Technical Papers
Dec 24, 2021

Effect of Different Factors on Bonding Properties of Bitumen–Aggregate Combinations

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 3

Abstract

The bond between bitumen and aggregate is important in ensuring suitable performance of flexible pavements in different environmental conditions. The bonding properties of bitumen–aggregate samples can be affected by different factors (i.e., aggregate types, bitumen types, temperature variations, aging phenomenon, and moisture conditioning). This study illustrated the effects of different factors on the bonding properties of bitumen–aggregate samples and aimed to identify the significant factors. The experimental variables in this study were aggregates (limestone and granite), bitumen (traditional black bitumen, clear binder), aging duration, curing conditioning, and curing times. Bitumen bond strength (BBS) tests and rolling bottle tests (RBTs) were performed to determine the pull-off tensile strength (POTS) and stripping degree of bitumen–aggregate samples, respectively. BBS test results illustrated that aging initially improved the bond strength of the samples, but further increases in aging duration attenuated bond strength because of bitumen embrittlement. In general, temperature changes showed an inverse relation to the bond strength of the samples. Failure type changed from cohesive to mix failure or adhesive failure at low temperatures. BBS results also showed that bonding between bitumen and aggregate was dominated by bitumen type when cohesive failure was observed, and in cases of adhesive failure or cohesive-adhesive failure, aggregate types had a significant effect on bonding properties. Cohesive-adhesive failure or adhesive failure was observed at low temperatures and in wet conditioning. RBT results showed that a bitumen–granite mixture showed high moisture susceptibility. Statistical analysis suggested that all variables of this study except aggregate types were statistically significant and affected bond strength in dry conditioning. In wet conditioning, all the variables were significant, and curing time was the most influential variable. Partial eta squared values were highest for bitumen type, indicating the importance of this factor for bitumen–aggregate bond strength.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

No data, models, or code were generated or used during the study.

