Technical Papers
Jan 17, 2018

Effect of the Ratio between Porosity and SiO2 and Al2O3 on Tensile Strength of Zeolite-Cemented Sands

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 4

Abstract

The practice of soil treatment using cement and zeolite is an approach that can be widely used in soil stabilization particularly in road construction, as a support layer for shallow foundations, to strengthen slopes, and to prevent sand liquefaction. The present study intends to quantify the impact of cement and zeolite contents, porosity index, porosity/cement and porosity/SiO2, and Al2O3 particles ratios on zeolite-cemented sands by the assessment of splitting tensile strength (qt). A program of splitting tensile tests considering three distinct porosity ratios, four cement contents (2, 4, 6, and 8%), and six different percentages of zeolite replaced by part of cement (0, 10, 30, 50, 70, and 90%) is performed in this study. Results indicate that cement replaced by zeolite at optimum proportion of 30% and the value of improved qt of the cement sand specimens because zeolite and cement chemical properties are exploited. Increasing cement content and porosity of the compacted mixture, the efficiency of using zeolite rises. In this paper, it has been shown that for the zeolite-cement-sand mixtures, qt increases via cement content (C) raise and porosity (η) reduction and a power function is well-adapted to fit both qtC and qtη. Finally, a key parameter, i.e., SiO2 and Al2O3 particles as active particles (AP) introduced and six qtAP diagrams are drawn, any of which is traced to a specific amount of zeolite. Afterward, qt is plotted against 1/AP and η/AP, which is regarded as a controlling parameter of qt. As a consequence, for each of the zeolite-cement-sand mixtures studied, a target qt value could be obtained using a specific correlation by porosity reductions, cement content rises and zeolite variations. This experimental study will introduce an acceptable description of the mechanical parameters that are extensively used in the subgrade and foundation designs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Arabani, M., Sharafi, H., Habibi, M. R., and Haghshenas, E. (2012). “Laboratory evaluation of cement stabilized crushed glass-sand blends.” Electron. J. Geotech. Eng., 17, 1777–1792.
ASTM. (1995). “Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens.” ASTM 3967, West Conshohoken, PA.
ASTM. (2000). “Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohessive soil.” ASTM 2166, West Conshohoken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system).” ASTM D2487-11, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard specification for portland cement.” ASTM C150/150M-12, West Conshohoken, PA.
Brazilian Standard Association. (1983). “Mortar and concrete—Test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical specimens.” NBR 7222, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (in Portuguese).
Canpolat, F., Yılmaz, K., Köse, M. M., Sümer, M., and Yurdusev, M. A. (2004). “Use of zeolite, coal bottom ash and fly ash as replacement materials in cement production.” Cem. Concr. Res., 34(5), 731–735.
Choobbasti, A. J., Vafaei, A., and Kutanaei, S. S. (2015). “Mechanical properties of sandy soil improved with cement and nanosilica.” Open Eng., 5(1), 111–116.
Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., Bachus, R. C., and Rad, N. S. (1981). “Cemented sands under static loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 107(6), 799–817.
Consoli, N. C., Consoli, B. S., and Festugato, L. (2013a). “A practical methodology for the determination of failure envelopes of fiber-reinforced cemented sands.” Geotext. Geomembr., 41(Nov), 50–54.
Consoli, N. C., Cruz, R. C., Floss, M. F., and Festugato, L. (2010). “Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 759–763.
Consoli, N. C., da Silva Lopez, L., Foppa, D., and Heineck, K. S. (2009). “Key parameters dictating strength of lime/cement-treated soils.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng., 162(2), 111–118.
Consoli, N. C., Festugato, L., da Rocha, C. G., and Cruz, R. C. (2013b). “Key parameters for strength control of rammed sand-cement mixtures: Influence of types of portland cement.” Constr. Build. Mater., 49(Dec), 591–597.
Consoli, N. C., and Foppa, D. (2014). “Porosity/cement ratio controlling initial bulk modulus and incremental yield stress of an artificially cemented soil cured under stress.” Géotech. Lett., 4(1), 22–26.
