Abstract

Planning transport infrastructure development involves high levels of uncertainty due to socioeconomic, environmental, and technological changes. Methodologies currently used in transport planning often have minimal consideration for adaptiveness, leading to costly redesigns or cancellation of entire projects. Presented herein is the investigation of the applicability of dynamic adaptive policy pathways, which is a methodology predominantly used in the field of flood-risk planning, to long-term transport infrastructure planning. Specifically, the paper investigates whether this methodology could facilitate ongoing adaptation to variations in service demand and capacity. It demonstrates this by examining future demand and capacity of road and rail travel between Manchester, United Kingdom, and London using publicly available data and information sources. The study shows that dynamic adaptive policy pathways is useful for identifying periods of time of significant capacity vulnerability for the examined transport network in the coming decade. The method is demonstrated to be valuable for identifying the points in time when policy-makers will have to make decisions and for assessing the impact of transport mode switching. This can have implications of cost-saving and improved service delivery.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Community’s H2020 Programme MG7-1-2017 Resilience to extreme (natural and man-made) events, under Grant [769255] “GIS-based infrastructure management system for optimized response to extreme events of terrestrial transport networks (SAFEWAY).”

References

Abdelaal, M. A. 2016. “A methodology for determining critical decision points through analysis of wargame data.” Ph.D. thesis, School of Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Bloemen, P., T. Reeder, C. Zevenbergen, J. Rijke, and A. Kingsborough. 2018. “Lessons learned from applying adaptation pathways in flood risk management and challenges for the further development of this approach.” Mitigation Adapt. Strategies Global Change 23 (7): 1083–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9773-9.
CAA (Civil Aviation Authority). 2020. “UK airport data | UK civil aviation authority.” Accessed July 22, 2020. https://www.caa.co.uk/Data-and-analysis/UK-aviation-market/Airports/Datasets/UK-Airport-data/Airport-data-1990-onwards/.
Cervero, R. 2003. “Road expansion, urban growth, and induced travel: A path analysis.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 69 (2): 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360308976303.
Chen, C.-L., and P. Hall. 2012. “The wider spatial-economic impacts of high-speed trains: A comparative case study of Manchester and Lille sub-regions.” J. Transp. Geogr. 24: 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.09.002.
Chen, C.-L., and R. Vickerman. 2017. “Can transport infrastructure change regions’ economic fortunes? Some evidence from Europe and China.” Reg. Stud. 51 (1): 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1262017.
Clauss, T., and S. Döppe. 2016. “Why do urban travelers select multimodal travel options: A repertory grid analysis.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 93: 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.021.
Cottrell, W. D. 1999. “Simplified program evaluation and review technique (PERT).” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 125 (1): 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1999)125:1(16).
Dewar, J. A., C. H. Builder, W. M. Hix, and M. H. Levin. 1993. Assumption-based planning; a planning tool for very uncertain times. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2013. “Vehicle mileage and occupancy.” Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/nts09-vehicle-mileage-and-occupancy.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2015. “Technical Annex: Demand and Capacity Pressures on the West Coast Main Line.” Accessed July 2, 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480647/annex-demand-and-capacity-pressures.pdf.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2018. “Road traffic forecasts 2018.” Accessed July 1, 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/road-traffic-forecasts-2018.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2019. “GB road traffic counts.” Accessed January 25, 2021. https://data.gov.uk/dataset/208c0e7b-353f-4e2d-8b7a-1a7118467acc/gb-road-traffic-counts.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2020a. “Average speed, delay and reliability of travel times (CGN).” Accessed July 13, 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/average-speed-delay-and-reliability-of-travel-times-cgn.
DfT (Department for Transport). 2020b. “Road investment strategy 2: 2020–2025. 131.” Accessed July 13, 2020. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/951100/road-investment-strategy-2-2020-2025.pdf.
Duranton, G., and M. A. Turner. 2011. “The fundamental law of road congestion: Evidence from US cities.” Am. Econ. Rev. 101 (6): 2616–2652. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2616.
Ellis, M. 2019. Electric vehicles: Charging points: Written question—265457. Northampton North, UK: House of Commons.
Faisal, A., M. Kamruzzaman, T. Yigitcanlar, and G. Currie. 2019. “Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy.” J. Transp. Land Use 12 (1): 45–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/26911258.
Givoni, M., and A. Perl. 2017. “Rethinking transport infrastructure planning to extend its value over time.” J. Plann. Educ. Res. 40 (1): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17741196.
Goodwin, P. B. 1996. “Empirical evidence on induced traffic.” Transportation 23 (1): 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166218.
GOV.UK. 2019. “National infrastructure and construction pipeline 2018.” Accessed June 10, 2020. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-infrastructure-and-construction-pipeline-2018.
