Abstract

This study examines the moderating role of project type between project delivery system (PDS) and cost performance to decide whether project types should be addressed prior to evaluating PDS performance. Previous studies evaluating PDSs performance using direct relationship analysis present controversial assessments in terms of cost-efficiency. They recognize that project type causes inconsistencies when comparing design–build (DB) and design–bid–build (DBB) systems. However, they have yet to determine the specific role of the project type, leading to ambiguity regarding how to control the project type (e.g., a dataset using unspecified or mixed project types). This study employed a moderation analysis to identify the role of project type and to compare the cost performance of DB and DBB systems associated with project types as a post hoc test, leveraging statistical methodology, based on 90 public building projects in Seoul, South Korea. The results show that the moderating effect of project type is statistically significant. The cost growth in DB for nonresidential building projects presents statistically lower than that in DBB, whereas the cost growth difference between DB and DBB for residential buildings is not statistically significant. Additional analysis of full life-cycle cost performance shows another dimension of comparison that indicates the cost performance comparison of DB and DBB projects is controversial and more likely to be influenced by other factors. This study contributes to the engineering in the management body of knowledge by distinguishing the effects of project type and PDS on cost performance using a causal relationship analysis. The findings provide objective criteria for public-sector practitioners in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction industry on how to address project types when they evaluate and select PDS and enhance the consistency of PDS evaluation in terms of cost performance.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data used during the study were provided by a third party. Direct requests for these materials may be made to the provider as indicated in the Acknowledgments.

Acknowledgments

This work is based on the first author’s Ph.D. dissertation. The research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2021R1I1A1A01049141 and NRF-2020R1I1A1A01067292). The authors are grateful to the Seoul Special City for sharing the data collected during the study.

