Comparison of Markov Chain and Semi-Markov Models for Crack Deterioration on Flexible Pavements
Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 19, Issue 2
Abstract
There is a growing demand to preserve transportation infrastructure utilizing limited funds, and the modeling of flexible pavement deterioration has become an integral component of any pavement preservation model. Markov chains have been used to model the performance of pavements in various pavement management systems (PMSs). The Markov property may be considered restrictive when modeling the deterioration of transportation assets, primarily because of the “memoryless” property and assumption of exponential distribution for sojourn times in the condition states. This paper outlines a semi-Markov model for modeling pavement deterioration in which the sojourn time in each condition state is assumed to follow a Weibull distribution and, thus, is more flexible than the traditional Markov chain model. The semi-Markov model does not possess the memoryless property if the sojourn time distribution is not exponential. Monte Carlo simulations are generated for the deterioration of flexible pavements over time based on both the traditional Markov chain model and the proposed semi-Markov model. The results of the work show that in some cases the semi-Markov model appears to be superior to the Markov chain model in modeling the actual deterioration patterns of the flexible pavements.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Baik, H.-S., Seok, H. J., and Abraham, D. M. (2006). “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 132(1), 15–24.
Billington, R., and Allan, R. N. (1983). Reliability evaluation of engineering systems: Concepts and techniques, Pitman, London.
Birolini, A. (2007). Reliability engineering: Theory and practice, 5th Ed., Springer, Berlin.
Black, M., Brint, A. T., and Brailsford, J. R. (2005a). “A semi-Markov approach for modelling asset deterioration.” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 56, 1241–1249.
Black, M., Brint, A. T., and Brailsford, J. R. (2005b). “Comparing probabilistic methods for the asset management of distributed items.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 11(2), 102–109.
Casella, G., and Berger, R. L. (2001). Statistical inference, 2nd Ed., Duxbury, Pacific Grove, CA.
Castillo, E., Hadi, A. S., Balakrishnan, N., and Sarabia, J. M. (2005). Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. W., and Gutierrez, R. G. (2001). An introduction to survival analysis using stata, revised edition, Stata Press, College Station, TX.
Dietrich, B. (2010). New developments in pavement design and pavement management in Florida, Civil and Environmental Engineering Seminar Series, College of Engineering, Florida A&M Univ.–Florida State Univ., Tallahassee, FL.
Golabi, K., Thompson, P. D., and Hyman, W. A. (1993). Pontis Version 2.0 technical manual: A network optimization system for bridge improvements and maintenance, Office of Technology, Applications, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Howard, R. A. (1971). Dynamic probabilistic systems. Volume II: Semi-Markov and decision processes, Wiley, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ibe, O. C. (2009). Markov processes for stochastic modeling, Elsevier, Burlington, MA.
Jiang, Y., and Sinha, K. C. (1992). “Comparison of methodologies to predict bridge deterioration.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 34–42.
Lee, E. T. (1992). Statistical methods for survival data analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Lounis, Z., and Mirza, M. S. (2001). “Reliability-based service life prediction of deteriorating concrete structures.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Concrete Under Severe Conditions.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., and Coombes, P. (2002). “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(2), 49–56.
Mishalani, R. G., and Madanat, S. M. (2002). “Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(4), 113–120.
Montgomery, D. C., and Runger, G. C. (2006). Applied statistics and probability for engineers, 4th Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Nasseri, S., Gunaratne, M., Yang, J., and Nazef, A. (2009). “Application of improved crack prediction methodology in Florida’s highway network.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 67–75.
Ng, S.-K., and Moses, F. (1998). “Bridge deterioration modeling using semi-Markov theory.” Proc., of ICOSSAR’97, The 7th Int. Conf. on Structure Safety and Reliability, Vol. 1, Kyoto, 24–28 November 1997, 113–120.
Ross, S. M. (1996). Stochastic processes, 2nd Ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Ross, S. M. (2002). First course in probability, 6th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Sobanjo, J. O. (2011). “State transition probabilities in bridge deterioration based on weibull sojourn times.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. Maint. Manage. Life-Cycle Des. Perform., 7(10), 747–764.
Sobanjo, J. O., and Thompson, P. D. (2001). Enhancement of the FDOT’s project level and network level bridge management analysis tools, Final Rep., Florida Dept. of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.
Tobias, P. A., and Trindade, D. C. (1995). Applied reliability, 2nd Ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Wang, C. P. (1992). “Pavement network optimization and analysis.” Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ.
Wang, K. C. P., Zaniewski, J., and Way, G. (1994). “Probabilistic behavior of pavements.” J. Transp. Eng., 120(3), 358–375.
Yang, J. (2004). “Road crack condition performance modeling using recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks.” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Yang, J., Gunaratne, M., Lu, J. J., and Dietrich, B. (2005). “Use of recurrent Markov chains for modeling the crack performance of flexible pavements.” J. Transp. Eng., 131(11), 861–872.
Yang, J., Lu, J. J., Gunaratne, M., and Dietrich, B. (2009). “Modeling crack deterioration of flexible pavements: Comparison of recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 18–25.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 13, 2011
Accepted: May 16, 2012
Published online: May 19, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.