Technical Papers
Mar 21, 2012

Performance of MEPDG Dynamic Modulus Predictive Models for Asphalt Concrete Mixtures: Local Calibration for Idaho

Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 11

Abstract

The mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG) is the research version of the newly released DARWin-ME software by AASHTO. MEPDG includes two models for Levels 2 and 3 hot-mix asphalt (HMA) dynamic modulus (E*) predictions. The two models are NCHRP 1-37A and NCHRP 1-40D. The primary difference between the two is the binder stiffness parameter; viscosity or shear modulus. Moreover, MEPDG includes three levels for binder stiffness characterization: viscosity for Level 1 conventional binders, shear modulus for Level 1 superpave binders, and default values for Level 3. The influence of the binder characterization input level on the performance of the MEPDG E* predictive models is evaluated in this paper. To calibrate the models for Idaho, 27 HMA mixtures commonly used in Idaho were investigated. Results showed that the performance of the investigated models varied based on the temperature and the binder characterization method. The NCHRP1-37A E* model with MEPDG Level 3 binder inputs yielded the most accurate and least biased E* estimates. The accuracy of this model was further enhanced by introducing a local calibration factor.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was partially provided by the ITD and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) under contract with the National Institute for Advanced Transportation Technology (NIATT) at the University of Idaho. Binder testing in DSR was performed at the Idaho Asphalt Laboratory in Boise, Idaho. The authors acknowledge the technical and financial support provided by these organizations.

