Sodium Sulfate Resistance of Mortars Containing Combined Nanosilica and Microsilica
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 7
Abstract
In this study, the effect of combined nanosilica (nS) and microsilica (mS) on sulfate resistance of portland cement mortars was compared with cement-only control mortars and mixtures with equivalent contents of only one form of silica. Silica-contained mortars had 6% cement replacement of either nS, mS, or 3% of each. An additional mixture with 3% mS was also tested. The series of mortars were prepared with both a moderate (7.2%) and a low (4.1%) cement to evaluate the effectiveness of each silica replacement paired with a chemically sulfate and nonsulfate-resistant cement. The mortars in this study were subjected to a 1.5-year period of full-submersion sulfate attack in a 5% sodium sulfate () solution. The mortars tested were measured for expansion and compressive strength. Additional testing for absorption, rapid sulfate penetration, and mercury porosimetry of select mortar mixtures, paired with laser diffraction particle analysis of sample silica particles suspended in water, supplemented the interpretation and explanation of the results. The expansion measurements indicated that mS replacement mortars outperform both nS-only and combination replacement mixtures. A negative effect of the dry nS powder replacement attributed to agglomeration of its fine-sized silica particles during mixing negated the expected superior pozzolanic activity of the nanomaterial. In light of the results, most of the beneficial contribution from the cement replacement with the combination mixtures could be attributed to the mS proportion given that the combination mixtures’ expansion performance was comparable to that of the 3% mS-only mortars.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2008. Guide to durable concrete. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ASTM. 1997a. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM C642. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 1997b. Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration. ASTM C1202. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 1999. Standard practice for mechanical mixing of hydraulic cement pastes and mortars of plastic consistency. ASTM C305. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2001. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. ASTM C1437. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2002. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars. ASTM C109/C109M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2003a. Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM C33. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2003b. Standard specification for flow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement. ASTM C230. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2004b. Standard specification for portland cement. ASTM C150. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2004a. Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution. ASTM C1012. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. ASTM C128-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bibby Scientific. n.d. Technical note T11-001: pH of distilled water. Bibby Scientific. http://www.stuart-equipment.com/adminimages/t11_001_ph_of_distilled_water.pdf.
Bihari, P., M. Vippola, S. Schultes, M. Praetner, A. G. Khandoga, C. A. Reichel, C. Coester, T. Tuomi, M. Rehberg, and F. Krombach. 2008. “Optimized dispersion of nanoparticles for biological in vitro and in vivo studies.” Part. Fibre Toxicol. 5 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-5-14.
Bizi, M. 2012. “Stability and flocculation of nanosilica by conventional polymer.” Nat. Sci. 4 (6): 372–385. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2012.46052.
Campillo, I., J. S. Dolado, and A. Porro. 2004. “High-performance nanostructured materials for construction.” In Nanotechnology in construction, edited by W. Z. Peter, J. M. Bartos, J. J. Hughes, and P. Trtik, 215–225. London: The Royal Society of Chemistry.
CCAA (Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia). 2011. Technical note: Sulfate-resisting concrete. Mascot, NSW, Australia: CCAA.
Du, H., S. Du, and X. Liu. 2014. “Durability performances of concrete with nano-silica.” Constr. Build. Mater. 73 (12): 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.014.
Gaitero, J. J., I. Campillo, and A. Guerrero. 2008. “Reduction of the calcium leaching rate of cement paste by addition of silica nanoparticles.” Cem. Concr. Res. 38 (8–9): 1112–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.021.
Gao, R., Q. Li, S. Zhao, and X. Yang. 2010. “Deterioration mechanisms of sulfate attack on concrete under alternate action.” J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., Mater. Sci. Ed. 25 (2): 355–359.
Hewlett, P. C., and F. Massazza. 2003. Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Holland, T. C. 2005. Silica fume—User’s manual. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2000. Sample preparation—Dispersing procedures for powders in liquids. ISO 14887. Geneva: ISO.
