Technical Papers
May 30, 2018

Decision-Making Framework for Holistic Sustainable Disaster Recovery: Agent-Based Approach for Decreasing Vulnerabilities of the Associated Communities

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24, Issue 3

Abstract

Sustainable disaster recovery involves not merely the restoration of the physical built environment, but also meeting the needs of the impacted stakeholders and decreasing the vulnerability of the host community to future hazards. Nonetheless, the available disaster recovery frameworks deal with community restoration as isolated redevelopment projects and lack the integration of the host community’s overall welfare and vulnerability into the objective functions of the optimization models. This paper balances the short-term redevelopment objectives and the long-term goals of reducing the host community three-dimensional vulnerability (i.e., social, economic, and environmental). The authors develop an innovative decision-making framework that assimilates and meets the needs of the broad community stakeholders. Through a bottom-up multiagent-based model, the authors simulate the stakeholders’ decision-making processes and integrate well-established vulnerability indicators into the objective functions of the stakeholders to better guide the redevelopment strategies. Adopting the recovery processes in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina catastrophe, the proposed model is implemented and tested on the residential housing and economic financial recovery as well as the infrastructure development in three devastated coastal counties in Mississippi. Each action plan provided by governmental agencies had its own advantages and negative impacts on the vulnerability and/or the recovery of the impacted communities. By holistically addressing the multidimensional recovery processes using simultaneous simulation and optimization techniques, the model develops a Pareto optimal set of strategies that increases the recovery rates and decreases the three-dimensional vulnerabilities. The proposed innovative approach gives decision makers a broader understanding of the disaster recovery outcomes rather than relying on strategies that aim to return the community to pre-event conditions. As such, the proposed holistic approach will enable decision makers to identify optimal disaster recovery strategies that achieve immediate redevelopment objectives and avoid sacrificing the right of future generations to sustainability and resilience.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors deeply thank and appreciate the anonymous reviewers for their invaluable comments and remarks that helped hone and strengthen the quality of the manuscript through the blind peer-review process.

