Technical Papers
Sep 7, 2022

VfM-at-Risk Analysis Model for Build–Operate–Transfer Infrastructure Projects

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28, Issue 4

Abstract

Existing models have failed to capture the stochastic nature of input variables for the value-for-money (VfM) analysis in build–operate–transfer (BOT) infrastructure projects. The present study aims to address this knowledge gap by offering a VfM-at-risk analysis model and developing a stochastic-based model that takes account of the risk allocation scheme and cost efficiency in the valuation. The proposed model can deal with the net-cost and net-revenue projects. This study introduces weighted risk reduction factors to accommodate the interaction between public and private agencies in sharing risk outcomes and a metric to measure the optimality of a risk allocation scheme. A case study based on Indonesia’s BOT water supply project was used to demonstrate the model application. It is shown that cost efficiency and an optimal risk allocation scheme enhance VfM. Moreover, the wisdom of using the BOT option can be challenged when the public agency is at least as good as the private agency unless other reasons exist, and allocating project risk to an agency that cannot best deal with it can reduce VfM. This study concludes with model limitations and directions for future research.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the Journal editors and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions, which helped improve the quality of the previous version of this paper.

References

American Association of Cost Engineers. 2020. “Cost estimate classification system as applied in engineering, procurement, and construction for the process industries.” In AACE international recommended practice. Morgantown, WV: AACE International.
Ameyaw, E. E., and A. P. C. Chan. 2016. “A fuzzy approach for the allocation of risks in public-private partnership water-infrastructure projects in developing countries.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (3): 04016016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000297.
Ball, R., M. Heafey, and D. King. 2003. “Risk transfer and value for money in PFI projects.” Public Manage. Rev. 5 (2): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667032000066444.
Blanc-Brude, F., and R. Strange. 2007. “How banks price loans to public-private partnerships: Evidence from the European markets.” J. Appl. Corporate Finance 19 (4): 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2007.00163.x.
Boardman, A., and M. Hellowell. 2017. “A comparative analysis and evaluation of specialist PPP units’ methodologies for conducting value for money appraisals.” J. Comp. Policy Anal.: Res. Pract. 19 (3): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1190083.
Brealey, R. A., S. C. Myers, and F. Allen. 2020. Principles of corporate finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cheung, E., and A. P. C. Chan. 2010. “Evaluation model for assessing the suitability of public-private partnership projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 27 (2): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000044.
Cheung, E., A. P. C. Chan, and S. K. Kajewski. 2009. “Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects.” J. Financ. Manage. Property Constr. 14 (1): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/13664380910942617.
Coulson, A. 2008. “Value for money in PFI proposals: A commentary on the UK Treasury guidelines for public sector comparators.” Public Administration 86 (2): 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00729.x.
Cruz, C. O., and R. C. Marques. 2012. “Using probabilistic methods to estimate the public sector comparator.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 27 (10): 782–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00771.x.
Cui, C., J. Wang, Y. Liu, and V. Coffey. 2019. “Relationships among value-for-money drivers of public-private partnership infrastructure projects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000479.
Damodaran, A. 2014. Applied corporate finance. New York: Wiley.
DeCorla-Souza, P. 2014. “New tool to understand value-for-money analysis concepts in evaluating public-private partnership options.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2450 (1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.3141/2450-13.
Espinoza, R. D., and J. W. F. Morris. 2013. “Decoupled NPV: A simple, improved method to value infrastructure investments.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 31 (5): 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2013.800946.
Government of Western Australia Department of Treasury. 2013. “Public sector comparator policy: Additional policy guide.” Accessed May 6, 2019. https://www.treasury.wa.gov.au.
Grimsey, D., and M. K. Lewis. 2004. “Discount debates: Rates, risk, uncertainty and value for money in PPPs.” Public Infrastruct. Bull. 1 (3): 1–6.
Grimsey, D., and M. K. Lewis. 2005. “Are public private partnerships value for money? Evaluating alternative approaches and comparing academic and practitioner views.” Accounting Forum 29 (4): 345–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2005.01.001.
Infrastructure Australia. 2008. National PPP guidelines volume 4: Public sector comparator guidance, 1–168. Canberra, Australia: The Common Wealth of Australia. https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/infrastructure/ngpd/files/Volume-4-PSC-Guidance-Dec-2008-FA.pdf.
Ismail, S. 2013. “Drivers of value for money public private partnership projects in Malaysia.” Asian Rev. Accounting 21 (3): 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-06-2013-0042.
