Technical Papers
Sep 22, 2021

Comminution: A Supplementation for Pozzolanic Adaptation of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 12

Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) has commendable potential as pozzolanic material on account of silica as an attractive oxide composition; however, the coarser size of SCBA fractions hinders the fullest potential. In this regard, the choice of the comminution process is inevitable. In the present investigation, three sugarcane bagasse ash samples with a variable loss on ignition (less than 20%), but in compliance with the oxide composition requirement of ASTM C618, were selected to assess the effect of grinding on the particle size of SCBA and, in turn, the pozzolanic reactivity of ground SCBA. Four different methods of pozzolanic reactivity were adopted to evaluate the suitable characteristics of SCBA, enhancing the pozzolanicity. The results of the pozzolanic reactivity of ground SCBA showed that a particle size (D50) lower than 35  μm and particles below 45  μm higher than 60% was a desirable level of grinding in attaining the minimum strength activity index (SAI) (75%). The provided amorphous silica was more than 25%, and oxide composition conformed to ASTM C618. Assessment of the pozzolanic reactivity of SCBA through simple and feasible techniques like the Frattini test and the modified Chapelle test with SAI appears reassuring. The attainment of the suggested level of particle sizes for SCBA through comminution indicates it is a viable method for developing pozzolanic reactivity.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely acknowledge all sugar industries for providing samples of sugarcane bagasse ash, as well as giving insights into the process followed in the generation of SCBA. Material characterization support from Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility, Department of Earth Sciences, and Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, IIT Bombay, is acknowledged. The authors also wish to thanks the Transportation Engineering Laboratory of Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli, Maharashtra, for providing the facility of the laser particle size analyzer and simultaneous thermal analyzer. Finally, the authors acknowledge the infrastructure and support of TEQIP-III and Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli, Maharashtra.

References

Andreão, P. V., A. R. Suleiman, G. C. Cordeiro, and M. L. Nehdi. 2019a. “Beneficiation of sugarcane bagasse ash: Pozzolanic activity and leaching behavior.” In Waste and Biomass Valorization. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Andreão, P. V., A. R. Suleiman, G. C. Cordeiro, and M. L. Nehdi. 2019b. “Sustainable use of sugarcane bagasse ash in cement-based materials.” Green Mater. 7 (2): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrma.18.00016.
Arif, E., M. W. Clark, and N. Lake. 2016. “Sugar cane bagasse ash from a high efficiency co-generation boiler: Applications in cement and mortar production.” Constr. Build. Mater. 128 (Dec): 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.091.
Arif, E., M. W. Clark, and N. Lake. 2017. “Sugar cane bagasse ash from a high-efficiency co-generation boiler as filler in concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 151 (Dec): 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.136.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM C1437. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for density of hydraulic cement. ASTM C188. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test methods for chemical analysis of hydraulic cement. ASTM C114. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019a. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use. ASTM C618. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019b. Standard test methods for sampling and testing fly ash or natural pozzolans for use. ASTM C311. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard specification for portland cement. ASTM C150/C150M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Athira, G., A. Bahurudeen, and V. S. Vishnu. 2020. “Availability and accessibility of sugarcane bagasse ash for its utilization in Indian cement plants: A GIS-based network analysis.” Sugar Tech 22: 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00842-x.
Avet, F., R. Snellings, A. Alujas, M. Ben, and K. Scrivener. 2016. “Cement and concrete research development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays.” Cem. Concr. Res. 85 (Jul): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.02.015.
Bahurudeen, A., D. Kanraj, V. Gokul Dev, and M. Santhanam. 2015. “Performance evaluation of sugarcane bagasse ash blended cement in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 59 (May): 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.03.004.
Bahurudeen, A., A. V. Marckson, A. Kishore, and M. Santhanam. 2014. “Development of sugarcane bagasse ash based portland pozzolana cement and evaluation of compatibility with superplasticizers.” Constr. Build. Mater. 68 (Oct): 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.013.
Bahurudeen, A., and M. Santhanam. 2015. “Influence of different processing methods on the pozzolanic performance of sugarcane bagasse ash.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 56 (Feb): 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.002.
