-controlled fatigue, welded reduced beam section connections have the best performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Abaqus. 2014. Standard user’s manual version 14.1. Providence, RI: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen.
AISC. 2020. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358s2-20. Chicago: AISC.
Amiri, A., and J. C. Anderson. 2012. “Effect of low cycle fatigue on steel moment frame with RBS.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas, edited by F. M. Mazoolani and R. A. Herrera. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-13. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1992. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. ATC 24. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Barsom, J. M. 2000. Development of fracture toughness requirements for weld metals in seismic applications. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 14 (1). https:// doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:1(44).
Benoit, A., and L. Rémy. 2014. “Experimental investigation of the behavior and the low cycle fatigue life of a welded structure.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 595 (Feb): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.082.
Cooper, J. D., I. M. Friedland, I. G. Buckle, R. B. Nimis, and N. M. Bobb. 1994. The Northridge Earthquake: Progress made, lessons learned in seismic-resistant bridge design.. Washington, DC: USDOT.
CSI (Computer and Structures). 2013. Integrated software for structural analysis and design. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
Downing, S. D., and D. F. Socie. 1982. “Simple rainflow counting algorithms.” Int. J. Fatigue 4 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4.
Endo, T., and M. Matsuishi. 1968. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress. Beijing: Japan Society of Mechanical Engineering.
Fell, B. V., A. M. Kanvinde, and G. G. Deierlein. 2010. Large-scale testing and simulation of earthquake induced ultra-low cycle fatigue in bracing members subjected to cyclic inelastic buckling.. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Gerami, M., A. Zarei, and M. Ghaderi. 2019. “Effect of low cycle fatigue on steel moment frames with prequalified rigid connections (bolted unstiffened and stiffened extended end-plate moment connections).” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 6 (Special Issue 3): 149–162. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2018.98736.1327.
Ghaderi, M., M. Gerami, and R. Vahdani. 2019a. “A comparison of seismic low cycle fatigue and extremely low cycle fatigue on steel moment frames with reduced beam section connection (RBS).” Int. J. Fatigue 119 (Feb): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.010.
Ghaderi, M., M. Gerami, and R. Vahdani. 2019b. “Investigating the effect of extremely low cyclic fatigue in steel moment frames with reduced beam section connections.” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. 7 (3): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2018.127480.1526.
Ghaderi, M., M. Gerami, and R. Vahdani. 2020a. “Estimated ultimate capacity of RBS connections under monotonic and cyclic load using ductile fracture mechanism.” Sharif J. Civ. Eng. 36.2 (1.2): 143–152. https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2018.50897.2353.
Ghaderi, M., M. Gerami, and R. Vahdani. 2020b. “Performance assessment of bolted extended end-plate moment connections constructed from grade St-37 steel subjected to fatigue.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 32 (5): 04020092. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003066.
Ghaderi, M., M. Gerami, and R. Vahdani. 2021. “Prediction of ultimate capacity of welded steel moment connections under extremely low cycle fatigue and progressive collapse.” J. Seismol. Earthquake Eng.
Gope, P. C. 2002. “Determination of minimum number of specimens in S-N testing.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 124 (4): 421–427. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1417486.
Hancock, J. W., and A. C. Mackenzie. 1976. “On the mechanics of ductile failure in high strength steel subjected to multi-axial stress-states.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 24 (2–3): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-7.
Hanji, T. 2014. “Low cycle fatigue assessments of corner welded joints based on local strain approach.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 14 (3): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-3015-8.
Hoseini, B., M. Gerami, and M. Ghaderi. 2021. “Evaluation of seismic low cycle fatigue on welded un-reinforced flange-welded web and reduce beam section on steel moment frame.” Sharif J. Civ. Eng. 37.2 (1.1): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.24200/j30.2020.54818.2677.
Huang Y. L., and S. A. Mahin. 2010. Simulating the inelastic seismic behavior of steel braced frames including the effects of low-cycle fatigue.. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2006. “Void growth model and stress modified critical strain model to predict ductile fracture in structural steels.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (12): 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1907).
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2007. “Cyclic void growth model to assess ductile fracture initiation in structural steels due to ultra low cycle fatigue.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (6): 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:6(701).
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2008. “Validation of cyclic void growth model for fracture initiation in blunt notch and dogbone steel specimens.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (9): 1528–1537. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:9(1528).
Khandelwal, K., S. El-Tawil, S. K. Kunnath, and H. Lew. 2008. “Macromodel-based simulation of progressive collapse: Steel frame structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 7 (134): 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1070).
