Technical Papers
May 15, 2012

Evaluation of On-Site Fuel Use and Emissions over the Duration of a Commercial Building Project

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 18, Issue 2

Abstract

Commercial construction operations are heavy users of nonroad equipment and diesel engines. These engines are large contributors of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other engine-based pollutants and consume large quantities of diesel fuel. This paper presents a case study to identify construction activities that cause the most emissions and fuel use on a construction project and to determine when and where these occur. The paper links emissions and fuel use of construction activities with a project schedule to establish a temporal relationship. RSMeans was used to obtain equipment productivity. Equipment emission rates and fuel use rates were obtained from the EPA’s NONROAD Model. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of changes in scheduling, equipment size, and EPA engine tier on emissions and fuel use. Site construction activities proved to be the heaviest polluters and caused a significant spike in emissions early in the project. Further study is recommended to validate the trends found and to determine the broader effects of this study. However, the methodology presented can be used by construction professionals to estimate fuel use and emissions for various infrastructure building projects.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Abolhasani, S., Frey, H. C., Kim, K., Rasdorf, W., Lewis, P., and Pang, S.-H. (2008). “Real-world in-use activity, fuel use, and emissions for nonroad construction vehicles: A case study for excavators.” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.JAWAEB, 58(8), 1033–1046.
Ahn, C., Pan, W., Lee, S., and Peña-Mora, F. (2010). “Lessons learned from utilizing discrete-event simulation modeling for quantifying construction emissions in pre-planning phase.” Proc., 2010 Winter Simulation Conf., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Baltimore.
Ahn, C., Rekapalli, P., Martinez, J., and Peña-Mora, F. (2009). “Sustainability analysis of earthmoving operations,” Proc., 2009 Winter Simulation Conf., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Austin, TX.
Bilec, M., Ries, R. J., and Matthews, H. S. (2010). “Life-cycle assessment modeling of construction processes for buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 16(3), 199–205.
Bilec, M., Ries, R. J., Matthews, H. S., and Sharrard, A. (2006). “Example of a hybrid life-cycle assessment of construction processes.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 12(4), 207–215.
Carlsen, R. (2010). “Delaying California diesel rule offers builders little relief.” Eng. News-Rec.ENREAU, 264(6), 12.
Caterpillar. (2008). Caterpillar performance handbook, 38th Ed., Caterpillar, Peoria, IL.
Constrution Specifications Institute (CSI). (1995). “Master format 1995.” 〈http://www.csinet.org〉 (Jun. 1, 2010).
EPA. (2005). User’s guide for the final NONROAD2005 model, EPA-420-R-05-013, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Ann Arbor, MI.
EPA. (2009). “Potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the construction sector.” EPA’s sector strategies program, Truitt, P., ed., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
EPA. (2010). “Exhaust and crankcase emission factors for nonroad engine modeling: Compression-ignition,” EPA 420-R-10-018, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, MI.
Frey, H. C., Rasdorf, W., Kim, K., Pang, S.-H., and Lewis, P. (2008). “Comparison of real-world emissions of backhoes, front-end loaders and motor graders for B20 biodiesel vs. petroleum diesel for selected engine tiers.” Transportation Research Record 2058, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 33–42.
Frey, H. C., Rasdorf, W., and Lewis, P. (2010). “Results of a comprehensive field study of fuel use and emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment.” Transportation Research Record 2158, National Research Council, Washington, DC. 69–76.
Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A. (2005). “Comparison of environmental effects of steel and concrete framed buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 11(2), 93–101.
Guggemos, A. A., and Horvath, A. (2006). “Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings.” J. Archit. Eng.JAEIED, 12(4), 187–195.
Junnila, S., Horvath, A., and Guggemos, A. A. (2006). “Life-cycle assessment of office buildings in Europe and the United States.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 12(1), 10–17.
Larson, M. (2010). “Clean-air costs will come in stages, catepillar execs say.” Eng. News-Rec.ENREAU, 264(6), 13.
Lewis, P., Frey, H. C., and Rasdorf, W. (2009a). “Development and use of emissions inventories for construction vehicles.” Transportation Research Record:, 2123, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 46–53.
Lewis, P., Rasdorf, W., Frey, C., Pang, S., and Kim, K. (2009b). “Requirements and incentives for reducing construction vehicle emissions and comparison of nonroad diesel engine emissions data sources.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage.JCEMD4, 135(5), 341–351.
Marshall, S. K., Rasdorf, W., Lewis, P., and Frey, H. C. (2011). “A methodology for estimating emissions inventories for commercial building projects.” J. Archit. Eng., in press.
Ochoa, L., Hendrickson, C., and Matthews, H. S. (2002). “Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of U.S. residential buildings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 8(4), 132–138.
Rasdorf, W., Frey, H. C., Lewis, P., Kim, K., Pang, S.-H., and Abolhassani, S. (2010). “Field procedures for real-world measurements of emissions from diesel construction vehicles.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 16(3), 216–225.
Rasdorf, W., Lewis, P., Marshall, S. K., and Arocho, I. (2011). “Project based fuel use and CO2 emissions performance of construction equipment.” Proc., 3rd Int. and 9th Construction Specialty Conf., Canadian Society of Civil Engineers, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
RSMeans. (2009). Building construction cost data, Reed Construction Data, Norcross, GA.
Sharrard, A. L., Matthews, H. S., and Ries, R. J. (2008). “Estimating construction project environmental effects using an input-output-based hybrid life-cycle assessment model.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 14(4), 327–336.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 18Issue 2June 2012
Pages: 119 - 129

History

Received: Mar 7, 2011
Accepted: Jul 18, 2011
Published online: May 15, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William Rasdorf, Ph.D. [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Phil Lewis, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078. E-mail: [email protected]
Steven Kelly Marshall [email protected]
EI Design Engineer, Rummel, Klepper, and Kahl, LLP; Former Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7908. E-mail: [email protected]
Ingrid Arocho [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7908. E-mail: [email protected]
H. Christopher Frey, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7908. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share