References

Airey, G. D., and Y. K. Choi. 2002. “State of the art report on moistures test methods for bituminous pavement materials.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 3 (4): 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2002.9689930.
Airey, G. D., A. C. Collop, S. E. Zoorob, and R. C. Elliott. 2008. “The influence of aggregate, filler and bitumen on asphalt mixture moisture damage.” Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (9): 2015–2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.009.
Al-Qadi, I. L., E. H. Fini, J.-F. Masson, and K. M. McGhee. 2008. “Effect of bituminous material rheology on adhesion.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2044 (1): 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3141/2044-11.
Ameri, M., S. Kouchaki, and H. Roshani. 2013. “Laboratory evaluation of the effect of nano-organosilane anti-stripping additive on the moisture susceptibility of HMA mixtures under freeze–thaw cycles.” Constr. Build. Mater. 48 (Nov): 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.030.
Apeagyei, A. K., J. R. Grenfell, and G. D. Airey. 2014. “Moisture-induced strength degradation of aggregate–asphalt mastic bonds.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 15 (S1): 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.927951.
Asif, S. A., N. Ahmed, A. Hayat, S. Hussan, F. Shabbir, and K. Mehmood. 2018. “Study of adhesion characteristics of different bitumen–aggregate combinations using bitumen bond strength test.” J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 41 (5): 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2018.1490205.
ASTM. 2002. Standard test method for pull-off strength of coating using portable adhesion testers. ASTM D4541. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019a. Standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). ASTM D6521-19a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019b. Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test). ASTM D2872-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Blackman, B. R., S. Cui, A. J. Kinloch, and A. C. Taylor. 2013. “The development of a novel test method to assess the durability of asphalt road–pavement materials.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 42 (Apr): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.10.013.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2012. Bitumen and bituminous binders—Accelerated long-term ageing conditioning by a pressure ageing vessel (PAV). EN 14769. London: BSI.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2020. Bituminous mixtures. Test methods determination of the affinity between aggregate and bitumen. BS EN 12697-11:2020. London: BSI.
Canestrari, F., F. Cardone, A. Graziani, F. A. Santagata, and H. U. Bahia. 2010. “Adhesive and cohesive properties of asphalt-aggregate systems subjected to moisture damage.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 11 (S1): 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2010.9690325.
Cebon, D. 1993. Interaction between heavy vehicles and roads. Sydney, Australia: SAE International.
Cuadri, A. A., P. Partal, N. Ahmad, J. Grenfell, and G. Airey. 2015. “Chemically modified bitumens with enhanced rheology and adhesion properties to siliceous aggregates.” Constr. Build. Mater. 93 (Sep): 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.098.
Ehinola, O., O. Falode, and G. Jonathan. 2012. “Softening point and penetration index of bitumen from parts of Southwestern Nigeria.” Nafta 63 (9–10): 319–323.
Elkholy, S., A. Abd El-Rahman, M. El-Shafie, and Z. Abo-Shanab. 2018. “Physical and rheological properties of modified sulfur asphalt binder.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 11 (1): 838–845.
Faramarzi, M., B. Golestani, and K. W. Lee. 2017. “Improving moisture sensitivity and mechanical properties of sulfur extended asphalt mixture by nano-antistripping agent.” Constr. Build. Mater. 133 (Feb): 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.038.
Gao, Y., Y. Zhang, F. Gu, T. Xu, and H. Wang. 2018. “Impact of minerals and water on bitumen-mineral adhesion and debonding behaviours using molecular dynamics simulations.” Constr. Build. Mater. 171 (May): 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.136.
Gorkem, C., and B. Sengoz. 2009. “Predicting stripping and moisture induced damage of asphalt concrete prepared with polymer modified bitumen and hydrated lime.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (6): 2227–2236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.001.
Grenfell, J., N. Ahmad, Y. Liu, A. Apeagyei, D. Large, and G. Airey. 2014. “Assessing asphalt mixture moisture susceptibility through intrinsic adhesion, bitumen stripping and mechanical damage.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 15 (1): 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2013.863162.
Harvey, J. A. F., and D. Cebon. 2003. “Failure mechanism in viscoelastic films.” J. Mater. Sci. 38 (5): 1021–1032. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022345713409.
Hefer, A. W. 2005. Adhesion in bitumen-aggregate systems and quantification of the effect of water on the adhesive bond. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Univ.
Hefer, A. W., D. N. Little, and R. L. Lytton. 2005. “A synthesis of theories and mechanisms of bitumen-aggregate adhesion including recent advances in quantifying the effects of water.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 74 (139): e196.
Huang, S.-C., R. E. Robertson, J. F. Branthaver, and J. Claine Petersen. 2005. “Impact of lime modification of asphalt and freeze–thaw cycling on the asphalt–aggregate interaction and moisture resistance to moisture damage.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 17 (6): 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(711).
