OTHER TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 9, 2010

Revisiting the Strengths and Limitations of Regulatory Contracts in Infrastructure Industries

Publication: Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 16, Issue 4

Abstract

This paper evaluates regulation by contract in public-private partnerships (PPPs) in infrastructure services. Although the benefits of competition for the market and of regulatory contracts are widely acknowledged, the literature identifies several failures in their design. These “flaws” are present in both developed and developing countries and arise in all types of contracts. This study analyzes both contractual PPPs and institutionalized PPPs (mixed companies). The evidence suggests that for all kinds of contracts, the major problems tend to arise in the preparation of public tender documents: the “best” bidder is not often the winner. The likely results include redistribution in favor of the private partner, weak incentives for high performance, and renegotiation of contracts. Moreover, risks are not allocated correctly nor is effective monitoring ensured. This review of contract procedures and design allows us to draw several implications for policy makers and to present suggestions and recommendations for improving regulatory contracts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Armstrong, M., Cowan, S., and Vickers, J. (1994). Regulatory reform: Economic analysis and British experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Bajari, P., Houghton, S., and Tadelis, S. (2006). “Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis.” Working paper 12051, NBER, Cambridge, Mass.
Baldwin, R., and Cave, M. (1999). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy and practice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Berg, S. V., Pollitt, M. G., and Tsuji, M. (2002). Private initiatives in infrastructure: Priorities, incentives, and performance, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K.
Boehm, F., and Olaya, J. (2006). “Corruption in public contracting auctions: The role of transparency in bidding processes.” Ann. Public Coop. Econ., 77(4), 431–452.
Bognetti, G., and Robotti, L. (2007). “The provision of local public services through mixed enterprises: The Italian case.” Ann. Public Coop. Econ., 78(3), 415–437.
Chadwick, E. (1859). “Results of different principles of legislation and administration in Europe: Of competition for the field, as compared with the competition within the field of service.” J. R. Stat. Soc., 22A, 381–420.
Chiu, W. C. (2003). “Estimating the cost efficiency of mixed enterprises in Taiwan.” Int. J. Manage., 20, 81–87.
Crampes, C., and Estache, A. (1998). “Regulatory trade-offs in the design of concession contracts.” Util. Policy, 7(1), 1–13.
Crew, M. A., and Zupan, M. A. (1990). “Franchise bidding for public utilities revisited.” Competition and the regulation of utilities, M. A. Crew, ed., Kluwer Academic, Boston, 173–188.
Demsetz, H. (1968). “Why regulate utilities?” J. Law Econom., 11(1), 55–65.
Dietz-Uhler, B. (1996). “The escalation of commitment in political decision-making groups: A social identity approach.” Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 26(4), 611–629.
Dnes, A. W. (1995). “Franchising and privatization. Public policy for the private sector.” Note 40, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Eckel, C. C., and Vining, A. R. (1985). “Elements of a theory of mixed enterprise.” Scott. J. Polit. Econ., 32(1), 82–94.
Engel, E., Fischer, R. D., and Galetovic, A. (1997). “Revenue-based auctions and unbundling infrastructure franchises.” Infrastructure finance market publication 112, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.
Engel, E., Fischer, R. D., and Galetovic, A. (2001). “Least-present-value-of-revenue auctions and highway franchising.” J. Polit. Econ., 109(5), 993–1020.
Estache, A. (2006). “PPI partnerships vs. PPI divorces in LDCs.” Rev. Ind. Organ., 29(1–2), 3–26.
Ezell, B. C., Farr, J. V., and Wiase, I. (2000). “Infrastructure risk analysis model.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 6(3), 114–117.
Goldberg, V. P. (1976). “Regulation and administered contracts.” Bell J. Econ., 7(2), 426–448.
Guasch, J. L. (2004). Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concessions: Doing it right, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Haimes, Y. Y., and Jiang, P. (2001). “Leontief-based model of risk in complex interconnected infrastructures.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(1), 1–12.
Hart, O. (2003). “Incomplete contract and public ownership: Remarks, and an application to public-private partnerships.” Econom. J., 113, C69–C76.
Johnson, L. (1989). Price cap regulation in telecommunications regulatory reform, Markle Foundation, Santa Monica, Calif.
Jouravlev, A. S. (2000). Water utility regulation: Issues and options for Latin America and the Caribbean, ECLAC, Santiago do Chile, Chile.
Klein, M. (1998). “Bidding for concessions.” World Bank policy research 1957, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Klein, M., and Roger, N. (1995). “Back to the future: The potential in infrastructure privatization.” Finance and the international economy: 8, R. O. Brien, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 42–68.
Littlechild, S. C. (2002). “Competitive bidding for a long-term electricity distribution contract.” Rev. Netw. Econ., I(1), 1–38.
Marques, R. C., and Berg, S. V. (2009). Risks, contracts, and private sector participation in infrastructure, PURC working paper no. 9, Gainesville, Fla.
Marques, R. C., and Levy, J. Q. (2006). A Qualidade dos Serviços de Água e de Águas Residuais. O Parecer do Consumidor (The quality of water and wastewater services. The consumer's opinion), AEPSA, Lisbon, Portugal.
Marques, R. C., and Monteiro, A. (2002). “A Regulação dos Serviços de Abastecimento de Água e de Saneamento (The regulation of water and wastewater utilities).” Águas & Resíduos, II(2), 10–20.
Marra, A. (2007). “Internal regulation by mixed enterprises: The case of the Italian water sector.” Ann. Public Coop. Econ., 78(2), 245–275.
Murphy, T. (2008). “The case for public-private partnerships in infrastructure.” Can. Public Adm., 51(1), 99–126.
Posner, R. A. (1972). “The appropriate scope of regulation in the cable television industry.” Bell J. Econ. Manage. Sci., 3(1), 98–129.
Vickers, J., and Yarrow, G. (1989). Privatization, an economic analysis, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Vining, A. R., and Boardman, A. E. (2008). “Public-private partnerships. Eight rules for governments.” Public Works Manage. Policy, 13(2), 149–161.
Viscusi, W. K., Vernon, J., and Harrington, J. M. (1995). Economics of regulation and antitrust, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Williamson, O. E. (1976). “Franchising bidding for natural monopolies—In general and with respect to CATV.” Bell J. Econ., 7(1), 73–104.
Willig, R. D. (1978). “Pareto-superior nonlinear outlay schedules.” Bell J. Econ., 9(1), 56–69.
Zupan, M. A. (1989). “The efficiency of franchise bidding schemes in the case of cable television: Some systematic evidence.” J. Law Econom., 32(2), 401–445.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Journal of Infrastructure Systems
Volume 16Issue 4December 2010
Pages: 334 - 342

History

Received: Sep 20, 2009
Accepted: Mar 3, 2010
Published online: Apr 9, 2010
Published in print: Dec 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rui Cunha Marques [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Center of Urban and Regional Systems, Technical Univ. of Lisbon, Avenida Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Sanford Berg [email protected]
Distinguished Service Professor, Public Utilities Research Center, Univ. of Florida, P.O. Box 117142, Gainesville, FL32611-7142. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share