Technical Papers
Jul 19, 2022

Optimal Planning of Renovation Work in Leased Buildings under Integrated Project Delivery Method

Publication: Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38, Issue 6

Abstract

This paper presents the development of a novel model for optimizing the planning of renovation work in leased buildings that utilize the integrated project delivery (IPD) method to maximize the income of leased units during renovation work. The present model is developed in two main phases: optimization and renovation planning. The model integrates a novel methodology that enables decision makers to select optimal crew deployment data and number of assigned crews for all renovation activities, identify an optimal unit renovation order of all leased units, generate feasible renovation schedules, and quantify and minimize total net renovation cost. A real-life case study of three renovation projects was analyzed to illustrate the use of the model and demonstrate its capabilities. The results of this analysis clearly illustrate the original contributions of the model to the body of knowledge and its novel capability in generating optimal renovation schedules for leased buildings that enable contractors to maximize their share of rewards under IPD projects while minimizing their total renovation cost.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) for the financial support. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.

References

Ahmad, I., N. Azhar, and A. Chowdhury. 2019. “Enhancement of IPD characteristics as impelled by information and communication technology.” J. Manage. Eng. 35 (1): 04018055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000670.
AIA (American Institute of Architects). 2007. Integrated project delivery: A guide, 62. Washington, DC: AIA.
AlOtaibi, M., K. El-Rayes, and A. Altuwaim. 2021. “Optimizing the renovation scheduling of leased residential buildings to minimize total project cost.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (7): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002063.
Bakry, I., O. Moselhi, and T. Zayed. 2014. “Optimized acceleration of repetitive construction projects.” Autom. Constr. 39: 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2013.07.003.
Barutha, P. J., H. D. Jeong, D. D. Gransberg, and A. Touran. 2021. “Evaluation of the impact of collaboration and integration on performance of industrial projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 04021037. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000921.
EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2020. Commercial buildings have gotten larger in the United States, with implications for energy - Today in energy. Washington, DC: EIA.
El Asmar, M., A. S. Hanna, and W.-Y. Loh. 2013. “Quantifying performance for the integrated project delivery system as compared to established delivery systems.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 139 (11): 04013012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000744.
El-Rayes, B. K. 2001. “Optimal planning of highway construction A/B bidding method.” Constr. Eng. Manage. 127 (Aug): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:4(261).
Engebo, A., O. J. Klakegg, J. Lohne, and O. Lædre. 2020. “A collaborative project delivery method for design of a high-performance building.” Int. J. Managing Projects Bus. 13 (6): 1141–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2020-0014.
Fan, S. L., K. S. Sun, and Y. R. Wang. 2012. “GA optimization model for repetitive projects with soft logic.” Autom. Constr. 21 (1): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.009.
Galiotto, N., P. Heiselberg, and M. A. Knudstrup. 2015. “The integrated renovation process: Application to family homes.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustainability 168 (6): 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.14.00020.
Ghassemi, R., and B. Becerik-Gerber. 2011. “Transitioning to integrated project delivery: Potential barriers and lessons learned.” Lean Constr. J. 2011 (Apr): 32–52.
Hassan, A., and K. El-Rayes. 2019. “Quantifying the interruption impact of activity delays in non-serial repetitive construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 0 (0): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1657922.
Hegazy, T., M. Asce, and E. Kamarah. 2007. “Efficient repetitive scheduling for high-rise construction.” Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:4(253).
Hyari, K., and K. El-Rayes. 2005. “Optimal planning and scheduling for repetitive construction projects.” Manage. Eng. 22 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2006)22:1(11).
Jeunesse, E. L. A. 2019. Healthy home remodeling: Consumer trends and contractor preparedness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ.
Lahdenperä, P. 2012. “Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 30 (1): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.648947.
Lee, H. Y. 2012. “Renovation scheduling to minimize user impact of a building that remains in operation.” Autom. Constr. 22 (Mar): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.018.
Manata, B., V. Miller, S. Mollaoglu, and A. J. Garcia. 2018. “Measuring key communication behaviors in integrated project delivery teams.” J. Manage. Eng. 34 (4): 06018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000622.
Monghasemi, S., and M. Abdallah. 2021. “Linear optimization model to minimize total cost of repetitive construction projects and identify order of units.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (4): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000936.
Park, C. Y. 2017. “Managing tenant movement scenarios based on tenant satisfaction during occupied renovation activities.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering/Engineering Practice School.
Pishdad-Bozorgi, P., and D. Srivastava. 2018. “Assessment of integrated project delivery (IPD) risk and reward sharing strategies from the standpoint of collaboration: A game theory approach.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2018, 196–206. Reston, VA: ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481271.020.
Rojas, E. M., and I. Kell. 2008. “Comparative analysis of project delivery systems cost performance in pacific northwest public schools.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 134 (6): 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:6(387).
Salama, T., and O. Moselhi. 2019. “Multi-objective optimization for repetitive scheduling under uncertainty.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 26 (7): 1294–1320. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2018-0217.
Su, G., M. Hastak, X. Deng, and R. Khallaf. 2020. “Risk sharing strategies for IPD projects: Interactional analysis of participants’ decision-making.” J. Manage. Eng. 37 (1): 04020101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000853.
US Census Bureau. 2019. “2015-2019 American community survey 5-year estimates.” Accessed March 16, 2021. https://www.census.gov/search-results.html?searchType=web&cssp=SERP&q=residential%20units.
Whiteman, W. E., and H. G. Irwig. 1988. “Disturbance scheduling technique for managing renovation work.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 114 (2): 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1988)114:2(191).
Yee, P., M. Fischer, J. Haymaker, P. Fischer, and M. Haymaker. 2013. “Automated identification of occupant interactions in renovations of occupied buildings.” J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 2009 (Dec): 67.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Management in Engineering
Journal of Management in Engineering
Volume 38Issue 6November 2022

History

Received: Oct 4, 2021
Accepted: May 11, 2022
Published online: Jul 19, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mansour AlOtaibi, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management, King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia. Email: [email protected]
Khaled El-Rayes, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 3112 Newmark Civil Engineering Bldg., 205 North Mathews Ave., Urbana, IL 61801 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, King Saud Univ., Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-4699. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share