Technical Papers
Aug 20, 2014

Accounting for Censoring and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Pavement Cracking

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 21, Issue 2

Abstract

Most fatigue cracking models in use have been developed using the ordinary least squares (OLS) method. However, fatigue cracking data (or any type of cracking data) consists of censored data since it has a lower limit of zero. This can cause bias in the fatigue cracking model because the data is not continuous but has positive probability mass at zero. Additionally, when data is selected only from pavements that exhibit cracking, bias will result because the estimates are based on a nonrandom sample. Moreover, bias can also be generated by unobserved factors not included in the fatigue cracking model. This type of bias can be removed by considering the deterioration history of each pavement section, if the unobserved factors are section-specific. Based on a long-term pavement performance (LTPP) dataset consisting of SPS-1 pavement sections, the authors have modeled fatigue cracking of pavement structures. The data were initially used in modeling fatigue cracking by means of OLS and by a corner solution regression model (Tobit) that accounts for data censoring in fatigue cracking. The Tobit model was used, analyzing the data as pooled and also as a panel dataset (by random-effects), to check for possible bias in the model due to unobserved heterogeneity. The OLS fatigue cracking model exhibits several types of biases due to heterogeneity and erroneous assumptions in the modeling process. The model estimates and test statistics used to evaluate them indicated that the preferred fatigue cracking model was the random effects Tobit model because it accounts for the censoring and heterogeneity bias. Estimating the model by accounting for these types of bias in the data resulted in significant changes in the effects of different parameters affecting fatigue through time.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Adhikari, S., Shen, S., and You, Z. (2009). “Evaluation of fatigue models of hot-mix asphalt through laboratory testing.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 36–42.
Amemiya, T. (1984). “Tobit models: A survey.” J. Econometrics, 24(1–2), 3–61.
Bhat, C. R. (2001). “Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model.” Transp. Res. Part B, 35(7), 677–693.
Chamberlain, G. (1980). “Analysis of covariance with qualitative data.” Rev. Econ. Stud., 47(1), 225–238.
Chu, C. Y., and Durango-Cohen, P. L. (2008). “Empirical comparison of statistical pavement performance models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 138–149.
Dong, Q., Jiang, X., Huang, B., and Richards, S. H. (2013). “Analyzing influence factors of transverse cracking on LTPP resurfaced asphalt pavements through NB and ZINB models.” J. Transp. Eng., 889–895.
Finn, F. N. (1973). “Relation between cracking and performance.”, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC.
Guler, S. I., and Madanat, S. M. (2011). “Axle load power for pavement fatigue cracking: Empirical estimation and policy implications.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 21–24.
Hodges, J. W., Rolt, J., and Jones, T. E. (1975). “The Kenya road transport cost study: Research on road deterioration.”, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Berkshire, U.K.
Hudson, W. R., Monismith, C. L., Shook, J. F., Finn, F. N., and Skok, E. L. (2007). “Pavement lessons learned from the AASHO road test and performance of the interstate highway system.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 17–30.
Kutay, M. E., Gibson, N., Youtcheff, J., and Dongré, R. (2009). “Use of small samples to predict fatigue lives of field cores. newly developed formulation based on viscoelastic continuum damage theory.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 90–97.
Loizos, A., and Karlaftis, M. G. (2005). “Prediction of pavement crack initiation from in-service pavements a duration model approach.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 38–42.
Madanat, S., Bulusu, S., and Mahmoud, A. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure distress initiation and propagation models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 146–150.
Madanat, S., Nakat, Z., and Jin, E. J. (2010). “Empirical modeling of pavement overlay crack progression with field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 292–298.
Madanat, S., Prozzi, J. A., and Han, M. (2002). “Effect of performance model accuracy on optimal pavement design.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 17(1), 22–30.
Madanat, S., and Shin, H. C. (1998). “Development of distress progression models using panel data sets of in-service pavements.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 20–24.
Markow, M. J., and Brademeyer, B. (1981). “Modification of the system EAROMAR.”, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Miller, J. S., and Bellinger, W. Y. (2003). “Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program (fourth revised edition).”, Federal Highway Administration Agency, Washington, DC.
Molenaar, A. A. A. (2007). “Prediction of fatigue cracking in asphalt pavements. Do we follow the right approach?”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 155–162.
Nakat, Z. S., and Madanat, S. (2008). “Stochastic duration modeling of pavement overlay crack initiation.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 185–192.
NCHRP. (2004). “Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Parsley, L., and Robinson, R. (1982). “The TRRL road investment model for developing countries.”, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Berkshire, U.K.
Paterson, W. D. O. (1987). “Road deterioration and maintenance effects: Models for planning and management.” Highway design and maintenance standard ser, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Queiroz, C. A. V. (1981). “Performance prediction models for pavement management in Brazil.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Texas at Austin, TX.
Reger, D., Christofa, E., Guler, I., and Madanat, S. (2013). “Estimation of pavement crack initiation models by combining experimental and field data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 434–441.
Shin, H. C., and Madanat, S. (2003). “Development of a stochastic model of pavement distress initiation.” J. Infrastruct. Plann. Manage. JSCE, 744, 61–67.
Sun, L., Hudson, W. R., and Zhang, Z. (2003). “Empirical-mechanistic method-based stochastic modeling of fatigue damage to predict flexible pavement cracking for transportation infrastructure management.” J. Transp. Eng., 109–117.
Tseng, K. H., and Lytton, R. L. (1990). “Fatigue damage properties of asphaltic pavements.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 150–163.
Wen, H., and Bahia, H. (2009). “Characterizing fatigue of asphalt binders with viscoelastic continuum damage mechanics.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 55–62.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Zhou, F., Hu, S., Chen, D. H., and Scullion, T. (2007). “Overlay tester. simple performance test for fatigue cracking.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–8.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 21Issue 2June 2015

History

Received: Oct 14, 2013
Accepted: Jul 25, 2014
Published online: Aug 20, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 20, 2015
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

José P. Aguiar-Moya, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, National Materials and Structural Models Laboratory (LanammeUCR), Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501-2060 San José, Costa Rica (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Jorge A. Prozzi, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share