References

Aldrich, D. 2010. Fixing recovery: Social capital in post-crisis resilience. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
Aldrich, D. P. 2011. “The power of people: Social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake.” Nat. Hazards 56 (3): 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9577-7.
Aldrich, D. P. 2012. “Social, not physical, infrastructure: The critical role of civil society after the 1923 Tokyo earthquake.” Disasters 36 (3): 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01263.
Barnett, J., S. Lambert, and I. Fry. 2008. “The hazards of indicators: Insights from the environmental vulnerability index.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geographers 98 (1): 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600701734315.
Berke, P. R., J. Kartez, and D. Wenger. 1993. “Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity.” Disasters 17 (2): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb01137.
Blackburn, J. M. 1936. The acquisition of skill: An analysis of learning curves. London: Industrial Health Research Board.
Boz, M., I. El-adaway, and M. Eid. 2014. “A systems approach for sustainability assessment of civil infrastructure projects construction.” In Proc., Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network, 444–453. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Boz, M. A., and I. H. El-adaway. 2014. “Managing sustainability assessment of civil infrastructure projects using work, nature, and flow.” J. Manage. Eng. 30 (5): 04014019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000203.
Bryson, K. M. N., H. Millar, A. Joseph, and A. Mobolurin. 2002. “Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 141 (3): 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00275-2.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014. “Consumer expenditures in 2012.” Accessed October 20, 2014. http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxann12.pdf.
Burton, C. G. 2010. “Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling.” Nat. Hazards Rev. 11 (2): 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2010)11:2(58).
Burton, C. G. 2012. The development of metrics for community resilience to natural disasters. Columbia, SC: Univ. of South Carolina.
Burton, C. G. 2014. “A validation of metrics for community resilience to natural hazards and disasters using the recovery from Hurricane Katrina as a case study.” Ann. Assoc. Am. Geographers 105 (1): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.960039.
Chang, S. E. 2010. “Urban disaster recovery: A measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake.” Disasters 34 (2): 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.
Chang, S. E., and A. Z. Rose. 2012. “Towards a theory of economic recovery from disasters.” Int. J. Mass Emergencies Disasters 32 (2): 171–181.
Chen, X., and F. B. Zhan. 2017. “Agent-based modelling and simulation of urban evacuation: Relative effectiveness of simultaneous and staged evacuation strategies.” J. Oper. Res. Soc. 59 (1): 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602321.
Clarke, K. C. 2014. “Cellular automata and agent-based models.” In Handbook of regional science, edited by M. M. Fischer, and P. Nijkamp, 1217–1233. Berlin: Springer.
Crooks, A. T., and S. Wise. 2013. “GIS and agent-based models for humanitarian assistance.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 41: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.05.003.
Cutter, S. L. 1993. Living with risk: The geography of technological hazards. London: E. Arnold.
Cutter, S. L., B. J. Boruff, and W. L. Shirley. 2003. “Social vulnerability to environmental hazards.” Social Sci. Q. 84 (2): 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002.
Cutter, S. L., C. T. Emrich, J. T. Mitchell, B. J. Boruff, M. Gall, M. C. Schmidtlein, and G. Melton. 2006. “The long road home: Race, class, and recovery from Hurricane Katrina.” Environ. Sci. Policy Sustainable Dev. 48 (2): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.2.8-20.
Dawson, R. J., R. Peppe, and M. Wang. 2011. “An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management.” Nat. Hazards 59 (1): 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4.
Eid, M., M. Abdelrazek, and E. Elbeltagi. 2012. “Multi-objective repetitive activities projects scheduling using genetic algorithms.” In Advances in civil engineering and building materials. edited by S.-Y. Chang, S. Bahar, and J. Zhao, 331–335. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Eid, M., and I. El-adaway. 2017a. “Integrating the social vulnerability of host communities and the objective functions of associated stakeholders during disaster recovery processes using agent-based modeling.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (5): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000680.
Eid, M., and I. El-adaway. 2017b. “Sustainable disaster recovery decision-making support tool: Integrating economic vulnerability into the objective functions of the associated stakeholders.” J. Manage. Eng. 33 (2): 04016041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000487.
Eid, M., and I. El-adaway. 2017c. “Sustainable disaster recovery: Multi-agent based model for integrating environmental vulnerability into decision making processes of the associated stakeholders.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 143 (1): 04016022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000349.
Eid, M., I. El-adaway, and K. Coatney. 2015. “Evolutionary stable strategy for postdisaster insurance: Game theory approach.” J. Manage. Eng. 31 (6): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000357.
El-Anwar, O., K. El-Rayes, and A. Elnashai. 2010. “Maximizing the sustainability of integrated housing recovery efforts.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 136 (7): 794–802. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000185.
El-Anwar, O., J. Ye, and W. Orabi. 2015. “Efficient optimization of post-disaster reconstruction of transportation networks.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 30 (3): 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000503.
Erev, I., and A. E. Roth. 1998. “Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria.” Am. Econ. Rev. 88 (4): 848–881.
Federal Highway Administration. 2014. “Transpiration and housing costs: Combined transpiration and housing decisions save money and build wealth.” Accessed October 20, 2014. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/livability/fact_sheets/transandhousing.cfm.
FEMA. 2000. Hazards, disasters, and the US emergency management system: An introduction, session 6: Fundamentals of US emergency management. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Fiedrich, F., and P. Burghardt. 2007. “Agent-based systems for disaster management.” Commun. ACM 50 (3): 41–42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226736.1226763.
Goffe, W. L., G. D. Ferrier, and J. Rogers 1994. “Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing.” J. Econom. 60: 65–99.
Grinberger, A. Y., M. Lichter, and D. Felsenstein. 2015. “Simulating urban resilience: Disasters, dynamics and (synthetic) data.” In Planning support systems and smart cities, edited by S. Geertman, J. Ferreira, Jr., R. Goodspeed, and J. Stillwell, 99–119. New York, NY: Springer.
Groen, J. A., and A. E. Polivka. 2010. “Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas.” Demography 47 (4): 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03214587.
Haimes, Y. Y. 2012. “Systems-based approach to preparedness for, response to, and recovery from natural and human-made disasters.” Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 12 (4): 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000183.
