Technical Papers
Jun 26, 2014

Identifying Rehabilitation Options for Optimum Improvement in Municipal Asset Condition

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 21, Issue 2

Abstract

Sustainability in municipal services calls for a comprehensive asset management approach that balances between the needs of a growing portfolio of aging infrastructure and the increased demand(s) arising from new growth—all while staying within the financial means of the community. Best practices for municipal asset management require municipalities and communities to clearly define and state their respective goals that reflect their expectations in terms of level of service. The challenge lies in the fact that asset performance from a community perspective may be quite different from that of a municipal perspective. There is need to interrelate the two perspectives and accordingly determine the optimum quantity of improvement required in the condition of a municipal asset. A complete solution should lead to the most appropriate technique for asset rehabilitation. A methodology to address these issues is proposed and illustrated that identifies and adopts: (1) a model to express asset level of service, (2) a model to measure asset condition based on performance, and (3) a fuzzy logic–based method that maps the level of service to the asset condition rating. Based on the inputs of these models, a structured method for analyzing the capacity and suitability of rehabilitation techniques is designed. Case study of a water main is presented to illustrate the concept and to quantitatively demonstrate the implementation of the methodology. This methodology will assist municipal asset managers to quantify the condition improvement required in their assets, in order to meet service goals, and to thereby make more informed decisions on the type and priority of rehabilitation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support extended for this study by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Further, the authors deeply appreciate Tony DiFruscia, Director of Strategic Planning Water Network, City of Montreal (East), for his cooperation during the course of this study.

