Technical Papers
Mar 23, 2020

Conceptual and Numerical Analysis of Flexibility in Infrastructure Systems

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 26, Issue 2

Abstract

The dynamics and uncertainties of environmental, physical, and social demands (e.g., climate change, technological evolution, population growth, and market changes) have a significant effect on the performance of infrastructure systems. Dynamic external conditions can affect the performance of infrastructure systems because traditional designs are thought for long-term demands and assume stationarity in future behavior. This results in rigid and permanent features that may not perform optimally under variable conditions. Specifically, the system may be rendered inefficient from an operational point of view, might be more exposed to risks, and may even stop serving its purpose to society altogether. This situation can be reduced by implementing alternative design and management strategies that facilitate changes in the system as unplanned scenarios arise. One novel strategy is to incorporate the possibility of change by making systems more flexible from the outset. While some benefits of introducing flexibility have been identified and discussed in the literature, the concept is still far from being completely understood. The objective of this work is to address this knowledge gap by presenting an analysis of the concept of flexibility. The analysis includes a literature review concerning the most relevant aspects of flexibility: quantification, valuation, and management. Additionally, the adaptation process is deconstructed to identify the core components that must be present in any flexibility analysis. From this analysis, the main system attributes affected by flexibility are made explicit to formulate a novel flexibility metric. Finally, three numerical examples are presented and discussed to illustrate the application of the metric and highlight the relationship between flexibility and the value added to the system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data and code used to generate the examples in this study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support and funding provided by the Vice-Rectorate for Research of Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.

