Evaluation of the Infrastructure Project Management System of Government Organizations and Suggestions for Their Improvement
Publication: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15, Issue 1
Abstract
The success of infrastructure projects of government organizations depends primarily on government policies, which include the rules, regulations, manuals, standard contract documents, systems, and practices that govern mutual relations between the government and private contractors to a large extent. This study aimed to critically examine this part of the project management system of government organizations and to suggest measures for its improvement. The systems of three government organizations were studied in detail by examining their documents and interviewing their senior officers. Their salient features were compared and best practices grouped to frame propositions and determine the opinion of experts regarding their implementation. Consensus on the suggested propositions was measured using a questionnaire survey and a Delphi analysis, and out of 11 propositions, consensus was found on nine; therefore, these nine propositions were suggested for adoption by the three organizations to bring about system improvements. Said improvements were expected to be the authentication of the tender process, a less time-consuming and dispute-free process, enhancement of the financial liquidity of the contractor through assurance of timely payments, compensation for losses due to idling of labor and machinery, adoption of strict measures in the contract through the introduction of a debarment clause for failure to perform, and deemed termination of the contract in case of abnormal delays in preconstruction activity. The most crucial recommendation that emerged in the study was the introduction of a focus-on-delivery clause in the work manual, which would enhance bona fide decisions in favor of work while addressing various issues faced during work execution.
Practical Applications
The paper aims to critically examine the infrastructure project management system of government organizations and suggests measures for improvement. This includes rules, regulations, manuals, standard contract documents, systems, and practices, which form an important base for an amicable relation between the contractor and the client (government departments) resulting in favorable conditions for successful completion of the projects. For this purpose, systems of three government organizations were studied in detail and their salient features were compared to formulate important propositions. Delphi analysis with two rounds of questionnaire survey was conducted to measure the consensus of the experts with the propositions. Finally, consensus was achieved on nine propositions suggested for improvement. These improvements are expected to authenticate the tendering process, make it less time-consuming, make it dispute-free, and increase the financial liquidity of the contractor. Further, adoption of strict measures in the contract and introduction of the focus-on-delivery clause in the work manual will enhance bona fide decisions in favor of work while addressing various issues faced during the execution of work. All these improvements are directly related to the actual works being performed by the organizations and thus they would prove to be of high practical relevance.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All of the data, models, and/or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request, including write-ups of the project management system of each organization.
References
Works Cited
Adler, M., and E. Ziglio. 1996. Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Kingsley Publishers.
Ahsan, K., and I. Gunawan. 2010. “Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects.” Int. J. Project Manage. 28 (1): 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.03.005.
Bossink, B. A. G., and H. J. H. Brouwers. 1996. “Construction waste: Quantification and source evaluation.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 122 (1): 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(55).
Cantrill, J. A., B. Sibbald, and S. Buetow. 1996. “The Delphi and nominal group technique in health services research.” Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 4 (2): 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7174.1996.tb00844.x.
Chan, A. P. C., D. Seott, and A. P. L. Chan. 2004. “Factor affecting the success of a construction project.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 130 (1): 153–155. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(153).
Chin, C. M. M., A. C. Spowage, and E. H. Yap. 2012. “Project management methodologies: A comparative analysis.” J. Adv. Perform. Inf. Value 4 (1): 106. https://doi.org/10.37265/japiv.v4i1.102.
Chua, D. K. H., Y. C. Kog, and P. K. Loh. 1999. “Critical success factor for different project objectives.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (3): 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:3(142).
Cicibas, H., O. Unal, and K. A. Demir. 2010. “A comparison of project management software tools (PMST).” In Proc., 2010 Int. Conf. on Software Engineering Research & Practice. Irvine, CA: CSERP Press.
Crawley, D., and I. Aho. 1999. “Building environmental assessment methods: Applications and development trends.” Build. Res. Inf. 27 (4): 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369417.
Dalkey, N. C. 2003. “The Delphi methodology.” Accessed April 10, 2013. https://www.optimizationgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/IdeaGeneration-Turning-Questions-IntoAnswers.pdf.
FIDIC Yellow Book. 2017. Conditions of contract for plant and design-build for electrical & mechanical plant, and for building and engineering works designed by the contractor. 2nd ed. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.
Fiksel, J. 2006. “A framework for sustainable materials management.” JOM 58 (8): 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0047-3.
Giannarou, L., and E. Zervas. 2014. “Using Delphi technique to build consensus in practice.” Int. J. Bus. Sci. Appl. Manage. 9 (2): 65–82.
Hallowell, M. R., and J. A. Gambatese. 2010. “Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137.
