Technical Papers
Sep 20, 2021

Influence of Geogrid Properties on Rutting and Stress Distribution in Reinforced Flexible Pavements under Repetitive Wheel Loading

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 12

Abstract

Geogrid reinforcement effectively controls the rutting of pavements under traffic loads, especially when constructed over soft subgrades. In this study, extensive large-scale model pavement experiments (LSMPEs) were performed to quantify the rut depths of flexible pavements. In all, 20 LSMPEs were performed on pavement sections overlying subgrades of different strengths with California bearing ratio (CBR) values varying from 1% to 5%. Three geogrid types were considered to study the effects of material type [polypropylene (PP) and polyester (PET)] and tensile strengths (3060  kN/m) on the rutting behavior of flexible pavements. LSMPEs were first performed under monotonic loading to obtain the optimum depth of reinforcement within the base layer of flexible pavement. Thereafter, a series of repetitive load (haversine loading) was applied on paved sections of reinforced flexible pavements using a high-end, linear, double-acting actuator system. Rut deformations were measured at both the surface and the subgrade levels of the model pavements. The rut deformations were found to distinctly vary in accordance with the condition of the subgrade, the thickness of the pavement layers, and the type of geogrid used. The rut depth reduction (RDR) at the pavement surface was found to range from 22% to 69% for PP- and PET-geogrid reinforced base layers. Geogrid reinforcement significantly reduced the rut depths at the subgrade level (as high as 90%) compared to unreinforced sections. In addition, the model pavements were instrumented with the earth pressure cells to measure the vertical pressures transferred to the subgrade due to surface loading. The ability of geogrid reinforcement to distribute loads to wider areas was quantified in terms of the vertical stress distribution angle, αmax, at the end of the load cycles (N=100,000  cycles). The αmax maximum values for geogrid (GG1/GG2/GG3)-reinforced pavements built over weak subgrade (CBR=1%) varied from 28.4° to 32.2°, while it was 25.7° for unreinforced pavements. Likewise, αmax values for geogrid-reinforced pavements overlying a relatively fair subgrade (CBR=5%) varied from 34.5° to 43.6° against 30.4° for an unreinforced case.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) for funding this research project under Grant No. NHAI/TIC/R&D/108/2016. The authors also thank Strata Geosystems (India) Pvt. Ltd and TechFab (India) Pvt. Ltd. for supplying the geogrids used in the testing. The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for reviewing this research manuscript.

Disclaimer

This research article is an objective-based project and does not emphasize any statements in favor of the manufacturer or any third party.

