Model for Corrective Maintenance Scheduling of Rail Transit Networks: Application to Athens Metro
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 25, Issue 1
Abstract
Efficient and safe rail transit (metro) operations require regularly inspected and properly maintained infrastructures. While preventive maintenance is usually undertaken following a predetermined schedule, decisions on repairs and corrective maintenance are usually scheduled ad hoc, following inspections. This paper presents a model for optimally scheduling corrective maintenance activities in a rail transit network, following their identification as part of an inspection process. An integer programming model is formulated for that purpose, aiming at minimizing passenger delay caused by reduced operational speeds on degraded rail segments and prioritizing activities in segments with intensive operations; higher train traffic and associated train loads; and under budget, staff, and other practical constraints. The model is applied for the case of the Athens, Greece, metro system and results are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors of this study would like to thank STA.SY. S.A. for providing all the necessary data and information and for the helpful comments.
References
Andrade, A., and P. Teixeira. 2011. “Biobjective optimization model for maintenance and renewal decisions related to rail track geometry.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2261 (1): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.3141/2261-19.
Budai, G., R. Dekker, and U. Kaymak. 2009. Genetic and memetic algorithms for scheduling railway maintenance activities. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam.
Budai, G., R. Dekker, and R. P. Nicolai. 2008. “Maintenance and production: A review of planning models.” In Complex system maintenance handbook, edited by K. A. H. Kobbacy and D. N. P. Murthy, 321–344. London: Springer.
Budai, G., D. Huisman, and R. Dekker. 2006. “Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57 (9): 1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602085.
Caetano, L., and P. Teixeira. 2013. “Availability approach to optimizing railway track renewal operations.” J. Transp. Eng. 139 (9): 941–948. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000575.
Caetano, L., and P. Teixeira. 2015. “Optimization model to schedule railway track renewal operations: A life-cycle cost approach.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (11): 1524–1536. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.982133.
Cheung, B. S. N., K. P. Chow, L. C. K. Hui, and A. M. K. Yong. 1999. “Railway track possession assignment using constraint satisfaction.” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 12 (5): 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-1976(99)00025-1.
Couy, A. 1997. Railway maintenance manual—0G00TW700X000. Paris: RATP.
Ferreira, L., and M. H. Murray. 1997. “Modelling rail track deterioration and maintenance: Current practices and future needs.” Transp. Rev. 17 (3): 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441649708716982.
Gustavsson, E., M. Patriksson, A. Strömberg, A. Wojciechowski, and M. Önnheim. 2014. “Preventive maintenance scheduling of multi-component systems with interval costs.” Comput. Ind. Eng. 76 (Oct): 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.02.009.
He, Q., H. Li, D. Bhattacharjya, D. P. Parikh, and A. Hampapur. 2015. “Track geometry defect rectification based on track deterioration modelling and derailment risk assessment.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66 (3): 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.7.
Heinicke, F., A. Simroth, G. Scheithauer, and A. Fischer. 2014. On a railway maintenance scheduling problem with customer costs and multi-depots. Dresden, Germany: TU-Dresden.
Lidén, T. 2015. “Railway infrastructure maintenance: A survey of planning problems and conducted research.” Transp. Res. Procedia 10: 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.011.
Lidén, T., and M. Joborn. 2017. “An optimization model for integrated planning of railway traffic and network maintenance.” Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 74 (Jan): 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.016.
Luan, X., J. Miao, L. Meng, F. Corman, and G. Lodewijks. 2017. “Integrated optimization on train scheduling and preventive maintenance time slots planning.” Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 80 (Jul): 329–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.010.
Oyama, T., and M. Miwa. 2006. “Mathematical modeling analyses for obtaining an optimal railway track maintenance schedule.” Jpn. J. Ind. Appl. Math. 23 (2): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03167551.
Pintelon, L., and A. Parodi-Herz. 2008. “Maintenance: An evolutionary perspective.” In Complex system maintenance handbook, 21–48. London: Springer.
Quiroga, L. M., and E. Schnieder. 2010. “A heuristic approach to railway track maintenance scheduling.” WIT Trans. Built Environ. 114: 687–699.
Vale, C., and I. M. Ribeiro. 2014. “Railway condition-based maintenance model with stochastic deterioration.” J. Civ. Eng. Manage. 20 (5): 686–692. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802711.
Vale, C., I. M. Ribeiro, and R. Calçada. 2011. “Integer programming to optimize tamping in railway tracks as preventive maintenance.” J. Transp. Eng. 138 (1): 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000296.
Wen, M., R. Li, and K. B. Salling. 2016. “Optimization of predictive condition-based tamping for railway tracks.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 252 (2): 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.024.
Zhang, T., J. Andrews, and R. Wang. 2013. “Optimal scheduling of track maintenance on a railway network.” Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 29 (2): 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1381.
Zhao, J., A. H. C. Chan, and M. P. N. Burrow. 2007. “Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58 (8): 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602251.
Zhao, J., A. H. C. Chan, and M. P. N. Burrow. 2009. “A genetic-algorithm-based approach for scheduling the renewal of railway track components.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F 223 (6): 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT273.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 28, 2018
Accepted: Jul 13, 2018
Published online: Oct 27, 2018
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Mar 27, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.