Abstract

Spatiotemporal information on historical peatland drainage is needed to relate past land use to observed changes in catchment hydrology. Comprehensive knowledge of historical development of peatland management is largely unknown at the catchment scale. Aerial photos and light detection and ranging (LIDAR) data enlarge the possibilities for identifying past peatland drainage patterns. Here, our objectives are (1) to develop techniques for semiautomatically mapping the location of ditch networks in peat-dominated catchments using aerial photos and LIDAR data, and (2) to generate time series of drainage networks. Our approaches provide open-access techniques to systematically map ditches in peat-dominated catchments through time. We focused on the algorithm in such a way that we can identify the ditch networks from raw aerial images and LIDAR data based on the modification of multiple filters and number of threshold values. Such data are needed to relate spatiotemporal drainage patterns to observed changes in many northern rivers. We demonstrate our approach using data from the Simojoki River catchment (3,160  km2) in northern Finland. The catchment is dominated by forests and peatlands that were almost all drained after 1960. For two representative locations in cultivated peatland (downstream) and peatland forest (upstream) areas of the catchment; we found total ditch length density (km/km2), estimated from aerial images and LIDAR data based on our proposed algorithm, to have varied from 2% to 50% compared with the monitored ditch length available from the National Land survey of Finland (NLSF) in 2018. A different pattern of source variation in ditch network density was observed for whole-catchment estimates and for the available drained-peatland database from Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE). Despite such differences, no significant differences were found using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test with a 0.05 significance level based on the samples of pixel-identified ditches between (1) aerial images and NLSF vector files and (2) LIDAR data and NLSF vector files.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request (All codes are available in Supplemental Materials).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Python group, the Stack Overflow community, and the ArcPy developers for discussions. This work was part of the Nordic Centre of Excellence BIOWATER, funded by Nordforsk under Project No. 82263.

