Technical Papers
May 4, 2021

Use of Limited Experimental Data for the Prediction of Creep and Recovery of Asphalt Binders

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 7

Abstract

Prediction of creep and recovery of asphalt binders using limited experimental data can reduce instrumental stress and save time. A simple methodology, using generalized Burger’s model (GBM) and time temperature superposition principle (TTSP), has been proposed to predict the creep and recovery response of asphalt binders at different temperatures. The proposed methodology has been validated using six different asphalt binders at a stress level of 3.2 kPa. It is found that the proposed technique offers reasonable prediction of unrecoverable creep compliance and percentage recovery with a percentage error of ±10%.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) for facilitating the laboratory study.

References

AASHTO. 2012. Standard test method for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. AASHTO TP70. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASTM. 2012. Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. ASTM D7405-10a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bastos, J. B. S., L. F. A. L. Babadopulos, and J. B. Soares. 2017. “Relationship between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) binder test results and asphalt concrete rutting resistance in Brazilian roadways.” Constr. Build. Mater. 145 (Aug): 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.216.
Celauro, C., C. Fecarotti, A. Pirrotta, and A. C. Collop. 2012. “Experimental validation of a fractional model for creep/recovery testing of asphalt mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 36 (Nov): 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.028.
Costa, M. F. P., and C. Ribeiro. 2012. “Generalized fractional Maxwell model: Parameter estimation of a viscoelastic material.” In Vol. 1479 of Proc., AIP Conf., 790–793. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4756256.
D’Angelo, J. 2009. “The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 10 (S1): 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2009.9690236.
Dealy, J., and D. Plazek. 2009. “Time-temperature superposition: A users guide.” Rheol. Bull. 78 (2): 16–31.
Di Benedetto, H., F. Olard, C. Sauzéat, and B. Delaporte. 2004. “Linear viscoelastic behaviour of bituminous materials: From binders to mixes.” Supplement, Road Mater. Pavement Des. 5 (S1): 163–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2004.9689992.
Domingos, D. M. I., and A. L. Faxina. 2015. “Rheological behaviour of bitumens modified with PE and PPA at different MSCR creep–recovery times.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 16 (9): 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.953503.
Dubois, E., D. Y. Mehta, and A. Nolan. 2014. “Correlation between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) results and polymer modification of binder.” Constr. Build. Mater. 65 (Aug): 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.111.
Goli, A., A. Baditha, A. R. Muppireddy, and B. B. Pandey. 2019. “Comparison of various rutting parameters and modelling of creep and recovery behaviour of high modulus bituminous binders.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12 (6): 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0077-1.
Hajikarimi, P., M. Rahi, and F. Moghadas Nejad. 2015. “Comparing different rutting specification parameters using high temperature characteristics of rubber-modified asphalt binders.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 16 (4): 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2015.1063533.
Hossain, Z., D. Ghosh, M. Zaman, and K. Hobson. 2016. “Use of the multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test method to characterize polymer-modified asphalt binders.” J. Test. Eval. 44 (1): 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140061.
Huang, Y. H. 2010. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. London: Pearson Education.
Jaczewski, M., J. Judycki, and P. Jaskula. 2019. “Asphalt concrete subjected to long-time loading at low temperatures: Deviations from the time-temperature superposition principle.” Constr. Build. Mater. 202 (Mar): 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.049.
Kumar, R., N. Saboo, P. Kumar, and S. Chandra. 2017. “Effect of warm mix additives on creep and recovery response of conventional and polymer modified asphalt binders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 138 (May): 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.019.
Matsumoto, D. S. 1988. “Time-temperature superposition and physical aging in amorphous polymers.” Polym. Eng. Sci. 28 (20): 1313–1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760282005.
Mturi, G. A. J., J. O’Connell, S. E. Zoorob, and M. De Beer. 2014. “A study of crumb rubber modified bitumen used in South Africa.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 15 (4): 774–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.910130.
Oeser, M., T. Pellinen, T. Scarpas, and C. Kasbergen. 2008. “Studies on creep and recovery of rheological bodies based upon conventional and fractional formulations and their application on asphalt mixture.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 9 (5): 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430802068923.
Olard, F., and H. Di Benedetto. 2003. “General ‘2S2P1D’ model and relation between the linear viscoelastic behaviours of bituminous binders and mixes.” Road Mater. Pavement Des. 4 (2): 185–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2003.9689946.
Saboo, N., and P. Kumar. 2015. “A study on creep and recovery behavior of asphalt binders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 96 (Oct): 632–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.078.
Saboo, N., and P. Kumar. 2016. “Analysis of different test methods for quantifying rutting susceptibility of asphalt binders.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (7). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001553.
Saboo, N., and A. Mudgal. 2018. “Modelling creep and recovery response of asphalt binders using generalized burgers model.” Pet. Sci. Technol. 36 (20): 1627–1634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2018.1496109.
Saboo, N., A. Mudgal, and A. Singh. 2019. “Using frequency sweep test to predict creep and recovery response of asphalt binders.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (6): 04019081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002707.
Singh, D., and A. V. Kataware. 2016. “Comparison of different rheological parameters for rutting susceptibility of SBS + WMA modified binders.” Innovative Infrastruct. Solutions 1 (1): 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-016-0026-7.
Tayebali, A. A., B. B. Vyas, and G. A. Malpass. 1997. “Effect of crumb rubber particle size and concentration on performance grading of rubber modified asphalt binders.” In Proc., Progress of Superpave (Superior Performing Asphalt Pavement): Evaluation and Implementation, edited by R. Jester, 30–47. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp12078s.
Teymourpour, P., A. J. Hanz, T. Mandal, H. U. Bahia, and S. J. Rizzutto. 2016. “Effect of parallel plate gap height on repeatability in DSR measurements of crumb-rubber modified binders.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (8): 04016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001542.
Wasage, T. L. J., J. Stastna, and L. Zanzotto. 2011. “Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test.” Int. J. Pavement Eng. 12 (6): 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.573557.
Williams, M. L., R. F. Landel, and J. D. Ferry. 1955. “The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids.” J. Am. Soc. 77 (14): 3701–3707. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01619a008.
Yang, J. L., Z. Zhang, A. K. Schlarb, and K. Friedrich. 2006. “On the characterization of tensile creep resistance of polyamide 66 nanocomposites. Part II: Modeling and prediction of long-term performance.” Polymer 47 (19): 6745–6758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.07.060.
Yusoff, N. I. M., F. M. Jakarni, V. H. Nguyen, M. R. Hainin, and G. D. Airey. 2013. “Modelling the rheological properties of bituminous binders using mathematical equations.” Constr. Build. Mater. 40 (Mar): 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.105.
Zoorob, S. E., J. P. Castro-Gomes, L. A. Pereira Oliveira, and J. O’Connell. 2012. “Investigating the multiple stress creep recovery bitumen characterisation test.” Constr. Build. Mater. 30 (May): 734–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.060.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 33Issue 7July 2021

History

Received: Jul 27, 2020
Accepted: Dec 1, 2020
Published online: May 4, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 4, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nikhil Saboo [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh 221005, India. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Fractional derivative viscoelastic response of high-viscosity modified asphalt, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128915, 350, (128915), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share