Haasnoot, M., J. H. Kwakkel, W. E. Walker, and J. ter Maat. 2013. “Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world.” Global Environ. Change 23 (2): 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.006.
Haasnoot, M., M. van Aalst, J. Rozenberg, K. Dominique, J. Matthews, L. M. Bouwer, J. Kind, and N. L. Poff. 2019. “Investments under non-stationarity: Economic evaluation of adaptation pathways.” In Climatic change, 1–13. New York: Springer.
Haasnoot, M., S. van ’t Klooster, and J. van Alphen. 2018. “Designing a monitoring system to detect signals to adapt to uncertain climate change.” Global Environ. Change 52: 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.003.
Hadjidemetriou, G. M., J. Masino, S. E. Christodoulou, F. Gauterin, and I. Brilakis. 2020. “Comprehensive decision support system for managing asphalt pavements.” J. Transp. Eng. Part B: Pavements 146 (3): 06020001.
Hall, J. W., J. J. Henriques, A. J. Hickford, and R. J. Nicholls. 2013. “Systems-of-systems analysis of national infrastructure.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustainability 166 (5): 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.12.00028.
Hall, P. 2013. “High speed two: The great divide.” Built Environ. 39 (3): 339–354. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.39.3.339.
Hall, P., D. Thrower, and I. Wray. 2014. “High-speed North—Building a transpennine mega-city.” In Town and country planning, 160–167. London: Town and Country Planning Association.
Handy, S., and M. G. Boarnet. 2014. Impact of highway capacity and induced travel on passenger vehicle use and greenhouse gas emissions. Washington, DC: California EPA.
Hansen, M., and Y. Huang. 1997. “Road supply and traffic in California urban areas.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 31 (3): 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(96)00019-5.
Hermans, L. M., M. Haasnoot, J. ter Maat, and J. H. Kwakkel. 2017. “Designing monitoring arrangements for collaborative learning about adaptation pathways.” Environ. Sci. Policy 69: 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.005.
Herrera, J., and K. MacAskill. 2020. Identifying barriers and opportunities for adaptation planning of urban transport infrastructure: A case study of Bogotá, Colombia. Athens, Greece: National Technical Univ. of Athens.
Herrera, J. S. C., K. MacAskill, and S. Haigh. 2020. “Identifying interactions between policy, accountability and outcomes for adaptation of urban roads.” Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 88: 102595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102595.
Highways England. 2006. “Traffic flows.” In Volume 6—Road geometry, design manual for roads and bridges. Stafford, UK: Staffordshire County Council.
Highways England. 2020. “Highways England programmes | smart motorways.” Accessed June 30, 2020. https://highwaysengland.co.uk/programmes/smart-motorways/.
HS2 (High Speed Two). 2013. The economic case for HS2—PFM v4.3: Assumptions report. London: HS2.
HS2 (High Speed Two). 2020. “Capacity-helping reduce overcrowding.” Accessed September 29, 2021. https://www.hs2.org.uk/why/capacity/.
Hymel, K. 2019. “If you build it, they will drive: Measuring induced demand for vehicle travel in urban areas.” Transport Policy 76: 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.12.006.
Ivanova, E., and J. Masarova. 2013. “Importance of road infrastructure in the economic development and competitiveness.” Econ. Manage. 18 (2): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.18.2.4253.
Jeuken, A., M. Haasnoot, T. Reeder, and P. Ward. 2015. “Lessons learnt from adaptation planning in four deltas and coastal cities.” J. Water Clim. Change 6 (4): 711–728. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2014.141.
Ke, Q., M. Haasnoot, and M. Hoogvliet. 2016. “Exploring adaptation pathways in terms of flood risk management at a city scale—A case study for Shanghai city.” In Vol. 7 of Proc., E3S Web of Conf., edited by M. Lang, F. Klijn, and P. Samuels, 21002. Les Ulis, France: EDP Sciences.
KPMG (Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler). 2013. HS2 regional economic impacts, 95. London: High Speed Two.
Kuipéri, F., M. van Geenhuizen, and J. A. Annema. 2018. “Electric vehicles and charging infrastructure: adaptive policy making in cities.” In Cities and sustainable technology transitions. Cheltenham,UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kwadijk, J. C. J., et al. 2010. “Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: A case study in the Netherlands: Adaptation tipping points.” Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 1 (5): 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.64.
Kwakkel, J. H., M. Haasnoot, and W. E. Walker. 2016. “Comparing robust decision-making and dynamic adaptive policy pathways for model-based decision support under deep uncertainty.” Environ. Modell. Software 86: 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.017.
Laird, J., C. Nash, and P. Mackie. 2014. “Transformational transport infrastructure: cost-benefit analysis challenges.” Town Plann. Rev. 85 (6): 709–730. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2014.43.
Lawrence, J., and M. Haasnoot. 2017. “What it took to catalyse uptake of dynamic adaptive pathways planning to address climate change uncertainty.” Environ. Sci. Policy 68: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.003.
Lempert, R. J. 2003. Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative. Santa Monica, CA: Long-Term Policy Analysis Rand Corporation.
Litman, T. 2001. “Generated traffic: Implications for transport planning.” ITE J. 71 (4): 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1.1.376.4786&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Lyons, G., K. Chatterjee, M. Beecroft, and G. Marsden. 2002. “Determinants of travel demand—Exploring the future of society and lifestyles in the UK.” Transp. Policy 9 (1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(01)00034-8.