References

AASHTO. 2013. Standard practice for geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base course of flexible pavement structures. AASHTO-R50. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abu-Farsakh, M., I. Akond, and Q. Chen. 2015. “Evaluating the performance of geosynthetic- reinforced unpaved roads using plate load tests.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 17 (10): 901–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1031131.
Abu-Farsakh, M., S. Hanandeh, X. Tang, and Q. Chen. 2016. “Sustainability evaluation of geosynthetic stabilized soft subgrade soil in unpaved test sections.” In Proc., Geo-Chicago 2016, 687–696. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Alimohammadi, H., J. Zheng, V. R. Schaefer, and R. Velasquez. 2021. “Evaluation of geogrid reinforcement of flexible pavement performance: A review of large-scale laboratory studies.” Transp. Geotech. 27 (Mar): 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100471.
Al-Qadi, I. L., S. Dessouky, J. Kwon, and E. Tutumluer. 2008. “Geogrid in flexible pavements: Validated mechanism.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2045 (1): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.3141/2045-12.
Al-Qadi, I. L., S. Dessouky, J. Kwon, and E. Tutumluer. 2012. “Geogrid-reinforced low-volume flexible pavements: Pavement response and geogrid optimal location.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (9): 1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000409.
Al-Suleiman, T. I., M. T. Obaidat, G. T. Abdul-Jabbar, and T. S. Khedaywi. 2000. “Field inspection and laboratory testing of highway pavement rutting.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 27 (6): 1109–1119. https://doi.org/10.1139/l00-037.
ASTM. 2013. Standard test method for penetration of bituminous materials. ASTM D5M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. ASTM D4402M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018a. Standard test method for flash and fire points by Cleveland open cup tester. ASTM D92. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018b. Standard test method for elastic recovery of asphalt materials by ductilometer. ASTM D6084M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. ASTM D2216. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020. Standard test method for softening point of bitumen (ring-and-ball apparatus). ASTM D36M-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Berg, R. R., B. R. Christopher, and S. W. Perkins. 2000. Geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base/subbase courses of pavement structures. Roseville, MN: Geosynthetic Material Association.
Cancelli, A., F. Montanelli, P. Rimoldi, and A. Zhao. 1996. “Full scale laboratory testing on geosynthetics reinforced paved roads.” In Proc., of the Int. Symp. on Earth Reinforcement, 573–578. Fukuoka/Kyushu, Japan: A. A. Balkema.
Ceratti, J. A., W. P. Núñez, W. Y. Y. Gehling, and J. A. de Oliveira. 2000. “Rutting of thin pavements: Full-scale study.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1716 (1): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.3141/1716-10.
Chen, Q., S. Hanandeh, M. Abu-Farsakh, and L. Mohammad. 2018. “Performance evaluation of full-scale geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement.” Geosynth. Int. 25 (1): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.17.00031.
Collin, J. G., T. C. Kinney, and X. Fu. 1996. “Full scale highway load test of flexible pavement systems with geogrid reinforced base courses.” Geosynth. Int. 3 (4): 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.3.0074.
Fwa, T. F. 2006. The hand book of highway engineering: Highway materials, 174–175. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Giroud, J. P., and J. Han. 2004. “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I: Development of design method.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775).
Gopalakrishnan, K., and M. R. Thompson. 2007. “Subgrade stress ratios as airfield pavement rutting performance indicators.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34 (2): 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1139/l06-134.
Goud, G. N., S. S. Mouli, B. Umashankar, S. Sireesh, and M. R. Madhav. 2020. “Design and sustainability aspects of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavements—An Indian perspective.” Front. Built Environ. 6 (Jun): 71. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00071.
Goud, G. N., and B. Umashankar. 2018. “Interface shear strength properties of gravel bases and subgrades with various reinforcements.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 4 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0124-4.
Han, J. 2013. “Design of planar geosynthetic-improved unpaved and paved roads.” In Proc., 1st Int. Symp. on Pavement and Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation, 31–41. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Han, J. 2015. Principle and practice of ground improvement: Geosynthetic-reinforced roads, 383–385. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Han, J., S. K. Pokharel, X. Yang, C. Manandhar, D. Leshchinsky, I. Halahmi, and R. L. Parsons. 2011. “Performance of geocell-reinforced rap bases over weak subgrade under full-scale moving wheel loads.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23 (11): 1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000286.
Hufenus, R., R. Rueegger, R. Banjac, P. Mayor, S. M. Springman, and R. Brönnimann. 2006. “Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade.” Geotext. Geomembr. 24 (1): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.06.002.
Imjai, T., K. Pilakoutas, and M. Guadagnini. 2019. “Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements in full-scale field trials.” Geotext. Geomembr. 47 (2): 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.012.
Ingle, G. S., and S. S. Bhosale. 2017. “Full-scale laboratory accelerated test on geotextile reinforced unpaved road.” Int. J. Geosynth. Ground Eng. 3 (4): 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0110-x.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2012. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. New Delhi, India: IRC.
IRC (Indian Road Congress). 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. New Delhi, India: IRC.
Kwon, J., and E. Tutumluer. 2009. “Geogrid base reinforcement with aggregate interlock and modeling of associated stiffness enhancement in mechanistic pavement analysis.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2116 (1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.3141/2116-12.
Kwon, J., E. Tutumluer, and M. Kim. 2005. “Development of a mechanistic model for geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements.” Geosynth. Int. 12 (6): 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2005.12.6.310.
Kwon, J., E. Tutumluer, and H. Konietzky. 2008. “Aggregate base residual stresses affecting geogrid reinforced flexible pavement response.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 9 (4): 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430701582347.
Mardookhpour, A. R. 2012. “Experimental evaluation of utilizing geogrids under subbase layers to decrease rutting and increasing bearing capacity.” Emerging Mater. Res. 1 (5): 275–278. https://doi.org/10.1680/emr.12.00001.
Montanelli, F., A. Zhao, and P. Rimoldi. 1997. “Geosynthetic-reinforced pavement system: Testing and design.” In Vol. 2 of Proc., of Geosynthetics ’97, 619–632. Long Beach, CA: Industrial Fabrics Association International.
MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways). 2013. Specifications for road and bridge works. New Delhi, India: MoRTH.
Pokharel, S. K., J. Han, C. Manandhar, X. Yang, D. Leshchinsky, I. Halahmi, and R. Parsons. 2011. “Accelerated pavement testing of geocell-reinforced unpaved roads over weak subgrade.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2204 (1): 67–75. https://doi.org/10.3141/2204-09.
Qian, Y., J. Han, S. K. Pokharel, and R. L. Parsons. 2013. “Performance of triangular aperture geogrid-reinforced base courses over weak subgrade under cyclic loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (8): 1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000577.
Robinson, W. J., J. S. Tingle, G. J. Norwood, M. H. Wayne, and J. Kwon. 2018. “Performance of multi-axial geogrid stabilised flexible pavements.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Ground Improv. 171 (4): 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.17.00032.
Saride, S., V. K. Rayabharapu, and S. Vedpathak. 2015. “Evaluation of rutting behaviour of geocell reinforced sand subgrades under repeated loading.” Indian Geotech. J. 45 (4): 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0120-8.
Suku, L., S. S. Prabhu, and G. L. S. Babu. 2017. “Effect of geogrid-reinforcement in granular bases under repeated loading.” Geotext. Geomembr. 45 (4): 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.008.
Thakur, J. K., J. Han, S. K. Pokharel, and R. L. Parsons. 2012. “Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under cyclic plate loading.” Geotext. Geomembr. 35 (Dec): 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.004.
White, D. J., V. Pavana, J. Siekmeier, and H. Gieselman. 2019. “Cyclic plate load testing for assessment of asphalt pavements supported on geogrid stabilized granular foundation.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2019: Geotechnical Materials, Modeling and Testing, 250–259. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 12December 2021

