Soil-Water Dynamics, Evapotranspiration, and Crop Coefficients of Cover-Crop Mixtures in Seed Maize Cover-Crop Rotation Fields. I: Soil-Water Dynamics and Evapotranspiration
Publication: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 143, Issue 9
Abstract
Cover crops are incorporated into row crop production systems as rotational crops because of their potential contributions to soil and water conservation. However, extremely limited data and information exist in the literature in terms of their water use (i.e., evapotranspiration) rates, especially in the midwestern United States. The primary objective of this research study was to investigate the impact of cover-crop mixtures on soil-water dynamics and measure, analyze, and compare the magnitude and trend of weekly, monthly, and seasonal evapotranspiration (ET) rates from different surface covers, including (1) mixture of cover crops (CC) without maize residue, (2) bare soil, (3) cover crops with maize residue (SCCC), and (4) only seed maize residue (SC) without cover crops. Extensive field research was conducted in three cover-crop growing seasons (2012–2013, 2013–2014, and 2014–2015) in three center pivot-irrigated large-scale seed maize cover-crop rotation production fields (F1, F2, and F3) near Beaver Crossing, Nebraska. The during 2012–2013 (dry year) was lower in the CC treatment than bare soil and was significantly higher () in the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 growing seasons (above average years). In 2013–2014 and 2014–2015, SCCC was significantly lower () than those in the CC only treatment. Cumulative for CC only and SCCC treatments for the 2012–2013 cover-crop growing season was 135 and 142 mm, respectively, while it was 267 and 237 mm, respectively, in the 2013–2014 season, and 417 and 381 mm, respectively, in the 2014–2015. The SCCC and SC only treatments were compared to quantify the potential impact of cover crops on water use. While there were cases when SCCC treatment had lower values than SC only treatment, when the values from all three fields (F1, F2, and F3) are averaged, results indicated that cover crops did not have positive or negative impact on reducing or increasing evaporative losses when incorporated as a rotational crop in the soil, climate, and management conditions presented in this research study. For example, in the 2012–2013 season the three field average values for the SCCC and SC only were essentially the same (142 and 145 mm, respectively); in the 2013–2014 season they were exactly the same (237 mm); and in the 2014–2015 season they were 381 and 367 mm, respectively [SCCC treatment had significantly greater (14 mm) than the SC only treatment], indicating that the cover crops did not have impact in reducing evaporative losses. Substantial interseasonal variations were observed in terms of impact of the same surface covers on in the field. Soil-water storage (SWS) was significantly lower () in CC treatment than the bare soil during the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 seasons and significantly higher in 2012–2013. Surface cover’s influence on SWS for the next season’s crop and ET rates in a maize cover-crop rotation system can vary substantially, depending on the current year’s climatic conditions, especially air temperature (influence on evaporative losses), precipitation (influence on soil-water availability), growth, and water use of the cover crops.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was funded and supported by the USDA-NRCS, National Conservation Innovation Grants Program under project number 69-3A75-12-207. As the project principal investigator, Dr. Suat Irmak expresses his appreciation to the USDA-NRCS for collaboration and for providing financial support for this project. Dr. Irmak also expresses his appreciation to David Cast and Doug Cast in Beaver Crossing, Nebraska for allowing these extensive projects to happen in their production fields and for their excellent collaboration. Dr. Irmak also thanks Kari E. Skaggs for her contributions in field data collection. This study is based on work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA, Dr. Irmak’s hatch project, under project number NEB-21-155.
References
Asbjornsen, H., Mora, G., and Helmers, M. J. (2007). “Variation in water uptake dynamics among contrasting agricultural and native plant communities in the midwestern US.” Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 121(4), 343–356.
Clark, A. (2007). Managing cover crops profitably, 3rd Ed., Sustainable Agriculture Network, Beltsville, MD.
Colla, G., et al. (2000). “Soil physical properties and tomato yield and quality in alternative cropping systems.” Agron. J., 92(5), 924–932.
Ewing, R., Wagger, M., and Denton, H. (1991). “Tillage and cover crop management effects on soil water and maize yield.” J. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 55(4), 1081–1085.
Irmak, S. (2010). “Nebraska water and energy flux measurement, modeling, and research network (NEBFLUX).” Trans. ASABE, 53(4), 1097–1115.
