Equivalent California Bearing Ratios of Multiaxial Geogrid-Stabilized Aggregates over Weak Subgrade
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 11
Abstract
Geosynthetics have been successfully used to stabilize granular aggregate over weak subgrade in recent years. In some actual applications, geosynthetics are first used to stabilize aggregates over weak subgrade as construction platforms to carry construction loads, and then the construction platforms become subgrade in pavement structures. Unfortunately, no commonly accepted method is available to quantify the benefit of construction platforms with geosynthetics in pavement design. This study aimed to quantify this benefit by treating the geosynthetic-stabilized construction platform as an “equivalent subgrade.” The quantification was based on the cyclic plate loading test results of nine test sections of nonstabilized and multiaxial geogrid-stabilized aggregate over weak subgrade and five test sections of homogeneous subgrade with California bearing ratios (CBRs) ranging from 2.9 to 9.5. The permanent deformations of these test sections were recorded and used to estimate the equivalent CBR values of the geogrid-stabilized aggregate over weak subgrade. The test sections that had the same performance (i.e., permanent deformation) under the same number of loading cycles were considered equivalent. The analysis of test results shows that the equivalent CBR values of the nonstabilized and geogrid-stabilized test sections decreased with the increase of the load intensity. The percent of equivalent CBR increase of the granular bases over the weak subgrade due to the inclusion of a geogrid ranged from 30% to 85%.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The experimental tests reported in this paper were sponsored by Tensar International. Dr. Mark H. Wayne and Mr. Tim Oliver at Tensar International provided great suggestions and valuable comments during the preparation of this paper.
References
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. ASTM D6951/D6951M-09. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Dong, Y. L., J. Han, and X. H. Bai. 2011. “Numerical analysis of tensile behavior of geogrids with rectangular and triangular apertures.” Geotext. Geomembr. 29 (2): 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.007.
Giroud, J. P., and J. Han. 2004a. “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I: Development of design method.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775).
Giroud, J. P., and J. Han. 2004b. “Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. II: Calibration and applications.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (8): 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(787).
Han, J. 2015. Principles and practice of ground improvement, 432. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Han, J., X. Yang, R. Parsons, and D. Leshchinsky. 2007. Design of geocell-reinforced bases. Lawrence, KS: Univ. of Kansas.
Holtz, R., B. R. Christopher, and R. R. Berg. 1998. Geosynthetic design and construction guidelines. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Nataatmadja, A., S. Y. Tao, and K. Chim. 2012. “Design subgrade CBR for flexible pavements: Comparison of predictive methods.” In Proc., ARRB Conf. Melbourne, Australia: ARRB Group.
Pokharel, S. K. 2010. “Experimental study on geocell-reinforced bases under static and dynamic loading.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Kansas.
Qian, Y., J. Han, S. Pokharel, and R. Parsons. 2013. “Performance of triangular aperture geogrid-reinforced base courses over weak subgrade under cyclic loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (8): 1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000577.
Sun, X., J. Han, and R. Corey. 2017. “Equivalent modulus of geogrid-stabilized granular base back-calculated using permanent deformation.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 143 (9): 06017012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001761.
Sun, X., J. Han, L. Crippen, and R. Corey. 2016. “Back-calculation of resilient modulus and prediction of permanent deformation for fine-grained subgrade under cyclic loading.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 29 (5): 04016284. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001834.
Sun, X., J. Han, J. Kwon, R. L. Parsons, and M. H. Wayne. 2015a. “Radial stresses and resilient deformations of geogrid-stabilized unpaved roads under cyclic plate loading tests.” Geotext. Geomembr. 43 (5): 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.018.
Sun, X., J. Han, M. H. Wayne, R. L. Parsons, and J. Kwon. 2014. “Quantifying the benefit of triaxial geogrid in stabilizing granular bases over soft subgrade under cyclic loading at different intensities.” In Proc., Geo-Congress 2014, 2568–2577. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Sun, X., J. Han, M. H. Wayne, R. L. Parsons, and J. Kwon. 2015b. “Determination of load equivalency for unpaved roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2473: 233–241. https://doi.org/10.3141/2473-27.
Tingle, J., and S. Jersey. 2005. “Cyclic plate load testing of geosynthetic-reinforced unbound aggregate roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1936: 60–69. https://doi.org/10.3141/1936-08.
Tingle, J., and S. Jersey. 2009. “Full-scale evaluation of geosynthetic-reinforced aggregate roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2116: 96–107. https://doi.org/10.3141/2116-13.
Webster, S. L. 1993. “Geogrid reinforced base courses for flexible pavements for light aircraft: Test section construction, behavior under traffic, laboratory tests, and design criteria.”. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Corps of Engineers.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 20, 2017
Accepted: Apr 30, 2018
Published online: Aug 14, 2018
Published in print: Nov 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jan 14, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.