Technical Papers
Feb 27, 2014

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional, Glass Powder, and Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete and Mortar

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 20, Issue 4

Abstract

This study compares the cradle-to-gate greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), energy use, water use, and potential environmental toxicity of conventional (Conv), glass powder (GP), and alkali-activated slag (AAS) concrete and mortar. The comparison is based on 1m3 of concrete/mortar with similar 28-day compressive strength, so the same concrete/mortar member with same dimensions may be manufactured from Conv, GP, or AAS materials and used for same applications. The result shows that compared to a 35-MPa Conv concrete, a 35-MPa GP concrete has, on average, 19% lower GHGs, 17% less energy, 14% less water, and 14–21% lower environmental toxicity. A 35-MPa AAS concrete has 73% lower GHGs, 43% less energy, 25% less water, and 22–94% lower effects for all environmental toxicity categories except an 72% higher ecotoxicity effect. Environmental impact reductions are also found for using GP as a cement replacement in concrete with lower strengths and replacing cement with GP or AAS in mortars with different strengths. The paper concludes that using alternative cementitious materials GP and AAS as cement replacements could significantly reduce the environmental impacts of cement-based products.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers wish to thank Hamed Maraghechi and Christopher Cartwright of Pennsylvania State University for providing helpful information regarding concrete and mortar compositions and Bill Shaker of Potters Industries Inc.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grants No. CMMI-1030708 and CMMI-1255847. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