References

Aibinu, A. A., and A. M. Al-Lawati. 2010. “Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding.” J. Autom. Constr. 19 (6): 714–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.016.
Aiken, L. S., and S. G. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Allen, L. N. 2001. “Comparison of design-build to design-bid-build as a project delivery method.” M.S. thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.
Asmar, M. E., A. S. Hanna, and W. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” J. Personality Social Psychol. 51 (6): 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
Bennett, J., E. Pothecary, and G. Robinson. 1996. Designing and building a world-class industry: The University of Reading design and build forum report. Reading, UK: Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, Univ. of Reading.
Bhargava, A., P. C. Anastasopoulos, S. Labi, K. C. Sinha, and F. L. Mannering. 2010. “Three-stage least-squares analysis of time and cost overruns in construction contracts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (11): 1207–1218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000225.
Carr, P. G. 2005. “Investigation of bid price competition measured through prebid project estimates, actual bid prices, and number of bidders.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131 (11): 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1165).
Chen, Q., Z. Jin, B. Xia, P. Wu, and M. Skitmore. 2016. “Time and cost performance of design-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (2): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001056.
Cohen, P., S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2014. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Psychology Press.
Fernane, J. D. 2011. “Comparison of design-build and design-bid-build performance of public university projects.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Construction Management, Univ. of Nevada, Las Vegas.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2002. Contract administration: Technology and practice in Europe. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2006. Design-build effectiveness study. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, FHWA.
Field, A. 2013. Discovering C statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. New York: SAGE.
Frazier, P. A., A. P. Tix, and K. E. Baron. 2004. “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counselling psychology.” J. Counselling Psychol. 51 (1): 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115.
Gkritza, K., and S. Labi. 2008. “Estimating cost discrepancies in highway contracts: Multistep econometric approach.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (12): 953–962. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:12(953).
Goftar, V. N., M. E. Asmar, and E. Bingham. 2014. “A meta-analysis of literature comparing project performance between design-build (DB) and design-bid-build (DBB) delivery systems.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress, 1389–1398. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Gu, V. C., J. J. Hoffman, Q. Cao, and M. J. Schniederjans. 2014. “The effects of organizational culture and environmental pressures on IT project performance: A moderation perspective.” Int. J. Project Manage. 32 (7): 1170–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.12.003.
Hale, D. R., P. P. Shrestha, E. Gibson, and G. C. Migliaccio. 2009. “Empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 35 (7): 579–587. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000017.
Hartono, B., S. R. Sulistyo, K. H. Chai, and N. Indarti. 2019. “Knowledge management maturity and performance in a project environment: Moderating roles of firm size and project complexity.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (6): 04019023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000705.
Hayes, A. F. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Holmbeck, G. N. 2002. “Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and mediational effects in studies of pediatric populations.” J. Pediatr. Psychol. 27 (1): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.87.
Ibbs, C. W., Y. Kwak, T. Ng, and A. M. Odabase. 2003. “Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 129 (4): 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:4(382).
Ibrahim, M. W., A. Hanna, and D. Kievet. 2020. “Quantitative comparison of project performance between project delivery systems.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (6): 04020082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000837.
Jaccard, J., and R. Turrisi. 2003. Interaction effects in multiple regression. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Jahren, C. T., and A. M. Ashe. 1990. “Predictors of cost overrun rates.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 116 (3): 548–552. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(548).
Jang, Y., N. Kwon, Y. Ahn, H. S. Lee, and M. Park. 2019. “International diversification and performance of construction companies: Moderating effect of regional, product, and industry diversifications.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (5): 04019015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000713.
Konchar, M., and V. Sanvido. 1998. “Comparison of U.S. project delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(435).
Koo, H. J., and J. T. O’Connor. 2021. “Complexity analysis of design deliverable defects on building projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (3): 04021014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000897.
Korkmaz, S., D. Riley, and M. Horman. 2010. “Piloting evaluation metrics for sustainable high-performance building project delivery.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (8): 877–885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000195.
Korkmaz, S., L. Swarup, and D. Riley. 2013. “Delivering sustainable, high-performance buildings: Influence of project delivery methods on integration and project outcomes.” J. Manage. Eng. 29 (1): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000114.
Kraemer, H. C., G. T. Wilson, C. G. Fairburn, and W. S. Agras. 2002. “Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials.” Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 59 (10): 877–883. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.59.10.877.
Ling, F. Y. Y., S. L. Chan, E. Chong, and L. P. Ee. 2004. “Predicting performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(75).
Liu, B., T. Huo, Y. Liang, Y. Sun, and X. Hu. 2016. “Key factors of project characteristics affecting project delivery system decision making in the Chinese construction industry: Case study using Chinese data based on rough set theory.” J. Civ. Eng. Educ. 142 (4): 05016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000278.
Love, P. E. D. 2002. “Influence of project type and procurement method on rework costs in building construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 128 (1): 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(18).
Mesa, H. A., R. M. Keith, and F. A. Luis. 2016. “Exploring performance of the integrated project delivery process on complex building projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (7): 1089–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.007.
Minchin, R. E., X. Li, R. R. Issa, and G. G. Vargas. 2013. “Comparison of cost and time performance of design-build and design-bid-build delivery systems in Florida.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (10): 04013007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000746.
Molenaar, K., A. Songer, and M. Barash. 1999. “Public-sector design/build evolution and performance.” J. Manage. Eng. 15 (2): 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1999)15:2(54).
Molenaar, K. R., and A. D. Songer. 1998. “Model for public sector design-build project selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 124 (6): 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:6(467).
