Comparison of Three Retaining Wall Condition Assessment Rating Systems
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 24, Issue 1
Abstract
In general, the nature of permanent earth retaining structures (ERSs) in highway engineering is well suited to the concept of asset management as a valuable tool for operational efficiency and cost control. Earth retaining structure failures can be detrimental to the roadway and the surroundings, and may pose potential hazards to the safety of the public. Work in this paper utilized field survey results from 11 ERSs to illustrate the disadvantages of using a numerical rating system that relies on a single average number, and the applicability of the alternative system presented herein. The ERSs evaluated include mechanically stabilized earth (MSE), soil nail, anchored, gravity, and cantilever earth retaining wall types. Results indicated that the use of a single-value numerical rating can mask deficiencies in ERS elements that are critical to the stability and function of the ERS system. In addition, the identification of specific elements in distress is not apparent when using such an approach. An alternative two-part rating system provides a summary rating that articulates both the condition of the ERS and identifies potential problems with specific ERS elements. As transportation agencies attempt to align with Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), a two-part condition rating system is recommended to better execute an ERS asset management program and integrate it into a systemwide plan.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (2013). Manual for bridge element inspection, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2014). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
Access [Computer software]. Microsoft, Redmond, WA.
Akofio-Sowah, M., Boadi, R., Amekudzi, A., and Meyer, M. (2014). “Managing ancillary transportation assets: The state of the practice.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 04013010.
Bernhardt, K., Loehr, J., and Huaco, D. (2003). “Asset management framework for geotechnical infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 107–116.
Brutus, O., and Tauber, G. (2009). “Guide to asset management of earth retaining structures.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Brutus, O., Tauber, G., and Gandhi, K. (2011). “Asset management of earth retaining structures.” Proc., 2011 Bridge Conf., Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 1–12.
Butler, C., Gabr, M., Rasdorf, W., Findley, D., Chang, J., and Hammit, B. (2016). “Retaining wall field condition inspection, rating analysis, and condition assessment.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015039.
DeMarco, M., Keough, D., and Lewis, S. (2010). “Retaining wall inventory and condition assessment program (WIP): National Parks Service procedure manual.”, Federal Highway Administration, Lakewood, CO.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2008). “Earth structures and asset management.” Washington, DC.
Gerber, T. M. (2012). “Assessing the long-term performance of mechanically stabilized earth walls.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Jensen, W. (2009). “Inspector’s manual for mechanically stabilized earth walls.”, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.
Kim, Y., et al. (2009). “Asset management inventory and data collection.”, Federal Highway Administration, Lakewood, CO.
Kleiner, Y. (2001). “Scheduling inspection and renewal of large infrastructure assets.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 136–143.
Schofer, J., et al. (2010). “Research agenda for transportation infrastructure preservation and renewal: Conference report.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 228–230.
VicRoads Technical Consulting. (2011). Road structures inspection manual, State Government of Victoria, VIC, Australia.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 21, 2015
Accepted: Jun 9, 2017
Published online: Oct 31, 2017
Published in print: Mar 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Mar 31, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.