Consoli, N. C., Foppa, D., Festugato, L., and Heineck, K. S. (2007). “Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 197–205.
Consoli, N. C., Prietto, P. D. M., Carraro, J. A. H., and Heineck, K. S. (2001). “Behavior of compacted soil-fly ash-carbide lime mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 774–782.
Consoli, N. C., Prietto, P. D. M., and Ulbrich, L. A. (1998). “Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1211–1214.
Consoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V, and Prietto, P. D. M. (2000). “Influence of curing under stress on the triaxial response of cemented soils.” Geotechnique, 50(1), 99–105.
Dalla Rosa, F., Consoli, N. C., and Baudet, B. A. (2008). “An experimental investigation of the behaviour of artificially cemented soil cured under stress.” Géotechnique, 58(8), 675–679.
Feng, N. Q., Li, G. Z., and Zang, X. W. (1990). “High-strength and flowing concrete with a zeolitic mineral admixture.” Cem. Concr. Aggr., 12(2), 61–69.
Festugato, L., Menger, E., Benezra, F., Kipper, E. A., and Consoli, N. C. (2017). “Fibre-reinforced cemented soils compressive and tensile strength assessment as a function of filament length.” Geotext. Geomembr., 45(1), 77–82.
Hashemi, S. S., Melkoumian, N., Taheri, A., and Jaksa, M. (2015). “The failure behaviour of poorly cemented sands at a borehole wall using laboratory tests.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 77(Jul), 348–357.
Horpibulsuk, S., Suddeepong, A., Suksiripattanapong, C., Chinkulkijniwat, A., Arulrajah, A., and Disfani, M. M. (2014). “Water-void to cement ratio identity of lightweight cellular-cemented material.” J. Mater. Civil Eng., 6014021.
Huang, J. T., and Airey, D. W. (1998). “Properties of artificially cemented carbonate sand.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 492–499.
Ladd, R. S. (1978). “Preparing test specimens using undercompaction.” Geotech. Test. J., 1(1), 16–23.
Mola-Abasi, H., Kordtabar, B., and Kordnaeij, A. (2016a). “Effect of natural zeolite and cement additive on the strength of sand.” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 34(5), 1539–1551.
Mola-Abasi, H., Kordtabar, B., and Kordnaeij, A. (2016b). “Parameters controlling strength of zeolite–cement–sand mixture.” Int. J. Geotech. Eng., 11(1), 72–79.
Mola-Abasi, H., and Shooshpasha, I. (2016a). “Influence of zeolite and cement additions on mechanical behavior of sandy soil.” J. Rock. Mech. Geotech. Eng., 8(5), 746–752.
Mola-Abasi, H., and Shooshpasha, I. (2016b). “Prediction of zeolite-cement-sand unconfined compressive strength using polynomial neural network.” Eur. Phys. J. Plus., 131(4), 1–12.
Mola-Abasi, H., and Shooshpasha, I. (2017). “Polynomial models controlling strength of zeolite-cement-sand mixtures.” Scienti Iranica, 24(2), 526–536.
Pino, L. F. M., and Baudet, B. A. (2015). “The effect of the particle size distribution on the mechanics of fibre-reinforced sands under one-dimensional compression.” Geotext. Geomembr., 43(3), 250–258.
Poon, C. S., Lam, L., Kou, S. C., and Lin, Z. S. (1999). “A study on the hydration rate of natural zeolite blended cement pastes.” Constr. Build. Mater., 13(8), 427–432.
Thomé, A., Donato, M., Consoli, N. C., and Graham, J. (2005). “Circular footings on a cemented layer above weak foundation soil.” Can. Geotech. J., 42(6), 1569–1584.
Toll, D. G., and Ali Rahman, Z. (2017). “Critical state shear strength of an unsaturated artificially cemented sand.” Géotechnique, 67(3), 208–215.
Yılmaz, B., Uçar, A., Öteyaka, B., and Uz, V. (2007). “Properties of zeolitic tuff (clinoptilolite) blended portland cement.” Build Environ., 42(11), 3808–3815.
Yilmaz, E., Belem, T., and Benzaazoua, M. (2015). “Specimen size effect on strength behavior of cemented paste backfills subjected to different placement conditions.” Eng. Geol., 185(Feb), 52–62.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 30Issue 4April 2018

History

Received: Feb 20, 2017
Accepted: Sep 11, 2017
Published online: Jan 17, 2018
Published in print: Apr 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Jun 17, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hossein Mola-Abasi [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Gonbad Univ., 4971799151 Gonbad, Iran (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Aghileh Khajeh
M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Lameie Institute, 4913946439 Gorgan, Iran.
Safora Naderi Semsani
M.Sc. Student, Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering, Lameie Institute, 4913946439 Gorgan, Iran.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share