Technical Papers
Jul 15, 2013

Evaluation of Interface Shear Strength Properties of Geogrid-Reinforced Construction and Demolition Materials Using a Modified Large-Scale Direct Shear Testing Apparatus

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 5

Abstract

The interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition (C&D) aggregates were determined using a modified large scale direct shear test (DST) apparatus. Comparisons were made between the results of the various C&D aggregates reinforced with biaxial and triaxial geogrids and with the unreinforced aggregates by means of the modified and conventional DST methods. The modified DST method employed sought to increase interlocking between the C&D aggregates with the geogrids and thus ascertains the true interface shear strength properties of the recycled demolition aggregates. Biaxial and triaxial geogrids were used as the geogrid-reinforcement materials. The C&D aggregates tested with the DST were recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), crushed brick (CB), and reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). The modified DST results indicated that the interface shear strength properties of the geogrid-reinforced C&D aggregates were higher than that of the conventional test method and the respective unreinforced materials. Geogrid-reinforced RCA was found to have the highest interface peak and residual shear strength property of the C&D materials. RAP was found to have the smallest interface shear strength properties of the C&D aggregates. The higher stiffness triaxial geogrid attained higher interface shear strength properties than that of the lower stiffness biaxial geogrid. The modified device also showed some increased measured interface coefficients compared with a conventional DST. The geogrid-reinforced recycled C&D aggregates was found to meet the peak and residual shear strength requirements for typical construction aggregates used in civil engineering applications.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Aatheesan, T., Arulrajah, A., Bo, M. W., Vuong, B., and Wilson, J. (2010). “Crushed brick blends with crushed rock for pavement systems.” Waste Res. Manage., 163(1), 29–35.
Abu-Farsakh, M., Coronel, J., and Tao, M. (2007). “Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 540–549.
Alfaro, M. C., Miura, N., and Bergado, D. T. (1995). “Soil geogrid reinforcement interaction by pullout and direct shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J., 18(2), 157–167.
Ali, M. M. Y., Arulrajah, A., Disfani, M. M., and Piratheepan, J. (2011). “Suitability of using recycled glass-crushed rock blends for pavement subbase applications.” Conf., Geotechnical and Foundation Design, ASCE, Dallas, TX, 1325–1334.
Araujo, G. L. S., Palmeira, E. M., and Cunha, R. P. (2009). “Behaviour of geosynthetic-encased granular columns in porous collapsible soil.” Geosynth. Int., 16(6), 433–451.
Arulrajah, A., Abdullah, A., Bo, M. W., and Bouazza, A. (2009). “Ground improvement techniques for railway embankments.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng., 162(1), 3–14.
Arulrajah, A., Abdullah, A., Bo, M. W., and Leong, M. (2013a). “Geosynthetic applications in a high-speed railway: Case study.” Ground Improvement, Proc., Institution of Civil Engineers (UK), in press.
Arulrajah, A., Ali, M. M. Y., Disfani, M. M., Piratheepan, J., and Bo, M. W. (2013b). “Geotechnical performance of recycled glass-waste rock blends in footpath bases.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 653–661.
Arulrajah, A., Ali, M. M. Y., Piratheepan, J., and Bo, M. W. (2012a). “Geotechnical properties of waste excavation rock in pavement subbase applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 924–932.
Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Aatheesan, T., and Bo, M. W. (2011). “Geotechnical properties of recycled crushed brick in pavement applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 1444–1542.
Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Ali, M. M. Y., and Bo, M. W. (2012b). “Geotechnical properties of recycled concrete aggregate in pavement sub-base applications.” Geotech. Test. J., 35(5), 1–9.
Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Bo, M. W., and Sivakugan, N. (2012c). “Geotechnical characteristics of recycled crushed brick blends for pavement sub-base applications.” Can. Geotech. J., 49(7), 796–811.
Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., and Disfani, M. M. (2014). “Reclaimed asphalt pavement/recycled concrete aggregate blends in pavement subbase applications: Laboratory and field evaluation.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 349–357.
Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Disfani, M. M., and Bo, M. W. (2013c). “Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 1077–1088.
Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Disfani, M. M., and Bo, M. W. (2013d). “Resilient moduli response of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 1920–1928.
Arulrajah, A., Rahman, M. A., Piratheepan, J., Bo, M. W., and Imteaz, M. A. (2013e). “Interface shear strength testing of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials.” Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater., 2(1).
ASTM. (2007a). “Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils.” ASTM-D1883-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007b). “Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils.” ASTM-D422-63, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007c). “Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils.” ASTM-D2974, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method.” ASTM-D5321, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009). “Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort.” ASTM-D1557, West Conshohocken, PA.
Azam, A. M., and Cameron, D. A. (2013). “Geotechnical properties of blends of recycled clay masonry and recycled concrete aggregates in unbound pavement construction.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 788–798.
Bergado, D. T., Chai, J. C., Abiera, H. O., Alfaro, M. C., and Balasubramaniam, A. S. (1993). “Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements.” Geotext. Geomembr., 12(4), 327–349.