Bahurudeen, A., K. Wani, M. A. Basit, and M. Santhanam. 2016. “Assessment of pozzolanic performance of sugarcane bagasse ash.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (2): 04015095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001361.
Batool, F., A. Masood, and M. Ali. 2020. “Characterization of sugarcane bagasse ash as pozzolan and influence on concrete properties.” Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 45 (5): 3891–3900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04301-y.
Batra, V. S., S. Urbonaite, and G. Svensson. 2008. “Characterization of unburned carbon in bagasse fly ash.” Fuel 87 (13–14): 2972–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.04.010.
Berenguer, R. A., A. P. B. Capraro, M. H. F. de Medeiros, A. M. P. Carneiro, and R. A. De Oliveira. 2020. “Sugar cane bagasse ash as a partial substitute of portland cement: Effect on mechanical properties and emission of carbon dioxide.” J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8 (2): 103655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103655.
BSI (British Standard Institute). 2011. Methods of testing cement Part 5: Pozzolanicity test for pozzolanic cement. BS EN 196-5. London: BSI.
BSI (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2015a. Metakaolin for use in cement, cement mortar and concrete specification. IS 16354. New Delhi, India: BSI.
BSI (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2015b. Ordinary portland cement—Specification. IS 269. New Delhi, India: BSI.
BSI (Bureau of Indian Standards).2017. Pulverized fuel ash- specification (Part 1 for use as pozzolana in cement, cement mortar and concrete). IS 3812 (Part 1). New Delhi, India: BSI.
BSI (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2018a. Specification for planetary mixer used in tests of cement and pozzolana. IS 10890. New Delhi, India: BSI.
BSI (Bureau of Indian Standards). 2018b. Standard sand for testing cement-specification. IS 650. New Delhi, India: BSI.
Cho, H., J. Kwon, K. Kim, and M. Mun. 2013. “Optimum choice of the make-up ball sizes for maximum throughput in tumbling ball mills.” Powder Technol. 246 (Sep): 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.06.026.
Chusilp, N., C. Jaturapitakkul, and K. Kiattikomol. 2009a. “Effects of LOI of ground bagasse ash on the compressive strength and sulfate resistance of mortars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (12): 3523–3531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.046.
Chusilp, N., C. Jaturapitakkul, and K. Kiattikomol. 2009b. “Utilization of bagasse ash as a pozzolanic material in concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (11): 3352–3358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.030.
CMA (Cement Manufacturers Association). 2020. “Cement manufacturers association (CMA) India.” Accessed May 17, 2020. https://www.cmaindia.org/about-us/introduction/.
Cordeiro, G. C., P. V. Andreão, and L. M. Tavares. 2019. “Pozzolanic properties of ultrafine sugar cane bagasse ash produced by controlled burning.” Heliyon 5 (10): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02566.
Cordeiro, G. C., T. R. Barroso, and R. D. Toledo Filho. 2018. “Enhancement the properties of sugar cane bagasse ash with high carbon content by a controlled re-calcination process.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 22 (4): 1250–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-0881-6.
Cordeiro, G. C., R. D. T. Filho, and R. S. de Almeida. 2011a. “Influence of ultrafine wet grinding on pozzolanic activity of submicrometre sugar cane bagasse ash.” Adv. Appl. Ceram. 110 (8): 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743676111Y.0000000050.
Cordeiro, G. C., R. D. T. Filho, and E. D. M. R. Fairbairn. 2009a. “Use of ultrafine rice husk ash with high-carbon content as pozzolan in high performance concrete.” Mater. Struct. 42 (7): 983–992. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-008-9437-z.
Cordeiro, G. C., R. D. T. Filho, L. M. Tavares, E. D. M. R. Fairbairn, and S. Hempel. 2011b. “Influence of particle size and specific surface area on the pozzolanic activity of residual rice husk ash.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 33 (5): 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.005.
Cordeiro, G. C., and K. E. Kurtis. 2017. “Effect of mechanical processing on sugar cane bagasse ash pozzolanicity.” Cem. Concr. Res. 97 (Jul): 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.03.008.
