Abstract

A leading factor in structural decline of highway bridges is the deterioration of concrete decks. Thus, a method to predict bridge deck performance is vital for transportation agencies to allocate future repair and rehabilitation funds. While service-life prediction tools are available, they rely on input parameters that are often difficult to obtain or estimate. This study estimates the relationships between concrete highway bridge deck performance and information readily available from the National Bridge Inventory (NBI), perhaps the single most comprehensive nationwide source of bridge information. As such, this paper takes full advantage of the NBI data using a scale of analysis exceeding that of previous studies. Using recent computational advances in Bayesian survival analysis, this paper models the factors affecting time-in-condition ratings (TICR)—defined as the time duration a bridge deck is assigned the same condition rating (CR) before it decreases—using over 150,000 bridge decks observed over 23 years. Because the dataset only spans 23 years of elapsed time and bridge deck deterioration takes place over years and sometimes decades, many observations of bridge deck CR only provide a censored view of how long a bridge deck may have been assigned a certain CR. Reasons for censorship include the following: (1) data is censored as its CR prior to 1992 is unknown; (2) data is censored as its rating after 2014 is unknown; (3) data is censored due to missing observations; and (4) data is censored due to an increase in CR from 1 year to the next, which is considered maintenance. Fortunately, the Bayesian approach provides a coherent method for handling censored observations while simultaneously providing meaningful estimates of parameter uncertainty. The results provide insight into the parameters driving concrete bridge deck deterioration and may help agencies with maintenance repair prioritization.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The material presented in this article is based on work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under Cooperative Agreement No. DTFH61-11-H-00027. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. Additional funding to support the second author was provided by the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Portland State University.

References

Betancourt, M. 2017. “A conceptual introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.” Preprint, Submitted January 10, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.02434.
Bolukbasi, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using national bridge inventory data.” Periodical Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:1(16).
Carpenter, B., A. Gelman, M. D. Hoffman, D. Lee, B. Goodrich, M. Betancourt, M. Brubaker, J. Guo, P. Li, and A. Riddell. 2017. “Stan: A probabilistic programming language.” J. Stat. Software 76 (1): 1-–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v076.i01.
Chen, M. H., Q. M. Shao, and J. G. Ibrahim. 2012. Monte Carlo methods in Bayesian computation. New York: Springer.
Dekelbab, W., A. Al-Wazeer, and B. Harris. 2008. “History lessons from the national bridge inventory.” Public Roads 71 (6): 30.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1995. Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Transportation, FHWA.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. Bridge deck preservation guide. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fleischhacker, A., O. Ghonima, and T. Schumacher. 2018. “Bridge data and code to accompany Bayesian survival analysis for US concrete highway bridge decks.” Accessed November 28, 2018. https://github.com/flyaflya/nbiData.
Ghonima, O., T. Schumacher, A. Unnikrishnan, and A. Fleischhacker. 2018. “Advancing bridge technology, task 10: Statistical analysis and modeling of US concrete highway bridge deck performance: Internal final report.” Accessed November 4, 2019. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cengin_fac/443.
Hatami, A., and G. Morcous. 2011. Developing deterioration models for Nebraska bridges. Lincoln, NE: Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Ibrahim, J. G., M.-H. Chen, and D. Sinha. 2001. Bayesian survival analysis. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
ICC (International Code Council). 2009. “2009 international energy conservation code (IECC).” Accessed March 13, 2017. https://law.resource.org/pub/us/code/ibr/icc.iecc.2009.pdf.
Koller, D., N. Friedman, and F. Bach. 2009. Probabilistic graphical models: Principles and techniques. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Law, C. G., and R. Brookmeyer. 1992. “Effects of mid-point imputation on the analysis of doubly censored data.” Stat. Med. 11 (12): 1569–1578. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780111204.
Leung, K. M., R. M. Elashoff, and A. A. Afifi. 1997. “Censoring issues in survival analysis.” Ann. Rev. Public Health 18 (1): 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.83.
Madanat, S., R. Mishalani, and W. H. W. Ibrahim. 1995. “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (2): 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:2(120).
Manafpour, A., I. Guler, A. Radlińska, F. Rajabipour, and G. Warn. 2018. “Stochastic analysis and time-based modeling of concrete bridge deck deterioration.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (9): 04018066. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001285.
Mishalani, R. G., and S. M. Madanat. 2002. “Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (4): 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:4(139).
Nakat, Z. S., and S. M. Madanat. 2008. “Stochastic duration modeling of pavement overlay crack initiation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14 (3): 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(185).
Nasrollahi, M., and G. Washer. 2015. “Estimating inspection intervals for bridges based on statistical analysis of national bridge inventory data.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (9): 04014104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000710.
ODOT (Oregon Department of Transportation). 2017. Bridge condition report & tunnel data. Salem, OR: ODOT Bridge Section.
Peltola, T., S. Aki, V. S. Havulinna, and A. Vehtari. 2014. “Hierarchical Bayesian survival analysis and projective covariate selection in cardiovascular event risk prediction.” In Vol. 1218 of Proc., 11th UAI Conf. on Bayesian Modeling Applications Workshop, 79–88. Quebec, Canada.
Sobanjo, J. O. 2011. “State transition probabilities in bridge deterioration based on Weibull sojourn times.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 7 (10): 747–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470902917028.
Stan Development Team. 2016. Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual V.2.16.0. Stan Development Team.
Stan Development Team. 2018. “Prior choice recommendations.” Accessed October 26, 2018. https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/wiki/Prior-Choice-Recommendations.
Stewart, M. G., and D. V. Rosowsky. 1998. “Time-dependent reliability of deteriorating reinforced concrete bridge decks.” Struct. Saf. 20 (1): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00021-0.
Tabatabai, H., C. W. Lee, and M. Tabatabai. 2011. “Reliability of bridge decks in Wisconsin.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (1): 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000133.
Tae-Hoon, H., C. Seung-Hyun, H. Seung-Woo, and L. Sang-Youb. 2006. “Service life estimation of concrete bridge decks.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 10 (4): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02830777.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 26Issue 1March 2020

History

Received: Oct 20, 2017
Accepted: Jun 3, 2019
Published online: Jan 2, 2020
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 2, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Business Administration, Univ. of Delaware, 303 Alfred Lerner Hall, Newark, DE 19716. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-4788. Email: [email protected]
Omar Ghonima [email protected]
Technical Product Manager, Delivery Hero, 70 Oranienburger Straße, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State Univ., 1930 SW 4th Ave., Suite 200, Portland, OR 97201 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0118-9119. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share