Jiang, J., G. Oberdörster, and P. Biswas. 2009. “Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies.” J. Nanopart. Res. 11 (1): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9446-4.
Kosmatka, S. H., and M. L. Wilson. 2016. Design and control of concrete mixtures. Skokie, IL: Portland Cement Association.
Li, H., H. Xiao, J. Yuan, and J. Ou. 2004. “Microstructure of cement mortar with nano-particles.” Composites, Part B 35 (2): 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00052-0.
Mehta, P. K. 1993. “Sulfate attack on concrete: A critical review.” In Materials science of concrete III, edited by J. Skalny, 105–130. Westerville, OH: American Ceramic Society.
Mehta, P. K. 1975. “Evaluation of sulfate-resisting cements by a new test method.” ACI J. Proc. 72 (10): 573–575.
Mindess, S., F. J. Young, and D. Darwin. 2003. Concrete. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Neville, A. M. 1998. Properties of concrete. New York: Wiley.
Quercia Bianchi, G., and H. J. H. Brouwers. 2010. “Application of nano-silica (nS) in concrete mixtures.” In 8th fib Intl. Ph.D. Symp. in Civil Engineering, 431–436. Lyngby, Denmark: DTU Byg.
Richardson, M. G. 2002. Fundamentals of durable reinforced concrete. New York: Spon Press.
Said, A. M., M. S. Zeidan, M. T. Bassuoni, and Y. Tian. 2012. “Properties of concrete incorporating nano-silica.” Constr. Build. Mater. 36 (11): 838–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.044.
Senff, L., D. Hotza, W. L. Repette, V. M. Ferreira, and J. A. Labrincha. 2010. “Effect of nanosilica and microsilica on microstructure and hardened properties of cement pastes and mortars.” Adv. Appl. Ceram. 109 (2): 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1179/174367509X12502621261659.
Shih, J.-Y., T.-P. Chang, and T.-C. Hsiao. 2006. “Effect of nanosilica on characterization of portland cement composite.” Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. 424 (1–2): 266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.010.
Sieger, B. H., M. Winterer, H. Mühlenweg, G. Michael, and H. Hahn. 2004. “Controlling surface composition and zeta potential of chemical vapor synthesized alumina-silica nanoparticles.” Chem. Vap. Deposition 10 (2): 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/cvde.200306270.
Singh, L. P., S. R. Karade, S. K. Bhattacharyya, M. M. Yousuf, and S. Ahalawat. 2013. “Beneficial role of nanosilica in cement based materials: A review.” Constr. Build. Mater. 47 (10): 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.052.
Skalny, J., J. Marchand, and I. Odler. 2002. Sulfate attack on concrete. London: Spon Press.
Sobolev, K., and M. F. Gutiérrez. 2005. “How nanotechnology can change the concrete world.” Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 84 (11): 16–19.
Stanish, K. D., R. D. Hooton, and M. D. A. Thomas. 1997. Testing the chloride penetration resistance of concrete: A literature review. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto.
Taurozzi, J. S., V. A. Hackley, and M. R. Wiesner. 2011. “Ultrasonic dispersion of nanoparticles for environmental, health and safety assessment—Issues and recommendations.” Nanotoxicology 5 (4): 711–729. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2010.528846.
Tobón, J. I., J. Payá, and O. J. Restrepo. 2015. “Study of durability of portland cement mortars blended with silica nanoparticles.” Constr. Build. Mater. 80 (4): 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.074.
Tumidajski, P. J., and I. Turc. 1995. “A rapid test for sulfate ingress into concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 25 (5): 924–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(95)00084-P.
Winter, N. B. 2012. Understanding cement. Woodridge, UK: WHD Microanalysis Consultants.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 29, 2017
Accepted: Jan 4, 2018
Published online: Apr 30, 2018
Published in print: Jul 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 30, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.