Technical Papers
Apr 10, 2018

Integrated Performance Assessment Model for Water Networks

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24, Issue 2

Abstract

Most water distribution systems worldwide are deteriorating rapidly, while their rehabilitation costs are on the rise. Maintaining water networks in a proper condition under a tight budget puts extra pressure on municipalities and triggers the need for a proper performance assessment. This research therefore aims at developing an Integrated Water Networks Performance Assessment (I-WNPA) model to assess the performance of water networks. It also presents a functional (physical, operational, quality of service, and environmental) and global (or total) performance index scale of different performance states, the description of each state and recommended intervention actions (long term, short term, or immediate). The model encompasses three main phases for utilizing the fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) to calculate the weights of functional performance criteria of the components in the first phase. It also uses both the preference ranking organization method of enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) and the simple multiattribute utility theory (MAUT) to compute the functional and global performance indices of the network components. Then, the probability-of-failure–based integration method is developed to integrate the component indices and to obtain the segment performance index (SPI). The topological clustering is adopted to integrate SPI to obtain the entire network index, using the topological chart of the network and the connectivity ranked matrix. In this research, data are obtained from questionnaires and case study databases. The proposed model is demonstrated via the data covering water subnetwork in the city of Montreal. The results are well aligned with Montreal water services assessment as follows: Excellent for 16 pipes and 49 accessories, good for 32 pipes, medium for 5 pipes and 8 accessories, and poor for 21 accessories. The results also show that the analyzed subnetwork is in a medium state. These results are used to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable components, subnetworks, or the entire network, and subsequently to identify the performance improvements required. The model can be linked to other models, such as rehabilitation planning and budget allocation. This approach suits any unidirectional (one-way flow) water network, and it can be adopted to support the performance assessment of any water network by considering hydraulic analysis and automation means. It can also be adopted by other infrastructure systems, such as sewer networks and subway systems, when suitable indicators are defined.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their thanks and appreciation to Service de l’eau de Montreal, Direction de la gestion stratégique des reseaux d’eau, and Divison plan directeur, for the valuable data they provided for the purpose of testing this model, and for their feedback and comments.

