Two Model Performance Comparisons with Multisite Observations Based on Uncertainty Methods for Modeling Hydrologic Dynamics
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 144, Issue 1
Abstract
The HSPF [Hydrologic Simulation Program—FORTRAN (Computer software). EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia] and SWAT [Soil and Water Assessment Tool (Computer software). USDA Agricultural Research Service and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Temple, Texas] models are often used to assess hydrological processes in a shallow water table setting. In the paper, these two models are evaluated and compared for accuracy in simulating runoff to the Peace River Basin in Central Florida, based on the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. Both models performed reasonably well in predicting daily streamflow in three gauges with acceptable values (0.66–0.85) and Nash-Sutcliffe’s (0.60–0.76) with reasonable and factors. The parameter sensitivity was quantified, and the GLUE method involved Monte Carlo sampling over feasible spaces of calibration parameters. The parameter pairwise correlation is investigated, as well as the uncertainties along with equifinality. The results indicate that HSPF and SWAT models performed satisfactorily after the calibration and the parameters of both models are identified with considerable uncertainty.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NSFC Project (Nos. 41271004 and 40901026) and National Key Research and Development Plan (No. 2017YFC0406004).
References
Abbaspour, K. C. (2011). “SWAT-CUP4: SWAT calibration and uncertainty programs—A user manual.” Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Abbaspour, K. C., Johnson, C. A., and van Genuchten, M. T. (2004). “Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure.” Vadose Zone J., 3(4), 1340–1352.
Ali, I., and Bruen, M. (2016). “Methodology and application of the combined SWAT-HSPF model.” Environ. Process., 3(3), 645–661.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment. I: Model development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Beven, K. J., and Binley, A. M. (1992). “The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction.” Hydrol. Process., 6(3), 279–298.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Jr., Jobes, T. H., Donigian, A. S., Jr., and Johanson, R. C. (2001). “Hydrological simulation program–FORTRAN (HSPF): User’s manual for version 12.” ⟨http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/basins/bsnsdocs.html⟩ (Aug. 1, 2002).
Box, G. E. P., and Tiao, G. C. (1973). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, Addison-Wesley, Boston.
Butcher, J. B., Johnson, T. E., Nover, D., and Sarkar, S. (2014). “Incorporating the effects of increased atmospheric CO2 in watershed model projections of climate change impacts.” J. Hydrol., 513(26), 322–334.
Chin, D. A., Sakura-Lemessy, D., Bosch, D. D., and Gay, P. A. (2009). “Watershed-scale fate and transport of bacteria.” Trans. ASAE, 52(1), 145–154.
Confesor, R. B., and Whittaker, G. W. (2007). “Automatic calibration of hydrologic models with multi-objective evolutionary algorithm and pareto optimization.” JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 43(4), 981–989.
Gebremariam, S. Y., Martin, J. F., DeMarchi, C., Bosch, N. S., Confesor, R., and Ludsin, S. A. (2014). “A comprehensive approach to evaluating watershed models for predicting river flow regimes critical to downstream ecosystem services.” Environ. Modell. Software, 61, 121–134.
Green, C. H., and Van Griensven, A. (2008). “Autocalibration in hydrologic modeling: Using SWAT2005 in small-scale watersheds.” Environ. Modell. Software, 23(4), 422–434.
Guerrero, J. L., Westerberg, I. K., Halldin, S., Lundin, L. C., and Xu, C. Y. (2013). “Exploring the hydrological robustness of model-parameter values with alpha shapes.” Water Resour. Res., 49(10), 6700–6715.
Houska, T., Multsch, S., Kraft, P., Frede, H.-G., and Breuer, L. (2014). “Monte Carlo-based calibration and uncertainty analysis of a coupled plant growth and hydrological model.” Biogeosciences, 11(7), 2069–2082.
HSPF (Hydrologic Simulation Program—FORTRAN) [Computer software]. EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA.
Im, S. J., Brannan, K. M., Mostaghimi, S., and Kim, S. M. (2007). “Comparison of HSPF and SWAT models performance for runoff and sediment yield prediction.” J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A, 42(11), 1561–1570.
Kavetski, D., Kuczera, G., and Franks, S. W. (2006). “Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling. 2: Application.” Water Resour. Res., 42(3), W03408.
Li, L., Xia, J., Xu, C. Y., and Singh, V. P. (2010). “Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models.” J. Hydrol., 390(3), 210–221.
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., and Veith, T. L. (2007). “Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations.” Trans. ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. I: A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10(3), 282–290.
Nasr, A., Bruen, M., Jordan, P., Moles, R., Kiely, G., and Byrne, P. (2007). “A comparison of SWAT, HSPF and SHETRAN/GOPC for modelling phosphorus export from three catchments in Ireland.” Water Res., 41(5), 1065–1073.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., Arnold, J. G., and Misganaw, D. (2005). “Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT.” J. Am. Water Res. Assoc., 41(2), 343–360.
Sobol, I. M. (1990). “On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models.” Matem. Mod., 2(1), 112–118.
Sobol, I. M. (2001). “Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates.” Math. Comput. Simul., 55(1–3), 271–280.
SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) [Computer software]. USDA Agricultural Research Service and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Temple, TX.
Van Liew, M. W., Arnold, J. G., and Garbrecht, J. D. (2003). “Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models.” Trans. ASAE, 46(6), 1539–1551.
Vazquez-Cruz, M. A., Guzman-Cruz, R., Lopez-Cruz, I. L., Cornejo-Perez, O., Torres-Pacheco, I., and Guevara-Gonzalez, R. G. (2014). “Global sensitivity analysis by means of EFAST and Sobol methods and calibration of reduced state-variable TOMGRO model using genetic algorithms.” Comput. Electron. Agric., 100, 1–12.
White, M. J., Storm, D. E., Busteed, P. R., Smolen, M. D., Zhang, H. L., and Fox, G. A. (2010). “A quantitative phosphorus loss assessment tool for agricultural fields.” Environ. Modell. Software, 25(10), 1121–1129.
Xie, H., and Lian, Y. Q. (2013). “Uncertainty-based evaluation and comparison of SWAT and HSPF applications to the Illinois River Basin.” J. Hydrol., 481(4), 119–131.
Yang, J., Reichert, P., Abbaspour, K. C., Xia, J., and Yang, H. (2008). “Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China.” J. Hydrol., 358(1), 1–23.
Zhang, J., Li, Q. N., and Guo, B. B. (2015). “The comparative study of multi-site uncertainty evaluation method based on SWAT model.” Hydrol. Process., 29, 2994–3009.
Zhang, J., Ross, M., and Geurink, J. (2012). “Discretization approach in integrated hydrologic model for surface and groundwater interaction.” Chin. Geograph. Sci., 22(6), 659–672.
Zhang, J., Ross, M., Trout, K., and Zhou, D. M. (2009). “Calibration of the HSPF model with a new coupled FTABLE generation method.” Prog. Nat. Sci., 19(12), 1747–1755.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 144 • Issue 1 • January 2018
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 19, 2015
Accepted: Sep 25, 2017
Published online: Nov 9, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 9, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.