Modified NRCS Abstraction Method for Flood Hydrograph Generation
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 147, Issue 10
Abstract
The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) abstraction method is based on two main assumptions. The first is that the ratio of actual water retention to maximum potential retention is equal to the ratio of actual surface runoff to potential surface runoff. The second assumption is that the initial abstraction for the watershed is 20% of the maximum potential retention. This study shows that both assumptions violate continuity principles and proposes a modification that renders an elementary relationship accounting for all abstraction forms by dividing them into a variable and constant components. Consequently, the surface runoff computation becomes dependent on the soil initial moisture content and implicitly influenced by the initial abstraction, while retaining the advantage of the subjective selection of curve number from an extensive database from which the NRCS method has gained popularity. A time of concentration model is proposed to extend the computation for flood hydrograph generation. A numerical example is provided to demonstrate the computation and results and to show how the surface runoff variation pattern behaves for the NRCS and modified methods when either a variable or constant abstraction component dominates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.
References
Aldosari, D., J. Almedeij, and A. A. Alsumaiei. 2020. “Update of intensity–duration–frequency curves for Kuwait due to extreme flash floods.” Environ. Ecol. Stat. 27 (3): 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-020-00454-4.
Almedeij, J., and I. I. Esen. 2014. “Modified Green-Ampt infiltration model for steady rainfall.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 19 (9): 04014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000944.
Almousawi, D., J. Almedeij, and A. A. Alsumaiei. 2020. “Impact of urbanization on desert flash flood generation.” Arabian J. Geosci. 13 (12): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05446-z.
Al-Qurashi, A., N. McIntyre, H. Wheater, and C. Unkrich. 2008. “Application of the Kineros2 rainfall–runoff model to an arid catchment in Oman.” J. Hydrol. 355 (1–4): 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.03.022.
ASCE. 1992. Design and construction of urban stormwater management systems. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Chin, D. A. 2021a. “Deficiencies in the curve number method.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 147 (5): 04021008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001552.
Chin, D. A. 2021b. Water-resources engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Chow, V. T. 1959. Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chow, V. T., D. R. Maidment, and L. W. Mays. 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cronshey, R. 1986. “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.”. Washington, DC: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Efstratiadis, A., A. D. Koussis, D. Koutsoyiannis, and N. Mamassis. 2014. “Flood design recipes vs. reality: Can predictions for ungauged basins be trusted?” Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (6): 1417–1428. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1417-2014.
Eli, R. N., and S. J. Lamont. 2010. “Curve numbers and urban runoff modeling: Application limitations.” In Low Impact Development 2010: Redefining water in the city, 405–418. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Grimaldi, S., A. Petroselli, and N. Romano. 2013. “Curve-number/Green–Ampt mixed procedure for streamflow predictions in ungauged basins: Parameter sensitivity analysis.” Hydrol. Processes 27 (8): 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9749.
Hawkins, R. H., F. D. Theurer, and M. Rezaeianzadeh. 2019. “Understanding the basis of the curve number method for watershed models and TMDLs.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (7): 06019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001755.
Hawkins, R. H., T. J. Ward, D. E. Woodward, and J. A. Van Mullem. 2008. Curve number hydrology: State of the practice. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kaufmann de Almeida, I., A. Kaufmann Almeida, S. Garcia Gabas, and T. Alves Sobrinho. 2017. “Performance of methods for estimating the time of concentration in a watershed of a tropical region.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 62 (14): 2406–2414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1384549.
McCuen, R. H. 2009. “Uncertainty analyses of watershed time parameters.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 14 (5): 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000011.
Michailidi, E. M., S. Antoniadi, A. Koukouvinos, B. Bacchi, and A. Efstratiadis. 2018. “Timing the time of concentration: Shedding light on a paradox.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 63 (5): 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1450985.
Mishra, S., and V. Singh. 2002. “SCS-CN method. Part 1: Derivation of SCS-CN-based models.” Acta Geophys. Pol. 50 (3): 457–477.
Mishra, S., and V. Singh. 2003. “SCS-CN method. Part II: Analytical treatment.” Acta Geophys. Pol. 51 (1): 107–123.
Moglen, G. E., R. H. McCuen, and R. L. Moglen. 2018. “Consequences of changes to the NRCS rainfall-runoff relations on hydrologic design.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 23 (8): 04018032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001681.
Morgali, J. R., and R. K. Linsley. 1965. “Computer analysis of overland flow.” J. Hydraul. Div. 91 (3): 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0001269.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2004. National engineering handbook: Part 630—Chapter 4: Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. Washington, DC: USDA.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2007. National engineering handbook: Part 630—Chapter 16: Hydrographs. Washington, DC: USDA.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2010. National engineering handbook: Part 630—Chapter 15: Time of concentration. Washington, DC: USDA.
Öztürk, M., N. K. Copty, and A. K. Saysel. 2013. “Modeling the impact of land use change on the hydrology of a rural watershed.” J. Hydrol. 497 (Aug): 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.022.
Paquet, E. 2019. “Synthetic hydrograph generation by hydrological donors.” Hydrol. Sci. J. 64 (5): 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1593418.
Petroselli, A., and S. Grimaldi. 2018. “Design hydrograph estimation in small and fully ungauged basins: A preliminary assessment of the EBA4SUB framework.” J. Flood Risk Manage. 11 (12): S197–S210. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12193.
Ponce, V. M., and R. H. Hawkins. 1996. “Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?” J. Hydrol. Eng. 1 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1996)1:1(11).
Ravazzani, G., L. Boscarello, A. Cislaghi, and M. Mancini. 2019. “Review of time-of-concentration equations and a new proposal in Italy.” J. Hydrol. Eng. 24 (10): 04019039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001818.
Sahu, R. K., S. K. Mishra, T. I. Eldho, and M. K. Jain. 2007. “An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method.” Hydrol. Processes 21 (21): 2872–2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6503.
SCS (Soil Conservation Service). 1972. National engineering handbook: Section 4: Hydrology. Washington, DC: USDA.
Sharifi, S., and S. M. Hosseini. 2011. “Methodology for identifying the best equations for estimating the time of concentration of watersheds in a particular region.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 137 (11): 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000373.
Soulis, K. X. 2021. “Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) Method: Current applications, remaining challenges, and future perspectives.” Water 13 (2): 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020192.
Wagener, T., M. Sivapalan, P. Troch, and R. Woods. 2007. “Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity.” Geogr. Compass 1 (4): 901–931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00039.x.
Woolhiser, D. A., and J. A. Liggett. 1967. “Unsteady, one-dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph.” Water Resour. Res. 3 (3): 753–771. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR003i003p00753.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 147 • Issue 10 • October 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 20, 2020
Accepted: Jun 2, 2021
Published online: Jul 20, 2021
Published in print: Oct 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Dec 20, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.