Technical Papers
Feb 28, 2020

Performance Assessment of Bolted Extended End-Plate Moment Connections Constructed from Grade St-37 Steel Subjected to Fatigue

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32, Issue 5

Abstract

Most studies on the bolted extended end-plate (BEEP) moment connection have focused on the rotation capacity of the connection before the yielding of the connection members takes place, and effects of seismic low-cycle fatigue (LCF) and ultralow-cycle fatigue (ULCF) in this type of connection have received little attention. This study focused on the effects of LCF and ULCF in BEEP-moment connections in steel moment frames. In this regard, four steel moment-frame structures of 3, 7, 12, and 15 stories with BEEP connections were selected for this study. All four structures, constructed from Grade St-37 steel material, were subjected to 11 earthquake records for investigation. Also, the effects of ULCF were evaluated by ABAQUS Finite Element Software using a cyclic-void growth model (CVGM). The results revealed that the effect of LCF in BEEP connections was more notable in beams than in columns. The results also showed that in high-rise structures, higher modes of vibration play an important role in increasing the damage due to LCF. Also, in BEEP connections under ULCF, the maximum rotation capacity of the connection was achieved by preventing both the yielding of the end-plate and the failure of the bolts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

ABAQUS. 2014. Standard user’s manual version 14.1. Providence, RI: Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen.
Amiri, A., and J. C. Anderson. 2012. “Effect of low cycle fatigue on steel moment frame with RBS.” In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas. edited by F. M. Mazoolani and R. A. Herrera. Santiago, Chile: CRC Press.
Anderson, T. L. 2005. Fracture mechanics: Fundamentals and applications. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
ANSI/AISC. 2016. Prequalified connections for special and intermediate steel moment frames for seismic applications. ANSI/AISC 358. Chicago: ANSI/AISC.
ASCE/SEI. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41. Reston, VA: ASCE/SEI.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). 1992. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. ATC 24. Redwood City, CA: ATC.
Barsom, J. M. 2000. “Development of fracture toughness requirements for weld metals in seismic applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:1(44).
Benoit, A., and L. Rémy. 2014. “Experimental investigation of the behavior and the low cycle fatigue life of a welded structure.” Mater. Sci. Eng., A 595 (Dec): 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.11.082.
BHRC (Building and Housing Research Center). 2015. Iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings. 4th ed. Standard No. 2800. Tehran: Building and Housing Research Center.
Downing, S. D., and D. F. Socie. 1982. “Simple rainflow counting algorithms.” Int. J. Fatigue 4 (1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4.
Fell, B. V., A. M. Kanvinde, and G. G. Deierlein. 2010. Large-scale testing and simulation of earthquake induced ultra-low cycle fatigue in bracing members subjected to cyclic inelastic buckling. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
FEMA. 1995. Interim guidelines: Evaluation, repair, modification and design of welded steel moment frame structures. FEMA 267. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 1997a. Interim guidelines advisory No. 1, supplement to FEMA 267. FEMA 267A. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 1997b. NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 274. Washington, DC: FEMA.
FEMA. 2000. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. FEMA 350. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gerami, M., A. Zarei, and M. Ghaderi. 2018 “Effect of low cycle fatigue on steel moment frames with prequalified rigid connections (bolted unstiffened and stiffened extended end-plate moment connections).” J. Struct. Constr. Eng. https://doi.org/10.22065/jsce.2018.98736.1327.
Ghaderi, M., M. Gerami, and M. Vahdani. 2018. “A comparison of seismic low cycle fatigue and extremely low cycle fatigue on steel moment frames with reduced beam section connection (RBS).” Int. J. Fatigue 119 (Feb): 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.010.
Hancock, J. W., and A. C. Mackenzie. 1976. “On the mechanics of ductile failure in highstrength steel subjected to multi-axial stress-states.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 24 (2–3): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(76)90024-7.
Hanji, T. 2014. “Low cycle fatigue assessments of corner welded joints based on local strain approach.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 14 (3): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-014-3015-8.
Huang, Y. L., and S. A. Mahin. 2010. Simulating the inelastic seismic behavior of steel braced frames including the effects of low-cycle fatigue. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California.
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2004. Micromechanical simulation of earthquake induced fracture in steel structures. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2006. “Void growth model and stress modified critical strain model to predict ductile fracture in structural steels.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (12): 1907–1918. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1907).
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2007. “Cyclic void growth model to assess ductile fracture initiation in structural steels due to ultra-low cycle fatigue.” J. Struct. Eng. 133 (6): 701–712. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:6(701).
Kanvinde, A. M., and G. G. Deierlein. 2008. “Validation of cyclic void growth model for fracture initiation in blunt notch and dogbone steel specimens.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (9): 1528–1537. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:9(1528).
Kishiki, S., D. Lee, and S. Yamada. 2019. “Low-cycle fatigue performance assessment of current Japanese steel beamto-column connections determined by ductile fracture.” Eng. Struct. 182 (Mar): 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.061.
Krawinkler, H., M. Zohrei, B. Lashkari-Irvani, N. G. Cofie, and H. Hadidi-Tamjed. 1983. Recommendations for experimental studies on the seismic behavior of steel components and materials. Stanford, CA: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford Univ.
Kuwamura, H., and T. Suzuki. 1992. “Low-cycle fatigue resistance of welded joints of high-strength steel under earthquake loading.” In Proc., 10th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2851–2856. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Kuwamura, H., and N. Takagi. 2004. “Similitude law of pre-fracture hysteresis of steel members.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (5): 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:5(752).