Moon, H., K. Kim, H. Lee, M. Park, T. Williams, B. Son, and J. Chun. 2020a. “Cost performance comparison of design-build and design-bid-build for building and civil projects using a mediation effect.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (9): 04020113. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001873.
Moon, H., T. P. Williams, H. S. Lee, and M. Park. 2020b. “Predicting project cost overrun levels in bidding stage using ensemble learning.” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 19 (6): 586–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1765171.
Moon, H. S., K. M. Cho, T. H. Hong, and C. T. Hyun. 2011. “Selection model for delivery methods for multifamily-housing construction projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (2): 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000038.
Müller, R., and J. R. Turner. 2007. “Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003.
Nguyen, P. H., D. Tran, and B. C. Lines. 2020. “Fuzzy set theory approach to classify highway project characteristics for delivery selection.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (5): 04020044. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001829.
Park, H. S., D. Lee, S. Kim, and J. L. Kim. 2015. “Comparing project performance of design-build and design-bid-build methods for large sized public apartment housing projects in Korea.” J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 14 (2): 323–330. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.14.323.
Park, J., and Y. H. Kwak. 2017. “Design-bid-build (DBB) versus design-build (DB) in the U.S. public transportation projects: The choice and consequences.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (3): 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.013.
Perkins, R. A. 2009. “Sources of changes in design-build contracts for a governmental owner.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (7): 588–593. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:7(588).
Pocock, J. B., C. T. Hyun, L. Y. Liu, and M. K. Kim. 1996. “Relationship between project interaction & amp; performance indicators.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 122 (2): 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:2(165).
Qiao, Y., J. D. Fricker, and S. Labi. 2019. “Effects of bundling policy on project cost under market uncertainty: A comparison across different highway project types.” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 130 (Dec): 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.10.001.
Rosner, J. W., A. E. Thal, and C. J. West. 2009. “Analysis of the design-build delivery method in Air Force construction projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 135 (8): 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000029.
Roth, M. 1995. “An empirical analysis of United States Navy design/ build contracts.” Master’s thesis, Univ. of Texas, Austin.
Sharma, S., R. M. Durand, and O. Gur-Arie. 1981. “Identification and analysis of moderator variables.” J. Marketing Res. 18 (3): 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800303.
Shi, C., Y. Chen, J. You, and H. Yao. 2018. “Asset specificity and contractors’ opportunistic behavior: Moderating roles of contract and trust.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (5): 04018026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000632.
Shrestha, P. P., and J. D. Fernane. 2017. “Performance of design-build and design-bid-build projects for public universities.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (3): 04016101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001241.
Songer, A., and K. Molenaar. 1996. “Selecting design-build: Public and private sector owner attitudes.” J. Manage. Eng. 124 (6): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(1996)12:6(47).
Sullivan, J., M. E. Asmar, J. Chalhoub, and H. Obeid. 2017. “Two decades of performance comparisons for design-build, construction manager at risk, and design-bid-build: Quantitative analysis of the state of knowledge on project cost, schedule, and quality.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (6): 04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001282.
Thomas, S. R., C. L. Macken, T. H. Chung, and I. Kim. 2002. Measuring the impacts of the delivery system on project performance—Design-build and design-bid-build. NIST GCR 02-840. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Tran, D. Q., G. Diraviam, and R. E. Minchin Jr. 2018. “Performance of highway design-bid-build and design-build projects by work types.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 144 (2): 04017112. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001437.
US Air Force. 2000. The United States Air Force project manager’s guide for design and construction. Virginia: US Air Force.
Warne, T. R. 2005. Design build contracting for highway projects: A performance assessment. South Jordan, UT: Tom Warne & Associates, LLC.
Wegener, D., and L. Fabrigar. 2000. “Analysis and design for non-experimental data addressing causal and non-causal hypothesis.” In Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, edited by H. T. Reis and C. M. Judd, 412–450. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, A. D., and B. D. Zumbo. 2008. “Understanding and using mediators and moderators.” Social Indic. Res. 87 (3): 367–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1.
Xiong, B., M. Skitmore, and B. Xia. 2015. “A critical review of structural modeling applications in construction research.” J. Autom. Constr. 49 (Part A): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.09.006.
Yang, L. R., J. H. Chen, and H. W. Wang. 2012. “Assessing impacts of information technology on project success through knowledge management practice.” J. Autom. Constr. 22 (Mar): 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.016.
Yang, L. R., J. H. Chen, and X. L. Wang. 2015. “Assessing the effect of requirement definition and management on performance outcomes: Role of interpersonal conflict, product advantage and project type.” Int. J. Project Manage. 33 (1): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.02.012.
You, W., Y. Chen, Y. Gao, and J. You. 2020. “Understanding the relationship between environmental uncertainty and transaction costs in construction projects: Moderating roles of prior cooperation experience and intragroup transactions.” J. Manage. Eng. 36 (6): 04020087. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000854.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 39Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Nov 2, 2021
Accepted: Jun 28, 2022
Published online: Sep 23, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Research Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.-Erica, Ansan 15588, South Korea. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-3181. Email: [email protected]
Moonseo Park, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Institute of Construction and Environmental Engineering, Seoul National Univ., Seoul 08826, Korea. Email: [email protected]
Yonghan Ahn, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Smartcity Engineering, Hanyang Univ.-Erica, Ansan 15588, South Korea. Email: [email protected]
Research Professor, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Hanyang Univ.-Erica, Ansan 15588, South Korea (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-9611. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Sensitivity of Cost Overrun Propensity and Severity to Highway Project Bundling, Journal of Management in Engineering, 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5425, 40, 2, (2024).
  • Data-Driven Analysis of Progressive Design Build in Water and Wastewater Infrastructure Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-13824, 150, 1, (2024).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share