Rational Method to Determine Investment Amount for Making Roadways Resilient to a Changing Climate
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24, Issue 1
Abstract
The increase in maximum air temperature and annual rainfall caused by climate change can shorten the lives of pavements and hence increase the mileage of roads that would require rehabilitation at any point in the future. Most agencies are aware of the potential of the use of better materials such as high-modulus asphalt in reducing the negative impacts, thereby making roads resilient to climate change. However, using better materials does involve higher investments; currently, the major hindrance is the inability to decide on a justifiable level of investment. This is a challenge because climate change predictions have major uncertainties associated with them, and there could be competing needs for the limited budget that is available. This paper presents a rational framework that is based on the use of system dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations to identify an appropriate level of investment for making roads resilient to climate change. The process consists of predicting the mileage of roads that will need rehabilitation because of climate change with and without the use of better materials, considering the reduction in this mileage caused by using better materials as a future “return” on a present investment on better materials, and then comparing that return with one that could be expected from a regular investment with a reasonable interest rate. The comparisons are made probabilistically, so that depending on the level of selected confidence level, one can identify the investment that would result in the same return in a certain number of years as the return from resilient pavements in the same number of years. This investment would then be used as an appropriate and justifiable number for investing in better materials for making roads resilient to climate change. A worked-out example is presented, which shows an appropriate investment (that is far greater than one would spend for a conventional pavement) of approximately $2,400 per 1.6 km (1 mi) of a roadway network to obtain the same benefit from the reduction of cost of rehabilitation as an amount that could be obtained from an interest-paying investment in 15 years. The framework allows users to utilize their preferred method of pavement analysis, costs, mileage of roads, and results of laboratory and/or field study on pavement life–enhancing ability of better materials.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dr. Jo Sias Daniel, Dr. Jennifer M. Jacobs, and Mr. Benjamin Miller for their help in analyzing climate change data in their earlier publications, without which they could not have completed this paper. The authors also thank the editorial staff and reviewers for their critical review and most helpful comments for improving the paper.
References
Button, J. W., Little, D. N., Kirn, Y., and Ahmed, J. (1987). “Mechanistic evaluation of selected asphalt additives.” Proc., Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 56, AAPT, St. Paul, MN, 62–90.
Buurman, J., and Babovic, V. (2016). “Adaptation pathways and real options analysis: An approach to deep uncertainty in climate change adaptation policies.” Policy Soc., 35(2), 137–150.
Carpenter, S. H., and Van Dam, T. (1987). “Laboratory performance comparisons of polymer-modified and unmodified asphalt concrete mixes.” Transp. Res. Rec., in press.
Dehghani, M. S., Flintsch, G., and McNeil, S. (2014). “Impact of road condition and disruption uncertainties on network vulnerability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04014015.
Dittrich, R., Wreford, A., and Moran, D. (2016). “A survey of decision-making approaches for climate change adaptation: Are robust methods the way forward?” Ecol. Econ., 122, 79–89.
Field, C., Barros, V., Mach, K., and Mastrandrea, M. (2014). “Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability.” ⟨https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/drafts/fd/WGIIAR5-TS_FGDall.pdf⟩ (Jan. 30, 2017).
Gersonius, B., Ashley, R., Pathirana, A., and Zevenbergen, C. (2013). “Climate change uncertainty: Building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure.” Clim. Change, 116(2), 411–423.
Guswa, A. J., Celia, M. A., and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2002). “Models of soil moisture dynamics in ecohydrology: A comparative study.” Water Resour. Res., 38(9), 1166.
Hawkins, E., and Sutton, R. (2009). “The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions.” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90(8), 1095–1107.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2016). “Adaptation, sustainable development, and equity.” ⟨http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=49⟩ (Jan. 22, 2016).
Isacsson, U., and Zeng, H. (1998). “Low temperature cracking of polymer modified asphalt.” Mater. Struct., 31(1), 58–63.
Jeuland, M., and Whittington, D. (2014). “Water resources planning under climate change: Assessing the robustness of real options for the Blue Nile.” Water Resour. Res., 50, 2086–2107.
Leahy, R. B., Harrigan, E. T., and Quintus, H. V. (1994). Validation of relationships between specification properties and performance, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 104.
Li, Q. J., Mills, L., McNeil, S., and Attoh-Okine, N. O. (2013). “Integrating potential climate change into the mechanistic empirical based pavement design.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 40(12), 1173–1183.
Meagher, W., Daniel, J. S., Jacobs, J. M., and Linder, E. (2012). “A methodology to evaluate the implications of climate change on the design and performance of flexible pavements.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2305, 111–120.
Mallick, R. B., Jacobs, J. M., Miller, B. J., Daniel, J. S., and Kirshen, P. (2017). “Understanding the impact of climate change on pavements with CMIP5, system dynamics and simulation.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 1–9.
Mallick, R., Radzicki, M., Daniel, J., and Jacobs, J. (2014). “Use of system dynamics to understand the long term impact of climate change on pavement performance and maintenance cost.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2455, 1–9.
Melillo, J. M., Richmond, T. C., and Yohe, G. W. (2014). Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment, U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 841.
National Research Council. (2010). Adapting to the impacts of future climate change, National Academies, Washington, DC, 293.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (2004). “Development of the 2002 guide for design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures: Phase II.”, Washington, DC.
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration). (2017). “National centers for environmental information.” ⟨https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global-regions/201613⟩ (Jul. 22, 2017).
PIARC (Permanent International Association of Road Congresses). (2012). “Dealing with the effects of climate change on road pavements.” ⟨https://www.piarc.org/en/order-library/16862-en-Dealing%20with%20the%20effects%20of%20climate%20change%20on%20road%20pavements.htm⟩ (Jan. 1, 2014).
U.S. DOT. (2014a). “U.S. Department of Transportation climate adaptation plan 2014. Ensuring transportation infrastructure and system resilience.” ⟨https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/2014-%20DOT-Climate-Adaptation-Plan.pdf⟩ (Jan. 22, 2017).
U.S. DOT. (2014b). “USDOT Gulf Coast study, Phase 2.” ⟨https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/resilience/case_studies/gulf_coast_study/gcsph2.pdf⟩ (Jun. 2, 2017).
Walsh, J., et al. (2014). “Appendix 3: Climate science supplement.” Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, 735–789.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24 • Issue 1 • March 2018
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 30, 2017
Accepted: Aug 8, 2017
Published online: Dec 15, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 15, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.