Heera, L., and K. Sridhar. 2009. “Impact of construction material on environment.” Master’s thesis, Industrial Engineering Quality and Environmental Management, Univ. College of Boras.
Jha, K. N., and K. C. Iyer. 2007. “Commitment, coordination, competence and the iron triangle.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (5): 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.11.009.
Kar, S., and K. N. Jha. 2021. “Exploring the critical barriers to and enablers of sustainable material management practices in the construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 147 (9): 04021102. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002125.
Ling, Y. Y., and M. C. H. Lim. 2002. “Implementation of a waste management plan for construction projects in Singapore.” Archit. Sci. Rev. 45 (2): 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2002.9697495.
Mason, K. J., and F. Alamdari. 2007. “EU network carriers, low cost carriers and consumer behaviour, a Delphi study of future trends.” J. Air Transp. Manage. 13 (5): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2007.04.011.
McKenna, H. P. 1989. “The selection by ward managers of an appropriate nursing model for long-stay psychiatric patient care.” J. Adv. Nurs. 14 (9): 762–775.
Ministry of Statistics and Project Implementation. 2020. “Government of India Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Infrastructure and Project Monitoring Division website.” Accessed March 28, 2022. https://www.cspm.gov.in/english/flr/FR_Mar_2020.pdf.
Mohanta, P. R. 2017. “Comparative assessment of project risk management and agile project management in the prospect of civil infrastructure projects.” In Proc., Conf. Paper, 2017. Maharashtra, India: National Institute of Construction Management and Research.
Mohindra, T., and M. Srivastava. 2019. “Comparative analysis of project management frameworks and proposition for project driven organizations.” PM World J. 8 (8).
Mullen, P. M. 2003. “Delphi: Myths and reality.” J. Health Organ. Manage. 17 (1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319.
Ngacho, C., and D. Das. 2015. “Performance evaluation framework of construction projects: Insights from literature.” Int. J. Project Organ. Manage. 7 (2): 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2015.069616.
Opfer, W. A., and T. J. Kloppenborg. 2001. “A comparison of government and industry project management practice.” In Proc., Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symp. Network Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Phillips, R. 2000. Vol. 2 of New applications for the Delphi technique, 191–196. San Diego: Pfeiffer and Company.
Ramos, D., P. Arezes, and P. Afonso. 2016. “Application of the Delphi method for the inclusion of the externalities in occupational safety and health analysis.” Dyna 83 (196): 14–20. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v83n196.56603.
Rowe, G., and G. Wright. 1999. “The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis.” Int. J. Forecast. 15 (4): 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7.
Schultz, R. L., D. P. Slevin, and J. K. Pinto. 1987. “Strategy and tactics in a process model of project implementation.” Interfaces 17 (3): 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.17.3.34.
Shou, W., J. Wang, X. Wang, and H. Y. Chong. 2015. “A comparative review of building information modelling implementation in building and infrastructure industries.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 22 (2): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9125-9.
Skulmoski, G. J., F. T. Hartman, and J. Krahn. 2007. “The Delphi method for graduate research.” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 6: 1–21.
Spalek, S. 2014. “Success factors in project management. Literature review.” In Proc., 8th Int. Technology, Education and Development Conf. INTED2014, 4828–4835. Ukraine: Ukraine Supreme Legal Council (USLC).
Tabish, S. Z. S., and K. N. Jha. 2011a. “Analysis of irregularities in public procurement in India.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (3): 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2010.549138.
Tabish, S. Z. S., and K. N. Jha. 2011b. “Identification and evaluation of success factors for public construction projects.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 29 (8): 809–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.611152.
Verweij, S., and L. M. Gerrits. 2019. Evaluating infrastructure project planning and implementation: A study using qualitative comparative analysis. London: SAGE.
Zarina A., E. Zawawi, K. Yusof, and N. M. Aris. 2014. “Quality of life in the built & natural environment.” In Proc., AicQoL2014Kota Kinabalu AMER Int. Conf. on Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.
Zia, M. N. 2020. “A review paper on identification of critical success factors (CSFs) for successful project management of construction projects.” J. Manage. Pract. Humanities Soc. Sci. 4 (2): 29–36. https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-4.2.2.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
Volume 15 • Issue 1 • February 2023
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 14, 2022
Accepted: Jun 19, 2022
Published online: Sep 23, 2022
Published in print: Feb 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2023
ASCE Technical Topics:
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Om Prakash Tripathi, Abid Hasan, Kumar Neeraj Jha, Arvind Kumar Jain, Evaluating Government Contracts for Delays, Delay Damages, and Levy of Compensation Provisions, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000584, 15, 1, (2023).