Case Studies
Apr 29, 2019

Embedding Flexibility within Pavement Management: Technique to Improve Expected Performance of Roadway Systems

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25, Issue 3

Abstract

Pavement-management systems are important tools that planning agencies depend on to cost-effectively maintain their roadway systems. The incorporation of uncertainty (beyond that related to pavement degradation) within these systems is limited, causing decision-makers to be unable to (a) recognize the risk of their status quo maintenance policy and (b) appreciate the value of embedding flexibility to capitalize on a prosperous future or mitigate downside risk. Consequently, this research develops a stochastic simulation model for pavement management that accounts for uncertainty as it relates to both pavement deterioration and the future cost of maintenance actions. The stochastic simulation model includes an allocation algorithm for sequential decision-making for the large-scale, performance maximization problem that generally leads to a high-fidelity solution. The authors implement the full model in a real-world case study in which they evaluate the implication of a planning agency broadening the types of paving materials and designs that it uses to proactively deal with an uncertain future. While the deterministic model estimates that an agency can achieve its objectives at a 4% cost reduction using a broader range of technologies, the probabilistic model estimates an expected cost reduction of 10%. This difference stems from the ability of the probabilistic model to capture the value generated from the flexibility to alter investment strategies at moments of spiraling costs for some maintenance actions and suppressed price levels for others. These findings suggest that the benefit from incorporating a diverse range of paving materials and designs by a planning agency could be much higher than agencies realize using the current deterministic frameworks.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted as part of the Concrete Sustainability Hub at MIT, supported by the Portland Cement Association (PCA) and Ready Mixed Concrete (RMC) Research and Education Foundation.

