Resilience and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure: Toward a Unified Approach
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 20, Issue 2
Abstract
In recent years, the concepts of resilience and sustainability have become very topical and popular. The concept of sustainability rose to prominence in the late 1980s and became a central issue in world politics, when the construction industry began to generate the first sustainable building assessment systems with more or less equally weighted environmental, economic, and social aspects for office buildings over their life cycles. On the other hand, resilience is usually connected to the occurrence of extreme events during the life cycle of structures and infrastructures. In the last decade, it has been used to minimize specifically direct and indirect losses from hazards through enhanced resistance and robustness to extreme events, as well as more effective recovery strategies. A detailed comparison of the studies dealing with either infrastructure sustainability or resilience presented in this paper leads to the conclusion that they have a vast number of similarities and common characteristics. For instance, they both combine structural analyses with social and economic aspects; they both rely on techniques for the life-cycle analysis and decision making; they both are in an early stage, where the academic world is trying to find the best way to promote the application of the scientific results among professional engineers and the industry. Indeed, both approaches try to optimize a system, such as a civil infrastructure system, with respect to structural design, utilized material, maintenance plans, management strategies, and impacts on the society. However, for the most part, researchers and practitioners focusing on either resilience or sustainability operate without a mutual consideration of the findings, which leads to a severe inefficiency. Therefore, this paper suggests that resilience and sustainability are complementary and should be used in an integrated perspective. In particular, the proposed approach is rooted in the well-established framework of risk assessment. The impact of the infrastructure and its service states on the society in normal operational conditions (assessed by sustainability analysis) and after exceptional events (assessed by resilience analysis) should be weighted by the associated probabilities of occurrence and combined in a global impact assessment. The proposed perspective and assessment technique is applicable to various types of civil infrastructure systems, but the case of transportation networks and bridge systems is emphasized herein. A numerical application dealing with the comparative analysis of two possible bridge layouts is presented to exemplify the approach. The results show that both resilience and sustainability analyses assess a relevant amount of the impact of the bridge on the community where it is built, so neither one can be neglected.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The support from (a) the National Science Foundation through Grant CMS-0639428; (b) the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Community and Economic Development, through the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance (PITA); (c) the U.S. Federal Highway Administration Cooperative Agreement Award DTFH61-07-H-00040; (d) the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology through Grant P 843; and (e) the Karlsruhe House of Young Scientists is gratefully acknowledged.
The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.
References
Alampalli, S., and Ettouney, M. (2007). “On application of theory of multi-hazards to bridge design, analysis, and monitoring.” Symp. on Emerging Developments in Multi-Hazard Engineering, ASCE-MCEER, New York.
American Association of State Highway, and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2003). A manual of user benefit analysis for highways, 2nd Ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1985). “Earthquake damage evaluation data for California.” Technical Rep., Applied Technology Council, ATC-13, Redwood City, CA.
ASCE. (2013). “Report Card for America’s Infrastructure.” 〈http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org〉 (May 15, 2013).
Barbosa, J. A., Mateus, R., and Bragança, L. (2011). “Development of a sustainability assessment tool for office buildings.” Sustainability of constructions: Towards a better built environment, L. Bragança, et al., eds., Gutenberg Press Ltd., Tarxien, Malta, 205–214.
Beck, M. (1996). “Wastewater infrastructure: Challenges for the sustainable city in the New Millennium.” Habitat Intl., 20(3), 405–420.
Berardi, U. (2012). “Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: Rating systems and rated buildings.” Sustain. Dev., 20, 411–424.
BMVBS. (2011). “Material database oekobau.dat.” BMVBS Federal Ministry of Transport, Building, and Urban Development, 〈http://www.nachhaltigesbauen.de/oekobaudat/〉 (Aug. 10, 2011).
Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Resilience-driven disaster management of civil infrastructure.” Computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis, and V. Plevris, eds., Keynote paper, Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), 1–11.
Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D. M. (2012). “Restoration of bridge networks after an earthquake: multi-criteria intervention optimization.” Earthq. Spectra, 28(2), 427–455.
Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D. M. (2013). “Optimal resilience- and cost-based post-disaster intervention prioritization for bridges along a highway segment.” J. Bridge Eng., 1–13.
Branco, F. A., and Brito, J. D. (2004). Handbook of concrete bridge management, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Brundtland-report, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bruneau, M., et al. (2003). “A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities.” Earthq. Spectra, 19(4), 733–752.
Bruneau, M. (2006). “Enhancing the resilience of communities against extreme events from an earthquake engineering perspective.” J. Secur. Educ., 1(4), 159–167.
Bruneau, M., et al. (2007). “White paper on the SDR grand challenges for disaster reduction.” Technical Rep., Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Bruneau, M., and Reinhorn, A. (2007). “Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities.” Earthq. Spectra, 23(1), 41–62.
Bruneau, M., and Reinhorn, A. M. (2006). “Overview of the resilience concept.” Proc. 8th National Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA.
Çağnan, Z., Davidson, R. A., and Guikema, S. D. (2006). “Post-earthquake restoration planning for Los Angeles electric power.” Earthq. Spectra, 22(3), 589–608.
California Dept. of Transportation (CalDOT). (2010). 2010 traffic volumes on the California State Highway System, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
CEEQUAL. (2010). “Scheme description and assessment process handbook.” Technical Rep. Version 4.1 for Projects, The Assessment and Awards Scheme for Improving Sustainability in Civil Engineering and the Public Realm, London.
CEN. (2012). “En 15804: Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products.” CEN European Center for Standardization, Brussels.
Chang, S., and Shinozuka, M. (2004). “Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities.” Earthq. Spectra, 20(3), 739–755.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2006). “Quantification of seismic resilience.” Proc. 8th National Conf. Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2010a). “Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience.” Eng. Struct., 32(11), 3639–3649.
Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., and Bruneau, M. (2010b). “Seismic resilience of a hospital system.” Struct. Infra. Eng., 6(1), 127–144.
DIN. (2012). “Valid standards issued by NA 005-01-31 AA.” DIN German Institute for Standardization, 〈http://www.nabau.din.de〉 (Jan. 5, 2012).
Draeger, S. (2010). “Vergleich des Systems des Deutschen Gütesiegels Nachhaltiges Bauen mit internationalen Systemen.” Technical Rep. Aktenzeichen SF—10.08.17.7-09.15, im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen, Berlin.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2009). “National bridge inventory.” Federal Highway Administration, 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.htm〉 (Jan. 13, 2011).
Fernández-Sánchez, G., and Rodríguez-López, F. (2010). “A methodology to identify sustainability indicators in construction project management—Application to infrastructure projects in Spain.” Ecol. Ind., 10(6), 1193–1201.
Florida Dept. of Transportation (FDOT). (2011). “Transportation cost report: Bridge costs—New construction.” Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 〈http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/policy/costs〉 (Jul. 10, 2011).
Fogib. (1997). “Ingenieurbauten—Wege zu einer ganzheitlichen Bewertung, Band 1–3, Abschlussbericht der DFG-Forschergruppe Ingenieurbauten.” Universität Stuttgart, Germany.
Gervásio, H. (2010). “Sustainable design and integral life-cycle analysis of bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Coimbra, Portugal.
Ghosh, J., Tapia, C., and Padgett, J. E. (2011). “Life-cycle analysis of embodied energy for aging bridges subject to seismic hazards.” Applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering, M. Faber, J. Köhler, and K. Nishijima, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 562–569.
Graubner, C.-A., Schneider, C., Schulte, C., and Mielecke, T. (2009). “Umwelt- und Nachhaltigkeitszertifizierungssysteme für Gebäude im Vergleich: ‘BREEAM’, ‘LEED’ und das ‘Deutsche Gütesiegel Nachhaltiges Bauen’.” Bauingenieur, 84(8), 320–329.
Holling, C. S. (1973). “Resilience and stability of ecological systems.” Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4(1), 1–23.
Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (ISI). (2011). “Draft of the envision assessment system, version 1.0.” Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure, 〈http://www.sustainableinfrastructure.org/〉 (Jul. 10, 2011).
International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC). (2004). Project Sustainability Management Guidelines, Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils, Geneve (in French).
ISO. (2013). “Draft of ISO/TS 21929-2: Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works—Sustainability indicators. Part 2: Framework for the development of indicators for civil engineering works.” ISO, Geneva.
Larsen, L., et al. (2011). Green building and climate resilience: Understanding impacts and preparing for changing conditions, Univ. of Michigan and U.S. Green Building Council, Ann Arbor, MI and Washington, DC.
Lee, W. (2012). “Benchmarking energy use of building environmental assessment schemes.” Energy Build., 45(2), 326–334.
Lünser, H. (1998). Ökobilanzen im Brückenbau: Eine umweltbezogene, ganzheitliche Bewertung, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland.
Lupíšek, A., Vonka, M., and Hájek, P. (2011). “Czech assessment system SBToolsCZ.” Sustainability of constructions: Towards a better-built environment, L. Bragança, et al., eds., Gutenberg Press Ltd., Tarxien, Malta, 221–224.
Maibach, M., et al. (2008). “Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector: Internalisation measures and policies for all external cost of transport (impact).” Technical Rep. Pub. number: 07.4288.52, CE Delft, Delft.
Mander, J. B. (1999). “Fragility curve development for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway bridges.” Technical Rep., Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Univ. at Buffalo, State Univ. of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Rander, J., and Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, Universe Books, New York.
Miles, S. B., and Chang, S. E. (2006). “Modeling community recovery from earthquakes.” Earthq. Spectra, 22(2), 439–458.
Muench, S., et al. (2011). “Greenroads manual.” Technical Rep. Version 1.5, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Mujumdar, V. (2007). “A need for risk-consistent approach to multi-hazard engineering.” Symp. Emerg. Dev. Multi-Hazard Eng., ASCE-MCEER, New York.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). (2003). Bridge life-cycle cost analysis—National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Rep. 483, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Sustainable critical infrastructure systems—A framework for meeting 21st-century imperatives, National Academies Press, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
National Steel Bridge Alliance (NSBA). (2006a). Steel bridge design handbook: Corrosion protection of steel bridges, National Steel Bridge Alliance, Division of the American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
National Steel Bridge Alliance (NSBA). (2006b). Steel bridge design handbook: Design example 2A: Two-span continious straight composite I-girder, National Steel Bridge Alliance, Division of the American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago.
Otto, S. (2007). Bedeutung und Verwendung der Begriffe nachhaltige Entwicklung und Nachhaltigkeit: Eine empirische Studie, Dissertation, Jacobs Univ. Bremen, Jacobs Center on Lifelong Learning and Institutional Development, Germany.
Pepper, D. (2005). Modern environmentalism: An introduction, Routledge, London.
Pimm, S. (1984). “The complexity and stability of ecosystems.” Nature, 307(5949), 321–326.
Poland, C. D. (2011). Building disaster-resilient communities, Fazlur R. Khan Distinguished Lecture Series, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA, 〈http://www.lehigh.edu/~infrk/frkarchive2011.html〉 (Apr. 8, 2011).
Puppe, C. (1991). Distorted probabilities and choice under risk, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, Springer, Germany.
Rametsteiner, E., Pülzl, H., Alkan-Olsson, J., and Frederiksen, P. (2011). “Sustainability indicator development—Science or political negotiation?” Ecol. Ind., 11(1), 61–70.
Rose, A. (2004). “Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters.” Disast. Prev. Manag., 13(4), 307–314.
Rose, A. (2011). “Resilience and sustainability in the face of disasters.” Environ. Inno. Soc. Trans., 1(1), 96–100.
Rose, A., and Liao, S. Y. (2005). “Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions.” J. Reg. Sci., 45(1), 75–112.