Lyons, G., and C. Davidson. 2016. “Guidance for transport planning and policymaking in the face of an uncertain future.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 88: 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.012.
Malekpour, S., R. R. Brown, and F. J. de Haan. 2015. “Strategic planning of urban infrastructure for environmental sustainability: Understanding the past to intervene for the future.” Cities 46: 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.003.
National Audit Office. 2006. “The modernisation of the west coast main line—National audit office (NAO) report.” Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-modernisation-of-the-west-coast-main-line/.
National Travel Survey. 2019a. “Mode of travel.” Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/nts03-modal-comparisons.
National Travel Survey. 2019b. Table NTS0317—Long distance trips within Great Britain by main mode and length: England, 2014/181. London: Department for Transport.
Oakervee, D. 2019. Oakervee review of HS2. London: Dept. for Transport.
Ogawa, M. J. 2017. “Monitoring and evaluation of smart motorway schemes.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Southampton. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/413955/.
ORR (Office of Rail and Road). 2019. “Regional rail usage | ORR data portal.” Accessed July 1, 2020. https://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/statistics/usage/regional-rail-usage/.
ORR (Office of Rail and Road). 2020. “West coast main line capacity assessment.” Accessed February 19, 2021. https://www.orr.gov.uk/media/17481.
Phaal, R., and G. Muller. 2009. “An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy.” Technol. Forecasting Social Change 76 (1): 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.018.
Sadatsafavi, H., A. A. Kim, S. D. Anderson, and P. Bishop. 2019. “Scenario planning application in US highway transportation industry.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (2): 05019002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000474.
Sánchez-Silva, M. 2019. “Managing infrastructure systems through changeability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (1): 04018040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000467.
Souche, S. 2010. “Measuring the structural determinants of urban travel demand.” Transp. Policy 17 (3): 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.12.003.
Tomaney, J., and P. Marques. 2013. “Evidence, policy, and the politics of regional development: The case of high-speed rail in the United Kingdom.” Environ. Plann. C: Govern. Policy 31 (3): 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11249r.
Torres-Rincón, S., D. F. Villarraga, and M. Sánchez-Silva. 2020. “Conceptual and numerical analysis of flexibility in infrastructure systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 26 (2): 04020012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000546.
Tracsis. 2020. “Origin-destination surveys.” Accessed July 1, 2020. https://tracsistraffic.com/services/traffic-surveys/origin-destination-surveys/.
Transport for London. 2012. Technical note 12—How many cars are there in London and who owns them? 15. London: Transport for London.
Tsotsolas, N., and S. Alexopoulos. 2019. “Towards a holistic strategic framework for applying robust facilitated approaches in political decision making.” Oper. Res. 19 (2): 501–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0295-8.
Van Duin, R., J. Bauwens, B. Enserink, L. Tavasszy, and K. J. Wong. 2016. Risk-aware roadmapping for city logistics in 2025. Bordeaux, France: Bordeaux Univ.
Virgin Trains. 2021. “Pendolino trains seating plan.” Accessed February 19, 2021. http://www.myrailtrip.co.uk/pdf/virgin.pdf.
Yao, E., and T. Morikawa. 2005. “A study of on integrated intercity travel demand model.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 39 (4): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.12.003.
Young, K., and J. W. Hall. 2015. “Introducing system interdependency into infrastructure appraisal: From projects to portfolios to pathways.” Infrastruct. Complexity 2 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40551-015-0005-8.
Yzer, J. R., W. E. Walker, V. A. W. J. Marchau, and J. H. Kwakkel. 2014. “Dynamic adaptive policies: A way to improve the cost—Benefit performance of megaprojects?” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 41 (4): 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1068/b39088.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 28Issue 1March 2022

History

Received: Mar 7, 2021
Accepted: Sep 27, 2021
Published online: Nov 25, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Apr 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Associate, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-7976. Email: [email protected]
Investment Analyst, Baillie Gifford, 1 Calton Hill, Greenside Row, Edinburgh EH1 3AN, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6831-6069. Email: [email protected]
Leon Kapetas, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Climate Resilience Expert, Environmental Consulting Services, Draxis Environmental S.A., Themistokli Sofouli 54-56, Thessaloniki 546 55, Greece. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Engineering, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6214-1739. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Design, Sustainable Infrastructure, 10.1680/si.66717.131, (131-180), (2022).
  • Planning road network layout based on connectivity assessment of critical assets, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction, 10.1680/jsmic.21.00034, 175, 4, (181-189), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share