Jorgensen, T. 2002. “Testing adhesion between bitumen and aggregate with the rolling bottle test and the boiling test.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, 889–897. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Kennedy, T. W., F. L. Roberts, and K. W. Lee. 1983. Evaluation of moisture effects on asphalt concrete mixtures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record.
Lantieri, C., R. Lamperti, A. Simone, V. Vignali, C. Sangiorgi, G. Dondi, and M. Magnani. 2017. “Use of image analysis for the evaluation of rolling bottle tests results.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 10 (1): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.003.
Liu, Y., A. Apeagyei, N. Ahmad, J. Grenfell, and G. Airey. 2014. “Examination of moisture sensitivity of aggregate–bitumen bonding strength using loose asphalt mixture and physico-chemical surface energy property tests.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 15 (7): 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.855312.
Mo, L. T., M. Huurman, M. F. Woldekidan, S. P. Wu, and A. A. Molenaar. 2010. “Investigation into material optimization and development for improved ravelling resistant porous asphalt concrete.” Mater. Des. 31 (7): 3194–3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.026.
Mohammed, M., T. Parry, N. Thom, and J. Grenfell. 2018. “Investigation into the bond strength of bitumen-fibre mastic.” Constr. Build. Mater. 190 (Nov): 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.084.
Molugaram, K., and G. S. Rao. 2017. “Chapter 11––ANOVA (Analysis of Variance).” In Statistical techniques for transportation engineering, 451–462. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Moraes, R., R. Velasquez and H. Bahia. 2012. “The effect of bitumen stiffness on the adhesive strength measured by the bitumen bond strength test.” In Proc., 5th Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress. Brussels, Belgium: European Asphalt Pavement Association.
Moraes, R., R. Velasquez, and H. U. Bahia. 2011. “Measuring the effect of moisture on asphalt-aggregate bond with the bitumen bond strength test.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2209 (1): 70–81. https://doi.org/10.3141/2209-09.
Paliukaitė, M., V. Vorobjovas, M. Bulevičius, and V. Andrejevas. 2016. “Evaluation of different test methods for bitumen adhesion properties.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14 (1): 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.339.
Piérard, N., J. De Visscher, S. Vansteenkiste and A. Vanelstraete. 2016. “Coloured asphalt pavements: Mix design and laboratory performance testing.” In Proc., 8th RILEM Int. Symp. on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials. New York: Springer.
Porot, L., J. Besamusca, H. Soenen, A. Apeagyei, J. Grenfell and D. Sybilski. 2016. “Bitumen/aggregate affinity—Rilem round robin test on rolling bottle test.” In Proc., 8th RILEM Int. Symp. on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials. New York: Springer.
Poulikakos, L. D., M. K. Tiwari, and M. N. Partl. 2013. “Analysis of failure mechanism of bitumen films.” Fuel 106 (Apr): 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.060.
Roberts, F. L., P. S. Kandhal, E. R. Brown, D.-Y. Lee and T. W. Kennedy. 1991. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction. Lanham, MD: NAPA Research and Education Foundation.
Sengoz, B., A. Topal, and G. Isikyakar. 2009. “Morphology and image analysis of polymer modified bitumens.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (5): 1986–1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.020.
Yin, Y., H. Chen, D. Kuang, L. Song, and L. Wang. 2017. “Effect of chemical composition of aggregate on interfacial adhesion property between aggregate and asphalt.” Constr. Build. Mater. 146 (Aug): 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.061.
Zaniewski, J., and A. G. Viswanathan. 2006. Investigation of moisture sensitivity of hot mix asphalt concrete. Morgantown, WV: Asphalt Technology Program.
Zhang, J., G. D. Airey, J. Grenfell, and A. K. Apeagyei. 2017. “Moisture damage evaluation of aggregate–bitumen bonds with the respect of moisture absorption, tensile strength and failure surface.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 18 (4): 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2017.1286441.
Zhang, J., G. D. Airey, J. Grenfell, A. K. Apeagyei, and M. Barrett. 2016a. “Development of a composite substrate peel test to assess moisture sensitivity of aggregate–bitumen bonds.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 68 (Jul): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.02.013.
Zhang, J., G. D. Airey, and J. R. Grenfell. 2016b. “Experimental evaluation of cohesive and adhesive bond strength and fracture energy of bitumen-aggregate systems.” Mater. Struct. 49 (7): 2653–2667. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0674-7.
Zhang, J., A. K. Apeagyei, G. D. Airey, and J. R. Grenfell. 2015. “Influence of aggregate mineralogical composition on water resistance of aggregate–bitumen adhesion.” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 62 (Oct): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.06.012.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 34Issue 3March 2022

History

Received: Mar 25, 2021
Accepted: Jul 20, 2021
Published online: Dec 24, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 24, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-3715. Email: [email protected]
Naveed Ahmad, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Applicability of Clay Soil Stabilized with Red Mud, Bioenzyme, and Red Mud–Bioenzyme as a Subgrade Material in Pavement, Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, 10.1061/JHTRBP.HZENG-1182, 27, 2, (2023).
  • Exploration for Cohesion and Adhesion Characteristics of High Viscosity–Modified Asphalt: Impacts of Composition-Associated Factors and Thermal Aging, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004491, 34, 11, (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share