History

Received: Oct 18, 2020
Accepted: Apr 8, 2021
Published online: Sep 20, 2021
Published in print: Dec 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 20, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4578-8527. Email: [email protected]
Umashankar Balunaini, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Sireesh Saride, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India. Email: [email protected]
Madhira R. Madhav, Ph.D. [email protected]
Visiting Honorary Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, Telangana 502285, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Engineering Properties and Micropore Structure of Clay-Based Foamed Lightweight Soil, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-16475, 36, 3, (2024).
  • Closure to “Influence of Geogrid Properties on Rutting and Stress Distribution in Reinforced Flexible Pavements under Repetitive Wheel Loading” by Ramu Baadiga, Umashankar Balunaini, Sireesh Saride, and Madhira R. Madhav, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004600, 35, 2, (2023).
  • Performance Characteristics of Black Vertosol as a Subgrade Material in Unpaved Granular Pavements, International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10.1007/s42947-022-00232-4, (2022).
  • Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Load-Carrying Capacity of Rigid Pavement Slabs Reinforced with Biaxial Geogrid, International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10.1007/s42947-022-00217-3, (2022).
  • Behavior of Geogrid- and Geocell-Stabilized Unpaved Pavements Overlying Different Subgrade Conditions Under Monotonic Loading, International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 10.1007/s40891-022-00379-x, 8, 3, (2022).
  • Effect of Geo-Grid Depth in Roads Cross-Section on Reducing Pavement Rutting, Eng, 10.3390/eng3010001, 3, 1, (1-8), (2021).
  • Effect of Geogrid Type and Subgrade Strength on the Traffic Benefit Ratio of Flexible Pavements, Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 10.1007/s40515-021-00203-5, (2021).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share