Optimization of Cementitious Material Content for Sustainable Concrete Mixtures
Publication: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 6
Abstract
Utilization of fly ash in concrete reduces the use of virgin materials and offers benefits of reduced landfill materials and emissions avoidance—fly ash therefore contributes to industrial sustainability. This paper presents a method to optimize the cement and fly ash contents in concrete on the basis of the hardened concrete properties testing and environmental effects. Such fly ash concrete would develop an adequate 1-day and 28-day compressive strength and would be as durable as the ordinary portland cement concrete. Nine concrete mixtures with fly ash contents ranging from 15–60% and cementitious material contents from () were investigated. Environmental life cycle assessments (LCA) were completed by using a model developed for Denver, Colorado. The optimized fly ash concrete was selected to yield a similar 28-day compressive strength and durability to that of Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class D structural concrete. The durability aspects investigated included the resistance to rapid chloride-ion penetration and the resistance to the rapid cycles of freezing and thawing. The results show that the mixtures with cementitious material content lower than () and fly ash content higher than 40% meet the CDOT Class D structural concrete strength and durability requirements. On the basis of the structural performances of the concrete mixtures and environmental effects, the optimized cementitious material content and the maximum possible cement replacement percentage with the fly ash was selected to be () and 50%, respectively. The optimized concrete mixture exhibited excellent characteristics in compressive strength (32.0 MPa, 4,635 psi at 28 days), resistance to chloride-ion penetration (moderate at 28 days of age) and freeze-thaw (96, average durability factor after 300 cycles). The mixture with optimum fly ash and cementitious content had the minimum embodied energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission among the nine mixtures. The embodied energy and GHG emission of the optimized concrete mixture (per cubic meter) were 2,643 MJ and , respectively, which are 32.8 and 35.2% less than the mixture with the most embodied energy and GHG emission.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Coal Ash Association (ACAA). (2001–2009). “Coal Combustion Product (CCP) Production and Use Statistics.” 〈http://acaa.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=3〉 (Dec. 16, 2010).
ASTM. (2002). “Standard test method for fundamental transverse, longitudinal, and torsional resonant frequencies of concrete specimens.” C215-02, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2004a). “Standard specification for Portland cement.” C150-04, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2004b). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C 39/C 39M-04a, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2005). “Standard test method for electrical indication of concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion penetration.” C1202-05, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2007). “Standard practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory.” C192/C192M-07, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM (2008a). “Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete.” C 618-08a, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008b). “Standard specification for concrete aggregates.” C33/C33M-08, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008c). “Standard test method for density (unit weight),yield, and air content (gravimetric) of concrete.” C 138/C 138M-08, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008d). “Standard test method for resistance of concrete to rapid freezing and thawing.” C 666/C 666M-03, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009a). “Standard test method for slump of hydraulic-cement concrete.” C143/C143M-09, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2009b). “Standard test method for air content of freshly mixed concrete by the pressure method.” C231-09, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bilodeau, A., Sivasundaram, V., Painter, K. E., and Malhotra, V. M. (1994). “Durability of concrete incorporating high volumes of fly ash from sources in the U.S..” ACI Mater. J.AMAJEF, 91(1), 3–12.
Boden, T. A., Marland, G., and Andres, R. J. (2010). Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel emissions, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN 〈http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_usa.html〉 (Oct. 20, 2010).
Bouzoubaâ, N., and Fournier, B. (2003). “Optimization of fly ash content in concrete. Part I: Non-air-entrained concrete made without superplasticizer.” Cem. Concr. Res.CCNRAI, 33(7), 1029–1037.
Carnegie Mellon Univ. Green Design Institute. (2009). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA).” US 1997 Industry Benchmark model 〈http://www.eiolca.net〉 (Apr. 15, 2009).
Colorado DOT. (2008). “2005 construction specifications, section 601.” 〈http://www.coloradodot.info/business/designsupport/construction-specifications/2005-construction-specs/2005book/sec601-609.pdf/view〉 (Dec. 16, 2008).
Gustin, M. S., and Ladwig, K. (2004). “An assessment of the significance of mercury release from coal fly ash.” J. Air Waster Manage. Assoc.JAWAFC, 54(3), 320–330.
Kosmatka, S. H., Kerkhoff, B., and Panarese, W. C. (2006). Design and control of concrete mixtures, 14th Ed., Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
Liu, R., Durham, S. A., and Rens, K. L. (2010). “Durabilty of sustainable concrete mixtures.” Proc., 2010 Green Streets and Highways Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA, 248–257.
Liu, R., Durham, S. A., and Rens, K. L. (2011). “Effects of post-mercury-control fly ash on fresh and hardened concrete properties.” Constr. Build. Mater.CBUMEZ, 25(8), 3283–3290.
Poon, C. S., Lam, L., and Wong, Y. L. (1999). “Effects of fly ash and silica fume on interfacial porosity of concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng.JMCEE7, 11(3), 197–205.
Reiner, M. B. (2007). “Technology, environment, resource and policy assessment of sustainable concrete in urban infrastructure.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). (1976). “Solid waste disposal act.” 〈http://epw.senate.gov/rcra.pdf〉 (Sep. 20, 2008).
Sanchez, F., Keeney, R., Kosson, D., Delapp, R., and Thorneloe, S. (2006). “Characterization of mercury-enriched coal combustion residues from electric utilities using enhanced sorbents for mercury control.” Final Rep., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency office of Research and Development, Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Category III/Applied Research Contract No. EP-C-04-023, Washington, DC, 〈http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600r06008/600r06008.pdf〉 (Sep. 16, 2007).
Senior, C., Bustard, C. J., Durham, M., Baldrey, K., and Michaud, D. (2004). “Characterization of fly ash from full-scale demonstration of sorbent injection for mercury control on coal-fired power plants.” Fuel Process. Technol.FPTEDY, 85(6–7), 601–612.
Sivasundaram, V., Carette, G. G., and Malhotra, V. M. (1991). “Mechanical properties, creep, and resistance to diffusion of chloride ions of concretes incorporating high volumes of ASTM class F fly ashes from seven different sources.” ACI Mater. J.AMAJEF, 88(4), 407–416.
Tewalt, S. J., Bragg, L. J., and Finkelman, R. B. (2001). “Mercury in U.S. coal-abundance, distribution, and modes of occurrence.” U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 095-01 〈http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs095-01/fs095-01.pdf〉 (Dec. 13, 2009).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 24, 2011
Accepted: Dec 8, 2011
Published online: Dec 10, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.