References

Bare, J. (2011). “TRACI 2.0: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0.” Clean Technol. Environ. Pol., 13(5), 687–696.
Bediako, M., Gawu, S. K. Y., and Adjaottor, A. A. (2012). “Suitability of some Ghanaian mineral admixtures for masonry mortar formulation.” Constr. Build. Mater., 29, 667–671.
Bellmann, F., and Stark, J. (2009). “Activation of blast furnace slag by a new method.” Cement Concr. Res., 39(8), 644–650.
Ben Haha, M., Le Saout, G., Winnefeld, F., and Lothenbach, B. (2011). “Influence of activator type on hydration kinetics, hydrate assemblage and microstructural development of alkali activated blast-furnace slags.” Cement Concr. Res., 41(3), 301–310.
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute (CMU GDI). (2013). “Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIO-LCA) US 2002 (428) model.” eiolcanet, 〈http://www.eiolca.net〉 (Jan. 15, 2013).
Cartwright, C., Rajabipour, F., and Radlinska, A. (2013). “Shrinkage characteristics of alkali-activated slag cements.” 3rd Int. Conf. on Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies (SCMT3), Coventry Univ., Coventry England.
Damtoft, J. S., Lukasik, J., Herfort, D., Sorrentino, D., Gartner, E. M. (2008). “Sustainable development and climate change initiatives.” Cement Concr. Res., 38(2), 115–127.
Douglas, E., Bilodeau, A., and Malhotra, V. M. (1992). “Properties and durability of alkali-activated slag concrete.” ACI Mater. J., 89(5).
EPA. (2010). “Available and emerging technologies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the portland cement industry.” Washington, DC, 1–48.
Fenton, M. D. (2013). “USGS 2011 minerals yearbook: Iron and steel.” Mineral commodity summaries, 〈http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/iron_&_steel/myb1-2011-feste.pdf〉 (Jun. 16, 2013).
Flower, D. J. M., and Sanjayan, J. G. (2007). “Green house gas emissions due to concrete manufacture.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12(5), 282–288.
Fortsch, D. S. (2005). “Wear impacts in slag grinding in various grinding technologies.” Cement Industry Technical Conf., IEEE, Piscataway NJ.
Frischknecht, R., et al. (2007). “Ecoinvent: Overview and methodology.” Ecoinvent Rep., Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories, Zurich, Switzerland, 1.
González, J. L. A. (2005). “Technology change and environmental management for cement manufacturing: The cement industry in the United States (2004–2050).” Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA.
Granta Material Intelligence (GMI). (2012). “Granta’s CES edupack.” Granta Design Limited, 〈http://www.grantadesign.com/education/〉 (Sep. 15, 2012).
Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A. (2005). “Comparison of environmental effects of steel-and concrete-framed buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 93–101.
Hanle, L. J., Jayaraman, K. R., and Smith, J. S. (2004). “CO2 emissions profile of the US cement industry.” EPA, Washington, DC.
Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L., and Lin, E. (2012a). “Emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production: A technical review.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 16(8), 6220–6238.
Hasanbeigi, A., Price, L., and Lin, E. (2012b). “A review of emerging energy-efficiency and CO2 emission-reduction technologies for cement and concrete production.” Proc., 2012 Industrial Energy Technology Conf., Texas A&M Univ., Energy Systems Laboratory, College Station, TX.
Haselbach, L. (2009). “Potential for carbon dioxide absorption in concrete.” J. Environ. Eng., 465–472.
Heard, R., Hendrickson, C., and McMichael, F. C. (2012). “Sustainable development and physical infrastructure materials.” MRS Bull., 37(4), 389–394.
Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L. B., and Matthews, H. S. (2006). Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: An input-output approach, RFF Press, Washington, DC.
Huntzinger, D. N., and Eatmon, T. D. (2009). “A life-cycle assessment of portland cement manufacturing: Comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies.” J. Cleaner Prod., 17(7), 668–675.
Keoleian, G. A., et al. (2005). “Life cycle modeling of concrete bridge design: Comparison of engineered cementitious composite link slabs and conventional steel expansion joints.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 51–60.
Kjellsen, K. O., Guimaraes, M., and Nilsson, A. (2005). The CO2 balance of concrete in a life cycle perspective, Nordic Innovation Centre, Oslo.
Malhotra, V. M. (1993). “Fly ash, slag, silica fume, and rice husk ash in concrete: a Review.” Conc. Int., 〈http://www.concrete.org/PUBS/JOURNALS/AbstractDetails.asp?ID=4090〉 (Apr. 2, 2013).
Marceau, M. L., Nisbet, M. A., and VanGeem, M. G. (2007). Life cycle inventory of portland cement concrete, Portland Cement Association, Washington, DC.
McIntyre, J., Spatari, S., and MacLean, H. L. (2009). “Energy and greenhouse gas emissions trade-offs of recycled concrete aggregate use in nonstructural concrete: A North American case study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 361–370.
Meyer, C., Egosi, N., and Andela, C. (2001). “Concrete with waste glass as aggregate.” Proc., Int. Symp. Concrete Technology Unit of ASCE and University of Dundee, ASCE, Reston, VA, 179–187.
Mindess, S., Young, J. F., and Darwin, D. (2003). Concrete, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Naik, T., Singh, S., and Hassaballah, A. (1992). “Effects of water to cementitious ratio on compressive strength of cement mortar containing fly ash.” 4th Int. Conf. on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
Nassar, R. U. D., and Soroushian, P. (2011). “Field investigation of concrete incorporating milled waste glass.” J. Solid Waste Tech. Manage, 37(4), 307–319.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2013). “U.S. life cycle inventory (LCI) database.” lcacommons.gov, 〈https://www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search〉 (Jan. 15, 2013).
Nisbet, M. A., Marceau, M. L., and VanGeem, M. G. (2000). “Environmental life cycle inventory of portland cement concrete.” Portland Cement Association, Washington, DC.
Rajabipour, F., Maraghechi, H., and Fischer, G. (2010). “Investigating the alkali-silica reaction of recycled glass aggregates in concrete materials.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 1201–1208.
Rajendran, S., and Gambatese, J. A. (2007). “Solid waste generation in asphalt and reinforced concrete roadway life cycles.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 88–96.
Santero, N. J., and Horvath, A. (2009). “Global warming potential of pavements.” Environ. Res. Lett., 4(3), 034011.
Shao, Y., Lefort, T., Moras, S., and Rodriguez, D. (2000). “Studies on concrete containing ground waste glass.” Cem. Concr. Res., 30(1), 91–100.
Shao, Y., Monkman, S., and Boyd, A. J. (2010). “Recycling carbon dioxide into concrete: A feasibility study.” NRMCA Concrete Sustainability Conf, National Ready Mix Concrete Association, Silver Spring, MD.
Shayan, A., and Xu, A. (2004). “Value-added utilisation of waste glass in concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res., 34(1), 81–89.
Shayan, A., and Xu, A. (2006). “Performance of glass powder as a pozzolanic material in concrete: A field trial on concrete slabs.” Cem. Concr. Res., 36(3), 457–468.
Shi, C., Krivenko, P. V., and Roy, D. M. (2006). Alkali-activated cements and concretes, Taylor and Francis, New York.
Shi, C., Wu, Y., Riefler, C., and Wang, H. (2005). “Characteristics and pozzolanic reactivity of glass powders.” Cem. Concr. Res., 35(5), 987–993.
USGS. (2011). “USGS mineral program cement report.” 〈http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cement/mcs-2012-cemen.pdf〉 (Nov. 5, 2011).
Van Oss, H. G. (2013). “USGS 2011 minerals yearbook: Slag-iron and steel.” Mineral Commodity Summ., United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, 1.
Zapata, P., and Gambatese, J. A. (2005). “Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 9–20.
Zhang, H., Keoleian, G. A., Lepech, M. D., and Kendall, A. (2010). “Life-cycle optimization of pavement overlay systems.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 310–322.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 20Issue 4December 2014

History

Received: Apr 19, 2013
Accepted: Jan 22, 2014
Published online: Feb 27, 2014
Discussion open until: Jul 27, 2014
Published in print: Dec 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohan Jiang
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Xiaoju Chen
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Farshad Rajabipour
A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802.
Chris T. Hendrickson [email protected]
Dist.M.ASCE
Duquesne Light Company University Professor of Engineering, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share