Correlating Long-Term Chip Seals Performance and Rheological Properties of Aged Asphalt Binders
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 5
Abstract
Two most common distresses found in chip seals are raveling and bleeding. Although raveling is a process that continues throughout the whole service life of chip seals, current performance tests available for chip seals focus mainly on early raveling and bond maturation. In this study, chip seals binders from the field were extracted and recovered for two consecutive years. Rheological properties of original, field-aged, and laboratory-aged binders were compared. Results showed that pressurized aging vessel (PAV-) aging simulates 3 to 4 years of field-aging for hot asphalt and less than 3 years for emulsion. Strain tolerance, shear stress at failure, oxidative aging index, and yield energy of the binder were correlated with long term field performance (raveling). Shear stress at failure of field-aged binders showed strong correlation with long-term field performance, exhibiting an value of 0.95. However, yield energy (a product of strain tolerance and shear stress at failure) of original binder, which showed an value of 0.83 with long-term field distress rating (raveling), was recommended as performance parameter for chip seals binder.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by the Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC). The authors sincerely acknowledge their support and contributions.
References
AASHTO. (2012). “Practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized vessel (PAV).” AASHTO R28-12, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2013). “Standard method of test for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test).” AASHTO T240-13, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer.” ASTM D7405, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011a). “Standard practice for recovering residue from emulsified asphalt using low temperature evaporative technique.” ASTM D7497, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011b). “Standard test method for sweep test of bituminous emulsion surface treatment samples.” ASTM D7000, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011c). “Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of bitumen from bituminous paving mixtures.” ASTM D2172, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2012). “Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator.” ASTM D5404, West Conshohocken, PA.
D’ Angelo, J. (2007). “Effect of polymer-asphalt binder compatibility and cross-link density of non-recoverable compliance in the MSCR test method.” Proc., 2007 Southeastern Asphalt User/Producer Group Conf., San Antonio, TX.
Epps, A. L., Glover, C. J., and Barcena, R. (2001). “A performance-graded binder specification for surface treatments.”, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, TX.
Gransberg, D. D., and James, D. M. B. (2005). “Chip seal best practices.”, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Hanz, A. J., Arega, Z. A., and Bahia, H. U. (2010). “Rheological evaluation of emulsion residues produced by evaporative recovery method.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2179, 102–108.
King, G., et al. (2010). “Field validation of performance-based polymer-modified emulsion residue tests: The FLH study.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Pavement Preservation, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
Kucharek, A. (2007). “Measuring the curing characteristics of chip sealing emulsions.” Proc., ARRA/ISSA/AEMA Joint Meeting, Asphalt Emulsion Manufacturers Association, Annapolis, MD.
Miller, T. D., Arega, Z. A., and Bahia, H. U. (2010). “Correlating rheological and bond properties of emulsions to aggregate retention of chip seals.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2179, 66–74.
Moraes, R., and Bahia, H. U. (2013). “Effects of curing and oxidative aging on raveling in emulsion chip seals.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2361, 69–79.
Petersen, J. C. (2009). “A transportation research circular E-C140: Review of the fundamentals of asphalt oxidation: Chemical, physicochemical, physical property, and durability relationships.” Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Shuler, S., Lord, A., Martin, A. E., and Hoyt, D. (2011). “Manuals for emulsion based chip seals for pavement preservation.”, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
Takamura, K. (2000). “Comparison of emulsion residues recovered by forced air flow and RTFO drying.” Proc., AEMA/ISSA Joint Annual Meeting, Asphalt Emulsion Manufacturers Association, Amelia Island, FL.
Transportation Research Board. (2014). “Transportation research circular E-C182: Progress toward performance-graded emulsified asphalt specifications.” Transportation Research Board of National Academies, Washington, DC.
Wasiuddin, N. M., Marshall, A., Saltibus, N. E., Saber, A., Abadie, C. D., and Mohammad, L. N. (2013a). “Use of sweep test for emulsion and hot asphalt chip seals: Laboratory and field evaluation.” J. Test. Eval., 41(2), 20120051.
Wasiuddin, N. M., Wilson, K., Islam, M. R., Parker, P., Abadie, C., and Mohammad, L. N. (2013b). “Field and laboratory evaluation of environmental effects on chip seal performance: Freeze-thaw and asphalt aging.” Proc., 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 26, 2014
Accepted: Sep 21, 2015
Published online: Nov 18, 2015
Discussion open until: Apr 18, 2016
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.