Development of High RAP–High Performance Thin-Lift Overlay Mix Design Using a Soybean Oil-Derived Rejuvenator
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32, Issue 6
Abstract
A laboratory study was conducted to develop a thin-lift overlay (Thinlay) mix design containing a polymer-modified PG58-34E+ binder with a 3.5% add to the mix, and 40% fine reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) that would meet the criteria for the State of Iowa using a bioderived rejuvenator called sub-epoxidized soybean oil (SESO). Two groups of binder and mix specimens were created for this investigation: (1) a control with no SESO, and (2) a rejuvenated group with 0.28% SESO by total mix weight (4.88% by total binder content-RAP binder + PG58-34E+), where the binder groups were evaluated using the multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test and bending beam rheometer (BBR), while the mix groups were evaluated using rutting, low-temperature, and fatigue performance tests. Binder results showed that the optimal dosage of SESO must be higher than 8% to achieve a PG46-46E+ to account for RAP inclusion in the mix design. Binder performance had a significant effect on low-temperature mix and fatigue performance, while rutting performance was found to be acceptable for the rejuvenated group.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
AASHTO. 2011. Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA). AASHTO T 324. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014a. Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). AASHTO T350. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014b. Performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. AASHTO M332. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. Performance-graded asphalt binder. AASHTO M 320. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Adhikari, S., and Z. You. 2010. “Fatigue evaluation of asphalt pavement using beam fatigue apparatus.” Technol. Interface J. 10 (3): 1–9.
Al-Qadi, I. L., S. H. Carpenter, G. Roberts, H. Ozer, Q. Aurangzeb, M. Elseifi, and J. Trepanier. 2009. Determination of usable residual asphalt binder in RAP. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
Al-Qadi, I. L., M. Elseifi, and S. H. Carpenter. 2007. Reclaimed asphalt pavement: A literature review. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
APAI (Asphalt Paving Association of Iowa). 2018. “The Iowa asphalt report.” In Let’s go HIPRO! high performance thin overlays take off. Ames, IA: APAI.
Asphalt Institute. 2001. Superpave mix design. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
ASTM. 2013. Standard test method for determining fracture energy of asphalt-aggregate mixtures using the disk-shaped compact tension geometry. ASTM D7313. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2014. Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using toluene and the rotary evaporator. ASTM D7906. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2017a. Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures. ASTM D2172/D2172M-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2017b. Standard test method for materials finer than 75-μm (No. 200) sieve in mineral aggregates by washing. ASTM C117. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. C136/C136M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Blankenship, P., N. Iker, and J. Drbohlav. 2004. “Interlayer and design considerations to retard reflective cracking.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1896 (1): 177–186. https://doi.org/10.3141/1896-18.
Cantrell, L. 2013. Design and evaluation of 4.75 mm mixture for thin asphalt overlay in Washington state. Pullman, WA: Washington State Univ.
Chou, E. Y. J., D. Datta, and H. Pulugurta. 2008. Effectiveness of thin hot mix asphalt overlay on pavement ride and condition performance. Columbus, OH: Ohio Department of Transportation.
Danov, S. M., O. A. Kazantsev, A. L. Esipovich, A. S. Belousov, A. E. Rogozhin, and E. A. Kanakov. 2017. “Recent advances in the field of selective epoxidation of vegetable oils and their derivatives: A review and perspective.” Catal. Sci. Technol. 7 (17): 3659–3675. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY00988G.
Hajj, R., A. Filonzi, A. Bhasin, A. Dormohammadi, C. Zhu, and V. Tandon. 2018. Design and construction of ultra thin overlays as an alternative to seal coats. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation Research.
Huang, B., Z. Zhang, W. Kingery, and G. Zuo. 2004. “Fatigue crack characteristics of HMA mixtures containing RAP.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Cracking in Pavements, RILEM, 631–638. Paris: Reunion Internationale des Laboratoires et Experts des Materiaux.
Huang, Y. H. 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Im, S., Y.-R. Kim, H. Haghshenas Fatmehsari, G. Nsengiyumva, and T. You. 2015. Evaluation of thin asphalt overlay practice preserving Nebraska’s asphalt pavement. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Transportation Center.
Irfan, M., M. B. Khurshid, and S. Labi. 2009. “Determining the service life of thin hot-mix asphalt overlay by means of different performance indicators.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2108 (1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2108-04.
Mogawer, W., A. Austerman, R. Bonaquist, and M. Roussel. 2011. “Performance characteristics of thin-lift overlay mixtures: High reclaimed asphalt pavement content, recycled asphalt shingles, and warm-mix asphalt technology.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2208 (1): 17–25. https://doi.org/10.3141/2208-03.
Mogawer, W. S., A. J. Austerman, R. Kluttz, and M. Roussel. 2012. “High-performance thin-lift overlays with high reclaimed asphalt pavement content and warm-mix asphalt technology: Performance and workability characteristics.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2293 (1): 18–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2293-03.
Newcomb, D. E. 2009. Thin asphalt overlays for pavement preservation. Lanham, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
Poulikakos, L. D., S. dos Santos, M. Bueno, S. Kuentzel, M. Hugener, and M. N. Partl. 2014. “Influence of short and long term aging on chemical, microstructural and macro-mechanical properties of recycled asphalt mixtures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 51 (Jan): 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.004.
Ritter, M. A. 1990. Timber bridges: Design, construction, inspection, and maintenance. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
Shu, X., B. Huang, and D. Vukosavljevic. 2008. “Laboratory evaluation of fatigue characteristics of recycled asphalt mixture.” Constr. Build. Mater. 22 (7): 1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.04.019.
Warwel, S. 1999. “Complete and partial epoxidation of plant oils by lipase-catalyzed perhydrolysis.” Ind. Crops Prod. 9 (2): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(98)00023-5.
Watson, D. E., and M. Heitzman. 2014. Thin asphalt concrete overlays. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Williams, R. C., and A. A. Cascione. 2014. Assessment of asphalt interlayer designed on jointed concrete. Ames, IA: Iowa State Univ.
Wilson, B. T., T. Scullion, C. Estakhri, M. Arellano, and T. Blackmore. 2015. Thin overlay guidelines: Project selection, design, and construction. College Station, TX: Texas A&M Transportation Institute.
Yang, L., H. Dai, A. Yi, B. Lin, and G. Li. 2008. “Structure and properties of partially epoxidized soybean oil.” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 93 (3): 875–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-008-9043-x.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 8, 2019
Accepted: Nov 20, 2019
Published online: Mar 27, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 27, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.