Szitar, M., and Grecea, D. (2011). “Sustainable building assessment tools and the quality of the built environment.” Sustainability of constructions: Towards a better-built environment, L. Bragança, et al., eds., Gutenberg Press Ltd., Tarxien, Malta, 155–162.
Timmerman, P. (1981). “Vulnerability. Resilience and the collapse of society: A review of models and possible climatic applications.” Environmental monograph, Institute for Environmental Studies, Univ. of Toronto, Canada, 1.
Turner, B., II (2010). “Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?” Glob. Environ. Change, 20(4), 570–576.
Ugwu, O., Kumaraswamy, M., Wong, A., and Ng, S. (2006a). “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 1. Development of indicators and computational methods.” Automat. Const., 15(2), 239–251.
Ugwu, O., Kumaraswamy, M., Wong, A., and Ng, S. (2006b). “Sustainability appraisal in infrastructure projects (SUSAIP): Part 2: A case study in bridge design.” Automat. Const., 15(2), 229–238.
United Nations Conference on Environment, and Development (UNCED). (1993). Agenda 21: Programme of action for sustainable development, United Nations Dept. of Public Information, New York.
United Nations (UN). (1998). “Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.” United Nations, 〈http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf〉 (Jan. 4, 2012).
United Nations (UN). (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, United Nations, Johannesburg, South Africa.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2002). “Earthquake ground motion tool.” U.S. Geological Survey, 〈http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/javacalc.php〉 (Aug. 4, 2012).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2008). “U.S. Geological Survey national seismic hazard maps.” U.S. Geological Survey, 〈http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/products/conterminous/2008/maps/〉 (Dec. 18, 2011).
van Essen, H., et al. (2011). “External costs of transport in Europe: Update study for 2008.”, CE Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.
Xu, N., Guikema, S. D., Davidson, R. A., Nozick, L. K., Çağnan, Z., and Vaziri, K. (2007). “Optimizing scheduling of post-earthquake electric power restoration tasks.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(2), 265–284.
Yao, H., Shen, L., Tan, Y., and Hao, J. (2011). “Simulating the impacts of policy scenarios on the sustainability performance of infrastructure projects.” Automat. Const., 20(8), 1060–1069.
Zhou, H., Wang, J., Wan, J., and Jia, H. (2010). “Resilience to natural hazards: a geographic perspective.” Natural Hazards, 53(1), 21–41.
Zinke, T., Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., and Ummenhofer, T. (2012a). “Combining resilience and sustainability in infrastructure projects.” Proc. 3rd Intl. Symp. Life-Cycle, Civil Eng., Vienna, Austria, October 3–6, 2012, A. Strauss, D. M. Frangopol, and K. Bergmeister, eds., Taylor & Francis, London, 2450–2457.
Zinke, T., Diel, R., Mensinger, M., and Ummenhofer, T. (2010). “Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung von Brückenbauwerken.” Stahlbau, 79(6), 448–455.
Zinke, T., and Ummenhofer, T. (2010). “The relevance of whole life costs for infrastructure buildings.” Proc. 5th Intl. Conf. Bridge Main. Safety Manage., D. Frangopol, R. Sause, and C. S. Kusko, eds., Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, London; extended abstract p. 691, full text on DVD.
Zinke, T., and Ummenhofer, T. (2011). “Sustainable assessment of bridges: Relevance of external costs.” Proc. 6th Eur. Conf. Steel Comp. Struct., L. Dunai, M. Iványi, K. Jármai, N. Kovás, and L. G. Vigh, eds., ECCS, Brussels, 1953–1958.
Zinke, T., Ummenhofer, T., Pfaffinger, M., and Mensinger, M. (2012b). “The social dimension of bridge sustainability assessment impacts on users and the public.” Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Bridge Main. Safety Manage., July 8–12, 2012, Stresa, Italy, F. Biondini and D. M. Frangopol, eds., CRC Press, London, Extended abstract p. 365, full text on DVD.
Zobel, C. W. (2011). “Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience.” Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 394–403.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 20 • Issue 2 • June 2014
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 25, 2012
Accepted: Jun 21, 2013
Published online: Jul 1, 2013
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.