Disfani, M. M., Arulrajah, A., Bo, M. W., and Hankour, R. (2011). “Recycled crushed glass in road work applications.” Waste Manage., 31(11), 2341–2351.
Disfani, M. M., Arulrajah, A., Bo, M. W., and Sivakugan, N. (2012). “Environmental risks of using recycled crushed glass in road applications.” J. Cleaner Prod., 20(1), 170–179.
Gabr, A., and Cameron, D. A. (2012). “Properties of recycled concrete aggregate for unbound pavement construction.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 754–764.
Hoyos, L. R., Puppala, A. J., and Ordonez, C. A. (2011). “Characterization of cement fiber-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates: Preliminary investigation.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 977–989.
Imteaz, M. A., Ali, M. M. Y., and Arulrajah, A. (2012). “Possible environmental impacts of recycled glass used as a pavement base material.” Waste Manage. Res., 30(9), 917–921.
Jewell, R. A., Milligan, G. W. E., Sarsby, R. W., and Dubois, D. (1984). “Interaction between soil and geogrids.” Proc., Symp. on Polymer Grid Reinforcement in Civil Engineering, Thomas Telford, London, 19–29.
Kazimierowicz, F. K. (2007). “Influence of geosynthetic reinforcement on the load-settlement characteristics of two-layer subgrade.” Geotext. Geomembr., 25(6), 366–376.
Konietzky, H., Kamp, L., Gröger, T., and Jenner, C. (2004). “Use of DEM to model the interlocking effect of geogrids under static and cyclic loading.” Numerical modeling in micromechanics via particle methods, Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3–12.
Lee, K. M., and Manjunath, V. R. (2000). “Soil–geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests.” Can. Geotech. J., 37(1), 238–252.
Ling, H. I., Wang, J. P., and Leshchinsky, D. (2008). “Cyclic behaviour of soil-structure interfaces associated with modular-block reinforced soil-retaining walls.” Geosynth. Int., 15(1), 14–21.
Liu, C. N., Ho, Y. H., and Huang, J. W. (2009a). “Large scale direct shear tests of soil/pet-yarn geogrid interfaces.” Geotext. Geomembr., 27(1), 19–30.
Liu, C. N., Zornberg, J. G., Chen, T. C., Ho, Y. H., and Lin, B. H. (2009b). “Behavior of geogrid-sand interface in direct shear mode.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1863–1871.
McCartney, J. S., and Zornberg, J. G., and Swan, R. H., Jr. (2009). “Analysis of a large database of gcl-geomembrane interface shear strength results.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 209–223.
McDowell, G. R., Harireche, O., Konietzky, H., Brown, S. F., and Thom, N. H. (2006). “Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng., 159(1), 35–48.
Palmeira, E. M., and Antunes, L. G. S. (2010). “Large scale tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads subjected to surface maintenance.” Geotext. Geomembr., 28(6), 547–58.
Palmeira, E. M., Beirigo, E. A., and Gardoni, M. G. (2010). “Tailings-nonwoven geotextile filter compatibility in mining applications.” Geotext. Geomembr., 28(2), 136–148.
Piratheepan, J., Arulrajah, A., and Disfani, M. M. (2013). “Large scale direct shear testing of recycled construction and demolition materials.” Adv. Civ. Eng. Mater., 2(1), 1–13.
Poon, C. S., and Chan, D. (2006a). “Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base.” Constr. Build. Mater., 20(8), 578–585.
Poon, C. S., and Chan, D. (2006b). “Paving blocks made with recycled concrete aggregate and crushed clay brick.” Constr. Build. Mater., 20(8), 569–577.
Puppala, A. J., Hoyos, L. R., and Potturi, A. K. (2011). “Resilient moduli response of moderately cement-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 990–998.
Rahman, M. A., Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Bo, M. W., and Imteaz, M. A. (2013). “Resilient modulus and permanent deformation responses of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng.,.
Rowe, R. K., and Taechakumthorn, C. (2011). “Design of reinforced embankments on soft clay deposits considering the viscosity of both foundation and reinforcement.” Geotext. Geomembr., 29(5), 448–461.
Sivakugan, N., and Das, B. M. (2010). Geotechnical engineering: A practical problem solving approach, J. Ross Publishing, Fort Lauderdale, FL.
Standards Association of Australia (SAA). (2000a). “Particle density and water absorption of coarse aggregate Weighing-in-water method.” AS1141.6.1, Sydney, Australia.
Standards Association of Australia (SAA). (2000b). “Particle density and water absorption of fine aggregate.” AS1141.5, Sydney, Australia.
Taha, R., Al-Harthy, A., Al-Shamsi, K., and Al-Zubeidi, M. (2002). “Cement stabilization of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate for road bases and subbases.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 239–245.
Tatlisoz, N., Edil, T. B., and Benson, C. H. (1998). “Interaction between reinforcing geosynthetics and soil-tire chip mixtures.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1109–1119.
Touahamia, M., Sivakumar, V., and McKelvey, D. (2002). “Shear strength of reinforced-recycled material.” Constr. Build. Mater., 16(6), 331–339.
Tutumluer, E., Huang, H., and Bian, X. (2012). “Geogrid-Aggregate interlock mechanism investigated through aggregate imaging-based discrete element modeling approach.” Int. J. Geomech., 391–398.
Zekkos, D., Athanasopoulos, G. A., Bray, J. D., Grizi, A., and Theodoratos, A. (2010). “Large-scale direct shear testing of municipal solid waste.” Waste Manage., 30(8–9), 1544–1555.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 26Issue 5May 2014
Pages: 974 - 982

History

Received: Mar 11, 2013
Accepted: Jul 12, 2013
Published online: Jul 15, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 15, 2013
Published in print: May 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

A. Arulrajah [email protected]
Associate Professor, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
M. A. Rahman [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
J. Piratheepan [email protected]
Lecturer, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
M.ASCE
Senior Principal/Director, DST Consulting Engineers Inc., Thunder Bay, ON, Canada P7B 5V5. E-mail: [email protected]
M. A. Imteaz [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne Univ. of Technology, P.O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share