Cordeiro, G. C., L. M. Tavares, and R. D. Toledo Filho. 2016. “Improved pozzolanic activity of sugar cane bagasse ash by selective grinding and classification.” Cem. Concr. Res. 89 (Nov): 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.08.020.
Cordeiro, G. C., R. D. Toledo Filho, and E. M. R. Fairbairn. 2009b. “Effect of calcination temperature on the pozzolanic activity of sugar cane bagasse ash.” Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (10): 3301–3303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.013.
Cordeiro, G. C., R. D. Toledo Filho, L. M. Tavares, and E. M. R. de Fairbairn. 2009c. “Ultrafine grinding of sugar cane bagasse ash for application as pozzolanic admixture in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 39 (2): 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.11.005.
Cordeiro, G. C., R. D. Toledo Filho, L. M. Tavares, and E. M. R. Fairbairn. 2008. “Pozzolanic activity and filler effect of sugar cane bagasse ash in portland cement and lime mortars.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 30 (5): 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.01.001.
Donatello, S., M. Tyrer, and C. R. Cheeseman. 2010. “Comparison of test methods to assess pozzolanic activity.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 32 (2): 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.008.
Durdzinski, P. T., et al. 2017. “Outcomes of the RILEM round robin on degree of reaction of slag and fly ash in blended cements.” Mater. Struct. 50 (135): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1002-1.
Erdem, A. S., and Ş. L. Ergün. 2009. “The effect of ball size on breakage rate parameter in a pilot scale ball mill.” Miner. Eng. 22 (7–8): 660–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2009.01.015.
Frías, M., E. Villar, and H. Savastano. 2011. “Brazilian sugar cane bagasse ashes from the cogeneration industry as active pozzolans for cement manufacture.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 33 (4): 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.02.003.
Ganesan, K., K. Rajagopal, and K. Thangavel. 2007. “Evaluation of bagasse ash as supplementary cementitious material.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 29 (6): 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.03.001.
Gartner, E. M., and D. E. MacPhee. 2011. “A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders.” Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (7): 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.006.
Hernandez, J. F. M., B. Middendorf, M. Gehrke, and H. Budelmann. 1998. “Use of wastes of the sugar industry as pozzolana in lime-pozzolana binders: Study of the reaction.” Cem. Concr. Res. 28 (11): 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00130-6.
ISMA (Indian Sugar Mills Association). 2020. “Indian Sugar Mills Association.” Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.indiansugar.com/Statics.aspx.
Jagadesh, P., A. Ramachandramurthy, and R. Murugesan. 2018. “Evaluation of mechanical properties of sugar cane bagasse ash concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 176 (Jul): 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.037.
Jagadesh, P., A. Ramachandramurthy, R. Murugesan, and K. Sarayu. 2015. “Micro-analytical studies on sugar cane bagasse ash.” Sadhana—Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci. 40 (5): 1629–1638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-015-0390-6.
Kanda, Y., and N. Kotake. 2007. “Chapter 12 comminution energy and evaluation in fine grinding.” In Vol. 12 of Handbook of powder technology, 529–550. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-3785(07)12015-7.
Li, X., et al. 2018. “Reactivity tests for supplementary cementitious materials : RILEM TC 267-TRM phase 1.” Mater. Struct. 51 (6): 151. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1269-x.
Maddalena, R., A. Hamilton, and A. K. Mali. 2016. “Low-pressure nano-silica injection on cement for crack-healing and water transport.” In Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, 579–584. London: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315616995-77.
Mali, A. K., and P. Nanthagopalan. 2020. “A systematic assessment for the determination of sugarcane bagasse ash variation potential throughout the harvesting season.” Mater. Today:. Proc. 32 (4): 888–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.511.
Mali, A. K., and P. Nanthagopalan. 2021. “Thermo-mechanical treatment of sugarcane bagasse ash with very high LOI: A pozzolanic paradigm.” Constr. Build. Mater. 288 (Jun): 122988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122988.
