Experimental Study of Central Baffle Flume
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 145, Issue 3
Abstract
In this paper, the hydraulics of a central baffle flume (CBF) were experimentally studied. Extensive experimental runs were carried out to highlight the effects of different geometrical parameters such as baffle length, contraction ratio, and the length of upstream and downstream guide walls. Two different approaches, i.e., the Π theorem of dimensional analysis coupled with the incomplete self-similarity theory and the energy balance equation, were applied to deduce the stage–discharge formula of a CBF characterized by different geometrical parameters. The stage–discharge relationship deduced by the dimensional analysis approach was more accurate than that obtained by the energy approach. Furthermore, the dimensional analysis approach has the advantage of calculating discharge values explicitly. The measurements demonstrated that the flow capacity of a CBF decreased with increasing values of the central baffle length. The experiments also showed that a central baffle flume with an apex angle of 75° for upstream guide walls provides suitable hydraulic conditions at the flume entrance. The existence of downstream guide walls did not affect the stage–discharge relationship. In order to distinguish between the free and submerged flow conditions and to determine the modular limit of the flume, the dimensional analysis approach and the momentum balance method were used to formulate the submergence threshold. The analysis showed that the best model to describe the submergence threshold condition was obtained by dimensional analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Center for International Scientific Studies & Collaboration (CISSC). The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Qolamreza Babaei, the hydraulic lab supervisor, in constructing the experimental setup.
References
Baiamonte, G., and V. Ferro. 2007. “Simple flume for flow measurement in sloping open channel.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 133 (1): 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:1(71).
Barenblatt, G. I. 1979. Similarity, self-similarity and intermediate asymptotics. New York: Consultants Bureau.
Barenblatt, G. I. 1987. Dimensional analysis. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Gordon & Breach.
Blaisdell, F. 1994. “Results of Parshall flume.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 120 (2): 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1994)120:2(278).
Bos, M. G. 1989. Discharge measurement structures. Wageningen, Netherlands: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement.
Carollo, F. G., C. Di Stefano, V. Ferro, and V. Pampalone. 2016. “New stage-discharge equation for the SMBF flume.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 142 (5): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001005.
Di Stefano, C., G. Di Piazza, and Ferro V. 2008. “Field testing of a simple flume (SMBF) for flow measurement in open channels.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 134 (2): 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(235).
Ferro, V. 2002. “Discussion of “Simple flume for flow measurement in open channel” by Zohrab Samani and Henry Magallanez.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 128 (2): 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:2(129).
Ferro, V. 2016. “Simple flume with a central baffle.” Flow Meas. Instrum. 52: 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2016.09.006.
Hager, W. H. 1985. “Modified Venturi channel.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 111 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:1(19).
Hager, W. H. 1986. “Modified trapezoidal Venturi channel.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 112 (3): 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1986)112:3(225).
Hager, W. H. 1988. “Mobile flume for circular channel.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 114 (3): 520–534. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1988)114:3(520).
Henderson, F. M. 1966. Open channel flow. New York: Macmillan.
Lin, C. H., J. F. Yen, and C. T. Tsai. 2002. “Influence of sluice gate contraction coefficient on distinguishing condition.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 128 (4): 249–252. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2002)128:4(249).
Parshall, R. 1926. “The improved Venturi flume.” Trans. ASCE 89: 841–851.
Peruginelli, A., and F. Bonacci. 1995. “Funzionamento libero e sommerso di un misuratore di portata a risalto idraulico.” [In Italian.] Idrotecnica 261–272.
Samani, Z. 2017. “Three simple flumes for flow measurement in open channels.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 146 (3): 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001168.
Samani, Z., S. Jorat, and M. Yousaf. 1991. “Hydraulic characteristics of circular flume.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 117 (4): 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1991)117:4(558).
Samani, Z., and H. Magallanez. 1993. “Measuring water in trapezoidal canals.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 123 (1): 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:1(181).
Samani, Z., and H. Magallanez. 2000. “Simple flume for flow measurement in open channel.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 126 (2): 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:2(127).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 25, 2018
Accepted: Sep 20, 2018
Published online: Jan 4, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Jun 4, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.