Development of Laboratory Procedure for Evaluating Microcracking Technology on Cement-Modified Soil Subgrade
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 31, Issue 12
Abstract
Cement modification of soils has been widely practiced for the last few decades. Recently, cement has become a more economical binder to modify in situ subgrade soil because other binders, such as fly ash, have become less available and therefore their prices have gone up significantly. In addition, a much higher percentage of fly ash needs be used when compared with cement to achieve the same subgrade strength and stiffness. However, cement-modified subgrade may have an issue with shrinkage cracking, which can eventually reflect through the asphalt pavement layers to the surface after construction. For some subgrade soils, a high cement content is needed to meet the unconfined compressive strength requirement without jeopardizing durability. A higher cement content will result in higher shrinkage cracking potential. To overcome this problem, microcracking technology has been developed and adopted in the field. This technology involves recompaction of cement-modified soil (CMS) with a roller 24–48 h after initial compaction to induce microcracks in the CMS and minimize the potential for large shrinkage cracks. Microcracking of CMS is not expected to significantly reduce the strength and stiffness of CMS, but it is expected to increase its permeability and reduce the potential for large shrinkage cracks. Unfortunately, the procedure to simulate microcracking of CMS in the laboratory and evaluate its effect on properties of CMS has not been established yet. This note documents the development of such a procedure and discusses the effect of microcracking on the properties (strength and modulus) of CMS specimens.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research was jointly sponsored by Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) and Terracon Consultants, Inc. Mr. Isaac M. Ferguson, the Geotechnical Specialist at KDOT, is the project monitor. Their support and guidance are greatly appreciated.
References
ASTM 2007. Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM-D422. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM-D698. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM 2016. Standard test method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils. ASTM-D1883. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM 2017a. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM-D2487. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM 2017b. Standard practice for making and curing soil-cement compression and flexure test specimens in the laboratory. ASTM-D1632. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM 2017c. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. ASTM-D4318. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM 2017d. Standard test methods for compressive strength of molded soil-cement cylinders. ASTM-D1633. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bofinger, H. 1971. “The behaviour of soil-cement pavements with special reference to the problem of cracking.” In Proc., 4th Asian Regional Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Khlong Nueng, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology.
Bofinger, H., H. Hassan, and R. I. T. Williams. 1978. The shrinkage of fine-grained soil-cement. Crowthorne, UK: Transport and Road Research Laboratory.
Brandl, H. 1999. “Mixed in place stabilisation of pavement structures with cement and additives.” In Proc., 12th European Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
George, K. P. 1968. Final report on the study of criteria for strength and shrinkage control of cement-treated bases. University, MS: Univ. of Mississippi.
George, K. P. 1969. “Cracking in pavements influenced by visoelastic properties of soil-cement.” In Proc., Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
George, K. P. 1973. “Mechanism of shrinkage cracking of soil-cement bases.” In Highway Research Record 442, 1–10. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
George, K. P. 2001. Soil stabilization field trial. University, MS: Univ. of Mississippi.
Han, J. 2015. Principles and practice of ground improvement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Litzka, J., and W. Haslehner. 1995. “Cold in-place recycling on low-volume roads in Austria.” In Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Low Volume Roads. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
PCA (Portland Cement Association). 2003. “Reflective cracking in cement stabilized pavements.” In Soil-cement information. Skokie, IL: PCA.
Scullion, T. 2002. “Precracking of soil-cement bases to reduce reflection cracking: Field investigation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1787 (1): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.3141/1787-03.
Sebesta, S. 2005. “Use of microcracking to reduce shrinkage cracking in cement-treated bases.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1936 (1): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193600101.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 2, 2018
Accepted: Jun 21, 2019
Published online: Sep 30, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 29, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.