References

AASHTO. (2006a). “Standard method of test determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR).”, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2006b). “Standard test method of test for viscosity determination of asphalt binder using rotational viscometer.”, Washington, D.C.
AASHTO. (2009). “Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (HMA).”, Washington, D.C.
Abu Abdo, A., Bayomy, F., Nielsen, R., Weaver, T., Jung, S. J., and Santi, M. (2009). “Prediction of the dynamic modulus of superpave mixes.” Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields, Tutumluer, E., and Al-Qadi, I. L., eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 305–314.
Al-Khateeb, G., Shenoy, A., Gibson, N., and Harman, T. (2006). “A new simplistic model for dynamic modulus predictions of asphalt paving mixtures.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 75, 1254–1293 〈http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=798333〉.
Andrei, D., Witczak, M. W., and Mirza, M. W. (1999). “Development of a revised predictive model for the dynamic (complex) modulus of asphalt mixtures.”, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD.
ARA, ERES Consultants Div. (2004). “Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
ASTM. (2009). “Standard viscosity—temperature chart for asphalts.”, West Conshohocken, PA.
Awed, A. (2010). “Material characterization of HMA for MEPDG implementation in idaho.” Masters thesis, Univ. of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
Awed, A., El-Badawy, S., and Bayomy, F. (2011). “Influence of the MEPDG binder characterization input level on the predicted dynamic modulus for idaho asphalt concrete mixtures.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Washington, D.C.
Azari, H., Al-Khateeb, G., Shenoy, A., and Gibson, N. (2007). “Comparison of simple performance test E* of accelerated loading facility mixtures and prediction E* use of NCHRP 1-37A and Witczak’s new equations.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1–9.
Bari, J. (2005). “Development of a new revised version of the Witczak E* predictive models for hot mix asphalt mixtures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
Bari, J., and Witczak, M. W. (2006). “Development of a new revised version of the Witczak E* predictive models for hot mix asphalt mixtures.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 75, 381–417 〈http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=798214〉.
Bari, J., and Witczak, M. W. (2007). “New predictive models for the viscosity and complex shear modulus of asphalt binders for use with the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 9–19.
Bennert, T., and Williams, S. G. (2009). “Precision of AASHTO TP62-07 for use in mechanistic empirical pavement design guide for flexible pavements.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 115–126.
Birgisson, B., Sholar, G., and Roque, R. (2005). “Evaluation of predicted dynamic modulus for florida mixtures.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 200–207.
Ceylan, H., Schwartz, C. W., Kim, S., and Gopalakrishnan, K. (2009). “Accuracy of predictive models for dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 21(6), 286–293.
Dongré, R., Myres, L., D’Angelo, J., Paugh, C., and Gudimettla, J. (2005). “Field evaluation of Witczak and Hirsch models for predicting dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 74, 381–434 〈http://144.171.11.39/view.aspx?id=776082〉.
El-Badawy, S. (2012). “Recommended changes to designs not meeting criteria using the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., 5(1), 54–61 〈http://144.171.11.39/view.aspx?id=1128500〉.
DARWin-ME. [Computer software]. AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
El-Badawy, S., Awed, A., and Bayomy, F. (2011). “Evaluation of the MEPDG dynamic modulus prediction models for asphalt concrete mixtures.” Proc., 1st Integrated Transportation and Development Institute Congress, Al-Qadi, I., and Murrell, S., eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 576–585.
El-Badawy, S., Jeong, M., and El-Basyouny, M. (2009). “Methodology to predict alligator fatigue cracking distress based on AC dynamic modulus.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 115–124.
El-Basyouny, M., Witczak, M. W., and El-Badawy, S. (2005). “Verification of the calibrated permanent deformation models for the 2002 design guide.” J. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol., 74, 601–652 〈http://144.171.11.39/view.aspx?id=776098〉.
Far, M., Underwood, B., Ranjithan, S., Kim, R., and Jackson, N. (2009). “Application of artificial neural networks for estimating dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 173–183.
Fugro Consultants and Arizona State Univ. (2011). “A performance-related specification for hot-mixed asphalt.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Haider, S., Mirza, M., Thottempudi, A., Bari, J., and Baladi, G. (2011). “Effect of test methods on viscosity temperature susceptibility characterization of asphalt binders for the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide.” Proc. 1st Integrated Transportation and Development Institute Congress, Al-Qadi, I., and Murrell, S., eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 482–492.
Harran, G., and Shalaby, A. (2009). “Improving the prediction of the dynamic modulus of fine-graded asphalt concrete mixtures at high temperatures.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(2), 180–190.
Idaho Transportation Dept. (ITD). (2010). “Standard specifications for highway construction 2004.” Section 405—Superpave Hot Mix Asphalt, 〈http://itd.idaho.gov/manuals/Downloads/spec'04'.htm〉 (Feb. 28, 2012).
Kim, R., King, M., and Momen, M. (2005). “Typical dynamic moduli values of hot mix asphalt in North Carolina and their prediction.” (CD-ROM), Washington, D.C.
Li, J., Pierce, L. M., and Uhlmeyer, J. S. (2009). “Calibration of flexible pavement in mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide for Washington state.” Transportation Research Record 2095, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 73–83.
Martinez, F. O., and Angelone, S. M. (2009). “Evaluation of different predictive dynamic modulus models of asphalt mixtures used in Argentina.” Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways, and Airfields, Tutumluer, E., and L. Al-Qadi, I., eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 275–284.
Obulareddy, S. (2006). “Fundamental characterization of Louisiana HMA mixtures for the 2002 mechanistic-empirical design guide.” Masters thesis, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
Pellinen, T. K. (2001). “Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt performance.” Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
Robbins, M., and Timm, D. (2011). “Evaluation of dynamic modulus predictive equations for NCAT test track asphalt mixtures.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Washington, D.C.
Saadeh, S., Obulareddy, S., Cooper, S., and Mohammad, L. (2008). “Characterization of Louisiana asphalt mixtures using simple performance tests.” Paper JTE101245, J. Test. Eval., 〈http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/JOURNALS/TESTEVAL/PAGES/JTE101245.htm〉, 36(1), 5–16.
Sholar, G., Roque, R., and Birgisson, B. (2005). “Evaluation of a predicted dynamic modulus for Florida mixtures.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 200–207.
Singh, D., Zaman, M., and Commuri, S. (2011). “Evaluation of predictive models for estimating dynamic modulus of HMA mixes used in Oklahoma.” Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers (CD-ROM), Washington, D.C.
Thompson, M. R., and Garcia, G. (2007). “HMA dynamic modulus predictive models: A review.”, Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana, IL.
Witczak, M., El-Basyouny, M., and El-Badawy, S. (2007). “Incorporation of the new (2005) E* predictive model in the MEPDG.”, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24Issue 11November 2012
Pages: 1412 - 1421

History

Received: Oct 20, 2011
Accepted: Mar 16, 2012
Published online: Mar 21, 2012
Published in print: Nov 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sherif El-Badawy, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Public Works Engineering Dept., Mansoura Univ., Mansoura, Egypt; and Adjunct Faculty, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Idaho, P.O. Box 441022, Moscow, ID 83844-1022 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Fouad Bayomy, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Idaho, P.O. Box 441022, Moscow, ID 83844-1022. E-mail: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ. System, College Station, TX 77843-3135. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share