Ingram, J. C., G. Franco, C. R. Rio, and B. Khazai. 2006. “Post-disaster recovery dilemmas: Challenges in balancing short-term and long-term needs for vulnerability reduction.” Environ. Sci. Policy 9 (7–8): 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.07.006.
MDA (Mississippi Development Authority). 2015. “Federal reporting.” Accessed October 5, 2015. http://www.msdisasterrecovery.com/federal-reporting.
Miles, S. B., and S. E. Chang. 2006. “Modeling community recovery from earthquakes.” Earthquake Spectra 22 (2): 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2192847.
Mileti, D. S. 1999. Disaster by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry.
Mississippi Automated Resource Information System. 2015. “GIS files.” Accessed February 1, 2014. http://www.maris.state.ms.us/.
National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2015. “Vegetation cover.” Accessed February 5, 2014. US Dept. of Agriculture. https://www.nass.usda.gov/.
National Land Cover Database. 2015. “Land use.” Accessed February 20, 2014. US Dept. of the Interior. https://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_data.php.
NDRF (National Disaster Recovery Framework). 2011. National disaster recovery framework, strengthening disaster recovery for the nation. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Olshansky, R. B. 2006. “Planning after Hurricane Katrina.” J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 72 (2): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976735.
Olshansky, R. B., L. A. Johnson, and K. C. Topping. 2006. “Rebuilding communities following disaster: Lessons from Kobe and Los Angeles.” Built Environ. 32 (4): 354–374. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.32.4.354.
Park, A. J., H. H. Tsang, M. Sun, and U. Glässer. 2012. “An agent-based model and computational framework for counter-terrorism and public safety based on swarm intelligence.” Secur. Inf. 1 (1): 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/2190-8532-1-23.
Pradhan, A., D. Laefer, and W. Rasdorf. 2007. “Infrastructure management information system framework requirements for disasters.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 21 (2): 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:2(90).
Pratt, C. R., U. L. Kaly, and J. Mitchell. 2004. Manual: How to use the environmental vulnerability index (EVI). 41. Sava, Fiji Islands: UNEP and SOPAC.
Railsback, S. F., S. L. Lytinen, and S. K. Jackson. 2006. “Agent-based simulation platforms: Review and development recommendations.” Simulation 82 (9): 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549706073695.
ReferenceUSA. 2000. Mean sales, number of retail trade, number of wholesale/distributors, number of depository and non-depository institutions, number of insurance carriers, number of health services. Papillion, NE: ReferenceUSA.
ReferenceUSA. 2009. Mean sales, number of retail trade, number of wholesale/distributors, number of depository and non-depository institutions, number of insurance carriers, number of health services. Papillion, NE: ReferenceUSA.
ReferenceUSA. 2010. Mean sales, number of retail trade, number of wholesale/distributors, number of depository and non-depository institutions, number of insurance carriers, number of health services. Papillion, NE: ReferenceUSA.
ReferenceUSA. 2011. Mean sales, number of retail trade, number of wholesale/distributors, number of depository and non-depository institutions, number of insurance carriers, number of health services. Papillion, NE: ReferenceUSA.
ReferenceUSA. 2012. Mean sales, number of retail trade, number of wholesale/distributors, number of depository and non-depository institutions, number of insurance carriers, number of health services. Papillion, NE: ReferenceUSA.
Smith, G., and D. Wenger. 2007. “Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing agenda.” Chap. 14 of Handbook of disaster research, edited by H. Rodriguez, E.Quarentelli, and R. Dynes. New York, NY: Springer.
Sterman, J. 2000. Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sullivan, K., M. Coletti, and S. Luke. 2010. GeoMason: Geospatial support for MASON. Fairfax, VA: Dept. of Computer Science, George Mason Univ.
Sullivan, M. 2003. “Integrated recovery management: A new way of looking at a delicate process.” Aust. J. Emergency Manage. 18 (2): 4–27.
Sun, J., and L. Tesfatsion. 2007. “An agent-based computational laboratory for wholesale power market design.” In Proc., IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 1–6. New York, NY: IEEE.
Thorndike, E. 1898. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animal: Psychological monographs. New York: Macmillan.
US Census Bureau. 2000. “Population, number of households, homeownership, household income, employment, occupation, Hancock MS, Harrison MS, Jackson MS, Census Tract.” Accessed October 16, 2014. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
US Census Bureau. 2009. “Population, number of households, homeownership, household income, employment, occupation, Hancock MS, Harrison MS, Jackson MS, Census Tract.” Accessed October 16, 2014. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t .
US Census Bureau. 2010. “Population, number of households, homeownership, household income, employment, occupation, Hancock MS, Harrison MS, Jackson MS, Census Tract.” Accessed October 16, 2014. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
US Census Bureau. 2011. “Population, number of households, homeownership, household income, employment, occupation, Hancock MS, Harrison MS, Jackson MS, Census Tract.” Accessed October 16, 2014. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
US Census Bureau. 2012. “Population, number of households, homeownership, household income, employment, occupation, Hancock MS, Harrison MS, Jackson MS, Census Tract.” Accessed October 16, 2014. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t.
Vidal, J. M. 2007. Fundamentals of multi-agent systems. Columbia, SC: Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Univ. of South Carolina.
Villa, F., and H. McLEOD. 2002. “Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: Guidelines and applications.” Environ. Manage. 29 (3): 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-001-0030-2.
Vlassis, N. 2003. A concise introduction to multi-agent systems and distributed AI, intelligent autonomous systems. Amsterdam, Holland: Informatics Institute, Univ. of Amsterdam.
Yang, H. Y., and H. Bozdogan. 2011. “Learning factor patterns in exploratory factor analysis using the genetic algorithm and information complexity as the fitness function.” J. Pattern Recognit. Res. 6 (2): 307–325. https://doi.org/10.13176/11.335.
Zhu, W. 2015. “Agent-based simulation and modeling of retail center systems.” J. Urban Plann. Dev. 142 (1): 04015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000280.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24Issue 3September 2018

History

Received: Jul 20, 2016
Accepted: Feb 14, 2018
Published online: May 30, 2018
Published in print: Sep 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Oct 30, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed S. Eid, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Construction and Building Engineering, Arab Academy for Science, Technology, and Maritime—Sheraton Heliopolis, Cairo 11799, Egypt. Email: [email protected]
Islam H. El-adaway, F.ASCE [email protected]
Hurst-McCarthy Professor of Construction Engineering and Management, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering and Dept. of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, Missouri Univ. of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO 65401; formerly, Associate Professor and Construction Engineering and Management Program Coordinator, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee–Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share