Maza-Ignacio, O. T., V. G. Jiménez-Quero, J. Guerrero-Paz, and P. Montes-García. 2020. “Recycling untreated sugarcane bagasse ash and industrial wastes for the preparation of resistant, lightweight and ecological fired bricks.” Constr. Build. Mater. 234 (Feb): 117314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117314.
Mertens, G., R. Snellings, K. Van Balen, B. Bicer-simsir, P. Verlooy, and J. Elsen. 2009. “Pozzolanic reactions of common natural zeolites with lime and parameters affecting their reactivity.” Cem. Concr. Res. 39 (3): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.11.008.
Mohan, R., G. Athira, A. K. Mali, A. Bahurudeen, and P. Nanthagopalan. 2021. “Systematic pretreatment process and optimization of sugarcane bagasse ash dosage for use in cement-based products.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 33 (4): 04021045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003650.
Morales, E. V., E. Villar-Cociña, M. Frías, S. F. Santos, and H. Savastano. 2009. “Effects of calcining conditions on the microstructure of sugar cane waste ashes (SCWA): Influence in the pozzolanic activation.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 31 (1): 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.10.004.
Murugesan, T., R. Vidjeapriya, and A. Bahurudeen. 2020. “Sugarcane bagasse ash-blended concrete for effective resource utilization between sugar and construction industries.” Sugar Tech 22: 858–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00794-2.
Payá, J., J. Monzó, M. V. Borrachero, L. Díaz-Pinzón, and L. M. Ordónez. 2002. “Sugar-cane bagasse ash (SCBA): Studies on its properties for reusing in concrete production.” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 77 (3): 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.549.
Praveenkumar, S., and G. Sankarasubramanian. 2019. “Mechanical and durability properties of bagasse ash-blended high-performance concrete.” SN Appl. Sci. 1 (12): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1711-x.
Rajasekar, A., K. Arunachalam, M. Kottaisamy, and V. Saraswathy. 2018. “Durability characteristics of ultra high strength concrete with treated sugarcane bagasse ash.” Constr. Build. Mater. 171 (May): 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.140.
Rukzon, S., and P. Chindaprasirt. 2012. “Utilization of bagasse ash in high-strength concrete.” Mater. Des. 34 (Feb): 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.07.045.
Scrivener, K. L., V. M. John, and E. M. Gartner. 2018. “Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry.” Cem. Concr. Res. 114 (Dec): 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015.
Skibsted, J., and R. Snellings. 2019. “Reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement blends.” Cem. Concr. Res. 124 (Oct): 105799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105799.
Snellings, R., et al. 2018. “Report of TC 238-SCM: Hydration stoppage methods for phase assemblage studies of blended cements—Results of a round robin test.” Mater. Struct. 51 (4): 111. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1237-5.
Somna, R., C. Jaturapitakkul, and A. M. Amde. 2012. “Effect of ground fly ash and ground bagasse ash on the durability of recycled aggregate concrete.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 (7): 848–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.03.003.
Tironi, A., M. A. Trezza, A. N. Scian, and E. F. Irassar. 2013. “Assessment of pozzolanic activity of different calcined clays.” Cem. Concr. Compos. 37 (Mar): 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.01.002.
Van, V. T. A., C. Rößler, D. D., Bui, and H. M. Ludwig. 2013. “Mesoporous structure and pozzolanic reactivity of rice husk ash in cementitious system.” Constr. Build. Mater. 43 (Jun): 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.004.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: Oct 19, 2020
Accepted: Apr 16, 2021
Published online: Sep 22, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Research Scholar, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 076, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-2693. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 076, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-1238. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Valorification of Egyptian volcanic tuff as eco-sustainable blended cementitious materials, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-023-30612-0, 13, 1, (2023).
  • Glass powder from non-returnable bottles: Pozzolanic additive to mortar, Engineering & Technology Scientific Journal, 10.55977/etsjournal.v01i01.e022003, 1, 1, (2022).
  • Mechanical and durability properties of concrete incorporating silica fume and a high volume of sugarcane bagasse ash, Results in Engineering, 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100666, 16, (100666), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share