References

Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” J. Political Econ. 81 (3): 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062.
Bronitowski, D., and J. Moses. 2016. “Measuring flexibility, descriptive complexity, and rework potential in generic system architectures.” Syst. Eng. 19 (3): 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21351.
Browning, T. R., and E. C. Honour. 2008. “Measuring the life-cycle value of enduring systems.” Syst. Eng. 11 (3): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20094.
Cardin, M.-A., M. Ranjbar-Bourani, and R. De Neufville. 2015. “Improving the lifecycle performance of engineering projects with flexible strategies: Example of on-shore LNG production design.” Syst. Eng. 18 (3): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21301.
Cardin, M.-A., Q. Xie, T. S. Ng, and S. Wang. 2017. “An approach for analyzing and managing flexibility in engineering systems design based on decision rules and multistage stochastic programming.” IISE Trans. 49 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0740817X.2016.1189627.
Chester, M. V., and B. Allenby. 2019. “Toward adaptive infrastructure: Flexibility and agility in a non-stationarity age.” Sustain Resilient Infrastruct. 4 (4): 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1416846.
Crundwell, F. K. 2008. Finance for engineers: Evaluation and funding of capital projects. 1st ed. Guildford, UK: Springer.
DeNeufville, R. 2003. “Real options: Dealing with uncertainty in systems planning and design.” Integr. Assess. 4 (1): 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1076/iaij.4.1.26.16461.
Fitzgerald, M. 2012. “Managing uncertainty in systems with a valuation approach for strategic changeability.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Flyvbjerg, B., et al. 2018. “Five things you should know about cost overrun.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 118 (Dec): 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.07.013.
Fricke, E., and A. P. Schulz. 2005. “Design for changeability (DfC): Principies to enable changes in systems throughout their entire lifecycle.” Syst. Eng. 8 (4): 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20039.
Garstka, S. J., and R. Wets. 1974. “On decision rules in stochastic programming.” Math. Program. 7 (1): 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01585511.
Gersonius, B., R. Ashley, A. Pathirana, and C. Zevenbergen. 2013. “Climate change uncertainty: Building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure.” Clim. Change 116 (2): 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0494-5.
Koh, E. C., N. H. Caldwell, and P. J. Clarkson. 2013. “A technique to assess the changeability of complex engineering systems.” J. Eng. Des. 24 (7): 477–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2013.769207.
Lempert, R. J. 2019. “Robust decision making (RDM).” In Decision making under deep uncertainty: From theory to practice, edited by V. A. W. J. Marchau, W. E. Walker, P. J. T. M. Bloemen, and S. W. Popper, 23–52. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Morlok, E. K., and D. J. Chang. 2004. “Measuring capacity flexibility of a transportation system.” Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 38 (6): 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.03.001.
National Academy of Science. 2000. Highway capacity manual. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Niese, N. D., and D. J. Singer. 2014. “Assessing changeability under uncertain exogenous disturbance.” Res. Eng. Des. 25 (3): 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0177-5.
Olewnik, A., and K. Lewis. 2006. “A decision support framework for flexible system design.” J. Eng. Des. 17 (1): 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820500274019.
Páez-Pérez, D., and M. Sánchez-Silva. 2016. “A dynamic principal-agent framework for modeling the performance of infrastructure.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 254 (2): 576–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.03.027.
Pistikopoulos, E. N., and T. Mazzuchi. 1990. “A novel flexibility analysis approach for processes with stochastic parameters.” Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 (9): 991–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(90)87055-T.
Ribes, D., and J. B. Polk. 2014. “Flexibility relative to what? Change to research infrastructure.” J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 15 (5): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00360.
Ross, A. M. 2006. “Managing unarticulated value: Changeability in multiattribute tradespace exploration.” Ph.D. thesis, Engineering Systems Div., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ross, A. M., D. H. Rhodes, and D. E. Hastings. 2008. “Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value.” Syst. Eng. 11 (3): 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20098.
Ryan, E. T., D. R. Jacques, and J. M. Colombi. 2013. “An ontological framework for clarifying flexibility-related terminology via literature survey.” Syst. Eng. 16 (1): 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21222.
Saleh, J. H., G. Mark, and N. C. Jordan. 2009. “Flexibility: A multi-disciplinary literature review and a research.” J. Eng. Des. 20 (3): 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820701870813.
Sánchez-Silva, M. 2019a. “Flexibility of infrastructure management decisions: The case of a project expansion.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (1): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2018.1486439.
Sánchez-Silva, M. 2019b. “Managing infrastructure systems through changeability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (1): 04018040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000467.
Sánchez-Silva, M. 2019c. “Providing flexibility to infrastructure design to improve cost efficiency.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (1): 04017050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000414.
Shapiro, A., D. Dentcheva, and A. Ruszczynski. 2014. Lectures on stochastic programming: Modeling and theory. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Špačková, O., B. Dittes, and D. Straub. 2015. “Risk based optimization of adaptable protection measures against natural hazards.” In Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering, ICASP12. Vancouver, Canada: Univ. of British Columbia.
Špačková, O., B. Dittes, and D. Straub. 2016. “Critical infrastructure and disaster risk reduction planning under socioeconomic and climate change uncertainty.” In Proc., Int. Disaster and Risk Conf. Davos, Switzerland: Global Risk Forum GRF Davos.
Špačková, O., and D. Straub. 2017. “Long-term adaption decisions via fully and partially observable Markov decision processes.” Sustain Resilient Infrastruct. 2 (1): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1278995.
Stäbler, M., J. Weber, and K. Paetzold. 2016. “Implementing changeability in a system with prioritization indicators.” Procedia CIRP 44: 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.011.
Swaney, R. E., and I. E. Grossmann. 1985. “An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part 2: Computational algorithms.” AIChE J. 31 (4): 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690310413.
Zhao, S., W. B. Haskell, and M. A. Cardin. 2018. “Decision rule-based method for flexible multi-facility capacity expansion problem.” IISE Trans. 50 (7): 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1426135.
Zhao, T., and C.-L. Tseng. 2003. “Valuing flexibility in infrastructure expansion.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 9 (3): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2003)9:3(89).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 26Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Jul 23, 2019
Accepted: Dec 23, 2019
Published online: Mar 23, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Aug 23, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 11711, Colombia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6306-8115. Email: [email protected]
Daniel F. Villarraga
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 11711, Colombia.
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 11711, Colombia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-6690

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share