Assessment of Air Pluviation Using Stationary and Movable Pluviators
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 5
Abstract
Methods used for laboratory sample preparation should be able to produce uniform and highly repeatable sand beds of required density and to simulate field conditions. Air pluviation is a widely used method to prepare cohesionless soil samples in the laboratory. In the present study, two currently used air pluviation setups, viz, stationary/portable traveling pluviator (PTP) and movable/mechanized traveling pluviator (MTP), are investigated in terms of their ability to prepare uniform and repeatable sand beds of a wide range of relative densities. The PTP and MTP pluviation setups mainly comprise hopper, orifice, flexible hose, and rigid tube. Chain pulley and rail track are the additional features of MTP, which allow the hopper to travel smoothly in one direction. Pluviation studies are performed by using Indian standard sand (Grade II), and a California bearing ratio (CBR) mold is used to evaluate relative density (RD) and deposition intensity (DI) of samples. The effect of height of fall (HF), DI, and number of diffuser sieves on the RD of the sand sample is studied for both the PTP and MTP pluviation setups. A model tank is used to verify the uniformity of the sand samples with the help of miniature cone-penetrations tests. The test results reveal that a wide range of RD with uniform and repeatable sand samples can be prepared by using MTP compared with PTP.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India [MoES/P.O(Seismo)/1(118)/2010], to carry out the research.
References
ASTM. (2006). “Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density.” ASTM D4254-00, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils.” ASTM D5778-12, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bolton, M. D., Gui, M. W., Garnier, J., Corte, J. F., Bagge, G., Laue, J., and Renzi, R. (1999). “Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand.” Geotechnique, 49(4), 543–552.
Butterfield, R., and Andrawes, K. Z. (1970). “An air activated sand spreader for forming uniform sand beds.” Geotechnique, 20(1), 97–100.
Choi, S. K., Lee, M. J., Choo, H., Tumay, M. T., and Lee, W. (2010). “Preparation of a large size granular specimen using a rainer system with a porous plate.” Geotech. Test. J., 33(1), 1–10.
Cresswell, A., Barton, M. E., and Brown, R. (1999). “Determining the maximum unit density of sands by pluviation.” Geotech. Test. J., 22(4), 324–328.
Dave, T. N., and Dasaka, S. M. (2012). “Assessment of portable traveling pluviator to prepare reconstituted sand specimens.” Geomech. Eng., 4(2), 79–90.
Dayal, U., and Allen, J. H. (1975). “The effect of penetration rate on the strength of remolded clay and sand samples.” Can. Geotech. J., 12(3), 336–348.
Dief, H. M., and Figueroa, J. L. (2003). “Shake table calibration and specimen preparation for liquefaction studies in the centrifuge.” Geotech. Test. J., 26(4), 1–8.
Fretti, C., Lo Presti, D. C. F., and Pedroni, S. (1995). “A pluvial deposition method to reconstitute well-graded sand specimens.” Geotech. Test. J., 18(2), 292–298.
Gade, V. K. and Dasaka, S. M. (2016): “Development of a mechanized travelling pluviator to prepare reconstituted uniform sand specimens.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., .
Lagioia, R., Sanzeni, A., and Colleselli, F. (2006). “Air, water and vacuum pluviation of sand specimens for the triaxial apparatus.” Soils Found., 46(1), 61–67.
Lo Presti, D. C. F., Berardi, R., Pedroni, S., and Crippa, V. (1993). “A new traveling sand pluviator to reconstitute specimens of well-graded silty sands.” Geotech. Test. J., 16(1), 18–26.
Lo Presti, D. C. F., Pedroni, S., and Crippa, V. (1992). “Maximum dry density of cohesionless soils by pluviation and by ASTM D 4253-83: A comparative study.” Geotech. Test. J., 15(2), 180–189.
Miura, S., and Toki, S. (1982). “A sample preparation method and its effect on static and cyclic deformation strength properties of sand.” Soils Found., 22(1), 61–77.
Passalacqua, R. (1991). “A sand-spreader used for the reconstitution of granular soil models.” Soils Found., 31(2), 175–180.
Rad, N. S., and Tumay, M. T. (1987). “Factors affecting sand specimen preparation by raining.” Geotech. Test. J., 10(1), 31–37.
Walker, B. P., and Whitaker, T. (1967). “An apparatus for forming uniform beds of sand for model foundation tests.” Geotechnique, 17(2), 161–167.
Zhao, Y., Gafar, K., Elshafie, M. Z. E. B., Deeks, A. D., Knappett, J. A., and Madabushi, S. P. G. (2006). “Calibration and use of new automatic sand pourer.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf., on Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, C. W. W. W. Ng, Y. H. Wang, and L. M. Zhang, eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 265–270.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 29 • Issue 5 • May 2017
Copyright
©2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 18, 2016
Accepted: Aug 25, 2016
Published online: Nov 23, 2016
Discussion open until: Apr 23, 2017
Published in print: May 1, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.