Johnson, D. 1997. “The triangular distribution as a proxy for the beta distribution in risk analysis.” Stat. 46 (3): 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.0009.
Kweun, J. Y., P. K. Wheeler, and J. L. Gifford. 2018. “Evaluating highway public-private partnerships: Evidence from US value for money studies.” Transp. Policy 62 (Feb): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.009.
Liang, Q., and H. Hu. 2017. “Uncertainty analysis of value for money assessment for public-private partnership projects.” J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 22 (6): 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-017-1889-2.
Liu, T., and S. Wilkinson. 2015. “Critical factors affecting the viability of using public-private partnerships for prison development.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 05014020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000324.
Marques, R. C., and S. Berg. 2011. “Risks, contracts and private-sector participation in infrastructure.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (11): 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000347.
Morallos, D., A. Amekudzi, C. Ross, and M. Meyer. 2009. “Value for money analysis in US transportation public-private partnerships.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2115 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.3141/2115-04.
New Zealand Government. 2015. “The PPP procurement process: A guide for public sector entities.” Accessed April 20, 2021. http://www.treasury.govt.nz/statesector/ppp/guidance/public-sector-comparator.
Ng, A., and M. Loosemore. 2007. “Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.005.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2008. Public-Private Partnerships: In pursuit of risk sharing and value for money. Paris: OECD.
Palisade Corporation. 2022. @Risk for risk analysis. New York: Palisade Corporation.
Peters, L. 2016. “Impact of probability distributions on real options valuation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22 (3): 04016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000289.
Prassas, E. S., and R. P. Roess. 2013. Engineering economics and finance for transportation infrastructure. New York: Springer.
Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility. 2009. “Value for money and the PSC.” In Toolkit for public-private partnerships in roads & highways. Washington, DC: Public-Private Infrastructure Advisory Facility.
Quiggin, J. 2004. “Risk, PPPs and the public sector comparator.” Aust. Accounting Rev. 14 (33): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2004.tb00229.x.
Shaoul, J., A. Stafford, and P. Stapleton. 2006. “Highway robbery? A financial analysis of design, build, finance and operate (DBFO) in UK roads.” Transp. Rev. 26 (3): 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500415243.
Siemiatycki, M., and N. Farooqi. 2012. “Value for money and risk in public-private partnerships.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 78 (3): 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2012.715525.
Singh, L. B., and S. N. Kalidindi. 2006. “Traffic revenue risk management through annuity model of PPP road projects in India.” Int. J. Project Manage. 24 (7): 605–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.008.
Sobhiyah, M. H., M. R. Bemanian, and Y. K. Kashtiban. 2009. “Increasing VFM in PPP power station projects-case study: Rudeshur gas turbine power station.” Int. J. Project Manage. 27 (5): 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.07.002.
Wang, N. 2014. “Correlation analysis of capital and life cycle costs in private financial initiative projects.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (5): 06014002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000277.
Wibowo, A., and S. Mohamed. 2010. “Risk criticality and allocation in privatised water supply projects in Indonesia.” Int. J. Project Manage. 28 (5): 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.003.
Wibowo, A., A. Permana, B. Kochendoerfer, R. T. L. Tiong, D. Jacob, and D. Neunzehn. 2012. “Modeling contingent liabilities arising from government guarantees in Indonesian BOT/PPP toll roads.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 138 (12): 1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000555.
Wibowo, A., and M. Sundermeier. 2020. “Developing a fuzzy value-for-money analysis model for annuity-based public-private partnership infrastructure projects under consideration of risk mitigation capability.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 146 (7): 04020081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001872.
Wu, J., J. Liu, X. Jin, and M. C. P. Sing. 2016. “Government accountability within infrastructure public–private partnerships.” Int. J. Project Manage. 34 (8): 1471–1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.003.
Yongjian, K., L. Xinping, and W. Shouqing. 2008. “Equitable financial evaluation method for public-private partnership projects.” Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 13 (5): 702–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70114-7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 4December 2022

History

Received: Nov 13, 2021
Accepted: Jul 8, 2022
Published online: Sep 7, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 7, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chair of Center of Excellence in Urban Infrastructure Development and Senior Lecturer in Construction Management, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic Univ., Jalan Ciumbuleuit 94, Bandung 40141, Indonesia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7367-395X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share