References

Agrawal, A., Ramalingam, K., Kawaguchi, A., Rozelman, S., Kulcsar, F., and Farooqi, N. (2008). “Asset management and nondestructive evaluation of force mains in New York City.” Proc., Pipelines Congress 2008, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Al-Barqawi, H., and Zayed, T. (2006). “Condition rating model for underground infrastructure sustainable water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 1061–1170.
Al-Barqawi, H., and Zayed, T. (2008). “Sustainable infrastructure management: Performance of water main.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 305–318.
American Iron and Steel Institute. (2007). Welded steel pipe design manual—Merits, design standards, technical data and references, Washington, DC.
American Water Works Association. (2004). “Steel water pipe—A guide for design and installation.” Manual for water supply practices M11, Denver.
American Water Works Company. (2002). “Deteriorating buried infrastructure—Management challenges and strategies.” Distribution System Issue Paper, U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
ASCE/UNESCO. (1998). “Sustainability criteria for water resource systems.” Task Committee on Sustainability Criteria, Principal, Camp, Dresser and McKee, Atlanta, GA.
Brown, R., and Clarke, J. (2007). “Transition to water sensitive urban design, the story of Melbourne, Australia.”, Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Monash Univ., Melbourne, Australia.
Burn, S., Marlow, D., Moglia, M., and Buckland, P. (2007). “Asset management for water infrastructure.” Water Asset Manage. Int., 2(3), 12–18.
Busba, E. R., Sagues, A. A., and Mullins, G. (2011). “Final Rep.: Reinforced concrete pipe cracks—Acceptance criteria.”, Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tempa, FL.
Christodoulou, S., and Agathokleous, A. (2012). “A study on the effects of intermittent water supply on the vulnerability of urban water distribution networks.” Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply, 12(4), 523–530.
Christodoulou, S., Aslani, P., and Vanrenterghem, A. (2003). “A risk analysis framework for evaluating structural degradation of water mains in urban settings, using neurofuzzy systems and statistical modeling techniques.” World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2003, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Corr Tech. (2002). Corr tech incorporated—Engineering guide, 〈http://corrtech.com/EG-all.pdf〉 (Jan. 2012).
Det Noriske Veritas. (2010). “Corroded pipe lines—Recommended practice.”, DNV GL, Høvik, Norway.
Dong, W., and Wong, F. S. (1987). “Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 21(2), 183–199.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC.
Elton, D. J., and Juang, C. H. (1988). “Asphalt pavement evaluation using fuzzy sets.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–7.
Fahmy, M., and Moselhi, O. (2009). “Forecasting the remaining useful life of cast iron water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 269–275.
ICC. (2012). International plumbing code 2012, Washington, DC.
InfraGuide. (2002). “Developing indicators and bench marks.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
InfraGuide. (2003a). “Coordinating infrastructure works.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
InfraGuide. (2003b). “Selection of technologies for the rehabilitation or replacement of sections of a water distribution system.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
InfraGuide. (2004a). “Managing infrastructure assets.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
InfraGuide. (2004b). “Assessment and evaluation of storm and wastewater collection systems.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
InfraGuide. (2006). “Managing risk.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Johanson, R. G. (2002). “Utility asset management—Where you are, where you are going, knowing when you get there.” Proc., Joint 2002 CSCE/ASCE Int. Conf. on Environmental Engineering—An Int. Perspective on Environmental Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1315–1331.
Jones, C., and Laven, K. (2008). “Water loss levels from transmission mains in urban environments.” Pipe Lines Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–10.
Juang, C. H. (1990). “A performance index for the unified rock classification system.” Bull. Assoc. Eng. Geol., 27(4), 497–504.
Kenway, S., Howe, C., and Maheepala, S. (2007). “Triple bottom line reporting of sustainable water utility performance.” American Water Works Association, Denver, CO.
Khan, Z., Moselhi, O., and Zayed, T. (2010). “Level of service based methodology for municipal infrastructure management.” J. Social Human Sci., World Acad. Sci. Technol., 5(4), 26–271.
Lambert, A., and Taylor, R. (2010). Water loss guidelines, Rep. for New Zealand Water and Wastes Association, Wairoa, New Zealand.
Litman, T. (2007). “Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transportation planning.” Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 10–15.
National Research Council Canada (NRCC). (2006a). “Translation of pipe inspection results into condition ratings using the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique.”, 〈www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc48317/nrcc48317.pdf〉 (Feb. 2012).
National Research Council Canada (NRCC). (2006b). “Estimating risk of contaminant intrusion in water distribution networks using Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence.”, 〈www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc45408/nrcc45408.pdf〉 (May 2012).
National Research Council Canada (NRCC). (2006c). “Decision models to prioritize maintenance and renewal alternatives.”, 〈www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc45571/nrcc45571.pdf〉 (May 2012).
National Research Council Canada (NRCC). (2006d). “Aggregative risk analysis for water quality failure in distribution networks.”, 〈www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc46269/nrcc46269.pdf〉 (Apr. 2012).
Osman, H., Atef, A., and Moselhi, O. (2012). “Optimizing inspection policies for buried municipal pipe infrastructure.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 345–352.
Oswald, M., Li, Q., and McNeil, S. (2011). “Capturing transportation infrastructure performance, transportation planning.” Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 191–201.
Rajani, B., and Kleiner, Y. (2004). “Non-destructive inspection techniques to determine structural distress indicators in water mains.” NRCC-47068, Evaluation and Control of Water Loss in Urban Networks, National Research Council of Canada, Valencia, Spain, 1–20.
Ray Sterling Trenchless Technologies Center. (2009). “State of technology review report on rehabilitation of wastewater collection and water distribution systems.”, U.S. EPA, National Risk Management Research, Water Supply and Water Resources Division, Edison, NJ.
Saaty, T. (1991). Decision-making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process, RWS, Pittsburgh.
Saaty, T. L. (1989). “Hierarchical-multiobjective systems.” Control Theory Adv. Technol., 5(4), 485–498.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1(1), 83–98.
Schmucker, K. J. (1984). Fuzzy set, natural language computations and risk analysis, Computer Science Press, Rockville, MA.
Selvakumar, A., Clark, R. M., and Sevaganesan, M. (2002). “Costs for water supply distribution systems rehabilitation.”, U.S. EPA, Edison, NJ.
Shahata, K., and Zayed, T. (2010). “Integrated decision-support framework for municipal infrastructure assets.” Proc., Pipelines 2010 Conf., Vol. 386, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1492–1502.
Sharma, V., Al-Hussein, M., Safouhi, H., and Bouferguène, A. (2008). “Municipal infrastructure asset levels of service assessment for investment decisions using analytic hierarchy process.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 93–200.
Slade, J. P., and Gendron, T. S. (2005). “Corrosion and cracking of carbon steel piping in primary water—Operating experience at the point lepreau generating station.” Proc., 12th Int. Conf. on Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power System—Water Reactors, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Toronto, ON, 773–784.
Stephenson, D., Barta, B., and Manson, N. (2001). “Asset management for the water services sector in South Africa.”, South African Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tafuri, A. N., and Dzuray, E. J. (2000). “Sewer pipeline performance indicators: Learning from the European experience.” Proc., Joint Conf. on Water Resource Engineering and Water Resources Planning and Management 2000: Building Partnerships, ASCE, Reston, VA.
The Water Services Regulation Authority–U.K. (Ofwat). (2013). “Water pressure.” 〈http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/mediacentre/informationnotes/prs_inf_pressure〉 (Jul. 2012).
Thornton, J., and Lambert, A. (2007). “Pressure management extends infrastructure life and reduces unnecessary energy costs.” Water Loss 2007: Conf. Proc. Bucharest, International Water Association (IWA), London, U.K.
Tran, T., Malano, H., and Thompson, R. (2003). “Application of the analytical hierarchy process to prioritize irrigation asset renewal: The case of the La Kheirrigation scheme, Vietnam.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage., 10(6), 382–390.
U.S. EPA. (2013a). “Water: Drinking water contaminants.” 〈http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm〉 (Jul. 2013).
U.S. EPA. (2013b). “Water sense.”, National Service Center for Environmental Publications (NSCEP), Washington, DC.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). “UN Documents: Gathering a Body of Global Agreements.”, NGO Committee on Education of the Conference of NGOs, New York.
Yan, J. M., and Vairavamoorthy, K. (2003). “Fuzzy approach for pipe condition assessment.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, ASCE, Reston, VA, 466–476.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1983). “Role of fuzzy logic in the management of uncertainty in expert systems.” Fuzzy Sets Syst., 11(1–3), 197–198.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 21Issue 2June 2015

History

Received: Apr 15, 2013
Accepted: Mar 14, 2014
Published online: Jun 26, 2014
Discussion open until: Nov 26, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, PQ, Canada J4M2P3. E-mail: [email protected]
Osama Moselhi, F.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, PQ, Canada H3G 1M8. E-mail: [email protected]
Tarek Zayed, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia Univ., Montreal, PQ, Canada H3G 1M8 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share