Krawinkler, H., M. Zohrei, B. Lashkari-Irvani, N. G. Cofie, and H. Hadidi-Tamjed. 1983. Recommendations for experimental studies on the seismic behavior of steel components and materials. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Kuwamura, H. 2003. “Classification of material and welding in fracture consideration of seismic steel frames.” Eng. Struct. 25 (5): 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00166-9.
Kuwamura, H., J. Iyama, and K. Matsui. 2003. “Effects of material toughness and plate thickness on brittle fracture of steel members.” J. Struct. Eng. 11 (129): 1475–1483. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:11(1475).
Kuwamura, H., and T. Suzuki. 1992. “Low-cycle fatigue resistance of welded joints of high-strength steel under earthquake loading.” In Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2851–2856. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kuwamura, H., and N. Takagi. 2004. “Similitude law of prefracture hysteresis of steel members.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (5): 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(752).
Kuwamura, H., and K. Yamamoto. 1997. “Ductile crack as trigger of brittle fracture in steel.” J. Struct. Eng. 6 (123): 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:6(729).
Miner, M. A. 1945. “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 12 (3): A159–A164. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4009458.
Miyazaki, Y., et al. 2013. “Seismic activity in Japan.” Accessed December 2, 2013. https://www.hp1039.jishin.go.jp/eqchreng/eqchrfrm.htm.
Myers, A. T., G. G. Deierlein, and A. M. Kanvinde. 2009a. Testing and probabilistic simulation of ductile fracture initiation in structural steel components and weldments. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Myers, A. T., A. M. Kanvinde, G. G. Deierlein, and B. V. Fell. 2009b. “Effect of weld details on the ductility of steel column baseplate connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (6): 1366–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.004.
Nastar, N. 2008. “The effect of higher modes on earthquake fatigue damage to steel moment frames.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School, Univ. of Southern California.
Nastar, N., and J. C. Anderson. 2010. “Effects of low-cycle fatigue on a ten-story steel building.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 19 (1): 95–113.
Nonaka, I., S. Setowaki, and Y. Ichikawa. 2014. “Effect of load frequency on high cycle fatigue strength of bullet train axle steel.” Int. J. Fatigue 60: 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.020.
Palmgren, A. G. 1924. “Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern (life length of roller bearings).” VDI Z. 68 (14): 339–341.
Partridge, J. E., S. R. Paterson, and R. M. Richard. 2000. “Low cycle fatigue tests and fracture analyses of bolted-welded seismic moment frame connections.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. STESSA 2000. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Partridge, J. E., S. R. Paterson, and R. M. Richard. 2003. “ATC-24 cumulative damage tests and fracture analyses of bolted-welded seismic moment frame connections.” In Proc., 3rd Congress, Technical Council on Forensic Engineering of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 142–157. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rice, J. R., and D. M. Tracey. 1969. “On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 17 (3): 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7.
Sadek, F., J. A. Main, H. S. Lew, S. D. Robert, V. P. Chiarito, and S. El-Tawil. 2013. “Performance of steel moment connections under a column removal scenario. I: Experiments.” J. Struct. Eng. 139 (1): 98–107.
Szyniszewski, S., and T. Krauthammer. 2012. “Energy flow in progressive collapse of steel framed buildings.” Eng. Struct. 42 (Sep): 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.014.
Tateishi, K., T. Hanji, and K. Minami. 2007. “A prediction model for extremely low cycle fatigue strength of structural steel.” Int. J. Fatigue 29 (5): 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.08.001.
Zambrano, A. 2014. “Damage indices evaluation for seismic resistant structures subjected to low-cycle fatigue phenomena.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 78 (Jan): 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.11.006.
Zhou, H., and Y. Wang. 2014. “Seismic low-cycle fatigue evaluation of welded beam-to-column connections in steel moment frames through global–local analysis.” Int. J. Fatigue 64 (Jul): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.002.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34Issue 4April 2022

History

Received: Apr 27, 2021
Accepted: Aug 11, 2021
Published online: Jan 18, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jun 18, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Graduate and Researcher of Civil-Earthquake Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Semnan Univ., Semnan 19111-35131, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4832-4464. Email: [email protected]
Mohsen Gerami [email protected]
Professor of Civil-Earthquake Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Semnan Univ., Semnan 19111-35131, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Reza Vahdani [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Civil-Earthquake Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Semnan Univ., Semnan 19111-35131, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Effects of Temperature Drop on Ultralow Cycle Fatigue of G20Mn5QT Cast Steel, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16111, 36, 3, (2024).
  • Experimental Investigation on Ductile Failure in Heat Retrofitted Connections by Ultra-Low Cycle Fatigue Method, International Journal of Steel Structures, 10.1007/s13296-023-00712-8, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share