References

Abu-Taleb, M. F., and Mareschal, B. (1995). “Water resources planning in the Middle East: Application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 81(3), 500–511.
Al Barqawi, H. (2006). “Condition rating models for underground infrastructure: Sustainable water mains.” M.S. thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
Al Barqawi, H., and Zayed, T. (2006). “Condition rating model for underground infrastructure sustainable water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 126–135.
Al-Barqawi, H., and Zayed, T. (2008). “Infrastructure management: Integrated AHP/ANN model to evaluate municipal water mains’ performance.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 305–318.
Alegre, H., Hirner, W., Baptista, J. M., and Parena, R. (2000). Performance indicators for water supply services (2000)—Manual of best practice series, IWA Publishing, London, 160.
Alegre, H., Hirner, W., Baptista, J. M., and Parena, R. (2004). Indicadores de desempenho paraserviços de abastecimento de água: versão portuguesa de Performance indicators for water supply services, IWA/IRAR/LNEC, London.
Al-Kloub, B., Al-Shemmeri, T., and Pearman, A. (1997). “Multi-criteria decision support system for water strategic planning in Jordan.” Multiple criteria decision making, Springer, Berlin, 545–555.
Al-Rashdan, D., Al-Kloub, B., Dean, A., and Al-Shemmeri, T. (1999). “Environmental impact assessment and ranking the environmental projects in Jordan.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 118(1), 30–45.
Amit, R., and Ramachandran, P. (2009). “Optimal design of water distribution networks a review.” ⟨http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006andcontext=rkamit⟩ (Dec. 14, 2013).
AQUAMODEX [Computer software]. Direxyon, Montreal.
ASCE. (2013). “Report card for America’s infrastructure.” ⟨www.infrastructurereportcard.org⟩ (Dec. 10, 2013).
Aydin, N. Y., Zeckzer, D., Hagen, H., and Schmitt, T. (2015). “A decision support system for the technical sustainability assessment of water distribution systems.” Environ. Modell. Software, 67(1), 31–42.
Barcelli, D., Ocampo-Martinez, C., Puig, V., and Bemporad, A. (2010). “Decentralized model predictive control of drinking water networks using an automatic subsystem decomposition approach.” IFAC Proc. Vol., 43(8), 572–577.
Bereskie, T., Haider, H., Rodriguez, M. J., and Sadiq, R. (2017). “Framework for continuous performance improvement in small drinking water systems.” Sci. Total Environ., 574(1), 1405–1414.
Brans, J., Vincke, P., and Mareschal, B. (1986). “How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 24(2), 228–238.
Chang, D. Y. (1996). “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP”. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 95(3), 649–655.
Cheng, C. H., and Yang, K. L. (1999). “Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 116(2), 423–435.
CIRC (Canadian Infrastructure Report Card). (2016). Municipal roads and water systems, Vol. 1, Canadian Society of Civil Engineering, Ottawa.
Coulibaly, H. D., and Rodriguez, M. J. (2003). “Spatial and temporal variation of drinking water quality in ten small Quebec utilities.” J. Environ. Eng. Sci., 2(1), 47–61.
Coulibaly, H. D., and Rodriguez, M. J. (2004). “Development of performance indicators for small Quebec drinking water utilities.” J. Environ. Manage., 73(3), 243–255.
Davidson, J., Bouchart, F., Cavill, S., and Jowitt, P. (2005). “Real-time connectivity modeling of water distribution networks to predict contamination spread.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 377–386.
Dziedzic, R., and Karney, B. (2015). “Performance index for water distribution networks under multiple loading conditions.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 04015040.
El Chanati, H. (2014). “Performance assessment of water network infrastructure.” M.S. thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
Etaati, L., Sadi-Nezhad, S., and Moghadam-Abyaneh, P. M. (2011). “Fuzzy analytical network process: An overview on methods.” Am. J. Sci. Res., 41, 101–114.
FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations). (2013). The state of food insecurity in the world: The multiple dimensions of food security, Rome, 214.
Federation of Canadian Municipalities and National Research Council. (2003). “Deterioration and inspection of water distribution systems.” National guide to sustainable municipal infrastructure, Ottawa.
Foxon, T. J., et al. (2010). “Sustainability criteria for decision support in the UK water industry.” J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 45(2), 285–301.
Garuti, C., and Sandoval, M. (2005). “Comparing AHP and ANP shiftwork models: Hierarchy simplicity v/s network connectivity.” Proc., 8th Int. Symp. of the AHP, MCDM, Whistler, BC, Canada.
Geem, Z. (2003). “Window-based decision support system for the water pipe condition assessment using artificial neural network.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, ASCE, New York, 23–26.
Haider, H., Sadiq, R., and Tesfamariam, S. (2014a). “Performance indicators for small and medium sized water supply systems: A review.” Environ. Rev., 22(1), 1–40.
Haider, H., Sadiq, R., and Tesfamariam, S. (2014b). “Selecting performance indicators for small and medium sized water utilities: Multi-criteria analysis using ELECTRE method.” Urban Water J., 12(4), 305–327.
Ismaeel, M. (2016). “Performance based budget allocation model for water networks.” M.S. thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
Ismaeel, M., and Zayed, T. (2016). “Performance assessment model for water networks.” ASCE Pipelines Conf. 2016, ASCE, Reston, VA, 696–707.
Jacobs, P., and Goulter, I. (1988). “Evaluation of methods for decomposition of water distribution networks for reliability analysis.” Civ. Eng. Syst., 5(2), 58–64.
Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., and Buyukozkan, G. (2006). “A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach.” J. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 171(2), 390–411.
Kalbar, P. P., Karmakar, S., and Asolekar, S. R. (2012). “Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach.” J. Environ. Manage., 113(30), 158–169.
Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives, Wiley, New York.