References

Araújo, M. B., and C. Rahbek. 2006. “How does climate change affect biodiversity?” Science 313 (5792): 1396–1397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131758.
Artz, R. R. E., G. Donaldson-Selby, L. Poggio, D. Donnelly, and M. J. Aitkenhead. 2017. Comparison of remote sensing approaches for detection of peatland drainage in Scotland. Aberdeen, Scotland: Rowett Institute.
Böhner, J., T. Selige, and A. Ringeler. 2006. “Image segmentation using representativeness analysis and region growing.” Göttinger Geographische Abhandlungen 115: 29–38.
Bradski, G. 2000. “The OpenCV library.” Dr Dobb’s J. Software Tools 25: 120–125.
Canny, J. 1986. “A computational approach to edge detection.” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-8 (6): 679–698. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851.
CLC (CORINE land cover). 2018. “CORINE land cover—Copernicus land monitoring service.” Accessed August 8, 2018. https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover.
Davis, S. M., D. A. Landgrebe, T. L. Phillips, P. H. Swain, R. M. Hoffer, J. C. Lindenlaub, and L. F. Silva. 1978. Remote sensing: The quantitative approach, 405. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Duke, G. D., S. W. Kienzle, D. L. Johnson, and J. M. Byrne. 2006. “Incorporating ancillary data to refine anthropogenically modified overland flow paths.” Hydrol. Process. 20 (8): 1827–1843. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5964.
Ecke, F. 2009. “Drainage ditching at the catchment scale affects water quality and macrophyte occurrence in Swedish lakes.” Freshwater Biol. 54 (1): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02097.x.
Fox, J., J. Krummel, S. Yarnasarn, M. Ekasingh, and N. Podger. 1995. “Land use and landscape dynamics in northern Thailand: Assessing change in three upland watersheds.” Ambio 24 (6): 328–334.
Heideman, H. K. 2014. LIDAR base specification (ver. 1.2). Reston, VA: USGS.
Karnieli, A., A. Meisels, L. Fisher, and Y. Arkin. 1996. “Automatic extraction and evaluation of geological linear features from digital remote sensing data using a Hough transform.” Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 62 (5): 525–531.
Laine, A. M., L. Mehtätalo, A. Tolvanen, S. Frolking, and E. S. Tuittila. 2019. “Impacts of drainage, restoration and warming on boreal wetland greenhouse gas fluxes.” Sci. Total Environ. 647 (Jan): 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.390.
Lambin, E. F. 1997. “Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions.” Prog. Phys. Geogr. 21 (3): 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339702100303.
Lepistö, A., M. N. Futter, and P. Kortelainen. 2014. “Almost 50 years of monitoring shows that climate, not forestry, controls long-term organic carbon fluxes in a large boreal watershed.” Global Change Biol. 20 (4): 1225–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12491.
Linderholm, H. W., and M. Leine. 2004. “An assessment of twentieth century tree-cover changes on a southern Swedish peatland combining dendrochronoloy and aerial photograph analysis.” Wetlands 24 (2): 357. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0357:AAOTCT]2.0.CO;2.
LUKE. 2018. “Drainage status of forestry land | Natural Resources Institute Finland.” Accessed October 28, 2019. http://statdb.luke.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/fi/LUKE/.
Nieminen, M., M. Palviainen, S. Sarkkola, A. Laurén, H. Marttila, and L. Finér. 2018. “A synthesis of the impacts of ditch network maintenance on the quantity and quality of runoff from drained boreal peatland forests.” Ambio 47 (5): 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0966-y.
Nieminen, M., T. Sallantaus, L. Ukonmaanaho, T. M. Nieminen, and S. Sarkkola. 2017. “Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in discharge from drained peatland forests are increasing.” Sci. Total Environ. 609 (Dec): 974–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.210.
Niu, R., X. Mei, L. Zhang, and P. Li. 2007. “Linear features extraction from remote sensing image based on wedgelet decomposition.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Image and Graphics (ICIG 2007), 508–512. New York: IEEE.
NLSF (National Land Survey of Finland). 2018. “National land survey of Finland data.” Accessed December 3, 2018. http://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/maps-and-spatial-data/expert-users/topographic-data-and-how-acquire-it.
NLSF (National Land Survey of Finland). 2019. “Laser scanning data.” Accessed March 29, 2019. https://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/maps-and-spatial-data/expert-users/product-descriptions/laser-scanning-data.
NLSF (National Land Survey of Finland). 2020. “NLS aerial photographs | National land survey of Finland.” Accessed April 6, 2020. https://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/maps-and-spatial-data/expert-users/product-descriptions/aerial-photographs.
O’Connell, J., J. Connolly, E. F. Vermote, and N. M. Holden. 2013. “Radiometric normalization for change detection in peatlands: A modified temporal invariant cluster approach.” Int. J. Remote Sens. 34 (8): 2905–2924. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.752886.
Ojanen, P., T. Penttilä, A. Tolvanen, J. P. Hotanen, M. Saarimaa, H. Nousiainen, and K. Minkkinen. 2019. “Long-term effect of fertilization on the greenhouse gas exchange of low-productive peatland forests.” For. Ecol. Manage. 432 (Jan): 786–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.015.
Paavilainen, E., and J. Päivänen. 1995. Peatland forestry: Ecology and principles. New York: Springer.
Paituli. 2019. “AVAA: Paituli spatial data service.” Accessed March 29, 2019. https://avaa.tdata.fi/web/avaa/-/paituli-paikkatietopalvelu.
Passalacqua, P., P. Belmont, and E. Foufoula-Georgiou. 2012. “Automatic geomorphic feature extraction from LIDAR in flat and engineered landscapes.” Water Resour. Res. 48 (3): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010958.
Perkkiö, S., E. Huttula, and M. Nenonen. 1995. “Water protection plan for the Simojoki River basin.” Publ. Water Environ. Admin.-Ser. A 200: 1–102.
Pirasteh, S., B. Pradhan, H. O. Safari, and M. F. Ramli. 2013. “Coupling of DEM and remote-sensing-based approaches for semi-automated detection of regional geostructural features in Zagros Mountains, Iran.” Arabian J. Geosci. 6 (1): 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-011-0361-0.
Roelens, J., B. Höfle, S. Dondeyne, J. Van Orshoven, and J. Diels. 2018. “Drainage ditch extraction from airborne LiDAR point clouds.” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 146 (Dec): 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.10.014.
Sangireddy, H., C. P. Stark, A. Kladzyk, and P. Passalacqua. 2016. “GeoNet: An open source software for the automatic and objective extraction of channel heads, channel network, and channel morphology from high resolution topography data.” Environ. Modell. Software 83 (Sep): 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.04.026.
Schneider, L. C., and R. Gil Pontius. 2001. “Modeling land-use change in the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA.” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 85 (1–3): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00189-X.
Torabi Haghighi, A., M. W. Menberu, H. Darabi, J. Akanegbu, and B. Kløve. 2018. “Use of remote sensing to analyse peatland changes after drainage for peat extraction.” Land Degrad. Dev. 29 (10): 3479–3488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3122.
Verburg, P. H., G. H. J. de Koning, K. Kok, A. Veldkamp, and J. Bouma. 1999. “A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use.” Ecol. Modell. 116 (1): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00156-2.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 147Issue 4April 2021

History

Received: Feb 11, 2020
Accepted: Oct 30, 2020
Published online: Feb 12, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jul 12, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Univ. of Oulu, Oulu FI-90014, Finland (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8113-4497. Email: [email protected]
Hannu Marttila [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Univ. of Oulu, Oulu FI-90014, Finland. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Univ. of Oulu, Oulu FI-90014, Finland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-0156. Email: [email protected]
Miia Saarimaa [email protected]
Leading Natural Science Expert, Finnish Forest Center, Oulu FI-90400, Finland. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Univ. of Oulu, Oulu FI-90014, Finland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5304-7510. Email: [email protected]
Ahti Lepistö [email protected]
Senior Research Scientist, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki FI-00251, Finland. Email: [email protected]
Martyn N. Futter [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences SLU, Uppsala SE-75007, Sweden. Email: [email protected]
Bjørn Kløve [email protected]
Professor, Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering Research Unit, Univ. of Oulu, Oulu FI-90014, Finland. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share