Kuwamura, H., and K. Yamamoto. 1997. “Ductile crack as trigger of brittle fractures in steel.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (6): 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:6(729).
Lee, D., S. Kishiki, and S. Yamada. 2018. “Experimental study of low-cycle fatigue behavior of a welded flange-bolted web connection in steel moment-resisting frames.” Earthquake Spectra 34 (4): 1829–1846. https://doi.org/10.1193/062617EQS131M.
Lee, D., S. Yamada, S. Kishiki, T. Ishida, and M. Nitawaki. 2017. “Low-cycle fatigue tests on welded flange-bolted web connection.” In Proc., 9th Int. Symp. on Steel Structures, 180–183. Seoul: Seoul National Univ.
Lee, P., R. Garai, and G. Ozkula. 2014. “Issues on using welded built-up box columns in steel special moment frames.” In Proc., 10th US National Conf. on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering. Anchorage, Alaska: Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
Maranian, P. 2010. Reducing brittle and fatigue failures in steel structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Miner, M. A. 1945. “Cumulative damage in fatigue.” J. Appl. Mech. 12 (3): A159–164.
Myers, A. T., G. G. Deierlein, and A. M. Kanvinde. 2009a. Testing and probabilistic simulation of ductile fracture initiation in structural steel components and weldments. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ.
Myers, A. T., A. M. Kanvinde, G. G. Deierlein, and B. V. Fell. 2009b. “Effect of weld details on the ductility of steel column baseplate connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (6): 1366–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.004.
Nastar, N. 2008. “The effect of higher modes on earthquake fatigue damage to steel moment frames.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School Univ. of Southern California.
Nastar, N., and J. C. Anderson. 2010. “Effects of low-cycle fatigue on a ten-story steel building.” Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 19 (1–2): 95–113.
Nastar, N., and J. C. Anderson. 2012. “The effects of low-cycle fatigue in steel structures.” In Proc., 6th Congress on Forensic Engineering, 1121–1130. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Nip, K. H., L. Gardner, C. M. Davies, and A. Y. Elghazouli. 2010. “Extremely low cycle fatigue tests on structural carbon steel and stainless steel.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 66 (1): 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.08.004.
Palmgren, A. G. 1924. “Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern (life length of roller bearings).” VDI Z 68 (14): 339–341.
Partridge, J. E., S. R. Paterson, and R. M. Richard. 2000. “Low cycle fatigue tests and fracture analyses of bolted-welded seismic moment frame connections.” In STESSA 2000, 3rd Int. Conf. Montreal, Canada.
Partridge, J. E., S. R. Paterson, and R. M. Richard. 2003. “ATC-24 cumulative damage tests and fracture analyses of bolted-welded seismic moment frame connections.” In Forensic Engineering (2003), 142–157. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Rice, J. R., and D. M. Tracey. 1969. “On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids 17 (3): 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7.
Ricles, J. M., C. Mao, L. W. Lu, and J. W. Fisher. 2000. Development and evaluation of improved details for ductile welded unreinforced flange connections. Richmond, CA: SAC Joint Venture.
Sato, R., S. Kishiki, and S. Yamada. 2017. “Cyclic rotation capacity of beam-to-column connection using various steel grades.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Santiago, Chile: Chilean Association of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering.
SEAOC Seismology Committee. 2002. Commentary and recommendations on FEMA 350. FEMA 350. Oakland, CA: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Sumner, A. 2003. “Unified design of extended end-plate moment connections subject to cyclic loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
Tateishi, K., T. Hanji, and K. Minami. 2007. “A prediction model for extremely low cycle fatigue strength of structural steel.” Int. J. Fatigue 29 (5): 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.08.001.
Tehranizadeh, M., A. Deylami, M. Gholami, and H. Moazemi. 2012. “Validation of cyclic void growth model for fracture initiation in the flange plate connection between beam and box column.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering (15 WCEE). Lisbon, Portugal: Sociedade Portuguesa de Engenharia Sismica.
Wang, Y., H. Zhou, Y. Shi, and J. Xiong. 2011. “Fracture prediction of welded steel connections using traditional fracture mechanics and calibrated micromechanics based models.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 11 (3): 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-011-3010-2.
Zambrano, A. 2014. “Damage indices evaluation for seismic resistant structures subjected to low-cycle fatigue phenomena.” Int. J. Mech. Sci. 78 (Jan): 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.11.006.
Zarei, A., and M. Gerami. 2017. “Effect of low cycle fatigue on steel moment frames with prequalified rigid connections (bolted unstiffened and stiffened extended end-plate moment connections).” Master’s thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering of Semnan Univ.
Zhou, H., and Y. Wang. 2014. “Seismic low-cycle fatigue evaluation of welded beam-to-column connections in steel moment frames through global–local analysis.” Int. J. Fatigue 64 (Jul): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.002.
Zhou, H., Y. Wang, Y. Shi, J. Xiong, and L. Yang. 2013. “Extremely low cycle fatigue prediction of steel beam-to-column connection by using a micro-mechanics based fracture model.” Int. J. Fatigue 48 (Mar): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.006.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 32Issue 5May 2020

History

Received: Mar 21, 2019
Accepted: Aug 7, 2019
Published online: Feb 28, 2020
Published in print: May 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jul 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohsen Ghaderi [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Civil-Earthquake Engineering, Semnan Univ., Semnan 19111-35131, Iran. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Civil-Earthquake Engineering, Semnan Univ., Semnan 19111-35131, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4113-932X. Email: [email protected]
Reza Vahdani [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Civil-Earthquake Engineering, Semnan Univ., Semnan 19111-35131, Iran. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share