Irmak, S., et al. (2012). “Large scale on-farm implementation of soil moisture-based irrigation management strategies for increasing maize water productivity.” Trans. ASABE, 55(3), 881–894.
Irmak, S., et al. (2016). “Principles and operational characteristics of Watermark granular matrix sensor to measure soil water status and its practical applications for irrigation management in various soil textures.”, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension Circular, Lincoln, NE, 14.
Islam, N., Wallender, W. W., Mitchell, J., Wicks, S., and Howitt, R. E. (2006). “A comprehensive experimental study with mathematical modeling to investigate the affects of cropping practices on water balance variables.” Agric. Water Manage., 82(1), 129–147.
Joyce, B., et al. (2002). “Infiltration and soil water storage under winter cover cropping in California’s Sacramento Valley.” Trans. ASAE, 45(2), 315–326.
Lal, R., Regnier, E., Eckert, D., Edwards, W., and Hammond, R. (1991). “Expectations of cover crops for sustainable agriculture.” Cover crops for clean water, W. L. Hargrove, ed., Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA, 1–11.
McVay, K., Radcliffe, D., and Hargrove, W. (1989). “Winter legume effects on soil properties and nitrogen fertilizer requirements.” J. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 53(6), 1856–1862.
Mitchell, J., Peters, D., and Shennan, C. (1999). “Changes in soil water storage in winter fallowed and cover cropped soils.” J. Sustainable Agric., 15(2–3), 19–31.
Mitchell, J. P., Shrestha, A., and Irmak, S. (2015). “Trade-offs between winter cover crop production and soil water depletion in California’s San Joaquin Valley.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 70(6), 430–440.
Moschler, W. W., Shear, G. M., Hallock, D. L., Sears, R. D., and Jones, G. D. (1967). “Winter cover crops for sod-planted corn: Their selection and management.” Agron. J., 59(6), 547–551.
Nielsen, D. C., and Vigil, M. F. (2005). “Legume green fallow effect on soil water content at wheat planting and wheat yield.” Agron. J., 97(3), 684–689.
NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (2009). “Nebraska vegetative zones.” ⟨http://efotg.sc.egov.usda.gov/references/public/NE/NebraskaVegetativeZones.pdf⟩ (May 30, 2014).
Odhiambo, J. J. O., and Bomke, A. A. (2007). “Cover crop effects on spring soil water content and the implications for cover crop management in south coastal British Columbia.” Agric. Water Manage., 88(1–3), 92–98.
Qi, Z., Helmers, M. J., and Kaleita, A. L. (2011). “Soil water dynamics under various agricultural land covers on a subsurface drained field in north-central Iowa, USA.” Agric. Water Manage., 98(4), 665–674.
SAS [Computer software]. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Sharma, V., and Irmak, S. (2012). “Mapping spatially interpolated precipitation, reference evapotranspiration, actual crop evapotranspiration, and net irrigation requirements in Nebraska. I: Precipitation and reference evapotranspiration.” Trans. ASABE., 55(3), 907–921.
Sharma, V., and Irmak, S. (2017). “Soil-water dynamics, evapotranspiration, and crop coefficients of cover-crop mixtures in seed maize cover-crop rotation fields. II: Grass-reference and alfalfa-reference single (normal) and basal crop coefficients.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 04017033.
Tanner, C., and Sinclair, T. (1983). “Efficient water use in crop production: Research or re-search?” Limitations to efficient water use in crop production, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1–27.
Unger, P. W., and Vigil, M. F. (1998). “Cover crop effects on soil water relationships.” J. Soil Water Conserv., 53(3), 200–207.
USDA-NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (1972). National engineering handbook. Section 4: Hydrology, USDA, Washington, DC.
USDA-NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (1985). National engineering handbook. Section 4: Hydrology, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, DC.
USDA-NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). (2016). “Plant material program: A comprehensive guide to cover crop species used in the northeast United States.” ⟨http://www.plantmaterials.nrcs.usda.gov/pubs/nypmcpu10645.pdf⟩ (Aug. 27, 2014).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
Volume 143 • Issue 9 • September 2017
Copyright
©2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 13, 2016
Accepted: Mar 21, 2017
Published online: Jun 24, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Nov 24, 2017
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.