References

Abaza, K. A., S. Ashur, S. A. Abu-Eisheh, and A. Rabay. 2001. “Macroscopic optimum for management of pavement rehabilitation.” J. Transp. Eng. 127 (6): 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:6(493).
Aguiar-Moya, J. P., J. A. Prozzi, and A. de Fortier Smit. 2011. “Mechanistic-empirical IRI model accounting for potential bias.” J. Transp. Eng. 137 (5): 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000200.
Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” J. Polit. Econ. 81 (3): 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062.
Carnahan, J. V., W. J. Davis, M. Y. Shahin, P. L. Keane, and M. I. Wu. 1987. “Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management.” J. Transp. Eng. 113 (5): 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1987)113:5(554).
Chan, W. T., T. F. Fwa, and C. Y. Tan. 1994. “Road-maintenance planning using genetic algorithms. I: Formulation.” J. Transp. Eng. 120 (5): 693–709. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1994)120:5(693).
Chen, X., S. Hudson, M. Pajoh, and W. Dickenson. 1996. “Development of new network optimization model for Oklahoma Department of Transportation.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1524 (1): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196152400112.
Chootinan, P., A. Chen, M. R. Horrocks, and D. Bolling. 2006. “A multi-year pavement maintenance program using a stochastic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach.” Transp. Res., Part A 40 (9): 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.003.
Dalla Rosa, F., L. Liu, and N. G. Gharaibeh. 2017. “IRI prediction model for use in network-level pavement management systems.” J. Transp. Eng., Part B: Pavements 143 (1): 04017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JPEODX.0000003.
de Neufville, R. 1991. “Strategic planning for airport capacity: An appreciation of Australia’s process for Sydney.” Aust. Plann. 29 (4): 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.1991.9657528.
de Neufville, R., and S. Scholtes. 2011. Flexibility in engineering design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
de Neufville, R., S. Scholtes, and T. Wang. 2006. “Real options by spreadsheet: Parking garage case example.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12 (2): 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(107).
de Weck, O., R. de Neufville, and M. Chaize. 2004. “Staged deployment of communications satellite constellations in low earth orbit.” J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun. 1 (3): 119–136. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6346.
Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Durango, P. L., and S. M. Madanat. 2002. “Optimal maintenance and repair policies in infrastructure management under uncertain facility deterioration rates: An adaptive control approach.” Transp. Res., Part A 36 (9): 763–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(01)00038-6.
Durango-Cohen, P. L. 2007. “A time series analysis framework for transportation infrastructure management.” Transp. Res., Part B 41 (5): 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2006.08.002.
Durango-Cohen, P. L., and P. Sarutipand. 2007. “Capturing interdependencies and heterogeneity in the management of multifacility transportation infrastructure systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 13 (2): 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2007)13:2(115).
Embacher, R. A., and M. B. Snyder. 2001. “Life-cycle cost comparison of asphalt and concrete pavements on low-volume roads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1749 (1): 28–37. https://doi.org/10.3141/1749-05.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2016. Long term pavement performance data. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Transportation.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. Highway statistics 2017. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Golabi, K., R. B. Kulkarni, and G. B. Way. 1982. “A statewide pavement management system.” Interfaces 12 (6): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.12.6.5.
Herbsman, Z. 1983. “Long-range forecasting highway construction costs.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 109 (4): 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1983)109:4(423).
Kuhn, K. D. 2010. “Network-level infrastructure management using approximate dynamic programming.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 16 (2): 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000019.
Lee, J., and S. Madanat. 2015. “A joint bottom-up solution methodology for system-level pavement rehabilitation and reconstruction.” Transp. Res., Part B 78 (Aug): 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.05.001.
Lee, J., and S. Madanat. 2017. “Optimal policies for greenhouse gas emission minimization under multiple agency budget constraints in pavement management.” Transp. Res., Part D 55 (Aug): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.009.
Lee, J., S. Madanat, and D. Reger. 2016. “Pavement systems reconstruction and resurfacing policies for minimization of life-cycle costs under greenhouse gas emissions constraints.” Transp. Res., Part B 93 (Nov): 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.016.
Lee, Y. H., A. Mohseni, and M. I. Darter. 1993. “Simplified pavement performance models.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1397: 7–14.
Liu, F., and K. C. P. Wang. 1996. “Pavement performance-oriented network optimization system.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1524 (1): 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196152400110.
Loijos, A., N. Santero, and J. Ochsendorf. 2013. “Life cycle climate impacts of the US concrete pavement network.” Resour., Conserv. Recycl. 72 (Mar): 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.014.
Markow, M. J. 1995. “Highway management systems: State of the art.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 1 (3): 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1995)1:3(186).
Marques, J., M. Cunha, D. Savic, and O. Giustolisi. 2014. “Dealing with uncertainty through real options for the multi-objective design of water distribution networks.” Procedia Eng. 89: 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.517.
Medury, A., and S. Madanat. 2013. “Incorporating network considerations into pavement management systems: A case for approximate dynamic programming.” Transp. Res., Part C 33 (Aug): 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.03.003.
Medury, A., and S. Madanat. 2014. “Simultaneous network optimization approach for pavement management systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 20 (3): 04014010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000149.
Oman Systems. 2016. bidTABS. Nashville, TN: Oman Systems.
Ouyang, Y., and S. Madanat. 2004. “Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: Exact and approximate solutions.” Transp. Res., Part A 38 (5): 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2003.10.007.
Rangaraju, P., S. Amirkhanian, and Z. Guven. 2008. Life cycle cost analysis for pavement type selection. Clemson, SC: Clemson Univ.
Reger, D., S. Madanat, and A. Horvath. 2015. “The effect of agency budgets on minimizing greenhouse gas emissions from road rehabilitation policies.” Environ. Res. Lett. 10 (11): 114007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114007.
Sathaye, N., and S. Madanat. 2012. “A bottom-up optimal pavement resurfacing solution approach for large-scale networks.” Transp. Res., Part B 46 (4): 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.12.001.
Smilowitz, K., and S. Madanat. 2000. “Optimal inspection and maintenance policies for infrastructure networks.” Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/0885-9507.00166.
Swei, O., J. Gregory, and R. Kirchain. 2016. “Pavement management systems: Opportunities to improve the current frameworks.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, 2940. Washington, DC: National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine.
Swei, O., J. Gregory, and R. Kirchain. 2017. “A probabilistic approach for long-run price projections: Case study of concrete and asphalt.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 143 (1): 05016018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001211.
USGAO (US Government Accountability Office). 2013. Improved guidance could enhance states’ use of life-cycle cost analysis in pavement selection. Washington, DC: USGAO.
Vadakpat, G., S. Stoffels, and K. Dixon. 2000. “Road user cost models for network-level pavement management.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1699 (1): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.3141/1699-07.
Wu, Z., and G. W. Flintsch. 2009. “Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability.” J. Transp. Eng. 135 (5): 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000006.
Yeo, H., Y. Yoon, and S. Madanat. 2013. “Algorithms for bottom-up maintenance optimisation for heterogeneous infrastructure systems.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9 (4): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.657649.
Zhang, H., G. A. Keoleian, and M. D. Lepech. 2013. “Network-level pavement asset management system integrated with life-cycle analysis and life-cycle optimization.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000093.
Zimmerman, K. A. 2015. “Pavement management’s role in an asset management world.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Managing Pavement Assets. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25Issue 3September 2019

History

Received: May 14, 2018
Accepted: Dec 18, 2018
Published online: Apr 29, 2019
Published in print: Sep 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 29, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Omar Swei, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia, CEME-2004C, 6250 Applied Science Ln., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Jeremy Gregory, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Scientist, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Bldg. E19-625, Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: [email protected]
Randolph Kirchain, Ph.D. [email protected]
Principal Research Scientist, Materials Research Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Bldg. E19-625, Cambridge, MA 02139. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share