Kirstein, J., Albrechtsen, H., and Rygaard, M. (2014). “Simplification of water distribution network simulation by topological clustering-investigation of its potential use in Copenhagen’s water supply monitoring and contamination contingency plans.” Procedia Eng., 89, 1184–1191.
Makar, J. M., and Kleiner, Y. (2000). “Maintaining water pipeline integrity.” Proc., AWWA Infrastructure Conf. and Exhibition, Baltimore, 1–13.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Mikhailov, L. (2004). “Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method.” Comput. Oper. Res. 31(2), 293–301.
Nafi, A., Tcheng, J., and Beau, P. (2015). “Comprehensive methodology for overall performance assessment of water utilities.” Water Resour. Manage., 29(15), 5429–5450.
Nazif, S., Karamouz, M., Yousefi, M., and Zahmatkesh, Z. (2013). “Increasing water security: An algorithm to improve water distribution performance.” Water Resour. Manage., 27(8), 2903–2921.
Ocampo-Martinez, C., Puig, V., and Bovo, S. (2011). “Decentralised MPC based on a graph partitioning approach applied to the Barcelona drinking water network.” IFAC Proc. Vol., 44(1), 1577–1583.
Özelkan, E. C., and Duckstein, L. (1996). “Analysing water resources alternatives and handling criteria by multi criterion decision techniques.” J. Environ. Manage., 48(1), 69–96.
Perelman, L., and Ostfeld, A. (2011). “Topological clustering for water distribution systems analysis.” Environ. Modell. Software, 26(7), 969–972.
Pohl, I. (1969). First results on the effect of error in heuristic search, Edinburgh Univ., Edinburgh, U.K., 219–236.
Popova, V., and Sharpanskykh, A. (2010). “Modeling organizational performance indicators.” Inf. Syst., 35, 505–527.
Rajani, B., and Kleiner, Y. (2002). “Forecasting variations and trends in water-main breaks.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 122–131.
Rajani, B., and Kleiner, Y. (2004). “Non-destructive inspection techniques to determine structural distress indicators in water mains.” Proc., Evaluation and Control of Water Loss in Urban Water Networks, Valencia, Spain, 1–20.
Raju, K. S., Duckstein, L., and Arondel, C. (2000). “Multicriterion analysis for sustainable water resources planning: A case study in Spain.” Water Resour. Manage., 14(6), 435–456.
Ramos, T. B. (2009). “Development of regional sustainability indicators and the role of academia in this process: The Portuguese practice.” J. Clean. Prod., 17(12), 1101–1115.
Rossman, L. E. (1989). EPANET: Users manual, Airhead Software, Boulder, CO.
Roy, B., and Vincke, P. (1987). “Pseudo-orders: Definition, properties and numerical representation.” Math. Soc. Sci., 14(3), 263–274.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process.” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 48(1), 9–26.
Saaty, T. L. (2001). “Analytic network process.” Encyclopedia of operations research and management science, Springer, New York, 28–35.
Sadiq, R., Rodríguez, M. J., and Tesfamariam, S. (2010). “Integrating indicators for performance assessment of small water utilities using ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operators.” Expert Syst. Appl., 37(7), 4881–4891.
Salman, A. (2011). “Reliability-based management of water distribution networks.” Ph.D. dissertation, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
Sarkis, J., and Sundarraj, R. P. (2006). “Evaluation of enterprise information technologies: A decision model for high-level consideration of strategic and operational issues.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C Appl. Rev., 36(2), 260–273.
Semaan, N. (2006). “Subway station diagnosis index (SSDI): A condition assessment model.” M.S. thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal.
Shen, L., Wu, Y., and Zhang, X. (2011). “Key assessment indicators for the sustainability of infrastructure projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 441–451.
Tarjan, R. (1972). “Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms.” SIAM J. Comput., 1(2), 146–160.
Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., and Pedrycz, W. (1983). “A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 11(1–3), 229–241.
Walski, T. M. (1993). “Practical aspects of providing reliability in water distribution systems.” J. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 42(1), 13–19.
Wang, Y. M., Elhag, T. M., and Hua, Z. (2006). “A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 157(23), 3055–3071.
Willuweit, L., and O’sullivan, J. J. (2013). “A decision support tool for sustainable planning of urban water systems: Presenting the dynamic urban water simulation model.” Water Res., 47(20), 7206–7220.
Xu, J., Small, M., Fischbeck, P., and VanBriesen, J. (2010). “Integratinglocation models with Bayesian analysis to inform decision making.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 209–216.
Xu, R. (2000). “Fuzzy least-squares priority method in the analytic hierarchy process.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 112(3), 395–404.
Yager, R. R. (1988). “Including importance in OWA aggregations using fuzzy systems modeling.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 6(1), 286–294.
Yan, J., and Vairavamoorthy, K. (2003). “Fuzzy approach for pipe condition assessment.” Proc., Pipeline Engineering and Construction Int. Conf., ASCE, Baltimore, 466–476.
Yang, S. L., Hsu, N. S., Louie, P. W., and Yeh, W. W. (1996). “Water distribution network reliability: Connectivity analysis.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 54–64.
Zadeh, L. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” J. Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zayed, T. M., and Halpin, D. W. (2004). “Quantitative assessment for piles productivity factors.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 405–414.
Zhou, X. (2012). “Fuzzy analytical network process implementation with MATLAB.” MATLAB: A fundamental tool for scientific computing and engineering applications, V. N. Katsikis, ed., Vol. 3, InTech, London, 500.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24Issue 2June 2018

History

Received: Mar 9, 2017
Accepted: Dec 5, 2017
Published online: Apr 10, 2018
Published in print: Jun 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Sep 10, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Research Assistant, Dept. of Building Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
T. Zayed, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, QC, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share